The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Vintage Rolex Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 21 January 2020, 04:26 PM   #1
SigmaMade
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: Moon
Posts: 13
DJ 1601 Originality and Case Condition?

Hi all,

I recently acquired a vintage datejust on the bay and it was one of my first watch purchases after some research. Not surprisingly I've passed through this forum numerous times during my hunt. The serial number on the datejust seems to suggest that it is a 1973 model (3XXXXXX). It has a sigma dial with open 6 and 9s. I was wondering if forum members can assist with their expertise in the following matters:

1) Are the parts original to the watch? Is it a redial?
2) Has the watch case been polished?

From what I can tell it is authentic, and parts look original to me but I believe the crystal may be a service replacement. Lume plots appear to match the hands and dial condition appears to be fairly consistent with the case (both in decent condition). The case seems polished but the satin brushing on the lugs still appear to be there. Fluted bezel appears fairly sharp and not too rounded. Also, the case doesn't appear as sharp. All these factors leads me to believe that polishing is slight.

Any help would be appreciated. As this is my first time putting my money where my mouth is so to speak so I'm just curious as to how I did.

Images: https://imgur.com/a/SG72rIh
SigmaMade is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 January 2020, 02:18 AM   #2
Tools
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
 
Tools's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,516
Looks fine for a 50 year old example.

This is likely a complete rebuild and the case has been refinished several times, so the grain you see is not original at all.
__________________
(Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....)
NAWCC Member
Tools is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 January 2020, 11:22 AM   #3
SigmaMade
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: Moon
Posts: 13
Thanks for all the replies.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tools View Post
Looks fine for a 50 year old example.

This is likely a complete rebuild and the case has been refinished several times, so the grain you see is not original at all.
Just curious what you mean by complete rebuild? Do you think all the parts are replacements?
SigmaMade is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 January 2020, 12:34 PM   #4
Tools
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
 
Tools's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,516
Quote:
Originally Posted by SigmaMade View Post
. . .

Just curious what you mean by complete rebuild? Do you think all the parts are replacements?
I mean that the watch has likely been overhauled and refinished to look it's best for sale. There is no way to know if all of the parts are original to this watch or not without complete service and build provenance.

Very few 50 year old watches have all their parts
__________________
(Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....)
NAWCC Member
Tools is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 January 2020, 12:50 PM   #5
SubMarine
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Real Name: Douglas
Location: London, UK & USA
Watch: Submariner 16610
Posts: 723
The only "parts" that matter in terms of originality are the case (non-service), dial, and handset -- that's it. As long as the entire watch is period-correct and authentic, nothing else matters.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tools View Post
I mean that the watch has likely been overhauled and refinished to look it's best for sale. There is no way to know if all of the parts are original to this watch or not without complete service and build provenance.

Very few 50 year old watches have all their parts
SubMarine is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 January 2020, 02:26 AM   #6
cads83
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Real Name: carl
Location: NYC
Watch: 1675 18k
Posts: 13
Nice.
cads83 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 January 2020, 03:15 AM   #7
carwashchris
2024 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: Ohio
Watch: Vintage DD'S
Posts: 877
Yes polished, date wheel is period correct, hard to know about everything else. I would think the case back should be dated under the 1601. Thanks for the post.
carwashchris is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 January 2020, 11:50 AM   #8
SubMarine
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Real Name: Douglas
Location: London, UK & USA
Watch: Submariner 16610
Posts: 723
100% polished. Lugs look very soft. Finding an unpolished 1601 or 1803 is more difficult than any other watch in Rolex's lineup. The reason is as dress watches, owners always wanted them looking pristine. Basically, if it was ever sent in for service, it was polished.
SubMarine is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 January 2020, 12:32 PM   #9
Claven2
"TRF" Member
 
Claven2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: OTTAWA
Posts: 374
Now you need a nice 6251H or 62510H bracelet for it.
Claven2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 January 2020, 02:15 PM   #10
SigmaMade
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: Moon
Posts: 13


Appreciate the lessons
SigmaMade is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

OCWatches

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.