explorer ii lover rolex case... 9 February 2009, 02:36 PM
bodybump ummmm good question..but only... 9 February 2009, 02:41 PM
explorer ii lover now im noticing there are... 9 February 2009, 02:54 PM
Tools I don't think that they... 9 February 2009, 04:47 PM
coddger completely agree !:cheers: 9 February 2009, 04:50 PM
Singslinger Rolex is notorious for not... 9 February 2009, 06:40 PM
padi56 Have to agree Larry 40mm is... 9 February 2009, 09:09 PM
Gasoil4ever I do agree 40mm is to my eyes... 10 February 2009, 06:49 AM
Trurolexer I think Rolex just fine with... 9 February 2009, 08:10 PM
Omega_Precision I don't think it's a trend... 9 February 2009, 08:38 PM
yannis They take cautious steps but... 9 February 2009, 08:49 PM
Rebel I wish Rolex made a mid-size... 10 February 2009, 02:59 AM
vapalux 40mm is just fine IMHO for... 10 February 2009, 03:22 AM
kokovovoru I hope they don't increase... 10 February 2009, 03:57 AM
ocwatching The larger watches just looks... 10 February 2009, 04:17 AM
touchdowntodd 40mm is the tradition, and i... 10 February 2009, 04:17 AM
dardeca 40mm is perfect, IMO!! 10 February 2009, 06:16 AM
dkpw To a couple of friends of... 10 February 2009, 06:53 AM
Gasoil4ever Having the choice would be... 10 February 2009, 06:57 AM
mfer I don't think Rolex's case... 10 February 2009, 07:31 AM
Dan Pierce You might be on to something... 10 February 2009, 07:43 AM
housemad Bigger is better 10 February 2009, 10:07 AM
touchdowntodd [QUOTE=housemad;986275]
I... 10 February 2009, 10:19 AM
housemad We are not criticizing the... 10 February 2009, 09:53 PM
leopardprey Wish Rolex would. 40mm is a... 10 February 2009, 08:22 AM
aleeboy This has me curious. How big... 10 February 2009, 10:40 AM
touchdowntodd they can if they want, ill... 10 February 2009, 08:23 AM
housemad Thanks touchdowntodd!!!
... 10 February 2009, 10:27 AM
touchdowntodd when u sell it sell cheap,... 10 February 2009, 10:31 AM
housemad Your dollar is getting higher... 10 February 2009, 10:51 AM
housemad Nice watch too! Love it! 10 February 2009, 10:54 AM
hflee55 40mm is fine but I don't mind... 10 February 2009, 11:18 AM
leopardprey The "average" size man these... 10 February 2009, 08:00 PM
Lion I like the 40mm case size... 10 February 2009, 08:20 PM
housemad All the competition proposed... 12 February 2009, 08:24 AM
94Gamecock It's hard to argue with how... 12 February 2009, 08:40 AM
housemad Good answer...but they could... 12 February 2009, 11:02 AM
Bisquitlips IMO Rolex S.A. needs to come... 12 February 2009, 08:32 AM
SirLoki owning the deep sea for a few... 12 February 2009, 09:01 AM
housemad Chronometer Certificats TOP... 12 February 2009, 11:17 AM
explorer ii lover i think the option to have... 12 February 2009, 11:33 AM
|
9 February 2009, 02:36 PM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: canada
Posts: 12
|
rolex case 40mm................
do you guys think rolex will come out with watches with bigger cases (besides yachtmaster) ....it seems to be becoming more and more the trend imo....i love by explorer ii but i think it would look amazing at 44-46mm
|
9 February 2009, 02:41 PM | #2 |
⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
2024 SubLV41 Sponsor & Boutique Seller Join Date: Sep 2008
Real Name: Oscar
Location: Florida
Watch: Me!!!
Posts: 23,233
|
ummmm good question..but only Rolex will know....i hope they make a bigger ss daytona..
__________________
|
9 February 2009, 02:54 PM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: canada
Posts: 12
|
now im noticing there are some bigger cases coming out.....the new sea-dweller has a 43mm case
|
9 February 2009, 04:47 PM | #4 |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,516
|
I don't think that they will.........
Neither the bigger Day-Date II at 41mm, or the DSSD at 43mm, or even the Yachtmaster II at 43mm, has been a big success.. There is no reason for them to decide that the watches that are selling should be up-sized to the watches that are not selling.
__________________
(Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....) NAWCC Member |
9 February 2009, 04:50 PM | #5 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: Only Mom Knows
Location: Land Of The Free
Watch: 116520,16610,16013
Posts: 1,573
|
Quote:
__________________
Contentment Is Not The Fulfillment Of Getting All The Watches You Want, It Is The Realization Of How Many Rolexes You Already Have. |
|
9 February 2009, 06:40 PM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: singapore
Posts: 6,424
|
Rolex is notorious for not following the crowd so I think it's unlikely. But hey, I wouldn't mind if they did..
|
9 February 2009, 09:09 PM | #7 | |
"TRF" Life Patron
Join Date: Jun 2005
Real Name: Peter
Location: Llanfairpwllgwyng
Watch: ing you.
Posts: 53,064
|
Quote:
__________________
ICom Pro3 All posts are my own opinion and my opinion only. "The clock of life is wound but once, and no man has the power to tell just when the hands will stop. Now is the only time you actually own the time, Place no faith in time, for the clock may soon be still for ever." Good Judgement comes from experience,experience comes from Bad Judgement,.Buy quality, cry once; buy cheap, cry again and again. www.mc0yad.club Second in command CEO and left handed watch winder |
|
10 February 2009, 06:49 AM | #8 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Cameroun
Watch: GS Snowflake
Posts: 1,534
|
Quote:
BUT Its difficult for very expensive watches to be great successes... over 25000€ for the YMII, over 20.000 for the DDII and the cheapest one being the DSSD... which is 7.500€... is a very thick watch not easy to wear if you are less than 1m85 tall and you need to like the litterature on the rehaut... so i guess size is not the matter here... Lets see what happens if the DJ 41mm comes out... Besides, Rolex did intriduce all those large models... and they continue... DSSD being the latest addition...
__________________
16710 GMT Master II "M" , SD4000, GS Snowflake, Stowa Marine Original. |
|
9 February 2009, 08:10 PM | #9 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: USA
Watch: 5513MaxiI+PreComex
Posts: 18,421
|
I think Rolex just fine with 40mm for sport models.
|
9 February 2009, 08:38 PM | #10 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2008
Real Name: Henry
Location: CA, US
Watch: ing basketball
Posts: 2,977
|
I don't think it's a trend that Rolex is following.
It's more like an evolution right now and we are in the swing of it. Just like the small wrist watch of the past, it evolves from era to era. |
9 February 2009, 08:49 PM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Real Name: Yannis
Location: Europe
Watch: maniac
Posts: 9,070
|
They take cautious steps but they cannot ignore the trend altogether. Hence we got the 43mm DeepSea, the YM2, 41mm versions of Day-Date and hopefully Date-Just. The GMT-IIc also changed and looks bigger although it has remained at 40mm.
|
10 February 2009, 02:59 AM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: Dr Mark R Nail
Location: New Albany
Watch: Tudor Sub 75090
Posts: 8,258
|
I wish Rolex made a mid-size in the sport model. Can't help the body size I was born with. Small wrists nothwithstanding, I wear and love the sport models....just wish I
had a choice of a smaller size. I may be the only Rolex customer that feels that way.
__________________
------------------------------- Member of the Nylon Nation |
10 February 2009, 03:22 AM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Real Name: Si
Location: united kingdom
Posts: 1,655
|
40mm is just fine IMHO for the majority of watches. While discussing this with an AD he said the fad would eventually die out as people went back to the 'good old days'
Still looking forward to the larger DJ though, and the TT ceramic I tried on was awesome in the case and weight. It was perfect for me , I just wasn't to struck on the yellow not looking like gold! Si |
10 February 2009, 03:57 AM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: CA
Posts: 192
|
I hope they don't increase thier case size - thickness maybe. 40mm is fine for me because I don't want Rolex to look like a Cartier Santos 100 XL, or a Panarai, or an Omega. Some of these watches are just giagantic for my suits and clothings.
|
10 February 2009, 04:17 AM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Phil
Location: CA
Posts: 5,374
|
The larger watches just looks more like jewelry and not a "sports" watch..IMHO
__________________
too much into watches... |
10 February 2009, 04:17 AM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Todd (Richard)
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Watch: Deep Sea Sea Dwell
Posts: 535
|
40mm is the tradition, and i dont see em breakin it... i also hope they dont
__________________
2013 DSSD! (ME) M Series OP No Date,White Arabic,Smooth Bezel(WIFE) Yachtmaster 1 SS/PLAT (wife) |
10 February 2009, 06:16 AM | #17 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: US
Watch: Rolex, Patek
Posts: 2,477
|
40mm is perfect, IMO!!
|
10 February 2009, 06:53 AM | #18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: David
Location: Scotland
Watch: 16610 & 214270
Posts: 1,294
|
To a couple of friends of mine, 40mm is too large and the Sub is too heavy. 38mm or 38mm is their preferred size.
__________________
Sub 16610, Explorer 214270, Ω Speedy Pro & many others. David |
10 February 2009, 06:57 AM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Cameroun
Watch: GS Snowflake
Posts: 1,534
|
Having the choice would be great... i mean, its all a matter of size... the wearer's size...
__________________
16710 GMT Master II "M" , SD4000, GS Snowflake, Stowa Marine Original. |
10 February 2009, 07:31 AM | #20 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Real Name: Mik
Location: USA
Posts: 13,724
|
I don't think Rolex's case style is compatible with larger watches. Somehow the proportions just don't work. I saw the 41mm DD and it just looks weird. I have yet to see the 43mm DSSD.
For the Rolex case, I think 40mm is just about perfect.
__________________
member#3242 |
10 February 2009, 07:43 AM | #21 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Real Name: D'OH!
Location: Kentucky
Watch: Rolex-1 Tudor-3
Posts: 36,217
|
Quote:
dP
__________________
TRF Member# 1668 Bass Player in TRF "AFTER DARK" Bar & NightClub Band Commander-in-Chief of The Nylon Nation The Crown & Shield Club Honorary Member of P-Club |
|
10 February 2009, 10:07 AM | #22 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: David
Location: Montreal
Watch: Graham chr.GMT O/S
Posts: 373
|
Bigger is better
I think it's about time Rolex comes with new bigger watch!!! (43 to 47mm)!!!
I have 2 Panerai 112 and 217 : 44 and 47mm I have 1 Graham oversize chronofighter GMT: 46mm I have 1 Bell&Ross: BR-01: 46mm I have 1 U-Boat: 55mm I have 1 IWC Big-pilot: 46mm I have 1 Girard Perregaux Sea Hawk pro Oracle BMW: 44mm I have 1 Audemars Piguet Royal Oak Orange scuba: 44mm and 1 Omega Seamaster GMT 50th.anniversary 41mm and my new Rolex Green sub LV only 40mm... Love the watch but after always find it small after wearing my other ones! |
10 February 2009, 10:19 AM | #23 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Todd (Richard)
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Watch: Deep Sea Sea Dwell
Posts: 535
|
[QUOTE=housemad;986275]
I have 1 Graham oversize chronofighter GMT: 46mm QUOTE] my DREAM WATCH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
__________________
2013 DSSD! (ME) M Series OP No Date,White Arabic,Smooth Bezel(WIFE) Yachtmaster 1 SS/PLAT (wife) |
10 February 2009, 09:53 PM | #24 | |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: David
Location: Montreal
Watch: Graham chr.GMT O/S
Posts: 373
|
Quote:
The only reason why I purchase a Rolex is for the quality of the watch...it is a must and a classic for a watch collector! Rolex have more competition today than 20 or 30 years ago! ...and yes people are larger than before! |
|
10 February 2009, 08:22 AM | #25 |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: Chad
Location: Around the world
Watch: Panerai 233
Posts: 4,204
|
Wish Rolex would. 40mm is a little small for the average size man in the USA these days, and the younger crowd is getting larger. I think Rolex should plus them all up to 42 or 43mm. On my wrist a 40mm Rolex looks a tad small.
The reason why the DSSD is not selling, at least to me, is not the increased diameter (I love it!) but the increase case thickness and not increasing the bracelet size. Made it uncomfortable when I tried it on. If Rolex would make a Sub or Explorer II or GMT II the same diameter as the DSSD, and keep it the same thickness as then current models have, it would be ideal! (the DDII and YMII are not selling well, IMHO, more do do with the price and overall dial designs). |
10 February 2009, 10:40 AM | #26 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Russel
Location: N/A
Watch: N/A
Posts: 755
|
Quote:
I am 6'0 and 200lbs solid. I think my Pilot Chrono is approaching a ridiculous size for me. I also think that the 40mm sports models are perfect in size. I can't make any sense of the bigger watch trend. Especially when a lot of people look like they're wearing a novelty watch. Long live the 40mm sport models. |
|
10 February 2009, 08:23 AM | #27 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Todd (Richard)
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Watch: Deep Sea Sea Dwell
Posts: 535
|
they can if they want, ill just collect only the 40mm ones
__________________
2013 DSSD! (ME) M Series OP No Date,White Arabic,Smooth Bezel(WIFE) Yachtmaster 1 SS/PLAT (wife) |
10 February 2009, 10:27 AM | #28 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: David
Location: Montreal
Watch: Graham chr.GMT O/S
Posts: 373
|
Thanks touchdowntodd!!!
Beside the quality and the prestige my Audemars is...Forced to admit my Graham is my favorite one...It caught the eye like you can't beleived! It is realy outstanding! |
10 February 2009, 10:31 AM | #29 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Todd (Richard)
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Watch: Deep Sea Sea Dwell
Posts: 535
|
when u sell it sell cheap, and call me! hahaa i wish
__________________
2013 DSSD! (ME) M Series OP No Date,White Arabic,Smooth Bezel(WIFE) Yachtmaster 1 SS/PLAT (wife) |
10 February 2009, 10:51 AM | #30 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: David
Location: Montreal
Watch: Graham chr.GMT O/S
Posts: 373
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX