ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

ChicagoBigHouse · 17 July 2010, 05:28 PM

I'd really like to see the Sub-C next to the old sub, or even the DSSD. I"m sure we'd ALL love to see it. Just a quick plea for those enjoying this new work of art!

steubi1 · 17 July 2010, 09:51 PM

Here you have them all:
DSSD, GMTIIc,old EX I+II,new Subs,old Sub Date,old Sub.

Name: IMG_0335.jpg
Views: 233
Size: 105.2 KB

Regards
Tom

bluemartinifan · 17 July 2010, 09:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by steubi1

Here you have them all:
DSSD, GMTIIc,old EX I+II,new Subs,old Sub Date,old Sub.

Attachment 148923

Regards
Tom

Beautiful collection Tom

OYSTERMANN · 17 July 2010, 10:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bluemartinifan

Beautiful collection Tom

Certainly is, Russ

Tom - absolutely amazing collection!

steubi1 · 17 July 2010, 10:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bluemartinifan

Beautiful collection Tom

Yeah, that's a nice collection. Unfortunately, it is not mine...These are watches "unverkäuflich", that means "not for sale", at an AD here in Zurich.

I thought it is an excellent chance for a nice groupshot.

But I was so happy with the new Sub (black) that I immediately ordered one and will get it within the next four weeks (hopefully).

Regards
Tom

InVision · 17 July 2010, 10:42 PM

Nice group. Wonder where the standard SeaDweller was?

rolexnovice · 18 July 2010, 12:02 AM

Awesome Tome! Wonderful collection and I don't blame you for not wanting to sell it!

SUPERDOC · 18 July 2010, 12:15 AM

THE case size - especially lug width really is notable on the SUBc
the GMT seems more refined...

I'm excited to see the new Sub in the "flesh"
but based on Pictures...it is Blocky..

rolexsubdate · 18 July 2010, 12:22 AM

For some reason, the new ceramic subs look a lot morre disporpotionate than the dssd....

ChicagoBigHouse · 18 July 2010, 12:49 AM

That is a great picture. I was hoping to get a close-up sub-C next to the 16610. It's hard to get a good sense of comparison with so many watches in the picture at different angles and depths. Beautiful though!

17 July 2010, 05:28 PM	#1
ChicagoBigHouse "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2009 Real Name: Justin Location: Columbus Watch: No rolex currently Posts: 132	Can anyone with the new Sub-C post some side by side comparison pics? I'd really like to see the Sub-C next to the old sub, or even the DSSD. I"m sure we'd ALL love to see it. Just a quick plea for those enjoying this new work of art!

17 July 2010, 09:51 PM	#2
steubi1 "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2008 Real Name: Tom Location: Switzerland Watch: too many Posts: 1,150	Here you have them all: DSSD, GMTIIc,old EX I+II,new Subs,old Sub Date,old Sub. Regards Tom

18 July 2010, 12:49 AM	#10
ChicagoBigHouse "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2009 Real Name: Justin Location: Columbus Watch: No rolex currently Posts: 132	Cool That is a great picture. I was hoping to get a close-up sub-C next to the 16610. It's hard to get a good sense of comparison with so many watches in the picture at different angles and depths. Beautiful though!

17 July 2010, 10:42 PM	#6
InVision Banned Join Date: Dec 2008 Real Name: Mike Location: Destin, FL USA Watch: Outerspace DayDate Posts: 2,662	Nice group. Wonder where the standard SeaDweller was?

18 July 2010, 12:02 AM	#7
rolexnovice Member Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: USA Watch: 16610 Posts: 366	Awesome Tome! Wonderful collection and I don't blame you for not wanting to sell it!

18 July 2010, 12:15 AM	#8
SUPERDOC "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2007 Real Name: R.J. Location: Canada Posts: 1,546	THE case size - especially lug width really is notable on the SUBc the GMT seems more refined... I'm excited to see the new Sub in the "flesh" but based on Pictures...it is Blocky..

18 July 2010, 12:22 AM	#9
rolexsubdate Banned Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: The Moon Posts: 1,238	For some reason, the new ceramic subs look a lot morre disporpotionate than the dssd....

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)