ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Kanger · 21 July 2010, 11:07 AM

I know that at the end of the day, it is my own decision, but I would just love some feedback from fellow members. I am stuck between a new GMT IIc and a M serial Sea Dweller that I can buy and send to RSC for a full service, so at the end of the day I will have to choose between two new watches, and prices are comparable. GMT IIc has the look factor yet is very common, but the Sea Dweller is not too shabby itself and is discontinued. I appreciate any opinion.

andrew79 · 21 July 2010, 11:13 AM

GMT iic for me.

smallcandle · 21 July 2010, 11:17 AM

I'd take the SD and get it serviced. The iic is just too flashy for me with the PCL and ceramic bezel.

nauticajoe · 21 July 2010, 11:19 AM

Tough choice Kanger. From your signature though, seems you already made up your mind! I presume the GMTIIc is an "M" or better as well? If so, why the full service?

For me, I'd probably lean towards the SD. I like the heft, no cyclops, and its discontinued. Also, it'll probably be tougher to find a decent condition as time goes by. The GMTIIc is here to stay.

Good Luck & Happy Hunting!

scl6118 · 21 July 2010, 11:42 AM

That's a tough decision?! IIC!!

mike · 21 July 2010, 11:57 AM

The GMT's versatility wins for me.

I bet when this poll runs it's course the decision won't be any easier.

JUSTROLEXES · 21 July 2010, 11:59 AM

Vote for the SD

you can always get a new GMT but sure you can not on the SD

Rockrolex · 21 July 2010, 12:00 PM

Quote:

the gmt's versatility wins for me.

I bet when this poll runs it's course the decision won't be any easier.

x2.

sakuraba · 21 July 2010, 12:01 PM

Tough choice indeed!

IMHO you can't go wrong with either. But since I've had a fantastic experience with my SD, I'd say go for it. A BNIB II-c is something you can grab for he next 10-15 years, but the 16600 will only get more difficult to get in as new condition as time goes by.

Maxseven · 21 July 2010, 12:08 PM

I'd go with the GMT-Master IIc, unless you are buying for investment / rarity sake.

The Dweller is rather spartan looking, and I dislike that it doesn't have any physicality to compensate for the lack of the cyclops.

AK40DJ50 · 21 July 2010, 12:20 PM

I think the GMT-Master IIc is more versatile - good choice.

Speed · 21 July 2010, 12:23 PM

What if the green writing & green hand on the GMTII C are replaced with Red next year? Can you imagine the wailing and moaning of WIS ;-)

R S · 21 July 2010, 12:29 PM

You cannot go wrong w/ the Dweller!!!!

sleddog · 21 July 2010, 12:30 PM

Thats a tough one.......I have a soft spot for both!!!
For me the SD came first then the GMTIIc.....
I guess if I was forced to chose,the GMTIIc would be my choice!!

chris russell · 21 July 2010, 12:35 PM

irreplaceable. Anyone who voted for the GMT, give your head a shake.

train-time · 21 July 2010, 12:48 PM

Based on your watch activity while on the forum and your age bracket, IMO the M series SD would be the best way to go. It won't need service for a few years and you can always get a GMTIIc down the road. The SD is a classic!

On the other hand, I'm an old fart, so if it were for me, I would go right for the GMTIIc

tgoose1 · 21 July 2010, 01:10 PM

If money will be about the same, and bezel/gmt functionality is really not an issue, I'd go with the new watch especially if it is the most comfortable to wear. I would not let the discontinuance issue of the SD/4000 factor into my decision, compare the two side by side and buy the one you like the best, then wear and enjoy.

Psmith · 21 July 2010, 01:11 PM

Another

for the GMT IIC

Latrodectus · 21 July 2010, 01:07 PM

I would go for the GMT IIc

sparky · 21 July 2010, 02:13 PM

my warped head sez:
tool watches don't have pcl's*

*'cept Daytonas, of course!

sea-dweller · 21 July 2010, 02:15 PM

Hard call, flip a coin, or save and buy both !

Tek · 21 July 2010, 03:00 PM

sorry can't help

Lion · 21 July 2010, 03:06 PM

If it was my choice I'd buy the GMT.....

Lol-x · 21 July 2010, 03:32 PM

The only SD for me is the 1665 as the SD you are referring to has the smaller hour marker dial.
So I would go for the GMT as an all round watch as stated above and for the fact it has the new clasp and maxi dial. The watch works really well and has all the waterproofness you are likely to need.

JJ Irani · 21 July 2010, 03:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kanger

I know that at the end of the day, it is my own decision, but I would just love some feedback from fellow members. I am stuck between a new GMT IIc and a M serial Sea Dweller that I can buy and send to RSC for a full service, so at the end of the day I will have to choose between two new watches, and prices are comparable. GMT IIc has the look factor yet is very common, but the Sea Dweller is not too shabby itself and is discontinued. I appreciate any opinion.

Go for the GMT-IIC; but if the SD is an M-series, it's like only a couple of years old..................so why would it need any kind of servicing?

Andad · 21 July 2010, 10:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JJ Irani

Go for the GMT-IIC; but if the SD is an M-series, it's like only a couple of years old..................so why would it need any kind of servicing?

X2.

jonathon555 · 21 July 2010, 04:17 PM

Both highly desirable ........ Tough descision

Gmt iic

htc8p · 21 July 2010, 04:45 PM

Hi Kanger,

its not a tough decision. While i love the 116710LN

I originally was looking for the SD. Grab it while you can! I just hope it was treated with love and respect.

cajunron · 21 July 2010, 05:18 PM

Hey buddy, I would go with the GMT IIC.

GradyPhilpott · 21 July 2010, 09:50 PM

For one thing the watches have two distinct functions, so if function matters, you should by the one that fits your needs.

If you need a dive watch or if function doesn't really matter, I would go for the SD. It should never have been discontinued and is bound to be a classic.

View Poll Results: GMT IIc or Sea Dweller
brand new GMT IIc	47	61.04%
like new M serial Sea Dweller, then send for service to RSC	30	38.96%
Voters: 77. You may not vote on this poll

21 July 2010, 11:07 AM	#1
Kanger Banned Join Date: Jan 2010 Real Name: Daniel Location: North Carolina Watch: Sea Dweller Posts: 5,524	Man what a tough decision! I know that at the end of the day, it is my own decision, but I would just love some feedback from fellow members. I am stuck between a new GMT IIc and a M serial Sea Dweller that I can buy and send to RSC for a full service, so at the end of the day I will have to choose between two new watches, and prices are comparable. GMT IIc has the look factor yet is very common, but the Sea Dweller is not too shabby itself and is discontinued. I appreciate any opinion.

21 July 2010, 11:13 AM	#2
andrew79 "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2010 Real Name: Andrew Location: Indonesia Watch: Rolex Posts: 2,277	GMT iic for me. __________________ Baume & Mercier Riviera Rolex GMT II c, DJ 116234, Sub 16610, EXP 2 16570 Panerai 111 , 232

21 July 2010, 11:17 AM	#3
smallcandle "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2009 Real Name: Brian Location: Kansas Watch: 16610, Omega PO Posts: 1,898	I'd take the SD and get it serviced. The iic is just too flashy for me with the PCL and ceramic bezel. __________________ Things got out of control and I had to stab a clown...

21 July 2010, 11:42 AM	#5
scl6118 "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2009 Real Name: Shawn Location: United States Watch: SS GMT IIC Posts: 1,624	That's a tough decision?! IIC!! __________________ Current: SS GMT IIC Former: Panerai 114 Former: Breitling Hercules :

21 July 2010, 11:19 AM	#4
nauticajoe "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2010 Real Name: Joe Location: PA Posts: 14,774	Tough choice Kanger. From your signature though, seems you already made up your mind! I presume the GMTIIc is an "M" or better as well? If so, why the full service? For me, I'd probably lean towards the SD. I like the heft, no cyclops, and its discontinued. Also, it'll probably be tougher to find a decent condition as time goes by. The GMTIIc is here to stay. Good Luck & Happy Hunting!

21 July 2010, 11:57 AM	#6
mike "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2005 Posts: 22,683	The GMT's versatility wins for me. I bet when this poll runs it's course the decision won't be any easier.

21 July 2010, 11:59 AM	#7
JUSTROLEXES ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ 2024 SubLV41 Sponsor & Boutique Seller Join Date: Jul 2009 Real Name: Tony Geha Location: San Diego, CA Watch: Yacht-Master Posts: 51,110	Vote for the SD you can always get a new GMT but sure you can not on the SD __________________ Instagram @JustRolexes 2FA security active

21 July 2010, 12:01 PM	#9
sakuraba "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2009 Real Name: Jib Location: SJ, California Watch: sun dial Posts: 8,189	Tough choice indeed! IMHO you can't go wrong with either. But since I've had a fantastic experience with my SD, I'd say go for it. A BNIB II-c is something you can grab for he next 10-15 years, but the 16600 will only get more difficult to get in as new condition as time goes by. __________________ F 14000 AirKing black F 16710 GMT Pepsi F 16570 Explorer II white T 16600 SD D 16610 LV "fine quality is remembered long after the pain of spending money" -Steve Mulholland

21 July 2010, 12:08 PM	#10
Maxseven "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2010 Real Name: Joe Location: Bloomfield, MI Watch: Submariner Posts: 467	I'd go with the GMT-Master IIc, unless you are buying for investment / rarity sake. The Dweller is rather spartan looking, and I dislike that it doesn't have any physicality to compensate for the lack of the cyclops. __________________ Hooper: Watch it! Damn it, Martin! This is compressed air! Martin: Well what the hell kind of a knot was that! Hooper: You pulled the wrong one! You screw around with these tanks and they're going to blow up!

21 July 2010, 12:20 PM	#11
AK40DJ50 "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2010 Real Name: Tom Location: Toronto, Canada Posts: 1,506	I think the GMT-Master IIc is more versatile - good choice. __________________ Datejust II 116333 Submariner 116610LN

21 July 2010, 12:23 PM	#12
Speed "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2009 Location: USA Posts: 19,706	What if the green writing & green hand on the GMTII C are replaced with Red next year? Can you imagine the wailing and moaning of WIS ;-)

21 July 2010, 12:29 PM	#13
R S "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2009 Real Name: Robert Location: N.O.LA. Posts: 475	You cannot go wrong w/ the Dweller!!!! __________________

21 July 2010, 12:30 PM	#14
sleddog TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron Join Date: Jul 2007 Real Name: Rob Location: Nearby. Posts: 24,931	Thats a tough one.......I have a soft spot for both!!! For me the SD came first then the GMTIIc..... I guess if I was forced to chose,the GMTIIc would be my choice!! __________________ He who wears a Rolex is always on time, even when late!! TRF's "After Dark" Bar & Nightclub Patron-Founding Member..

21 July 2010, 12:35 PM	#15
chris russell Banned Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: Peterborough, ON Watch: your mouth. Posts: 1,023	This question epitomizes the concept of a 'no-brainer'. The SD is iconic and... irreplaceable. Anyone who voted for the GMT, give your head a shake.

21 July 2010, 12:48 PM	#16
train-time 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Feb 2009 Real Name: Plankton Location: US Watch: less Posts: 4,161	Based on your watch activity while on the forum and your age bracket, IMO the M series SD would be the best way to go. It won't need service for a few years and you can always get a GMTIIc down the road. The SD is a classic! On the other hand, I'm an old fart, so if it were for me, I would go right for the GMTIIc

21 July 2010, 01:10 PM	#17
tgoose1 "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2009 Location: Louisiana Watch: Rolex Submariner Posts: 668	If money will be about the same, and bezel/gmt functionality is really not an issue, I'd go with the new watch especially if it is the most comfortable to wear. I would not let the discontinuance issue of the SD/4000 factor into my decision, compare the two side by side and buy the one you like the best, then wear and enjoy.

21 July 2010, 01:11 PM	#18
Psmith "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2008 Real Name: Clive Location: Exoplanet Watch: spring-driven Posts: 38,856	Another for the GMT IIC __________________

21 July 2010, 01:07 PM	#19
Latrodectus 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Sep 2008 Real Name: Fred Location: KY, USA Watch: GMT-Master II Posts: 10,043	I would go for the GMT IIc __________________ Member # 16057 4-Hands Club Tosser Club Member TRF Skypers Group

21 July 2010, 02:13 PM	#20
sparky "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2005 Real Name: Cal Location: Seattle, WA. Watch: explorer Posts: 658	my warped head sez: tool watches don't have pcl's* *'cept Daytonas, of course!

21 July 2010, 02:15 PM	#21
sea-dweller "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2007 Real Name: Dennis Location: Bay Area - 925 Posts: 40,018	Hard call, flip a coin, or save and buy both ! __________________ TRF Member #6699 (since September 2007)

21 July 2010, 03:00 PM	#22
Tek Member Join Date: Apr 2010 Location: Aus Watch: ALL Posts: 318	sorry can't help

21 July 2010, 03:06 PM	#23
Lion "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2009 Real Name: Leo Location: Midwest Watch: GMT-II 16710 PEPSI Posts: 21,461	If it was my choice I'd buy the GMT..... __________________ SS GMT-II 16710 PEPSI(Z-serial#) THE ONLY DIFFERENCE BETWEEN MEN AND BOYS IS THE PRICE OF THE TOYS!!! MontBlanc Meisterstuck Doue Silver Barley MontBlanc Meisterstuck Solitaire Doue Signum Proud Card Carrying Member of the Curmudgeons.....Yikes!!!

21 July 2010, 03:32 PM	#24
Lol-x Facilitator Join Date: Nov 2005 Real Name: Steve Location: Omnipresent Posts: 33,587	The only SD for me is the 1665 as the SD you are referring to has the smaller hour marker dial. So I would go for the GMT as an all round watch as stated above and for the fact it has the new clasp and maxi dial. The watch works really well and has all the waterproofness you are likely to need. __________________ *Most folks are about as happy as they make up their minds to be.* ~Abraham Lincoln Nothing compares to the simple pleasure of a bike ride. ~John F. Kennedy ROLEXploitation - yeah I'm a victim

21 July 2010, 04:17 PM	#27
jonathon555 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2010 Location: UK Posts: 582	Both highly desirable ........ Tough descision Gmt iic

21 July 2010, 04:45 PM	#28
htc8p "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2009 Real Name: Bert Location: philippines Watch: 116710 ln Posts: 3,472	Hi Kanger, its not a tough decision. While i love the 116710LN I originally was looking for the SD. Grab it while you can! I just hope it was treated with love and respect.

21 July 2010, 05:18 PM	#29
cajunron 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Nov 2009 Real Name: Ronnie Location: Southeastern USA Watch: Omega Seamaster PO Posts: 3,872	Hey buddy, I would go with the GMT IIC.

21 July 2010, 09:50 PM	#30
GradyPhilpott 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: New Mexico Watch: Seiko #SRK050 Posts: 34,460	For one thing the watches have two distinct functions, so if function matters, you should by the one that fits your needs. If you need a dive watch or if function doesn't really matter, I would go for the SD. It should never have been discontinued and is bound to be a classic.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)