ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

rolexsubdate · 8 January 2010, 11:01 PM

I am fan of Rolex dive watches only. So subs and sedwellers... nothing else in the Rolex lineup gets me going ....

So my stock is currently as follows:
16610-U-series
16613-M-series
16600-D-series
16600-Z-series

So I am pondering my next purchase ....If you had my collection, which one would be your next one?

Please keep in mind ... nothing else but dive watches get me going ... so it has to be a dive watch ... 14060 or 16610LV ...

SORRY FOLKS: My budget is under $5K so DSSD is out --- PLEASE DO NOT VOTE FOR DSSD -- I MADE A MISTAKE ADDING IT TO THE POLL---

thanks,

padi56 · 8 January 2010, 11:05 PM

Myself believe one of the next sort after watches from the 90s will be the 14060 with the tritium dial.Could be the next vintage must have,now out of production.If you can get hold of one mint with box papers etc,I believe that prices will rise in a few years time,could be the next investment piece.Now I don't normally recommend anyone owning watches just as pure investment

Trurolexer · 9 January 2010, 12:04 AM

LV for me.

esm · 9 January 2010, 02:32 AM

ditto

rickyslam · 9 January 2010, 02:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by esm

ditto

x2

Renoir · 9 January 2010, 02:35 AM

LV, too. :)

A1000 · 9 January 2010, 02:38 AM

LV for the maxi dial for me.

JPS · 9 January 2010, 02:55 AM

LV without a shadow of a doubt!

Speed · 9 January 2010, 03:05 AM

Seiko! ;-)

rad87gn · 9 January 2010, 03:08 AM

Absolute personal preference. They are all good and do the job. Pick the one that really gets you excited about owning it.

JBat · 9 January 2010, 03:26 AM

Since you already have a 16610, I think either of the 14060's would be a good choice.

desmoboy · 9 January 2010, 03:27 AM

Defo LV

Bullyterrier · 9 January 2010, 03:36 AM

Lv!

ronin7 · 9 January 2010, 04:04 AM

Without a shadow of a doubt get the lv,great watch

JUSTROLEXES · 9 January 2010, 04:07 AM

LV for me.

Clay · 9 January 2010, 04:08 AM

JJ Irani · 9 January 2010, 04:11 AM

Loo Vision!!

Speed · 9 January 2010, 04:52 AM

But the OP was giddy about his $150 Seiko sale in his other thread this morning...I would think he would want to acquire another - for the resale value!

http://rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=108706

Perdu · 9 January 2010, 08:37 AM

What about a 5513?

Tools · 9 January 2010, 12:02 PM

The LV would help round out your collection.. You could lose one of the SD's and fit in a 14060 Sub too and better flesh out the set..

mcjp6 · 9 January 2010, 12:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Perdu

What about a 5513?

exactly, or a 1680??

View Poll Results: Which Rolex Dive watch to get next?
14060 NON-COSC	11	18.33%
14060M COSC	11	18.33%
16610 LV	29	48.33%
DSSD	10	16.67%
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 60. You may not vote on this poll

8 January 2010, 11:01 PM	#1
rolexsubdate Banned Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: The Moon Posts: 1,238	Which one to get next: 14060M COSC OR 16610LV ??? I am fan of Rolex dive watches only. So subs and sedwellers... nothing else in the Rolex lineup gets me going .... So my stock is currently as follows: 16610-U-series 16613-M-series 16600-D-series 16600-Z-series So I am pondering my next purchase ....If you had my collection, which one would be your next one? Please keep in mind ... nothing else but dive watches get me going ... so it has to be a dive watch ... 14060 or 16610LV ... SORRY FOLKS: My budget is under $5K so DSSD is out --- PLEASE DO NOT VOTE FOR DSSD -- I MADE A MISTAKE ADDING IT TO THE POLL--- thanks,

8 January 2010, 11:05 PM	#2
padi56 "TRF" Life Patron Join Date: Jun 2005 Real Name: Peter Location: Llanfairpwllgwyng Watch: ing you. Posts: 53,062	Myself believe one of the next sort after watches from the 90s will be the 14060 with the tritium dial.Could be the next vintage must have,now out of production.If you can get hold of one mint with box papers etc,I believe that prices will rise in a few years time,could be the next investment piece.Now I don't normally recommend anyone owning watches just as pure investment __________________ ICom Pro3 All posts are my own opinion and my opinion only. "The clock of life is wound but once, and no man has the power to tell just when the hands will stop. Now is the only time you actually own the time, Place no faith in time, for the clock may soon be still for ever." Good Judgement comes from experience,experience comes from Bad Judgement,.Buy quality, cry once; buy cheap, cry again and again. www.mc0yad.club Second in command CEO and left handed watch winder

9 January 2010, 02:38 AM	#7
A1000 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2009 Real Name: Adrian Location: UK Posts: 953	LV for the maxi dial for me. __________________ Rolex 16610LV (2007) PAM 312K (2009) PAM 292K (2009)

9 January 2010, 03:36 AM	#13
Bullyterrier "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: . Posts: 1,343	Lv! __________________ So Mote it be.

9 January 2010, 12:04 AM	#3
Trurolexer Banned Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: USA Watch: 5513MaxiI+PreComex Posts: 18,421	LV for me.

9 January 2010, 02:32 AM	#4
esm "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2008 Real Name: Eric Location: Location,Location Watch: this, bro... Posts: 15,340	ditto

9 January 2010, 02:35 AM	#6
Renoir "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2009 Real Name: Renato Location: New York Posts: 2,396	LV, too. :)

9 January 2010, 02:55 AM	#8
JPS "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2008 Real Name: Jonathan Location: UK Watch: 116500 White&Black Posts: 1,360	LV without a shadow of a doubt!

9 January 2010, 03:05 AM	#9
Speed "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2009 Location: USA Posts: 19,706	Seiko! ;-)

9 January 2010, 03:08 AM	#10
rad87gn "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2009 Real Name: Chad Location: Des Moines, Iowa Watch: Rolex, PAM, Omega Posts: 1,607	Absolute personal preference. They are all good and do the job. Pick the one that really gets you excited about owning it.

9 January 2010, 03:26 AM	#11
JBat "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2007 Real Name: John Location: Washington Watch: 16710, 16610, DJ Posts: 7,329	Since you already have a 16610, I think either of the 14060's would be a good choice.

9 January 2010, 03:27 AM	#12
desmoboy "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: UK/NYC Watch: Sub Posts: 177	Defo LV

9 January 2010, 04:04 AM	#14
ronin7 Member Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: bucks uk Watch: green submariner Posts: 424	Without a shadow of a doubt get the lv,great watch

9 January 2010, 04:07 AM	#15
JUSTROLEXES ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ 2024 SubLV41 Sponsor & Boutique Seller Join Date: Jul 2009 Real Name: Tony Geha Location: San Diego, CA Watch: Yacht-Master Posts: 51,110	LV for me. __________________ Instagram @JustRolexes 2FA security active

9 January 2010, 04:08 AM	#16
Clay Banned Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: Up a tree Posts: 4,001	14060M Non COSC

9 January 2010, 04:11 AM	#17
JJ Irani Fondly Remembered Join Date: May 2005 Real Name: JJ Location: Auckland, NZ Watch: ALL SOLD!! Posts: 74,319	Loo Vision!! __________________ Words fail me in expressing my utmost thanks to ALL of you for this wonderful support during my hour of need!! I firmly believe that my time on planet earth is NOT yet up!! I shall fight this to the very end.......and WIN!!

9 January 2010, 04:52 AM	#18
Speed "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2009 Location: USA Posts: 19,706	But the OP was giddy about his $150 Seiko sale in his other thread this morning...I would think he would want to acquire another - for the resale value! http://rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=108706

9 January 2010, 08:37 AM	#19
Perdu "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2007 Real Name: Gary Location: GMT-6 Watch: GMT Posts: 3,350	What about a 5513? __________________ Omega Seamaster 300M GMT Noire Omega Seamaster Aqua Terra 8500 Benson 1937 Sterling Silver Hunter

9 January 2010, 12:02 PM	#20
Tools TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron Join Date: May 2007 Real Name: Larry Location: Mojave Desert Watch: GMT's Posts: 43,514	The LV would help round out your collection.. You could lose one of the SD's and fit in a 14060 Sub too and better flesh out the set.. __________________ (Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....) NAWCC Member

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)