ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
30 July 2009, 10:56 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 2,615
|
What would you do?
Here is a question that I have never seen on this forum. What would you do if you saw a post by either a newbie or a veteran poster that had a picture of his /her new purchase, and it was an incorrect watch...meaning totally fake or had a fake dial or band? Would you be the bearer of the bad news, complement them on their new purchase, or say nothing and move on?
|
30 July 2009, 10:58 AM | #2 |
Suspended
Join Date: Oct 2008
Real Name: Leo
Location: Boca Raton
Posts: 13,820
|
Timid as I am I'd probably move on.....
|
30 July 2009, 11:13 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Real Name: Mikey Uí Néill
Location: Olden Texas
Watch: 14060M & 16570
Posts: 1,941
|
He would be advised in a heartbeat, if I were sure. Otherwise I'd let someone else do it and then I'd pile on!
|
30 July 2009, 11:14 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: Allan
Location: California
Posts: 3,210
|
I would very gracefully raise the subject because that person should know and maybe he might be able to get his money back.
Allan |
30 July 2009, 11:14 AM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Real Name: Jen
Location: Jax, FL
Watch: Sea-Dweller
Posts: 3,977
|
That happened a little while ago... although the OP probably knew it was fake to begin with.
|
30 July 2009, 12:32 PM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: NYC
Posts: 1,605
|
They get banned.
|
30 July 2009, 12:36 PM | #7 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Florida, Canada
Watch: Rol/Seik/Tud/Omega
Posts: 30,244
|
I would say nothing.
|
30 July 2009, 06:01 PM | #8 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: Eddie
Location: Australia
Watch: A few.
Posts: 37,535
|
Hi Beaumont.
Are you posting some pix?
__________________
E |
30 July 2009, 08:20 PM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Ben
Location: New England, USA
Watch: Sub, Pam164, PO-XL
Posts: 383
|
If it's one of my pics, I would want to know...
__________________
ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ |
31 July 2009, 12:23 AM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: Allan
Location: California
Posts: 3,210
|
|
30 July 2009, 10:20 PM | #11 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: USA
Posts: 226
|
I think I'd let them know in a pm, instead of publicly - just to save them some embarassment.
|
30 July 2009, 10:26 PM | #12 | ||
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Real Name: D'OH!
Location: Kentucky
Watch: Rolex-1 Tudor-3
Posts: 36,217
|
Quote:
Quote:
dP
__________________
TRF Member# 1668 Bass Player in TRF "AFTER DARK" Bar & NightClub Band Commander-in-Chief of The Nylon Nation The Crown & Shield Club Honorary Member of P-Club |
||
30 July 2009, 11:37 PM | #13 |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,516
|
Depends on how they are representing it..........
It happens quite frequently..........
__________________
(Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....) NAWCC Member |
31 July 2009, 12:27 AM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 2,615
|
What would you do?
The reason I brought up the question is in addition to the outright fakes seen in auctions, there are an increasing number of watches that are put together from pieces that are bought separately. Relumed dials, non original but authentic dials, toned hands, service cases, aftermarket bezels, even to the extent of incorrect paper work... basically parts of authentic and non authentic rolex parts from different eras put together to make a watch. Recently I have seen a 1665 DRSD with a fake dial and a case back from the wrong era given that the serial number was a 3.7 mil. Another example, it would be very easy for an unsuspecting buyer to buy a late model 16800 Submariner with an authentic but incorrect flat matte dial with tritium markers. No one would be the wiser unless the serial number of the watch was made known. I recently considered buying a 1655 Exp II but the paper work was for a non chronometer movement. I am curious to know whether you all would let the new owner know that while his new watch is authentic it may be incorrect and tell him why.
|
31 July 2009, 12:26 AM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Real Name: al
Location: GEORGIA
Watch: Explorer II
Posts: 1,759
|
|
31 July 2009, 01:35 AM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Annapolis, MD
Watch: Sea-Dweller 16600
Posts: 5,081
|
It just happened recently. We let him know it was bogus, then he said he can have someone get him a real one anytime he wants (so there).
|
31 July 2009, 03:23 AM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Canada
Watch: Air-King 114200
Posts: 2,878
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.