ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
21 May 2018, 08:38 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: USA
Posts: 64
|
Coke Dial
What are your thoughts on the 16760 vs the 16710 Coke? I know most of the differences. Also what bracelet, oyster or jubilee?
Sent from my SM-G928V using Tapatalk |
21 May 2018, 08:46 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: NYC
Watch: 116710BLNR
Posts: 1,541
|
The Fat Lady has to be the one! I’m thinking of looking for a birth year for me. 1985 on an Oyster. Unfortunately an ‘85 Daytona is completely out of the question and I’m not so fond of older Datejusts/Day-Dates. I guess an ‘85 5513 would be cool, but the nicest ones are from the ‘60s and ‘70s.
__________________
Rolex 116710 BLNR Rolex Day Date 118238 Champagne/Batons |
21 May 2018, 09:23 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Real Name: Scott
Location: GMT -7
Watch: GMT's & Sub's
Posts: 10,401
|
I'd go with a 16760 with a 93150 bracelet that was an option at the time.
__________________
"The bitterness of poor quality remains long after the sweetness of lower price is forgotten." -Benjamin Franklin Member No. 922 |
21 May 2018, 10:04 AM | #4 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Real Name: Francisco
Location: San Juan, PR
Watch: Is Ticking !
Posts: 25,180
|
16710 from those 2
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
__________________
Francisco ♛ 16610 / 116264 Ω 168.022 / 2535.80.00 / 310.30.42.50.01.002 / 210.90.42.20.01.001 Zenith 02.480.405 2FA security enabled |
21 May 2018, 10:09 AM | #5 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: USA
Posts: 6,173
|
16710 if you get a Luminova/Super Luminova dial and prefer to have RSC to service it. 16760 if you're comfortable going independent. Anything tritium will be a challenge to keep original if it goes back to Rolex.
|
21 May 2018, 10:27 AM | #6 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: May 2015
Real Name: Mike
Location: Pacific Northwest
Watch: 116610LV 16710 SD
Posts: 10,653
|
|
21 May 2018, 11:38 AM | #7 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: jP
Location: Texas
Watch: GMT-MASTER
Posts: 17,319
|
I'd go with the 16760 if it is a correct watch. Many have had their dials and/or hands changed through the years due to cracking or corrosion.
__________________
Member of NAWCC since 1990. INSTAGRAM USER NAME: SPRINGERJFP Visit my Instagram page to view some of the finest vintage GMTs anywhere - as well as other vintage classics. |
21 May 2018, 01:34 PM | #8 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 12,443
|
I wouldn't mind having one but I like the 16710 profile better. But the 16760 has a real place in GMT history and finding a true good example like springer mentioned is truly rewarding because they're becoming like unicorns.
|
21 May 2018, 12:27 PM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 19,706
|
|
21 May 2018, 01:20 PM | #10 |
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Real Name: Lee
Location: 42.48.45N70.48.48
Watch: Too many to list!
Posts: 33,693
|
Thanks for saving me the trouble.
|
21 May 2018, 01:30 PM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2018
Real Name: David
Location: GA
Watch: 214270 SD43
Posts: 2,179
|
I'm actually sweating that actual choice between those two as my next. I like the idea of the 16760 because it has many firsts in the GMT lineage but I'm worried about the age, getting one that is correct and how far the fading is going to get as you wear it.
The 16710 appeals to me because you can get one with decedent age and can watch it patina while you wear it. You get a somewhat new watch and you get to age it under your ownership |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.