ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
18 July 2010, 01:31 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Chuck
Location: Orlando
Watch: 114060
Posts: 8,450
|
What does MINT condition mean?
What does MINT condition mean? I know BNIB means the watch is Brand New and in perfect condition. Once the watch hits the wrist the perfection is gone. If it has some surface scratches is that MINT?
|
18 July 2010, 01:37 AM | #2 | |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Real Name: Jocke
Location: Sweden
Watch: A dozen of Rolex's
Posts: 22,541
|
Quote:
and a few minor scratches at the lugs and case. The problem is when the seller says it's MINT so haven't he seen all the scratches I mention above. There is no MINT watches out there, they are only MINT between the factory and the AD. So that word dosen't belongs in a sales ad.
__________________
This message is written in perfect swenglish. What is best a custom Rolex or a Rolex that is stuck in custom? Buy a professional camera and you´re a professional photographer, buy a flute and you own a flute. |
|
18 July 2010, 01:45 AM | #3 |
Suspended
Join Date: Oct 2008
Real Name: Leo
Location: Boca Raton
Posts: 13,820
|
Here's TZ's grading system.
LNIB A pre-owned watch that has been worn, yet is in perfect condition. Accompanied by the factory box(es), tags and documentation. No alterations from factory-delivered condition. The warranty papers must be stamped to establish the authenticity and validity of the watch - TimeZone does not allow sales of watches with "open papers." No bracelet resizing or marks of any kind. 100% Mint A pre-owned watch that is in very nearly perfect condition. Signs of wear are visible with a low powered loupe. May be a watch that is in LNIB condition but not accompanied by the factory box(es) or documentation. May refer to an older watch that has been restored, so long as the restoration returned the watch to very nearly perfect factory original condition. Working perfectly, keeping excellent time, needs nothing. 98-100% Near Mint Showing very light signs of wear. Faint scratches on the case, bezel, bracelet or buckle are visible to the naked eye. Completely original in every way. Strap shows light use - may be bent or lightly creased, but not stained. Bracelet may be resized. The watch is working perfectly, keeping very good time and needs nothing. 93-97% Excellent Evidence of use is visible to the unaided eye. Scratches are light, but more numerous than "near mint". If the watch has been restored, all original replacement parts have been used. Strap clearly used but no stains. No dents or dings are detectable, and the bracelet has little wear. Working perfectly, needs no repair or service. 88-92% Very good The watch shows what might be considered normal wear by a careful owner who wore the watch regularly. Scratches are evident, but no nicks or dings. May have replacement parts and/or a high quality redial. Running and keeping good time, though may need minor regulation. A sound, attractive presentation overall. 83-87% Good Nothing fundamentally wrong with the watch, though it has quite obviously been used. Running and wearable, but may gain or lose a few minutes over 24 hours. Case may show a few dings, nicks, or deep scratches. May have a redial that is not up to high standards. May not have all original parts. 77-82% Fair Well used, may require service and/or restoration to be useable. May be running erratically. Dial, case, and other major components may not be original, but no pieces are missing. Even an untrained eye could tell the watch is worse for wear. Some might call it rough. 72-76% Poor Shows abuse, requires service and/or restoration. May have major cosmetic flaws, missing parts, may not run at all. A speculative piece - 'fixer-upper' would be too generous. Not junk, but requires lots of work to be made wearable. 66-71% Scrap / Parts A collection of parts that at one time may have been a functioning timekeeper. Now missing parts, may be rusted or corroded, not worth restoring. Most people would call it junk. 64% or worse. |
18 July 2010, 01:48 AM | #4 | |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Real Name: Jocke
Location: Sweden
Watch: A dozen of Rolex's
Posts: 22,541
|
Quote:
__________________
This message is written in perfect swenglish. What is best a custom Rolex or a Rolex that is stuck in custom? Buy a professional camera and you´re a professional photographer, buy a flute and you own a flute. |
|
18 July 2010, 01:49 AM | #5 |
Suspended
Join Date: Oct 2008
Real Name: Leo
Location: Boca Raton
Posts: 13,820
|
|
18 July 2010, 02:24 AM | #6 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Real Name: Jocke
Location: Sweden
Watch: A dozen of Rolex's
Posts: 22,541
|
Don't beat a dead horse.
__________________
This message is written in perfect swenglish. What is best a custom Rolex or a Rolex that is stuck in custom? Buy a professional camera and you´re a professional photographer, buy a flute and you own a flute. |
18 July 2010, 01:46 AM | #7 |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,515
|
I'll agree with Jocke... Mint really has no place in describing a watch condition accurately and is over-used..
Mint would/should mean exactly as it came from the factory (i.e., "newly minted" like a coin). If the watch is still in the little plastic coffin, and has never been removed, it is mint condition, otherwise, it is not.........
__________________
(Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....) NAWCC Member |
18 July 2010, 01:46 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Chuck
Location: Orlando
Watch: 114060
Posts: 8,450
|
Thanks for the information. I have a watch up for sale and said its MINT condition. After looking at it closer I noticed some surface scratches on the band and clasp. I don't want to miss lead a potential buyer. I'm trying to give my best opinion on the
watch. |
18 July 2010, 03:18 AM | #9 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: USA
Watch: SeaDweller
Posts: 464
|
Quote:
FWIW I bought a Sub described as "mint" on this forum two weeks ago. When my wife first saw it, she told me that I shouldn't have bought it new (she's a TRF member as well). IMO that means the description was accurate and not at all misleading. |
|
18 July 2010, 01:59 PM | #10 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Chuck
Location: Orlando
Watch: 114060
Posts: 8,450
|
Quote:
Last edited by HACKNSACK44; 18 July 2010 at 02:00 PM.. Reason: Missed a word.. |
|
18 July 2010, 02:04 AM | #11 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Real Name: Pete
Location: USA
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 1,607
|
I may be wrong (and will surely be corrected if I am :-) ) but I think the term "Mint Condition" referrs to coins that were literally fresh from the Mint (maybe other precious metals too). I would assume that that Mint Condition would mean never circulated, perfectly as Minted with no use or signs of circulation.
Putting this into Rolex world, I agree with Jocke, the only true Mint Condition watches are fresh from Rolex to the AD - never having been worn or sized. Even some of the NEW watches in AD cases show a lot of signs of wear and scratches from being tried on and handled. I have noticed this with yellow gold and slower selling models (maybe the two are the same?!). Just my thoughts - but for as long as I have been buying things, there is always the Sellers "MINT" and the Buyers "MINT". I will say that nothing is more depressing or frustrating- especially before the internet of going to pick up a "Mint" item and it is far from what you expected. Good luck with your sale! -Pete
__________________
SS Submariner K16610 SS Submariner F16610LV SS/P Yachtmaster M16622 SS Black Dial Daytona M116520 SS Explorer II D16570 |
18 July 2010, 02:13 AM | #12 |
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2009
Real Name: Tristan
Location: GIRONA , SPAIN
Watch: 116520/660/710/334
Posts: 7,147
|
Simple .. If Leo buys a LNIB watch he tells the seller it's is a battered piece of junk and pays accordingly ... when Leo sells a battered piece of junk he says it is LNIB and prices it accordingly .
Beauty is in the eye of the beholder . |
18 July 2010, 02:15 AM | #13 | |
Suspended
Join Date: Oct 2008
Real Name: Leo
Location: Boca Raton
Posts: 13,820
|
Quote:
And the cash difference is in your pocket. |
|
18 July 2010, 02:17 AM | #14 |
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2009
Real Name: Tristan
Location: GIRONA , SPAIN
Watch: 116520/660/710/334
Posts: 7,147
|
|
18 July 2010, 02:39 AM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Here and there
Posts: 12,485
|
TZ is a place that doesn't come close to TRF....
__________________
Fine Quality is Long Remembered After the Pain of Spending Money is Forgotten |
18 July 2010, 03:03 AM | #16 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: USA & France
Posts: 11,078
|
I like used mint to describe a watch, reffing to the coin description, but to me mint = LNIB. There should be no visible sign of wear.
I bought a "mint" Sea-Dweller from one of the TRF powersellers only to find out that his understanding of mint was different from mine. To his credit he took back the watch and offered me a full refund (minus shipping). |
18 July 2010, 03:15 AM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 19,706
|
Finally!!! I know what the infamous "TZ" scale is all about. Thanks Leo!
Lots of wiggle room for sure. However, buying pre-owned from LawrenceB - who is ULTRA conservative in his ratings - has served me well. Of course BNIB from DavidSW is pretty risk-free as well! |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.