The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 28 April 2017, 01:18 AM   #1
Martin_Taylor
"TRF" Member
 
Martin_Taylor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: NY
Posts: 77
Service vs "Adjusting" in slowing watch

If a watch is fast/slow regularly,

Shall it be adjusted to right timing or shall it be serviced fully?

Thanks Fellows
Martin_Taylor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 April 2017, 01:23 AM   #2
padi56
"TRF" Life Patron
 
padi56's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Real Name: Peter
Location: Llanfairpwllgwyng
Watch: ing you.
Posts: 53,064
Quote:
Originally Posted by Martin_Taylor View Post
If a watch is fast/slow regularly,

Shall it be adjusted to right timing or shall it be serviced fully?

Thanks Fellows
That would depend on how old the watch and by how much the +or- was if just a few seconds either way simple regulation is all thats needed only.Without much information in your post cannot give a better answer, and consistency is very important in any mechanical watch.
__________________

ICom Pro3

All posts are my own opinion and my opinion only.

"The clock of life is wound but once, and no man has the power to tell just when the hands will stop. Now is the only time you actually own the time, Place no faith in time, for the clock may soon be still for ever."
Good Judgement comes from experience,experience comes from Bad Judgement,.Buy quality, cry once; buy cheap, cry again and again.

www.mc0yad.club

Second in command CEO and left handed watch winder
padi56 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 April 2017, 01:37 AM   #3
Martin_Taylor
"TRF" Member
 
Martin_Taylor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: NY
Posts: 77
Quote:
Originally Posted by padi56 View Post
That would depend on how old the watch and by how much the +or- was if just a few seconds either way simple regulation is all thats needed only.Without much information in your post cannot give a better answer, and consistency is very important in any mechanical watch.

how about a watch +- 20s and it is year 2000?

thanks
Martin_Taylor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 April 2017, 10:15 AM   #4
FTX I
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Real Name: Flavio
Location: N/A
Posts: 14,654
Quote:
Originally Posted by Martin_Taylor View Post
how about a watch +- 20s and it is year 2000?

thanks
With no service history it's a 17 yrs watch running +-20s. I would service right away.
FTX I is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 April 2017, 11:12 AM   #5
madmax21
"TRF" Member
 
madmax21's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Toronto Canada
Watch: GMT Master ll
Posts: 1,036
Quote:
Originally Posted by ftx i View Post
with no service history it's a 17 yrs watch running +-20s. I would service right away.
x2
__________________
May the hands of time always treat us well...
madmax21 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 April 2017, 01:38 AM   #6
Furrygoat
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Usa
Posts: 428
This is something I've been thinking about recently, so I'll hijack.

I have two watches from around 2010. Both about +20 spd (one changed from about +6 recently.) Took them to a watch repair guy and he said the timing machine showed they were in good shape and didn't need a service. (I'm guessing he looked at amplitude and error.)

But we're still getting close to 10 years since production. Service anyway, or regulate?
Furrygoat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 April 2017, 02:34 AM   #7
amh
"TRF" Member
 
amh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Tejas
Watch: Various
Posts: 5,082
Regulate first, it's inexpensive. If that doesn't fix, then service.
amh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 April 2017, 05:05 AM   #8
JP Chestnut
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Ann Arbor MI
Watch: Rolex Ref 16600
Posts: 3,908
Quote:
Originally Posted by amh View Post
Regulate first, it's inexpensive. If that doesn't fix, then service.
Stick it on a timegrapher first. It's essentially free and doesn't risk damaging the case.
JP Chestnut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 April 2017, 05:15 AM   #9
toxicavenger
"TRF" Member
 
toxicavenger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Colorado Springs
Watch: Seiko's
Posts: 2,563
Quote:
Originally Posted by JP Chestnut View Post
Stick it on a timegrapher first. It's essentially free and doesn't risk damaging the case.
toxicavenger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 April 2017, 02:32 AM   #10
toxicavenger
"TRF" Member
 
toxicavenger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Colorado Springs
Watch: Seiko's
Posts: 2,563
It is according to the beat rate error and amplitude. If they are all over the place then a regulation won't work.
toxicavenger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 April 2017, 03:10 AM   #11
kilyung
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
kilyung's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Cave
Watch: Sundial
Posts: 33,940
Quote:
Originally Posted by toxicavenger View Post
It is according to the beat rate error and amplitude. If they are all over the place then a regulation won't work.
This. It's the reason why I own a timegrapher (also studying watchmaking). I can tell when a watch needs a simple regulation or time for service.
kilyung is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 April 2017, 04:10 AM   #12
Furrygoat
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Usa
Posts: 428
Quote:
Originally Posted by kilyung View Post
This. It's the reason why I own a timegrapher (also studying watchmaking). I can tell when a watch needs a simple regulation or time for service.


Quote:
Originally Posted by toxicavenger View Post
It is according to the beat rate error and amplitude. If they are all over the place then a regulation won't work.


Maybe this has been discussed elsewhere, but can you have a watch with great amplitude and acceptable error that would still need a service just for clean and lubrication?

Or put in a different way: do amplitude and error problems alone constitute the requirements for service, or are there other factors that ignore the feedback from a timegrapher?
Furrygoat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 April 2017, 04:17 AM   #13
Chadridv
2024 Pledge Member
 
Chadridv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Real Name: Chadri
Location: LI, NY
Watch: 116610LV
Posts: 11,357
Quote:
Originally Posted by Furrygoat View Post
Maybe this has been discussed elsewhere, but can you have a watch with great amplitude and acceptable error that would still need a service just for clean and lubrication?

Or put in a different way: do amplitude and error problems alone constitute the requirements for service, or are there other factors that ignore the feedback from a timegrapher?
These are good questions. Curious as well.

My guess... is that there can be issues with the watch that require service, despite a watch functioning well, keeping good time and showing great amplitude. One small example is that you could have issues with a crown stem and mono block that I don't affecting a timeograph report.
Chadridv is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 April 2017, 04:56 AM   #14
toxicavenger
"TRF" Member
 
toxicavenger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Colorado Springs
Watch: Seiko's
Posts: 2,563
Quote:
Originally Posted by Furrygoat View Post
do amplitude and error problems alone constitute the requirements for service, or are there other factors that ignore the feedback from a timegrapher?
The are some factors you use to determine whether or not it needs a service. Other factors can be low reserve, not being able to wind it manually, losing time etc.

My company watchmaker believes in fixing the actual problem of the watch, and not automatically saying "it needs a full service". Because most of the time it can be a cheaper solution to problem.
toxicavenger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 April 2017, 05:13 AM   #15
sensui
2024 Pledge Member
 
sensui's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 12,446
Quote:
Originally Posted by Furrygoat View Post
Maybe this has been discussed elsewhere, but can you have a watch with great amplitude and acceptable error that would still need a service just for clean and lubrication?

Or put in a different way: do amplitude and error problems alone constitute the requirements for service, or are there other factors that ignore the feedback from a timegrapher?
I'm no watchmaker but I have a really close relationship with my local CW21 guy that's been around for many decades. Of course he has a timegrapher and usually evaluates any of my watches (modern or vintage) before servicing. I'm of the belief that I service watches every 5-6 years anyway as maintenance but on a lot of vintage pieces....there are many risks to opening a watch and taking off the hands etc/handling the dial....so you'd want to do it as least as possible.

Usually amplitude is a great way to determine the condition of the movement....but the key is measuring the amplitude over periods in different positions (which his timegrapher does, it rotates the watch and measures over periods in different key positions). If the amplitude looks good and error rate looks low in all positions, he tends to recommend to wait on the service on vintage pieces......I'd think this is good advice as he's a guy that could sometimes tell if something's wrong with a watch by the way it winds (that's how many watches he's handled throughout the years).

To answer the OP's question....it's not uncommon for watches to have good amplitude but bad error rates or get magnetized over time and be off COSC significantly....as long as the error is consistent (for example if it's +20, it's +20 every day, not +20 one day, -10 another, and -30 the next etc). If that's the case, probably the watch only needs a regulation and not a full service.
sensui is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 April 2017, 05:26 AM   #16
madmax21
"TRF" Member
 
madmax21's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Toronto Canada
Watch: GMT Master ll
Posts: 1,036
Quote:
Originally Posted by sensui View Post
I'm no watchmaker but I have a really close relationship with my local CW21 guy that's been around for many decades. Of course he has a timegrapher and usually evaluates any of my watches (modern or vintage) before servicing. I'm of the belief that I service watches every 5-6 years anyway as maintenance but on a lot of vintage pieces....there are many risks to opening a watch and taking off the hands etc/handling the dial....so you'd want to do it as least as possible.

Usually amplitude is a great way to determine the condition of the movement....but the key is measuring the amplitude over periods in different positions (which his timegrapher does, it rotates the watch and measures over periods in different key positions). If the amplitude looks good and error rate looks low in all positions, he tends to recommend to wait on the service on vintage pieces......I'd think this is good advice as he's a guy that could sometimes tell if something's wrong with a watch by the way it winds (that's how many watches he's handled throughout the years).

To answer the OP's question....it's not uncommon for watches to have good amplitude but bad error rates or get magnetized over time and be off COSC significantly....as long as the error is consistent (for example if it's +20, it's +20 every day, not +20 one day, -10 another, and -30 the next etc). If that's the case, probably the watch only needs a regulation and not a full service.
I agree completely regarding the difference between when a watch require service or just being regulated. I think it's been well said in this post and would like to also say that I find way too many people to buy high-end luxury watches try to save a few bucks by not servicing their watches, and frankly I've never understood that attitude. I mean would you buy a Ferrari or Lamborghini and then not change the oil or not do proper maintenance to it I think it's the same thing with watches.

I totally understand the whole thing with vintage pieces and don't have an issue with the mentality of service only when you need to for these cases, but I mean you by yourself a $20,000 watch is $800 every 5 to 7 years really in the end of the world.
__________________
May the hands of time always treat us well...
madmax21 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 April 2017, 02:58 AM   #17
Chiboy
"TRF" Member
 
Chiboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Chicago
Watch: Daytona
Posts: 5,572
Wow, IMO 20 seconds per day ain't right. I don't know how much regulation can adjust, but it might not be that much. I'd be surprised if you didn't need a service, but there are much more knowledgeable people than me who will chime in.
__________________
Datejust w/black Tapestry dial (1985) / Daytona (2016)
Chiboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 April 2017, 05:20 PM   #18
padi56
"TRF" Life Patron
 
padi56's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Real Name: Peter
Location: Llanfairpwllgwyng
Watch: ing you.
Posts: 53,064
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chiboy View Post
Wow, IMO 20 seconds per day ain't right. I don't know how much regulation can adjust, but it might not be that much. I'd be surprised if you didn't need a service, but there are much more knowledgeable people than me who will chime in.
Today regulation is a very very simple task for any good watchmaker,its accomplished by turning the Microstella adjustment screws and nuts on the balance wheel.The two smaller Microstella screws make adjustments of one second for each turn on the tool, and the larger Microstella, two seconds for one turn on the tool,but adjustment must be balanced with the opposite gold adjustment screw. The rate adjustment on the balance wheel it's a max of around 150 seconds either way.And you need a microstella special tool and a timing machine although it's a easy job takes about 10 -15 minutes and expect this task is the most done daily by watchmakers worldwide.But seeing the OP watch is from 2000 and if no service history then a full service is needed then it will have a two year service warranty.

Microstella tool this is the older tool Rolex now has a more moderned one but it does the same job and adjustment is done the same way.


Balance-wheel.

__________________

ICom Pro3

All posts are my own opinion and my opinion only.

"The clock of life is wound but once, and no man has the power to tell just when the hands will stop. Now is the only time you actually own the time, Place no faith in time, for the clock may soon be still for ever."
Good Judgement comes from experience,experience comes from Bad Judgement,.Buy quality, cry once; buy cheap, cry again and again.

www.mc0yad.club

Second in command CEO and left handed watch winder
padi56 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 April 2017, 01:59 AM   #19
Chiboy
"TRF" Member
 
Chiboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Chicago
Watch: Daytona
Posts: 5,572
Quote:
Originally Posted by padi56 View Post
Today regulation is a very very simple task for any good watchmaker,its accomplished by turning the Microstella adjustment screws and nuts on the balance wheel.The two smaller Microstella screws make adjustments of one second for each turn on the tool, and the larger Microstella, two seconds for one turn on the tool,but adjustment must be balanced with the opposite gold adjustment screw. The rate adjustment on the balance wheel it's a max of around 150 seconds either way.And you need a microstella special tool and a timing machine although it's a easy job takes about 10 -15 minutes and expect this task is the most done daily by watchmakers worldwide.But seeing the OP watch is from 2000 and if no service history then a full service is needed then it will have a two year service warranty.

Microstella tool this is the older tool Rolex now has a more moderned one but it does the same job and adjustment is done the same way.


Balance-wheel.

Thanks for this. I would have never thought the Microstella adjustment could adjust up to 150 seconds/day!
__________________
Datejust w/black Tapestry dial (1985) / Daytona (2016)
Chiboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 April 2017, 04:19 AM   #20
breitlings
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Bethesda
Watch: Apple TV
Posts: 5,744
I look at how consistent it is. IFF its very consistent in its loss in a period then adjust. If losses are not very consistent or if there is no more adjustment to be made then it is time for service.
breitlings is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 April 2017, 05:03 AM   #21
JP Chestnut
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Ann Arbor MI
Watch: Rolex Ref 16600
Posts: 3,908
Quote:
Originally Posted by Martin_Taylor View Post
If a watch is fast/slow regularly,

Shall it be adjusted to right timing or shall it be serviced fully?

Thanks Fellows
Time keeping is only one part of needing a service. What's the amplitude and beat rate? What's the power reserve? An otherwise healthy watch that tells slightly poor time is a good candidate for regulation.
JP Chestnut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 April 2017, 10:22 AM   #22
madmax21
"TRF" Member
 
madmax21's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Toronto Canada
Watch: GMT Master ll
Posts: 1,036
2012-13 Ferrari California | 2012-13 Ferrari 458 Italia | 2012-13 Ferrari FF

There are three types of scheduled maintenance for your Ferrari. The Genuine Maintenance Program covers scheduled maintenance as listed below. Anything not expressly listed here is not included in the program.

ANNUAL MAINTENANCE*
Scheduled to be performed every 12 months and it is for vehicles that are generally driven less than 12,500 miles per year.

Engine Oil (replace)
Engine Oil Filter (replace)
Pollen Filter (replace)
Scheduled checks
Labor

*Every 12 months OR 12,500 miles, whichever comes first

TIME RELATED MAINTENANCE
ONLY EVERY TWO (2) YEARS
Scheduled to be performed at specific time intervals regardless of the vehicle's mileage

Brake System Fluid (replace)
Air Filter (replace)
- FF model only
Auxiliary Belts (replace)
- California and 458 Italia models only
Scheduled Checks
Labor

MILEAGE RELATED MAINTENANCE
Every 12,500 miles
Scheduled to be performed at intervals of 12,500 miles and it is generally for vehicles driven more than 12,500 miles per year.

Engine Oil (replace)*
Engine Oil Filter (replace) *
Pollen Filter (replace) *
Air Filter (replace)
- California and 458 Italia models only
Scheduled Checks
Labor

*Every 12,500 miles OR one (1) year, whichever comes first.

The following items are mileage related services and will be covered under this Program only if the vehicle actually reaches the specific mileage prior to the program expiration date (within 7 years from the original date of delivery)

ADDITIONAL MILEAGE RELATED MAINTENANCE
Every 37,500 miles

Spark Plugs (replace)
Auxiliary Belts (replace)
- FF models only*
Labor

*Every 37,500 miles OR 4 years, whichever comes first

ADDITIONAL MILEAGE RELATED MAINTENANCE
Every 62,500 miles

Gearbox Oil (replace)
Hydraulic Steering Oil (replace)
Labor

ADDITIONAL MILEAGE RELATED MAINTENANCE
Every 80,000 miles

Oxygen sensors (replace)
Labor

ADDITIONAL MILEAGE RELATED MAINTENANCE
Every 100,000 miles

Catalytic Convertors (replace)
Fuel Injectors (replace)
Labor

All maintenance work which is not part of Scheduled Maintenance, marked with an asterisk (*) in the maintenance schedule or marked "replace if necessary" in the Warranty and Service booklet, in the list of scheduled maintenance work, are specifically excluded under this program. The plan is voided if the vehicle's mechanics and electronics are modified without the manufacturer's authorization and/or if the odometer has been tampered with.
__________________
May the hands of time always treat us well...
madmax21 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 April 2017, 11:26 AM   #23
breitlings
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Bethesda
Watch: Apple TV
Posts: 5,744
Quote:
Originally Posted by madmax21 View Post
2012-13 Ferrari California | 2012-13 Ferrari 458 Italia | 2012-13 Ferrari FF

There are three types of scheduled maintenance for your Ferrari. The Genuine Maintenance Program covers scheduled maintenance as listed below. Anything not expressly listed here is not included in the program.

ANNUAL MAINTENANCE*
Scheduled to be performed every 12 months and it is for vehicles that are generally driven less than 12,500 miles per year.

Engine Oil (replace)
Engine Oil Filter (replace)
Pollen Filter (replace)
Scheduled checks
Labor

*Every 12 months OR 12,500 miles, whichever comes first

TIME RELATED MAINTENANCE
ONLY EVERY TWO (2) YEARS
Scheduled to be performed at specific time intervals regardless of the vehicle's mileage

Brake System Fluid (replace)
Air Filter (replace)
- FF model only
Auxiliary Belts (replace)
- California and 458 Italia models only
Scheduled Checks
Labor

MILEAGE RELATED MAINTENANCE
Every 12,500 miles
Scheduled to be performed at intervals of 12,500 miles and it is generally for vehicles driven more than 12,500 miles per year.

Engine Oil (replace)*
Engine Oil Filter (replace) *
Pollen Filter (replace) *
Air Filter (replace)
- California and 458 Italia models only
Scheduled Checks
Labor

*Every 12,500 miles OR one (1) year, whichever comes first.

The following items are mileage related services and will be covered under this Program only if the vehicle actually reaches the specific mileage prior to the program expiration date (within 7 years from the original date of delivery)

ADDITIONAL MILEAGE RELATED MAINTENANCE
Every 37,500 miles

Spark Plugs (replace)
Auxiliary Belts (replace)
- FF models only*
Labor

*Every 37,500 miles OR 4 years, whichever comes first

ADDITIONAL MILEAGE RELATED MAINTENANCE
Every 62,500 miles

Gearbox Oil (replace)
Hydraulic Steering Oil (replace)
Labor

ADDITIONAL MILEAGE RELATED MAINTENANCE
Every 80,000 miles

Oxygen sensors (replace)
Labor

ADDITIONAL MILEAGE RELATED MAINTENANCE
Every 100,000 miles

Catalytic Convertors (replace)
Fuel Injectors (replace)
Labor

All maintenance work which is not part of Scheduled Maintenance, marked with an asterisk (*) in the maintenance schedule or marked "replace if necessary" in the Warranty and Service booklet, in the list of scheduled maintenance work, are specifically excluded under this program. The plan is voided if the vehicle's mechanics and electronics are modified without the manufacturer's authorization and/or if the odometer has been tampered with.
That is incredible. Makes the 355 service schedule look insane.
breitlings is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 April 2017, 04:46 PM   #24
madmax21
"TRF" Member
 
madmax21's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Toronto Canada
Watch: GMT Master ll
Posts: 1,036
Quote:
Originally Posted by breitlings View Post
That is incredible. Makes the 355 service schedule look insane.
Yeah i know what you mean...i owned 355 and it was pricey to maintain but since i sold it i miss that car..makes an 800 dollar bill feel like chicken feed anyway my point is is the price of owning a beautiful watch maintain it properly and you won't have to worry about it
__________________
May the hands of time always treat us well...
madmax21 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 April 2017, 05:11 AM   #25
toxicavenger
"TRF" Member
 
toxicavenger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Colorado Springs
Watch: Seiko's
Posts: 2,563
This is one of the ones my guys have
Attached Images
 
toxicavenger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 May 2017, 03:12 AM   #26
Martin_Taylor
"TRF" Member
 
Martin_Taylor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: NY
Posts: 77
Thanks guys

my rolex certified watchmaker checked my watch and say just need to regulate for now
Martin_Taylor is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

OCWatches

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.