ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

whitelines · 26 September 2008, 05:32 AM

Hi all

Great to be here.

About to purchase my first Rolex. I've narrowed it down to 2 options. Let me know your thoughts, etc and what you'd go for. I can only get 1, but it will be between the following:

1) S/S GMTIIc Ceramic

2) Yachtmaster with Platinum Bezel S/S 166622

Thanks all

Baz

f16570 · 26 September 2008, 05:33 AM

Baz, YM for me.
Welcome & enjoy.

srl7741 · 26 September 2008, 05:34 AM

Tough call? I have the IIc and love everything about it.

toph · 26 September 2008, 05:37 AM

GMT IIC- such a great watch in my opinon

kudosguy · 26 September 2008, 05:38 AM

I used to own the Plat/SS YM and it is a beautiful watch, however, I prefer my GMT IIc.

James T · 26 September 2008, 05:39 AM

IF YOU CAN GET BOTH, GET BOTH OF THEM. I voted for the ym though as the first purchase. sporty yet you can dress it up also....

SLS · 26 September 2008, 05:39 AM

The GMT would be my choice, it has all of Rolex's most recent upgrades...case, maxi dial & hands, bracelet, bezel & movement. Some people complain about the polished center links, but both the YM & GMT have them so its a moot point. If you do choose to go with the YM, check out some of the pre-owned pieces, they are ranging around 3K below MSRP. Good luck!
~Scott

James T · 26 September 2008, 05:39 AM

btw, welcome to trf!

Ivy League · 26 September 2008, 05:41 AM

I also faced the same dilemna and opted for the GMT IIc because of all the new and improved features of this watch.
I love the look of the Plat YM but once you try it on and tinker with the clasp, it just seems too cheap and fragile as compared to the improved heavier clasp on the GMT IIc.

hsung · 26 September 2008, 10:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ivy League

I also faced the same dilemna and opted for the GMT IIc because of all the new and improved features of this watch.
I love the look of the Plat YM but once you try it on and tinker with the clasp, it just seems too cheap and fragile as compared to the improved heavier clasp on the GMT IIc.

I voted for the Platinum M , but would have voted for a TT GMTIIC for the same reasons above, plus the gap in price bet the TT GMT and the Platinum YM is in closer range. I am bias towards TT as it brings out a nice contrast on the bezel and bracelet.

Chris B · 26 September 2008, 05:43 AM

Welcome to TRF, tough choice but at a push I'd go with the GMT

Quicksilver · 26 September 2008, 05:48 AM

Welcome Whitelines.

I voted for the GMT IIc. A great watch - still a classic and now updated to state of the art Roly.

pilapandet · 26 September 2008, 05:48 AM

This is my logic. You buy YM then you get only YM. You buy GMT then you will get YM + extra hand for second time zone. Hope this help.

ttannert · 26 September 2008, 05:50 AM

Gmt!

Alex Stylianou · 26 September 2008, 05:51 AM

Platty !

JJ Irani · 26 September 2008, 05:53 AM

Both superb watches - tough choice!!

The GMT-II would naturally be the more practical buy.

The Platty would naturally be the more dressy buy!!

dimster · 26 September 2008, 05:52 AM

It all comes down to which one smiles at you. I would buy the YM.

Noonan · 26 September 2008, 05:56 AM

GMT all the way. I was deciding between it and a LV. I definitely made the right decision for my 1st.

mfer · 26 September 2008, 06:13 AM

Well, I just went through this EXACT situation. Bought the IIc!!!!!

C. Davidson · 26 September 2008, 06:29 AM

I thought the results would be a lot closer than that. Im biased towards the GMT, but the Platinum Yacht is great watch.

Good luck on your decision.

kcmo · 26 September 2008, 06:37 AM

Tough decision as they are both great! Really try listen to which one 'talks' to you.

I prefer the clean dial of the YM but find that the plat dial lacks contrast, so I'd go for the GMTC in this case.

You really won't go wrong with either! Good luck!

taylor · 26 September 2008, 10:08 AM

If this tells you anything, I have a GMT-IIC and want a yachtmaster. I tried one on yesterday, and the only thing I didn't like was the old-school clasp--it felt too cheap.

mike · 26 September 2008, 10:42 AM

Both are great pieces, but for me it's the GMT.

JJ Irani · 26 September 2008, 12:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kcmo

Really try listen to which one 'talks' to you.

Would you rather "talk" to your silly watches or silly ole' me?

Dylan Wade · 26 September 2008, 04:11 PM

Both great watches but GMTIIc would be my 1st, if not just because of the new clasp over the Plat.

Plat would make a stunning pair as #2

3starion · 26 September 2008, 04:23 PM

both are great watch, choose the one that can make your heartbeat faster!!

GMTII Owner · 26 September 2008, 08:46 PM

Easy call in my book.

John

seantk · 26 September 2008, 09:42 PM

GMT IIC. It is a very nice watch and very practical

Sean

Trurolexer · 26 September 2008, 09:50 PM

GMT II-C.

Oh yeah and...WELCOME TO TRF!!!

swatch · 26 September 2008, 06:42 AM

Both great choices. But GMT for the functionality and price.

View Poll Results: Which Rolex from the 2 options please?
S/S GMTIIc Ceramic	104	74.82%
Yacht-Master Platinum S/S 166622	35	25.18%
Voters: 139. You may not vote on this poll

26 September 2008, 05:32 AM	#1
whitelines "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: UK Posts: 2	First Rolex - 1 to choose out of 2!!! Hi all Great to be here. About to purchase my first Rolex. I've narrowed it down to 2 options. Let me know your thoughts, etc and what you'd go for. I can only get 1, but it will be between the following: 1) S/S GMTIIc Ceramic 2) Yachtmaster with Platinum Bezel S/S 166622 Thanks all Baz

26 September 2008, 05:37 AM	#4
toph "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2008 Real Name: ChrisTOPHer Location: Sydney Watch: Rolex, Brellum, Posts: 12,601	GMT IIC- such a great watch in my opinon __________________ "Where no counsel is the people fall, but in the multitude of counselors there is safety." Member No.# 11795

26 September 2008, 05:39 AM	#6
James T "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2008 Real Name: James Location: SoCal Baby! Watch: submariner 16610 Posts: 860	IF YOU CAN GET BOTH, GET BOTH OF THEM. I voted for the ym though as the first purchase. sporty yet you can dress it up also.... __________________ James T

26 September 2008, 05:39 AM	#8
James T "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2008 Real Name: James Location: SoCal Baby! Watch: submariner 16610 Posts: 860	btw, welcome to trf! __________________ James T

26 September 2008, 05:33 AM	#2
f16570 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2007 Real Name: F Location: Scotland Watch: Exp II White Face Posts: 4,272	Baz, YM for me. Welcome & enjoy. __________________ Why have what's new when you have what's best. f

26 September 2008, 05:34 AM	#3
srl7741 Member Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: GMT-6 Posts: 126	Tough call? I have the IIc and love everything about it.

26 September 2008, 05:38 AM	#5
kudosguy "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2008 Real Name: Mark Location: London Watch: DeepSea Posts: 323	I used to own the Plat/SS YM and it is a beautiful watch, however, I prefer my GMT IIc.

26 September 2008, 05:39 AM	#7
SLS "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2006 Real Name: Scott Location: GMT -7 Watch: GMT's & Sub's Posts: 10,401	The GMT would be my choice, it has all of Rolex's most recent upgrades...case, maxi dial & hands, bracelet, bezel & movement. Some people complain about the polished center links, but both the YM & GMT have them so its a moot point. If you do choose to go with the YM, check out some of the pre-owned pieces, they are ranging around 3K below MSRP. Good luck! ~Scott

26 September 2008, 05:41 AM	#9
Ivy League Banned Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: Earth Watch: 116710LN Posts: 448	I also faced the same dilemna and opted for the GMT IIc because of all the new and improved features of this watch. I love the look of the Plat YM but once you try it on and tinker with the clasp, it just seems too cheap and fragile as compared to the improved heavier clasp on the GMT IIc.

26 September 2008, 05:43 AM	#11
Chris B "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: Peterborough Posts: 9,631	Welcome to TRF, tough choice but at a push I'd go with the GMT

26 September 2008, 05:48 AM	#12
Quicksilver "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2008 Real Name: David Location: London+Guangzhou Watch: ing watches Posts: 2,603	Welcome Whitelines. I voted for the GMT IIc. A great watch - still a classic and now updated to state of the art Roly.

26 September 2008, 05:48 AM	#13
pilapandet "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2007 Real Name: Alexander Location: Anaheim Hills, CA Watch: GMT Master II SS Posts: 425	This is my logic. You buy YM then you get only YM. You buy GMT then you will get YM + extra hand for second time zone. Hope this help.

26 September 2008, 05:50 AM	#14
ttannert "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2007 Real Name: Tim Location: Ohio Watch: SS Black Daytona Posts: 872	Gmt! __________________ The greatest luxury in life is time; treasure every second. __________________ My Collection: SS Rolex M Black Daytona SS Rolex V Black Milgauss GV SS Rolex M Black Milgauss TT Rolex Z White MOP Datejust SS Rolex M Coke GMT II SS Tag Heuer Black Kirium Chronometer

26 September 2008, 05:51 AM	#15
Alex Stylianou "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: UK Posts: 1,785	Platty !

26 September 2008, 05:53 AM	#16
JJ Irani Fondly Remembered Join Date: May 2005 Real Name: JJ Location: Auckland, NZ Watch: ALL SOLD!! Posts: 74,319	Both superb watches - tough choice!! The GMT-II would naturally be the more practical buy. The Platty would naturally be the more dressy buy!! __________________ Words fail me in expressing my utmost thanks to ALL of you for this wonderful support during my hour of need!! I firmly believe that my time on planet earth is NOT yet up!! I shall fight this to the very end.......and WIN!!

26 September 2008, 05:52 AM	#17
dimster "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2008 Location: Denver CO Posts: 361	It all comes down to which one smiles at you. I would buy the YM.

26 September 2008, 05:56 AM	#18
Noonan Banned Join Date: Jul 2008 Location: US Watch: 3570.50 Posts: 2,156	GMT all the way. I was deciding between it and a LV. I definitely made the right decision for my 1st.

26 September 2008, 06:13 AM	#19
mfer "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2007 Real Name: Mik Location: USA Posts: 13,724	Well, I just went through this EXACT situation. Bought the IIc!!!!! __________________ member#3242

26 September 2008, 06:29 AM	#20
C. Davidson "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2008 Real Name: Chris Location: WXSW Watch: GMT (116710) Posts: 2,723	I thought the results would be a lot closer than that. Im biased towards the GMT, but the Platinum Yacht is great watch. Good luck on your decision. __________________ -Cheers, Chris #15,634 "The heart of the discerning acquires knowledge; the ears of the wise seek it out."

26 September 2008, 06:37 AM	#21
kcmo "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2007 Real Name: Karis Location: USA Posts: 19,377	Tough decision as they are both great! Really try listen to which one 'talks' to you. I prefer the clean dial of the YM but find that the plat dial lacks contrast, so I'd go for the GMTC in this case. You really won't go wrong with either! Good luck!

26 September 2008, 10:08 AM	#22
taylor "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2008 Location: StL Posts: 447	If this tells you anything, I have a GMT-IIC and want a yachtmaster. I tried one on yesterday, and the only thing I didn't like was the old-school clasp--it felt too cheap.

26 September 2008, 10:42 AM	#23
mike "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2005 Posts: 22,683	Both are great pieces, but for me it's the GMT.

26 September 2008, 04:11 PM	#25
Dylan Wade Member Join Date: Jun 2008 Location: BC, Canada Watch: EXP II Posts: 545	Both great watches but GMTIIc would be my 1st, if not just because of the new clasp over the Plat. Plat would make a stunning pair as #2

26 September 2008, 04:23 PM	#26
3starion Member Join Date: Aug 2008 Real Name: antony Location: Indonesia Posts: 19	both are great watch, choose the one that can make your heartbeat faster!!

26 September 2008, 08:46 PM	#27
GMTII Owner "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2008 Real Name: John Location: Nashville, TN Watch: S/S GMT Master IIc Posts: 1,210	Easy call in my book. John __________________

26 September 2008, 09:42 PM	#28
seantk "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2007 Real Name: Sean Location: West Florida Posts: 2,671	GMT IIC. It is a very nice watch and very practical Sean __________________ "Life is frittered away with detail... simplify, simplify!" Henry D. Thoreau

26 September 2008, 09:50 PM	#29
Trurolexer Banned Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: USA Watch: 5513MaxiI+PreComex Posts: 18,421	GMT II-C. Oh yeah and...WELCOME TO TRF!!!

26 September 2008, 06:42 AM	#30
swatch "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2008 Location: UK Watch: 116520 Posts: 98	Both great choices. But GMT for the functionality and price.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode