ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
8 October 2016, 02:05 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: David
Location: London+Guangzhou
Watch: ing watches
Posts: 2,603
|
5513 Pearl Insert
My 1980 5513 has a later Rolex pearl insert (with the small steel rim).
I have the following questions for you vintage gurus - 1. How easy is it to obtain a period Rolex tritium pearl insert to replace it with? Will I have to pay an exorbitant sum and is it worth it? 2. Alternatively, I have seen period style third party pearl inserts that seem reasonably priced. Should I go for one of these even though it's not a Rolex part ? My dealer (David Duggan in London) says best to leave it. Its a Rolex pearl and perfectly acceptable. And of course I prefer it to no pearl at all. It looks ok but it bugs me a little so I would like to replace it if possible. Thank you
__________________
Rolex Sea Dweller 116600, GMT Master II 16710 (Pepsi) and 116710 BLNR, Daytona 116500LN, Submariner 14060M. |
8 October 2016, 05:22 AM | #2 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: RedSox Nation
Watch: U Talkn Bout Wilis
Posts: 5,503
|
Need to see a photo of what you have - typically a 5513 pearl has not metallic rim, but an all plastic dot
__________________
I'm a sailor peg. And I've lost my leg. Climbing up the top sails. I've lost my leg! |
8 October 2016, 06:23 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Rome
Posts: 91
|
to fit a sapphire pearl (the one with the metal ring) they had to enlarge the original hole ... so now if you put an original pearl would be small ... in my opinion they have irreparably ruined a vintage insert.. I do not like the pearl with a metal ring on a 5513 (or on a vintage sub), I would prefer the hole..
only my 2 cent.. |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.