The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Old 22 March 2017, 02:23 PM   #1
Maxy
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: TX
Watch: Daytona
Posts: 3,231
Black Bay is Tudor's Speedy!!

Everyone is aware how Omega milked the Speedmaster model over the years by creating every variation of the speedmaster - Speedmaster Hesalite, Sapphire Sandwich, Hesalite/Sapphire combo, Dark side of the moo(again variations in them such as Black, Sedna), White side of the moon, Grey side of the moon, Mark II(model which didn't go to moon), Apollo missions Limited Editions, FOIS, Snoopy, Speedy Tuesday edition... etc etc.

Looks like Tudor is following the same following the success of Black Bay.
- Black Bay Red, Black Bay Blue, Black Bay Noir, Black Bay 36, Black Bay Bronze, Black Bay Chronograph, Black Bay Date(steel bezel)..another Tudor 369 Black Bay, etc.

I just hope Tudor doesn't' become 1-hit watch brand like many other watch brands. They need to do something to elevate other models in their brand than creating multiple versions of the one which is selling. I thought Tudor(Rolex) has much more brains than Omega and learn from its mistakes. Guess I'm wrong.

Maxy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 March 2017, 02:40 PM   #2
.db
"TRF" Member
 
.db's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: California
Posts: 398
Point well brought out.

Would we be so blasé if they called it with a different name and ditched the snowflake hand?
.db is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 March 2017, 02:58 PM   #3
japenney
"TRF" Member
 
japenney's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Real Name: Josh
Location: Canada
Watch: undecided
Posts: 4,777
it could have been such a beauty. So close and yet so far.
japenney is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 March 2017, 03:53 PM   #4
Nav01L
"TRF" Member
 
Nav01L's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Real Name: Fred
Location: Zurich
Posts: 2,697
Quote:
Originally Posted by .db View Post
Point well brought out.

Would we be so blasé if they called it with a different name and ditched the snowflake hand?
Great point indeed, as to the name and hand, would that make the Tuudmaster 57 look any less like a Speedmaster?
Nav01L is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 March 2017, 05:00 PM   #5
Blackdog
"TRF" Member
 
Blackdog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 629
Quote:
Originally Posted by .db View Post
Point well brought out.

Would we be so blasé if they called it with a different name and ditched the snowflake hand?
I'm really not feeling the Blackbay connection of this chrono. But will certainly be nice to see the new movement migrated to the THC!

One of the main reasons I don't have one is that I dislike modular chronos.
Blackdog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 March 2017, 03:06 PM   #6
ivanos
"TRF" Member
 
ivanos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 190
The bezel in the pic looks really awful. It makes the whole watch look cheap.
ivanos is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 March 2017, 03:14 PM   #7
capote
"TRF" Member
 
capote's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Real Name: Daniel
Location: Sweden
Watch: 16570
Posts: 7,315
Well the various Speedmasters are variations on a chronograph theme at least. The BB is a dive watch, field watch and now chronograph. Next up: GMT?
capote is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 March 2017, 03:40 PM   #8
sprezzatura
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: SoCal
Watch: Root Beer GMT
Posts: 126
Quote:
Originally Posted by capote View Post
Well the various Speedmasters are variations on a chronograph theme at least. The BB is a dive watch, field watch and now chronograph. Next up: GMT?
I think the analogy to Omega holds up even better if one shifts the focus to the Seamaster line and to a lesser extent to the brand at large. The differences between Seamaster wristwatches through years are much more severe than between the various Black Bays. Tudor is certainly heading in that direction, though.
sprezzatura is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 March 2017, 03:46 PM   #9
henrylee
"TRF" Member
 
henrylee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Socal/LA
Watch: 116610LN Ceramic
Posts: 3,223
Looks just like the co-axial.

__________________
♛ Sub 116610LN 2011 ♛ GMT 126710BLNR 2021 ♛ GMT 126711CHNR 2020 ♛ Datejust 16233 X-series 1993 Ω Speedmaster Mitsukoshi 2019 č Cartier Tank w5200025 2021
henrylee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 March 2017, 03:54 PM   #10
Maxy
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: TX
Watch: Daytona
Posts: 3,231
Quote:
Originally Posted by henrylee View Post
Looks just like the co-axial.

Yep..and the street price of these Omega speedy are around $5K and I want to see how in the world a normal person prefers Tudor Chrono over Omega Chrono unless he's WIS or Tudor fanatic. Tudor simply doesn't hold the value at over $5K in chrono area and can't beat Omegas at least.
Maxy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 March 2017, 04:22 PM   #11
ivanos
"TRF" Member
 
ivanos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 190
Quote:
Originally Posted by henrylee View Post
Looks just like the co-axial.

No it's quite different. This Omega has not a bit of style of a diving/field watch. But that new Tudor is a whole different story.
ivanos is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 March 2017, 05:24 PM   #12
Nav01L
"TRF" Member
 
Nav01L's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Real Name: Fred
Location: Zurich
Posts: 2,697
Quote:
Originally Posted by ivanos View Post
No it's quite different. This Omega has not a bit of style of a diving/field watch. But that new Tudor is a whole different story.
You're right, the Tuudmaster 57 simply has no style at all

In all seriousness, this is the type of design by committee that should never leave the board room. It's a bit like the Fiat 500. Like the original BB, the new 500 was a hardly foreseen (at least to the extent it turned out to be) amazing windfall success for Fiat. And then it was watered down by such ill-advised releases as the 500L or XL which were not even successful as the cheap rentalcars they turned out to be.

Why can't companies be respectful of their work when they accidentally release something great - just beyond me
Nav01L is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 March 2017, 03:50 PM   #13
Loevhagen
"TRF" Member
 
Loevhagen's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: The aperture
Posts: 4,941
Things are relative. Didn't care to much about the Speedmasters - but they sure look pretty now - compared to the Tudor havoc.
Loevhagen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 March 2017, 03:54 PM   #14
Shichinin
"TRF" Member
 
Shichinin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Planet Earth
Watch: BLNR/SubCND/Speedy
Posts: 969
Good to know that I am not the only one didnot like BBC. As pointed out it looks like a copy of a speedmaster and I really did not like the steel bezel. Lets see what else they got.
Shichinin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 March 2017, 05:18 PM   #15
xIZeitgeistIx
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Switzerland
Watch: DaytonaC & Sub
Posts: 116
I love (my) Tudor, but this looks like a Daytona, a Co-Axial Speedy and a Diver had a bad accident. :(
xIZeitgeistIx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 March 2017, 05:21 PM   #16
rootbeer7
2024 Pledge Member
 
rootbeer7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: london
Posts: 6,159
I like the lack of crown-guards, the dial and date, but the bezel isn't great and the snowflake hand blocks most of the subdial!
__________________
@imrootbeer7
rootbeer7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 March 2017, 05:29 PM   #17
henrylee
"TRF" Member
 
henrylee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Socal/LA
Watch: 116610LN Ceramic
Posts: 3,223
Looks like a Daytona and speedy had sex and this is their bastard child.
__________________
♛ Sub 116610LN 2011 ♛ GMT 126710BLNR 2021 ♛ GMT 126711CHNR 2020 ♛ Datejust 16233 X-series 1993 Ω Speedmaster Mitsukoshi 2019 č Cartier Tank w5200025 2021
henrylee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 March 2017, 06:35 PM   #18
RolexLuthor
"TRF" Member
 
RolexLuthor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: London
Watch: Seadweller 116600
Posts: 202
This is what makes me think they won't put any red text on the possible new Sea Dweller because Tudor are sticking it on a lot of their new watch models in a hark back to vintage.
RolexLuthor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 March 2017, 07:01 PM   #19
Aceofspades2345
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: UK
Posts: 26
Only in a Rolex forum would people complain that a watch has 10 different options to buy from. The number of threads of photoshopped alternatives people would like, people saying "I really wish the new Pepsi GMTII was in steel, not just white gold, etc". You'd think people would applaud Tudor for offering a few colour ways in 3 sizes. I mean, what is it, 2 options in 36mm, 5 in 41mm and 1 in 43mm? Hardly a cavalcade. Now they're offering a Chrono option in what looks like 1 colour. Unbelievable, the cheek of it!

It's not the prettiest watch, but in the video on ABTW it looks decent. I like the snowflake, but the detailing looks a little unrefined, and I don't like the font on the tachy. However, it is a third of the price of the Daytona.

https://youtu.be/BoLtLR6BcG4
Aceofspades2345 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 March 2017, 08:00 PM   #20
playmore009
"TRF" Member
 
playmore009's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Real Name: Shawn
Location: Boston, MA
Watch: GMT IIc, LVc
Posts: 737
Looks nice in the video.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
playmore009 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 March 2017, 08:22 PM   #21
Greg5512
"TRF" Member
 
Greg5512's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Real Name: Greg
Location: Rhode Island
Watch: Tudor Big Block
Posts: 527
I think it looks great in the video except I totally agree about the snowflake hand...looks out of place and makes no sense as you can't use the chrono certain times of day!
Greg5512 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 March 2017, 08:31 PM   #22
mikelcch
"TRF" Member
 
mikelcch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Real Name: Mike
Location: Malaysia
Posts: 149
IMHO I don't think it's fair to compare Tudor releases with Speedmaster (at least Speedy has decent designs) but I see similarities between the rise of Tudor and Panerai. No offense to the PAMS folks, I was an owner of a couple of PAMs too. First they talk about heritage and got people to jump in and then they milk it to death with different sizes, PVD, Bronze, add on a date, in-house movement, text on dial, chrono etc.

And i believe this won't be the end of things to come for the BB. Makes the regular 42mm BBs look like a work of a genius. Just saying.
mikelcch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 March 2017, 09:43 PM   #23
emersm
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
emersm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Real Name: Merle
Location: USA
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 2,544
Surprisingly, I like it, a lot!!
emersm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 March 2017, 10:48 PM   #24
Maxy
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: TX
Watch: Daytona
Posts: 3,231
I still don't see the regular version of the Bronze 369.. looks like it got dropped for now and will release sometime mid-year!!!
Maxy is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Takuya Watches

OCWatches

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.