ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
30 November 2018, 07:17 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2018
Real Name: Alex
Location: Tejas
Posts: 90
|
40mm Explorer II too small for my wrist?
I need opinions on the photo. Is it too small?
|
30 November 2018, 07:27 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Real Name: Clive
Location: Exoplanet
Watch: spring-driven
Posts: 38,856
|
You're going to get 2-5 pages of yes/no based on people's own personal preferences.
IMHO if you feel it's too small then it probably is, so try the 216570 instead and see how you feel PS: the Exp II on your wrist is actually smaller than 40 mm - Rolex round-up the size, as they do with some other models.
__________________
|
30 November 2018, 10:15 AM | #3 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Florida
Posts: 2,132
|
Quote:
I used to wear Brietlings. Now anything over 41mm is too big for my taste. I say 41mm because my DDII is 41mm. But taste is individual and I’ve found that it’s subject to change. So, buy what suits you and ...... No, it doesn’t look too small!
__________________
Official Member: 'Perpetual 30' Vegas International GTG 2016 Official Member "WIS-CON" Las Vegas International GTG 2017 |
|
30 November 2018, 10:36 AM | #4 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Wisconsin
Watch: SD43
Posts: 894
|
Quote:
This |
|
1 December 2018, 02:25 AM | #5 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: USA
Posts: 6,545
|
Quote:
__________________
Wear the watch you like, not the one they tell you to wear! |
|
3 December 2018, 05:40 AM | #6 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Surrey
Posts: 1,659
|
I hear this phrase a lot on this forum.
How about if someone is just undecided despite the watch actually looking totally fine. They may be used to just wearing larger or smaller watches and to them, subjectively, it seems too small or large in comparison. In this instance, OP, the watch looks perfect for your wrist. |
3 December 2018, 05:49 AM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2016
Real Name: Paul
Location: Chester UK
Watch: Rolex GMT Master
Posts: 4,600
|
Looks great , this size watch hits the watch sweet spot for me .
|
30 November 2018, 07:33 AM | #8 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 9,218
|
Looks good to me, but only you know if the look is what you want.
Funny, I have always found that watches look bigger on others in person than on my wrist. I see someone wearing a 16610 and think, "wow, that looks big" and then see it's a five digit sub and it would be lost on me, but maybe it's just in my head. I went SD43 and if I were to purchase an Explorer II, it would be 42mm for the same reason, but that's just what I know about myself. You have to decide for you - if you don't, you will just end up selling it or having it sit around with no wrist time. Explorer IIs are just too good not to get wrist time, so make your own peace with the decision and go forth with love for that beautiful watch! |
30 November 2018, 07:35 AM | #9 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Paris, France
Posts: 35,307
|
I think if you wear it a little higher up, it will look perfect.
|
2 December 2018, 12:50 AM | #10 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Brian (TBone)
Location: canada
Watch: es make me smile
Posts: 78,135
|
|
30 November 2018, 08:10 AM | #11 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: USA
Watch: Yes
Posts: 1,509
|
? I’m actually thinking of going to smaller watches just because I want to. I’d say it’s ggood
|
30 November 2018, 08:31 AM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: dallas
Posts: 37
|
Get the new explorer 2 polar. It’s a large 42mm as the lugs are bigger and are the hands and markers. It will be perfect and wears like a 44
|
30 November 2018, 09:30 AM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Canada
Posts: 3,652
|
Looks fine to me.
__________________
Rolex 116613LN Rolex 16610LN Omega Seamaster Aqua Terra 41mm Omega Geneve Tag Heuer Aquaracer WAY2112 Orient Ray 2 |
30 November 2018, 09:44 AM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: London
Posts: 111
|
I would go 42mm
|
30 November 2018, 10:16 AM | #15 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2017
Real Name: Don
Location: NC/WY
Watch: Me
Posts: 4,676
|
Dunno, it’s not on your wrist, it’s on your hand.
__________________
Purchasing your first non HOA home on a 3 acre lot DOES NOT equate to owning a “farm”. |
2 December 2018, 12:48 AM | #16 |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2017
Real Name: Jesus
Location: Texas
Watch: 116234
Posts: 8,721
|
|
30 November 2018, 10:19 AM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2017
Real Name: Louis Nick Ric
Location: Michigan, USA
Watch: Blnr, Expll, Subs,
Posts: 10,172
|
Yes, It looks too small for you. If it was a 42 I'll bet it would be perfect
Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk |
30 November 2018, 10:53 AM | #18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2018
Real Name: Robert
Location: Toronto
Posts: 45
|
It depends on whether you want to follow fashion or have style. As suggested earlier, wear it higher on your wrist and it will perfect sized and stylish IMO. I think larger watches are more fashionable nowadays but that trend may change. If you go for a more fashionable larger watch, when tastes change, your choice today may have you thinking twice tomorrow.
|
30 November 2018, 11:22 AM | #19 |
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2018
Location: South
Posts: 558
|
Move it up to your actual wrist and it will look just right.
|
30 November 2018, 11:25 AM | #20 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Real Name: Eddie
Location: Austin Tx
Watch: Sub-C
Posts: 510
|
Yes, looks tiny. You should give it to me
__________________
|
30 November 2018, 02:36 PM | #21 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2018
Real Name: Alex
Location: Tejas
Posts: 90
|
Well I decided it’s too small on my 8” wrist. I guess I’ll never be comfortable with wearing anything under a 40mm.
I couldn’t wear it any higher up my wrist without an extra extension. The owner was cool enough to let me use it for a day. Goodbye Explorers and Exploreres IIs. |
30 November 2018, 03:32 PM | #22 | |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2017
Real Name: Don
Location: NC/WY
Watch: Me
Posts: 4,676
|
Quote:
216570 exp ii
__________________
Purchasing your first non HOA home on a 3 acre lot DOES NOT equate to owning a “farm”. |
|
30 November 2018, 11:29 PM | #23 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Larry
Location: Kentucky
Watch: Yes
Posts: 35,055
|
Quote:
|
|
2 December 2018, 12:52 AM | #24 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: North East - UK
Posts: 99
|
|
30 November 2018, 05:20 PM | #25 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2018
Real Name: "BG"
Location: PacNW
Watch: that I'm Jonesin 4
Posts: 626
|
I think your wrist could handle the Explorer 42 rather easily, but the polar there looks just fine. Your preference on the size you want to wear.
__________________
116610LN, 326934BL, 116610LV, Tudor BB41, IWC tzc, Aerospace EVO, Tudor BB41, 116622, Fortis-705.21.11, Luminox original diver The watch you give up today for the next grail may one day become your grail: Rolex:116520, 16570, 216570, 116710LN, 16610LV, 16700, 116600 Panerai:PAM176, PAM1024, PAM88 Breitling:6.75, Aerospace x2, Chrono 44 GMT, Blackbird/utc, Bentley GT IWC:3717. |
30 November 2018, 05:30 PM | #26 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: ByDawns Earlylite
Watch: 16800
Posts: 3,580
|
Looks painful wearing it so low.
|
2 December 2018, 12:33 AM | #27 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2016
Real Name: jay
Location: North London
Watch: BBG,Hulk,16013,DJB
Posts: 3,278
|
|
30 November 2018, 09:21 PM | #28 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: U.S./Vienna, AT
Posts: 1,967
|
Alex, it seems as you have more of a flat wrist than a round wrist. A bigger size watch may be a better match for you. As someone suggested, try the new Exp II or look at Panerai 44mm or bigger.
|
30 November 2018, 10:05 PM | #29 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: North Carolina
Watch: Rolex/Others
Posts: 47,801
|
I think that it looks too small. It might help to have it properly sized and to try it on your wrist bit it will still be too small for my tastes. Look at the 42 MM Polar Explorer II. It will work much better size wise in my opinion.
|
30 November 2018, 10:27 PM | #30 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: US, SG, DK, GR
Watch: Reverso
Posts: 3,089
|
if you are asking us, it probably is! when you feel it is right, you won't need to ask.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.