ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Benjamin Yair · 21 July 2010, 07:21 PM

Guys, do you think that I should trade my Explorer II for a Panerai 164?

Psmith · 21 July 2010, 07:56 PM

Welcome to TRF. Can you tell us more about the proposed trade?

DOUBLE 0 SE7EN · 21 July 2010, 07:58 PM

Sure ..A good deal..

Benjamin Yair · 21 July 2010, 08:19 PM

well, it's an Explorer II Black Dial (Z series) and it's for a Panerai 164 L series.

Would it still be a good deal if I had to add money to it? Some people say that Rolex is definitely above Panerai in terms of movement. I wonder how these two perform in terms of that?

ParisDakarBmw · 21 July 2010, 08:32 PM

Welcome to TRF! What condition are each of the watches in. Do they have boxes & papers?

Benjamin Yair · 21 July 2010, 08:41 PM

they are both in good condition. The panerai was just purchased not so long ago 2 months ago, while the rolex was purchased in 2008 and in real good condition.

they both have box and papers.

ChicagoBigHouse · 21 July 2010, 08:44 PM

But you should get a panerai, and keep your explorer II. Unless you have an extensive rolex collection and no PAM. I"ve had PAMs and Rolexes and trading one for the other doesn't make sense. That being said, do whatever you can do to get a 233, with the old am/pm indicator.

psv · 21 July 2010, 09:32 PM

Mmoney wise it is a good deal but personally The PAM 164 is not my fav Panerai.

DRAWTOOL · 21 July 2010, 09:40 PM

I wouldn't trade me Exp-II for any amount of PAMs.

Dylan Wade · 21 July 2010, 09:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DRAWTOOL

I wouldn't trade me Exp-II for any amount of PAMs.

What he said X 2

chris russell · 21 July 2010, 11:45 PM

veidtadrian · 21 July 2010, 11:48 PM

That is a pretty good deal..but Panerais have only been "in fashion" somewhat recently.
No idea long term (think 20 years or so) how values will hold though!

Whereas with the EXP II...

mike · 22 July 2010, 01:05 AM

If you like the 164 that's the most important thing. Personally I think the 164 is a bit of sleeper. Such a unique dial.

jrpb · 22 July 2010, 03:37 AM

no way Jose

Rolex Freak · 22 July 2010, 03:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Benjamin Yair

Guys, do you think that I should trade my Explorer II for a Panerai 164?

Try to acquire the Pam without selling or trading your Exp II. You'll end up regretting it down the road. Exp II is a classic beauty.

Rolesor · 22 July 2010, 03:48 AM

nopers!

21 July 2010, 07:21 PM	#1
Benjamin Yair "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2010 Location: San Francisco Posts: 29	Explorer II for Panerai 164 Guys, do you think that I should trade my Explorer II for a Panerai 164?

21 July 2010, 07:56 PM	#2
Psmith "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2008 Real Name: Clive Location: Exoplanet Watch: spring-driven Posts: 38,856	Welcome to TRF. Can you tell us more about the proposed trade? __________________

21 July 2010, 08:44 PM	#7
ChicagoBigHouse "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2009 Real Name: Justin Location: Columbus Watch: No rolex currently Posts: 132	No But you should get a panerai, and keep your explorer II. Unless you have an extensive rolex collection and no PAM. I"ve had PAMs and Rolexes and trading one for the other doesn't make sense. That being said, do whatever you can do to get a 233, with the old am/pm indicator.

21 July 2010, 11:45 PM	#11
chris russell Banned Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: Peterborough, ON Watch: your mouth. Posts: 1,023	Not on your life.

22 July 2010, 03:37 AM	#14
jrpb "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2010 Real Name: jon Location: london Watch: White Explorer II Posts: 332	no way Jose __________________ Explorer II Polar Zenith Class Elite 18ct Marathon SAR Auto plain dial Casio G-Shock MTG 910D

21 July 2010, 07:58 PM	#3
DOUBLE 0 SE7EN "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2010 Real Name: KAAN Location: ISTANBUL Watch: Explorer-PAM233 Posts: 1,648	Sure ..A good deal..

21 July 2010, 08:19 PM	#4
Benjamin Yair "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2010 Location: San Francisco Posts: 29	well, it's an Explorer II Black Dial (Z series) and it's for a Panerai 164 L series. Would it still be a good deal if I had to add money to it? Some people say that Rolex is definitely above Panerai in terms of movement. I wonder how these two perform in terms of that?

21 July 2010, 08:32 PM	#5
ParisDakarBmw Banned Join Date: Dec 2009 Real Name: Paul Location: New Haven, CT Watch: 116610 Sub-C Posts: 6,552	Welcome to TRF! What condition are each of the watches in. Do they have boxes & papers?

21 July 2010, 08:41 PM	#6
Benjamin Yair "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2010 Location: San Francisco Posts: 29	they are both in good condition. The panerai was just purchased not so long ago 2 months ago, while the rolex was purchased in 2008 and in real good condition. they both have box and papers.

21 July 2010, 09:32 PM	#8
psv 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: USA & France Posts: 11,078	Mmoney wise it is a good deal but personally The PAM 164 is not my fav Panerai.

21 July 2010, 11:48 PM	#12
veidtadrian "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2010 Real Name: Ozymandias Location: BKK/NO/LDN/MPLS Watch: (2) SS DJ + SS Sub Posts: 311	That is a pretty good deal..but Panerais have only been "in fashion" somewhat recently. No idea long term (think 20 years or so) how values will hold though! Whereas with the EXP II...

22 July 2010, 01:05 AM	#13
mike "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2005 Posts: 22,683	If you like the 164 that's the most important thing. Personally I think the 164 is a bit of sleeper. Such a unique dial.

22 July 2010, 03:48 AM	#16
Rolesor "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2009 Real Name: Brandon Location: Toronto, ON Watch: 116234 Posts: 4,150	nopers! __________________ 116234 - Blue Concentric Dial - Fluted Bezel - Oyster Bracelet Tudor Black Bay 54 - Rubber Strap

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)