ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
22 April 2017, 08:18 PM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: London
Watch: Daytona 16518
Posts: 3
|
Zenith Daytona query please
Hi, i am lucky enough to own a new 116520 SS Daytona 2013 and, after a long search, recently treated myself to a 1995 16518 yellow gold/black strap with the Zenith movement.
Obviously the movements are different but i have noticed two characteristics between them that i would appreciate some reassurance with. As usual when you pull the crown out to set the time on the 116520 the second hand stops. When you do the same on the zenith movement the second hand only stops if you rotate the crown to move the main hands backwards. Effectively moving the time backwards stops the second hand - is this characteristic typical for the zenith movement? Secondly, when the crown is pulled out to just wind the Zenith movement there is more noise and a different feel as you wind it - again is this a typical characteristic? Thank you |
22 April 2017, 08:46 PM | #2 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: UK / Spain
Watch: 39mm Explorer
Posts: 1,990
|
Hi
I also have a 16520. Yes what you say in your first question is 100% correct. It is a PITA but that is what you have to put up with. After a while it becomes second nature and it eventually gets done within a few seconds. Practice makes perfect as they say. Your second question worries me. My winding mechanism is as smooth as silk and very quiet. The only other "moan" about the 16520 is that the pushers are harder to push than the later models but after a while you get used to it. Hope that helps Mick |
22 April 2017, 09:06 PM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: London, England
Posts: 81
|
Yes — the 16520 Zenith based 4030 movement is non-hacking. And I find if you turn the crown to wind the hands backwards but just hold it still, you can actually get the second hand to go backwards.
On mine, hand-wnding is a little stiffer/noisier than on my 116600/3135 and smoother and quieter than on my 1680/1575. Having said that, it's probably due for a service. It's a great watch — definitely one of the coolest iterations of the Daytona IMO. |
23 April 2017, 02:07 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: London
Watch: Daytona 16518
Posts: 3
|
Thank you for the feedback, it is a lovely piece and a pleasure to wear. Thanks again.
|
23 April 2017, 02:17 AM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 19,706
|
I have a 1969 Zenith El Primero...I need to try the the backwards winding. The only think I do not like about it is the non-hacking. Winding opposite way to set time also took some getting used to.
|
23 April 2017, 07:43 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: London
Watch: Daytona 16518
Posts: 3
|
|
23 April 2017, 08:42 AM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 19,706
|
|
23 April 2017, 07:05 AM | #8 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Real Name: Francisco
Location: San Juan, PR
Watch: Is Ticking !
Posts: 25,181
|
Quote:
A thread with no pictures? Show us that beauty! Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
__________________
Francisco ♛ 16610 / 116264 Ω 168.022 / 2535.80.00 / 310.30.42.50.01.002 / 210.90.42.20.01.001 Zenith 02.480.405 2FA security enabled |
|
23 April 2017, 08:52 AM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2012
Location: European Union
Posts: 588
|
I noticed some other differences as well , posted them here
https://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=524148 |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.