The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Old 27 March 2017, 01:37 PM   #1
wisguy
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Earth
Posts: 2,406
New SS Sky-Dweller

I have never liked the watch but I have to admit that looking at the new version with the blue dial it looks great. It's a very useful complication but I'm not sure about the size.

How does it compare to the new Datejust 41 or the previous Datejust II (I used to own one of those in the past)
__________________
5230G / 5146G / 124060 / BB58 / '59 Constellation
wisguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 March 2017, 01:45 PM   #2
japenney
"TRF" Member
 
japenney's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Real Name: Josh
Location: Canada
Watch: undecided
Posts: 4,777
A bit bigger than a datejust 2 as it is 42mm.
japenney is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 March 2017, 01:53 PM   #3
Eva123
"TRF" Member
 
Eva123's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Scotland
Watch: 116333
Posts: 415
You have to have pretty big wrist to wear this watch. However, it looks really amazing (especially in PM). It is very nice that this watch just became more affordable for wider range of people.
Eva123 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 March 2017, 02:59 PM   #4
rebelceb
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 40
Quote:
Originally Posted by Eva123 View Post
You have to have pretty big wrist to wear this watch. However, it looks really amazing (especially in PM). It is very nice that this watch just became more affordable for wider range of people.
Agree completely...

I'm also one of those wider range of people that it became more affordable for. I would rather have ~3 watches vs 1 Skydweller in PM. Will definitely be getting the new SD50 as a stablemate for my DSSD, then just have to decide on which of the SS Skydwellers to get. The blue is beautiful, just not sure I'm a "blue" wearer.
rebelceb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 March 2017, 02:40 PM   #5
Andrés G
"TRF" Member
 
Andrés G's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Guatemala
Posts: 3,392
It wears a bit bigger than a DJ II but not by much.
Andrés G is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 March 2017, 12:09 AM   #6
Investr
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Real Name: Rick
Location: LSU
Watch: Constantly changes
Posts: 3,815
Quote:
Originally Posted by Andrés G View Post
It wears a bit bigger than a DJ II but not by much.
This.... tried on the PM version this past wknd to get a feel for the size. It's a go!!!
Investr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 March 2017, 03:01 AM   #7
stylinleems
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
stylinleems's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: N/A
Watch: 116500
Posts: 3,216
Quote:
Originally Posted by Investr View Post
This.... tried on the PM version this past wknd to get a feel for the size. It's a go!!!
I did this as well, tried on the WG Black dial version and felt it wasn't too big for my wrist! Now the waiting begins lol (and I'm still waiting for my Daytona-C to arrive )
__________________
Rolex: 126334 (BL) | 116610LN | 116500LN (WT) | 116500LN (BK) | 126710BLRO | 116610LV | 116710BLNR
stylinleems is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 March 2017, 03:14 PM   #8
Maiden
"TRF" Member
 
Maiden's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Canada
Posts: 3,652
I really disliked its bulbous look and dial layout. They have cleaned up the dial issue with the baton markers and changing the 24 ring so that is great. Need to try it on again and see if the size is still a turn off.
__________________
Rolex 116613LN
Rolex 16610LN
Omega Seamaster Aqua Terra 41mm
Omega Geneve
Tag Heuer Aquaracer WAY2112
Orient Ray 2
Maiden is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 March 2017, 06:55 PM   #9
henry333
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Real Name: Hendricks
Location: USA
Watch: 116600
Posts: 826
It is a lot bigger. I tried it on many times trying to make it fit but it's big..
And it is thick. People that are interested have to try it on . The photo made it look like a DJ 41 but it is not
henry333 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 March 2017, 09:00 PM   #10
1William
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: North Carolina
Watch: Rolex/Others
Posts: 47,787
It is bigger than the DJ II by 1 mm and the case is thicker. It has a nice wrist presence and looks amazing in my opinion. Wears a lot like my Explore II, 42 mm.
1William is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 March 2017, 10:22 PM   #11
peterpl
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: .
Posts: 6,692
Its ALOT bigger than a DJ2 and alot thicker. By measurements it might be 1 or 2mm but it looks and feels alot more - I used to own both and I still do. LOL
peterpl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 March 2017, 11:32 PM   #12
pa30crewchief
"TRF" Member
 
pa30crewchief's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Dubai
Posts: 181
On the list for a SS blue dial. It will compliment the Batman. Can't wait. And there will be money left over for a PM WG Cellini Dual Time. Three killer watches for the price of one.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
pa30crewchief is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 March 2017, 11:42 PM   #13
Foxglove
"TRF" Member
 
Foxglove's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Real Name: Ross
Location: Houston, TX
Watch: yourself
Posts: 838
unfortunately the lug to lug distance is really too long for my smallish wrist. I love the new model, but a 51+mm lug to lug hangs out a bit too far.

for comparison - my SD4K at 46.25mm lug to lug.



Foxglove is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 March 2017, 12:37 AM   #14
1largecockpit
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: Sydney
Posts: 44
Quote:
Originally Posted by Foxglove View Post
unfortunately the lug to lug distance is really too long for my smallish wrist. I love the new model, but a 51+mm lug to lug hangs out a bit too far.

for comparison - my SD4K at 46.25mm lug to lug.



Gee , that SD looks small on your wrist .
1largecockpit is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 March 2017, 09:11 AM   #15
jagwap
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: China
Watch: IWC IW389001
Posts: 762
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1largecockpit View Post
Gee , that SD looks small on your wrist .
No, it really doesn't. He could go larger, just a little, but it is a good size for him.

Big watches can be too big.
jagwap is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 March 2017, 12:19 AM   #16
AK797
2024 Pledge Member
 
AK797's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,369
It does wear pretty big but worth going to the gym for this magnificent bad boy!
AK797 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 March 2017, 12:21 AM   #17
kilyung
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
kilyung's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Cave
Watch: Sundial
Posts: 33,940
It's not often mentioned but a SkD is significantly thicker than DD40 or DJ41

kilyung is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 March 2017, 02:34 AM   #18
SC11
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Real Name: Sam
Location: UK
Watch: AP ☠️
Posts: 6,151
Quote:
Originally Posted by kilyung View Post
It's not often mentioned but a SkD is significantly thicker than DD40 or DJ41

How does the height compare to the 116600
SC11 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 March 2017, 12:36 AM   #19
1largecockpit
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: Sydney
Posts: 44
The SKD is stunning on the wrist . The white gold on a bracelet wears deceptively smaller than the yellow gold . Ive never liked Roman numerals , but the WG roman is just superb .
1largecockpit is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 March 2017, 12:43 AM   #20
watchwatcher
"TRF" Member
 
watchwatcher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Larry
Location: Kentucky
Watch: Yes
Posts: 35,047
It wears big...the dial is the largest in the line up, see diagram below. And as Mike said, it's really got some thickness going on as well.

I'm curious to see how the steel version wears. I tried on a WG model with the black dial a few months ago and felt a noticeable difference to the BLRO I had worn into the store.
Attached Images
 
watchwatcher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 March 2017, 09:57 AM   #21
Etschell
"TRF" Member
 
Etschell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: FL
Watch: platinum sub
Posts: 15,884
It's quite thick at 14.1 mm

A subc is 12.8 and a pelagos is 13.8
__________________
If you wind it, they will run.

25 or 6 to 4.
Etschell is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 March 2017, 02:29 AM   #22
wisguy
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Earth
Posts: 2,406
Quote:
Originally Posted by Etschell View Post
It's quite thick at 14.1 mm

A subc is 12.8 and a pelagos is 13.8
That's too thick for me... bummer.

I can't get my head around how Rolex being so conservative is jumping so late into bigger watches... just when every other brand is downsizing.

I used to like big watches but now I can't go beyond 40mm and thickness is a big issue for me now, I have gotten used to relatively flat watches, only on the weekends I can wear thicker ones.

Too bad, because I really liked it, maybe in the future they will apply to Datejust formula like the did to the Datejust II now 41, get the proportions right and slim it down.
__________________
5230G / 5146G / 124060 / BB58 / '59 Constellation
wisguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 March 2017, 02:53 AM   #23
Etschell
"TRF" Member
 
Etschell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: FL
Watch: platinum sub
Posts: 15,884
Quote:
Originally Posted by wisguy View Post
That's too thick for me... bummer.

I can't get my head around how Rolex being so conservative is jumping so late into bigger watches... just when every other brand is downsizing.

I used to like big watches but now I can't go beyond 40mm and thickness is a big issue for me now, I have gotten used to relatively flat watches, only on the weekends I can wear thicker ones.

Too bad, because I really liked it, maybe in the future they will apply to Datejust formula like the did to the Datejust II now 41, get the proportions right and slim it down.
its the movement and command bezel tbh. nothing can really be done. its basically the same as my pelagos which is 42 mm and fits nice on the wrist. i will be getting one, in white or blue, in due time.
__________________
If you wind it, they will run.

25 or 6 to 4.
Etschell is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 March 2017, 02:45 AM   #24
SC11
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Real Name: Sam
Location: UK
Watch: AP ☠️
Posts: 6,151
Quote:
Originally Posted by Etschell View Post
It's quite thick at 14.1 mm

A subc is 12.8 and a pelagos is 13.8
With my Daytona 116500 at 13mm and a SDc (11660) at 15.5mm so the Skydweller should sit nicely (hopefully)
SC11 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 March 2017, 02:40 AM   #25
BiotechBrainiac
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Canada
Posts: 4
Absolutely love the new Sky-dweller. It's a dream watch of mine that was previously out of reach due to only being in PM. Still pretty expensive at $14,400 though. I'll have to keep saving, lol.
BiotechBrainiac is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 March 2017, 02:57 AM   #26
Lordofrolex
"TRF" Member
 
Lordofrolex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Real Name: Brandon
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Watch: Yes Please!
Posts: 6,691
I tried on the white gold version a couple days ago to see the size. Way to big for my 6.5"~ wrist.
__________________
Rolex GMT Master II 116710LN
Panerai PAM 359
Audemars Piguet RO 15300OR


Follow me on Instagram: @b_jakobovich
Lordofrolex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 March 2017, 04:41 AM   #27
Fletcher UK
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: England
Watch: Sub LV
Posts: 200
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lordofrolex View Post
I tried on the white gold version a couple days ago to see the size. Way to big for my 6.5"~ wrist.
That's funny because I tried a full rose gold on bracelet at the weekend on my 6.5" wrist (for sizing purposes only) and thought it was spot on. I promptly ordered the SS version (and paid a deposit! 3rd on the list! ). Its not as big as everyone seems to think. Its only 42mm, its not Big Ben you know I think it will pretty much fit any wrist.

PS - the full rose gold on bracelet BTW OMG the weight, the presence, the fluted bezel and they way it reflects light blew me away. £35,850 pounds though. Its an incredible watch and will be almost as stunning in SS. Can't wait to get mine.
Fletcher UK is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

OCWatches

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.