The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Old 1 March 2018, 10:38 PM   #1
ar0821
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: Clifton
Posts: 18
Datejust 41 vs Sub

Hi, new to this thread. Don't know much about watches, but have been doing my research for the past few months and met with some rolex dealers. Planning to get one for my fiance as a wedding/30th gift but torn between the:

Datejust 41 two tone with the champagne dial or the Sub two tone with the blue dial.

Any suggestions appreciated.
Thanks in advance!
ar0821 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 March 2018, 10:44 PM   #2
Kiddodoc
2024 Pledge Member
 
Kiddodoc's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Real Name: Rick
Location: Texas
Watch: 15 and counting!
Posts: 3,531
First of all, welcome to TRF!
I would recommend the TT blue sub of the two you mentioned. The bluesy is such a beautiful watch. DJ is a great watch but the sub he can take diving and snorkeling. My wife bought me a TT Daytona for my wedding gift! He will b stoked. BTW, most on here don't like TT watches.
Kiddodoc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 March 2018, 10:53 PM   #3
BzKneez
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: toronto
Posts: 503
Both are great watches. I own the sub and my wife has the 2 tone datejust. I find the datejust can be worn daily and as well for formal occasions with the exception of black tie/black suit. The same goes for the sub two tone but you might have just a little harder time matching the watch with clothes due to its blue face (that's just me though)

One thing with the choice of the blue 2 tone sub is that you'll see less of them around on other people. I do often see steel subs as well as 2 tone datejusts on people.

Tough choice... my vote goes to the 2 tone sub blue face
BzKneez is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 March 2018, 11:11 PM   #4
scarabei
"TRF" Member
 
scarabei's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Real Name: Andrey
Location: Vienna, VA
Watch: 116610
Posts: 149
The question is, can she pull off that big of a watch? I would consider a Datejust 31 as a much more sensible and elegant option:
https://www.rolex.com/watches/dateju...8240-0025.html



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
scarabei is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 March 2018, 11:14 PM   #5
opawlows
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Earth
Watch: Rolex/Tudor/PAM
Posts: 1,272
Quote:
Originally Posted by scarabei View Post
The question is, can she pull off that big of a watch? I would consider a Datejust 31 as a much more sensible and elegant option:
https://www.rolex.com/watches/dateju...8240-0025.html



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
Perhaps the fiancee is a male?
opawlows is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 March 2018, 11:30 PM   #6
Trek737
"TRF" Member
 
Trek737's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: Houston
Posts: 397
Wish you would of clarified the gender in the first post... Oh well... Deleted my original post...

And yes... Sub TT... As I own that one and really love it...
__________________
116610LN
116613LB
326933 SkyD TT Blk Dial
116660 DeepBlue
Wife:
116231 DJ Black MOP set w Diamonds
178384 DJ White MOP set w Diamonds

Last edited by Trek737; 1 March 2018 at 11:34 PM.. Reason: delete...
Trek737 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 March 2018, 11:50 PM   #7
ar0821
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: Clifton
Posts: 18
sorry should've said he's a male.
ar0821 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 March 2018, 12:05 AM   #8
Swiss Mad!
"TRF" Member
 
Swiss Mad!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Real Name: Max
Location: UK
Watch: Various
Posts: 3,727
Quote:
Originally Posted by Trek737 View Post
Wish you would of clarified the gender in the first post... Oh well... Deleted my original post...

And yes... Sub TT... As I own that one and really love it...
OP did. Is fiance not clear enough?
Fiancee is female.

Sent from my Moto G (5) using Tapatalk
__________________

instagram: max.parkin
Swiss Mad! is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 March 2018, 11:03 PM   #9
Trek737
"TRF" Member
 
Trek737's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: Houston
Posts: 397
Quote:
Originally Posted by Swiss Mad! View Post
OP did. Is fiance not clear enough?
Fiancee is female.

Sent from my Moto G (5) using Tapatalk
Yes but during the 15 min before she wrote that I was trying to compose a post and load pics of Lady's DJ... Wasn't until I posted then read what had been written while I was busy typing
that I saw which gender the watch was intended for...

No big deal..

So what did you decide on the watch...
__________________
116610LN
116613LB
326933 SkyD TT Blk Dial
116660 DeepBlue
Wife:
116231 DJ Black MOP set w Diamonds
178384 DJ White MOP set w Diamonds
Trek737 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 March 2018, 11:12 PM   #10
AK797
2024 Pledge Member
 
AK797's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,369
For fiancée I'd go DJ41 and TT chocolate dial, bet she will love it.
AK797 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 March 2018, 11:13 PM   #11
ar0821
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: Clifton
Posts: 18
thank you all!
ar0821 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 March 2018, 11:13 PM   #12
ar0821
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: Clifton
Posts: 18
my fiance is a man. I'm the woman lol, but thank you!
ar0821 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 March 2018, 11:16 PM   #13
scarabei
"TRF" Member
 
scarabei's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Real Name: Andrey
Location: Vienna, VA
Watch: 116610
Posts: 149
Quote:
Originally Posted by ar0821 View Post
my fiance is a man. I'm the woman lol, but thank you!


A sub it is then. 41mm Datejust is an ugly, disproportionate fad. It makes me think Rolex is trying to compete with Michael Kors, when it should be the other way around 🤪


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
scarabei is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 March 2018, 12:13 AM   #14
Jack T
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Real Name: Jack
Location: The Triangle
Watch: Several
Posts: 6,719
Quote:
Originally Posted by scarabei View Post
A sub it is then. 41mm Datejust is an ugly, disproportionate fad. It makes me think Rolex is trying to compete with Michael Kors, when it should be the other way around ��


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
That's as harsh a criticism of the new DJ41 as I have read. I'm not a big fan either, I love my classic 36mm, but I don't think the proportions are all that out of whack, more tapered bezel than the DJII.
__________________
Sub 116613 LN; GMT 116710 LN; Sinn 104R;
Exp 214270; GS SBGM221; Omega AT
Jack T is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 March 2018, 03:35 AM   #15
Dirt
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Brisbane
Watch: DSSD
Posts: 8,064
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jack T View Post
That's as harsh a criticism of the new DJ41 as I have read. I'm not a big fan either, I love my classic 36mm, but I don't think the proportions are all that out of whack, more tapered bezel than the DJII.
I don't know about it being a harsh criticism
But my enduring perception is that it was a load of garbage
Dirt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 March 2018, 02:45 AM   #16
datejustrms
"TRF" Member
 
datejustrms's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: USA
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 2,799
Quote:
Originally Posted by scarabei View Post
A sub it is then. 41mm Datejust is an ugly, disproportionate fad. It makes me think Rolex is trying to compete with Michael Kors, when it should be the other way around 🤪


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
Really? I don't think Rolex is trying to compete with Michael Kors.
datejustrms is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 March 2018, 03:22 AM   #17
superdog
2024 Pledge Member
 
superdog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Real Name: Seth
Location: nj
Watch: Omega
Posts: 24,834
Quote:
Originally Posted by scarabei View Post
A sub it is then. 41mm Datejust is an ugly, disproportionate fad. It makes me think Rolex is trying to compete with Michael Kors, when it should be the other way around 🤪


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
LMAO.

I could not disagree more. Most balanced watch I have.
__________________
If happiness is a state of mind, why look anywhere else for it?

IG: gsmotorclub
IG: thesawcollection

(Both mostly just car stuff)
superdog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 March 2018, 03:36 AM   #18
danlar
"TRF" Member
 
danlar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: Geneva
Posts: 78
Quote:
Originally Posted by superdog View Post
LMAO.

I could not disagree more. Most balanced watch I have.
I second this.

If you think about it, none of the Rolex watches have even proportions. Even the Sub is "disproportionate."
Just look at the hands vs the hour markers. Different sizes, shapes, etc. Yet, it is arguably the most iconic watch in the world.

I guess we should all throw away our disproportionate Rolex watches. Especially our watches > 36mm because this has got to be the decade, not the past two decades, that "the big watch trend" will finally end lol
danlar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 March 2018, 11:18 PM   #19
watchwatcher
"TRF" Member
 
watchwatcher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Larry
Location: Kentucky
Watch: Yes
Posts: 35,047
Quote:
Originally Posted by ar0821 View Post
my fiance is a man. I'm the woman lol, but thank you!
Well, then. This one, no doubt.
Attached Images
 
watchwatcher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 March 2018, 11:19 PM   #20
scarabei
"TRF" Member
 
scarabei's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Real Name: Andrey
Location: Vienna, VA
Watch: 116610
Posts: 149
Quote:
Originally Posted by watchwatcher View Post
Well, then. This one, no doubt.


Precisely!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
scarabei is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 April 2018, 10:51 AM   #21
superstarmar
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: In Motion
Watch: my wrist presence
Posts: 7,436
Quote:
Originally Posted by watchwatcher View Post
Well, then. This one, no doubt.
Yes this one ... blue dial sub TT ...
Attached Images
 
superstarmar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 March 2018, 12:07 AM   #22
Jack T
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Real Name: Jack
Location: The Triangle
Watch: Several
Posts: 6,719
Quote:
Originally Posted by ar0821 View Post
my fiance is a man. I'm the woman lol, but thank you!
As I read the first few posts, I thought some people were a bit presumptuous; glad you cleared that up.

I am indifferent on DJ41 and if the Sub I'd go with the black dial.

Have fun deciding, it won't be easy!!
__________________
Sub 116613 LN; GMT 116710 LN; Sinn 104R;
Exp 214270; GS SBGM221; Omega AT
Jack T is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 March 2018, 03:23 AM   #23
AK797
2024 Pledge Member
 
AK797's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,369
Quote:
Originally Posted by ar0821 View Post
my fiance is a man. I'm the woman lol, but thank you!
Ah, well I'd lean more Blue Subc but I still love the chocolate DJ41 but then I'm a Gemini. I had both dials.

AK797 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 March 2018, 12:17 AM   #24
904VT
"TRF" Member
 
904VT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: USA
Watch: All Rolex
Posts: 7,024
Quote:
Originally Posted by AK797 View Post
Ah, well I'd lean more Blue Subc but I still love the chocolate DJ41 but then I'm a Gemini. I had both dials.

Put that gold Sub away Neil, every time I see it, just too tempting and I'm being pulled subconsciously to my car to head to the AD to purchase

It's just too nice
904VT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 March 2018, 05:38 AM   #25
Roy Webber
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Fuerteventura
Watch: Submariner no date
Posts: 13
Quote:
Originally Posted by ar0821 View Post
my fiance is a man. I'm the woman lol, but thank you!
lol :omg::omg:
Roy Webber is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 March 2018, 03:24 AM   #26
Yobber76
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Real Name: Mike
Location: Illinois
Watch: BLNR VTNR PAM 915
Posts: 1,982
Quote:
Originally Posted by ar0821 View Post
my fiance is a man. I'm the woman lol, but thank you!
Well then based on the advice, buy yourself the Datejust 41 two tone with the champagne dial. Problem solved!

And buy your fiancé the Sub-whatever.
Yobber76 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 March 2018, 11:18 PM   #27
c41006
"TRF" Member
 
c41006's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Real Name: Joshua
Location: Atlanta
Watch: Pelagos
Posts: 7,933
My vote goes to the Sub
c41006 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 March 2018, 11:24 PM   #28
ar0821
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: Clifton
Posts: 18
thanks again everyone, was leaning towards the sub as well.
ar0821 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 March 2018, 11:27 PM   #29
zjd168
"TRF" Member
 
zjd168's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: US
Posts: 2,698
sub
zjd168 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 March 2018, 11:28 PM   #30
ar0821
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: Clifton
Posts: 18
seems like sub it is!
ar0821 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches

Asset Appeal

Wrist Aficionado


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.