ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
24 May 2019, 07:48 PM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: London
Posts: 117
|
White gold or steel Daytona?
I have come to the conclusion that rather than wait years for a new Daytona I will bite the bullet and buy now from what's available.
The 2 models I like are the white gold with the blue dial and the steel with the ceramic bezel and white dial. At my go to dealer there isn't that much price difference with the steel going for double retail and the gold at slightly below. I genuinely like both and will wear most of the time. On the one hand it seems crazy to me to pay so much for the steel but with the way the market is heading it probably won't be long before the steel is worth more than the gold one? Or is the point at which prices meet the point at which the heat comes out of the market? Any thoughts? |
24 May 2019, 07:51 PM | #2 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: USA
Watch: Daytona
Posts: 6,092
|
I don’t like to speculate pricing, but if you are saying it’s between paying a grey for SS or buying at retail for a WG, I say go for WG.
|
24 May 2019, 07:52 PM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2018
Real Name: Tom
Location: Honolulu
Watch: 116519LN
Posts: 3,828
|
I’ll be the first to say it, but the one you want. OK, we got that out of the way. Personally, I would buy the WG without even thinking about it. It’s such a nicer watch. Hopefully you can try on both and decide.
Either way, you’re going to end up with a beautiful watch. Good luck! Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
24 May 2019, 07:56 PM | #4 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Real Name: Scott
Location: UK
Watch: ^^^ for now
Posts: 5,797
|
Quote:
The case is slightly bigger and symmetrical. There's something about a PM Daytona that SS just cannot match. And that blue dial is beautiful. The only downside is that the WG bezel is more prone to scratches, whereas he cerachrome isn't. But that's small price to pay for what is unquestionably the nicer watch
__________________
Past: 6239 (yes, I know...), 16610, 16600, 116515, 116613LN, 126600, 126711 CHNR Present: 16600, 116509, Cartier Santos Green. |
|
24 May 2019, 11:20 PM | #5 | |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2015
Real Name: Richard
Location: GA
Watch: YTBD
Posts: 23,512
|
Quote:
|
|
24 May 2019, 07:58 PM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: London
Posts: 117
|
Thanks, I think you're all right and there is only one choice
|
24 May 2019, 08:03 PM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: London, UK
Watch: Daytona,Pepsi,SD4K
Posts: 569
|
No right or wrong here, both around the same price - so will come down to the one you prefer.
For me steel was the one to have as it was mainly the bezel that pushed me that way. The various minor differences in dial will also swing it one way or the other. Weight may do it as the gold is heavier although the gold wearers on here assure me that you get used to this very quickly. Might be a big difference if you rotate steel / gold watches though If you are counting votes (as many people are in this country at the moment!), mine is for white face steel 116500. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
24 May 2019, 08:28 PM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2019
Location: West Midlands, UK
Watch: This space
Posts: 283
|
The WG Daytona is stunning but yes the bezel did make me think twice. In the end I’ve put the decision on hold. The SS would be an easier decision but I’m not yet prepared to go for a preowned model
|
24 May 2019, 09:45 PM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Middle West
Posts: 1,077
|
Would you rather have a man made ceramic bezel or all gold bezel? I think the gold Daytonas are pure fire, much more desirable. The current value gap is just a bonus to help justify it.
|
24 May 2019, 09:59 PM | #10 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: North Carolina
Watch: Rolex/Others
Posts: 47,801
|
I would go with the WG as the potential for significant loss in value is less than with the SS Daytona-C. If money was not an object then do what you please or if this is a lifetime watch then the SS could be the one. To think that the market will stay like this is not a real option. It may get worse before it gets better but it will change. A slightly discounted PM Daytona will lose thousands on the second hand market but no where near the potential to lose almost half of the 22-24K you will have to pay for SS. I would close the gap even more by finding a mint pre-owned WG Daytona that is complete with box, papers and most of the warranty left. A few extra thousand makes a difference. Good luck and I look forward to seeing an incoming.
|
24 May 2019, 10:00 PM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Larry
Location: Kentucky
Watch: Yes
Posts: 35,055
|
I love the 509 blue, but honestly, if you're considering a WG daytona, I would take a look at the oyster flex model as well.
|
24 May 2019, 10:56 PM | #12 |
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jun 2018
Real Name: Jonathan
Location: Texas
Watch: @Escapementt
Posts: 9,844
|
|
24 May 2019, 10:53 PM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2018
Location: USA
Watch: All of them!
Posts: 1,235
|
WG without question. SS Daytona is only if you want to spend 12k in my opinion.
I have the black ceramic Daytona, and honestly my sub c feels more substantial in terms of weight,etc. there is no way no matter how bad it’s desired that that watch is a 20k+ watch. I feel kind of surprised sometimes that I did pay 12k as it feels more like a 8-9k watch, I’d be kicking myself if I paid 22k for one, but hey to each their own. Don’t get me wrong, very nice piece but, it’s become a bit of a cult PM any day over steel if the money works. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
24 May 2019, 10:58 PM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Real Name: Michael
Location: RTP, NC, USA
Watch: ♕& Ω
Posts: 5,221
|
Another vote for the WG in blue, it's gorgeous. I also do not believe that the current hysteria around SS pricing will be sustainable.
Don't pay retail for the Daytona. You can pick one up in the states at a reputable reseller like that guy in Florida for enough of a savings that it will pay for the trip for two of you with money left over.
__________________
Enjoy life - it has an expiration date. Disclaimer: Please note that the avatar is not an accurate representation of how I look. The camera adds 10 pounds... |
24 May 2019, 11:22 PM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Playa Vista
Posts: 104
|
Find a 16520 and you have a classic.
|
24 May 2019, 11:39 PM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: London
Posts: 117
|
And here we are..
|
25 May 2019, 01:31 AM | #17 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Real Name: Bill
Location: Baltimore, MD
Watch: 116600 SD4K
Posts: 3,286
|
|
25 May 2019, 01:34 AM | #18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: USA
Watch: 1665
Posts: 4,764
|
__________________
He could not just wear a watch. It had to be a Rolex. Ian Fleming |
25 May 2019, 06:26 AM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: USA
Watch: All
Posts: 5,316
|
Congrats!
Fantastic choice.
__________________
Rolex 228235 DD40 Olive, 126710BLRO, 116710BLNR, 116613LB, 116500LN White, 126610LN, 116500LN Black, 126610LV, 116610LV, 126334 Blue Diamond Breitling Navitimer 01, Cartier Santos Large |
25 May 2019, 01:35 AM | #20 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2014
Real Name: Don
Location: USA
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 392
|
|
25 May 2019, 02:03 AM | #21 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2016
Real Name: Trey
Location: Texas
Watch: those three’s roll
Posts: 3,036
|
|
25 May 2019, 02:20 AM | #22 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Middle West
Posts: 1,077
|
|
25 May 2019, 04:22 AM | #23 |
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Real Name: Lee
Location: 42.48.45N70.48.48
Watch: Too many to list!
Posts: 33,697
|
I missed this being the OP's post!!!! Congratulations on the WG Daytona!!!
|
25 May 2019, 12:18 AM | #24 |
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Real Name: Lee
Location: 42.48.45N70.48.48
Watch: Too many to list!
Posts: 33,697
|
It is rare that the two will ever cost approximately the same. WG should hold its value as opposed to stainless which could easily fall to MSRP or lower. Buy WG and let SS sit until the price comes down.
|
25 May 2019, 12:19 AM | #25 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: California
Watch: PP,AP,Rolex,IWC
Posts: 578
|
Steel Daytona
|
25 May 2019, 12:23 AM | #26 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2019
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 7
|
Great choice!
|
25 May 2019, 12:33 AM | #27 | |
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2008
Real Name: Anastasios
Location: Athens Greece
Watch: Rolex GMT 1675
Posts: 8,497
|
WG vs Steel
Quote:
I bought one 6-8 months ago NO papers one link missing w a Rally Black Dial $17,500...when they ask me ...I say is ...stainless STEAL... |
|
25 May 2019, 12:39 AM | #28 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Mar 2015
Real Name: Richie
Location: "Nowhere Man"
Watch: out now,take care!
Posts: 29,779
|
The premium on SS is just too damn high right now. Given your two choices, I’d go WG. There’s just something about a PM piece that can’t be beat.
Good Luck
__________________
"I love to work at nothing all day" TRF #139960 |
25 May 2019, 12:46 AM | #29 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,369
|
I'd go for the WG with the stipulation that a CE WG would be ideal but that hasn't happened for so many years now that its not worth factoring in anymore, live today.
|
25 May 2019, 12:47 AM | #30 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: London
Posts: 117
|
Thanks everyone for all the advice on this thread. I bought the WG version. It's a year old and it really is a thing of beauty. I'm sure the SS one is also great but although it is no doubt a trick of the mind, this gold one just seems tro have a softness to it that I haven't found with any watch before. I'm staring at it far too much already!
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.