ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

glimmer · 3 July 2018, 02:59 PM

To all 126711 owners out there, may I ask how pronounced the contrast is between the RG center links and the steel on the bracelet, compared to let’s say, YG and steel? Is it closer in tone? One of the reasons why I don’t like the YG two tone models is because of the stark contrast between the metals and was wondering if this is somewhat more muted on the 126711. Any thoughts would be much appreciated.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

edyu · 3 July 2018, 03:32 PM

I can’t say whether it’s more pronounced or muted compared to tt yg but I can tell you that the everose rolesor tt has more contrast than say a full everose gold. Most common word I see people describing the rg tt is that it “pops.”

I do however think the rg tt is a beautiful watch if you want it to pop. I personally chose the full everose gold because it didn’t pop as much.

joli160 · 3 July 2018, 06:29 PM

RG/SS is a lot less "flashy" than YG/SS, but what's not to like ?

Kostas · 3 July 2018, 06:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by joli160

RG/SS is a lot less "flashy" than YG/SS, but what's not to like ?

wow that really sparkles

Rashid.bk · 3 July 2018, 09:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kostas

wow that really sparkles

It even makes his skin sparkle because it's so sparkly.

scottwmitch · 3 July 2018, 10:16 PM

I had the exact same concern as you, as I don't consider myself a TT guy because of the stark contrast.

The CHNR is different. The contrast is subtle; yet not so subtle that it doesn't simply blend in. This is a delicate balance, and IMHO, Rolex nailed it.

The colors of this watch vary in different lighting which is really cool. Overall, it's very classy.

AK797 · 3 July 2018, 07:52 PM

RG is much closer to SS in fact in certain light is looks like SS.

hodie9 · 3 July 2018, 09:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AK797

RG is much closer to SS in fact in certain light is looks like SS.

Exactly

T01 · 3 July 2018, 10:41 PM

I'd say the contrast is slightly subdued compared to SS/YG, however not much, there's no mistaking it for gold.

Reinhard in SA · 4 July 2018, 12:43 AM

I find it more appealing than YG/SS. I also don't see myself as a TT guy, but the RG/SS has a very different look to it. The contrast is definitely not as strong as on YG/SS.

My opinion is based on handling it in store under store lighting, not natural light.

3 July 2018, 02:59 PM	#1
glimmer Banned Join Date: Jul 2008 Location: Here, everywhere Posts: 1,244	Contrast between Rose Gold and Steel on 126711? To all 126711 owners out there, may I ask how pronounced the contrast is between the RG center links and the steel on the bracelet, compared to let’s say, YG and steel? Is it closer in tone? One of the reasons why I don’t like the YG two tone models is because of the stark contrast between the metals and was wondering if this is somewhat more muted on the 126711. Any thoughts would be much appreciated. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

3 July 2018, 06:29 PM	#3
joli160 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Apr 2013 Location: NL Watch: Yachtmaster Posts: 14,761	RG/SS is a lot less "flashy" than YG/SS, but what's not to like ? Attached Images __________________ Day Date 18238, Yachtmaster 16622, Deepsea 116660, Submariner 116619, SkyD 326935, DJ 178271, DJ 69158, Yachtmaster 169622, GMT 116713LN, GMT 126711.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

3 July 2018, 03:32 PM	#2
edyu 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Jan 2018 Location: CA Posts: 737	I can’t say whether it’s more pronounced or muted compared to tt yg but I can tell you that the everose rolesor tt has more contrast than say a full everose gold. Most common word I see people describing the rg tt is that it “pops.” I do however think the rg tt is a beautiful watch if you want it to pop. I personally chose the full everose gold because it didn’t pop as much.

3 July 2018, 10:16 PM	#6
scottwmitch "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2016 Location: USA Posts: 649	I had the exact same concern as you, as I don't consider myself a TT guy because of the stark contrast. The CHNR is different. The contrast is subtle; yet not so subtle that it doesn't simply blend in. This is a delicate balance, and IMHO, Rolex nailed it. The colors of this watch vary in different lighting which is really cool. Overall, it's very classy.

3 July 2018, 07:52 PM	#7
AK797 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Feb 2010 Real Name: Neil Location: UK Watch: ing ships roll in Posts: 59,369	RG is much closer to SS in fact in certain light is looks like SS.

3 July 2018, 10:41 PM	#9
T01 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2013 Real Name: T Location: AZ, NV, CA Posts: 6,490	I'd say the contrast is slightly subdued compared to SS/YG, however not much, there's no mistaking it for gold.

4 July 2018, 12:43 AM	#10
Reinhard in SA "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2016 Location: South Africa Posts: 873	I find it more appealing than YG/SS. I also don't see myself as a TT guy, but the RG/SS has a very different look to it. The contrast is definitely not as strong as on YG/SS. My opinion is based on handling it in store under store lighting, not natural light.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)