ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
25 April 2010, 05:14 AM | #1 |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Not here anymore
Posts: 4,787
|
Something's up with this 5512.....
It's supposedly a 5512 with a 5 mil serial number, that would put in a 1977 year, but the 5512 wasn't in production then. Now look a the "E" between the links...Are they long E's? The font on the dial appears off as well. Something is not right here, please correct me if I'm wrong.
http://cgi.ebay.com/Rolex-Submariner...item414ec54480 |
25 April 2010, 05:17 AM | #2 |
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: Pav
Location: Manhattan
Posts: 11,495
|
E's look ok to me... still looking at the rest of the watch.
|
25 April 2010, 05:23 AM | #3 |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Not here anymore
Posts: 4,787
|
|
25 April 2010, 05:19 AM | #4 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Real Name: Terry
Location: Pretoria
Watch: GMT Master
Posts: 261
|
5512 was produced from 59 to 78
|
25 April 2010, 05:21 AM | #5 |
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: Pav
Location: Manhattan
Posts: 11,495
|
|
25 April 2010, 05:25 AM | #6 |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Not here anymore
Posts: 4,787
|
|
25 April 2010, 05:48 AM | #7 |
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2010
Real Name: Frank McLaury
Location: ON THE ROAD AGAIN
Watch: Rolex Submariner
Posts: 269
|
The case is real, The E si correct, the stamping is correct, the dial is for a 5512, I looked at this before, it may have some replaced parts.
|
25 April 2010, 06:33 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Real Name: Andreas
Location: Margaritaville
Watch: Smurf
Posts: 19,879
|
E looks fine to me too.
__________________
Yeah, well, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man. |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.