ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Jaymesymonds · 30 July 2010, 02:00 PM

Well hello there!

I have a little dilemma here, i am absolutely torn between an Explorer 1 (39mm) and a Explorer 2. I have looked at both at my AD (well the 36mm since the 39mm isnt in yet) and i really cant make up my mind. there are so many great points to both, the white dial, extra hand and date are very nice on the expl 2, however i do like the class and simplicity of the expl.1.

I know there's been criticism on the new expl 1 and the non-lumineciant 3-6-9 however i quite like it, in fact i wish the 12'oclock was non-lum as well. i do agree that the hands should have been enlarged to suit the new watch but not a deal breaker for me.

The expl 2 is a fantastic looking watch as well, and does offer a few more features than the expl.1.

so all i can say is i am torn, what have you guys/gals done to "decide" when faced with this dilemma? Being my first rolex, i am very indecisive...any help would be appreciated.

J

Rolesor · 30 July 2010, 02:09 PM

The 39mm looks like it will be a great size - it's very sleek and has a nice low profile.

I'm also a big fan of the white dial Expy-II.

It's a tough call - I'd say wait until you can try both on. You'll know right away :)

sakuraba · 30 July 2010, 02:12 PM

I prefer the Explorer II because of the ability to track a second time zone (I use it for work). But for design alone, the Explorer's simplicity is hard to dismiss.

Good luck, you can't go wrong with either IMO.

sakuraba · 30 July 2010, 02:13 PM

Oh, and welcome to the forum!

Zed Homme · 30 July 2010, 02:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sakuraba

I prefer the Explorer II because of the ability to track a second time zone (I use it for work). But for design alone, the Explorer's simplicity is hard to dismiss.

Good luck, you can't go wrong with either IMO.

Im so disappointed in you Jib, you know the late night enabler crowd always recommends to get both!!!

sakuraba · 30 July 2010, 02:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Zed Homme

Im so disappointed in you Jib, you know the late night enabler crowd always recommends to get both!!!

I'm off tonight!

Looks like the burden of enabling is on you tonight, Chris. I don't think Rob's still online.

ibramr · 30 July 2010, 02:18 PM

Exp II is more functional and posses very elegant design. Exp I is nice, no question, but if simplicity is the point, then it can not compete with the 14060 Submariner no date. Use either of them in good health.

sleddog · 30 July 2010, 02:19 PM

Welcome to TRF J....!

Personaly,the EXP II is my choice,but we all have our own views......Try them both and see what signs the most!!!
Good luck,
Rob.

sakuraba · 30 July 2010, 02:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sleddog1000

Welcome to TRF J....!

Personaly,the EXP II is my choice,but we all have our own views......Try them both and see what signs the most!!!
Good luck,
Rob.

Ooops! I guessed wrong! here's the other enabler now!

sleddog · 30 July 2010, 03:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sakuraba

I'm off tonight!

Looks like the burden of enabling is on you tonight, Chris. I don't think Rob's still online.

Quote:

Originally Posted by sakuraba

Ooops! I guessed wrong! here's the other enabler now!

I just follow your lead Jib....!

sakuraba · 30 July 2010, 03:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sleddog1000

I just follow your lead Jib....!

Then we're going around in circles!

sleddog · 30 July 2010, 03:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sakuraba

Then we're going around in circles!

At least it's not a zig zag....

Ok,I'll admit it.....I like to enable as much as others enable me....

and this site is famous for it!!!
I'm actually going to my AD tomorrow to pick up my SD from its long awaited service...I'm excited,and scared!!

Of what might happen there....Could another watch come home as well??? We shall see........

pradeep · 30 July 2010, 02:47 PM

Get the explorer II. It looks more current, i think.

Zed Homme · 30 July 2010, 03:12 PM

brutal!

In all seriousness though, Rob is right. Try to get both on your wrist and see which one you prefer. Welcome to TRF!

I got to catch some sleep, going to work early tomorrow so I can leave early...

Jayo · 30 July 2010, 06:47 PM

I think the new Explorer II should be out next year! Wait for this beauty:

TimeOnHand · 30 July 2010, 06:51 PM

Both great watches.... However this one gets my vote!

RRGHOST1 · 30 July 2010, 06:56 PM

I agree with Jayo here, if you are desparate to buy now, go for the Explorer 1 but if you can wait for the new Explorer 2, i think it will be worth it. Anyway they both look good, so try them both on, and see which looks the best on your wrist, and then buy both of them.

30 July 2010, 02:00 PM	#1
Jaymesymonds Member Join Date: Jul 2010 Location: Canada Watch: 14060m Submariner Posts: 41	Absolutely Torn Well hello there! I have a little dilemma here, i am absolutely torn between an Explorer 1 (39mm) and a Explorer 2. I have looked at both at my AD (well the 36mm since the 39mm isnt in yet) and i really cant make up my mind. there are so many great points to both, the white dial, extra hand and date are very nice on the expl 2, however i do like the class and simplicity of the expl.1. I know there's been criticism on the new expl 1 and the non-lumineciant 3-6-9 however i quite like it, in fact i wish the 12'oclock was non-lum as well. i do agree that the hands should have been enlarged to suit the new watch but not a deal breaker for me. The expl 2 is a fantastic looking watch as well, and does offer a few more features than the expl.1. so all i can say is i am torn, what have you guys/gals done to "decide" when faced with this dilemma? Being my first rolex, i am very indecisive...any help would be appreciated. J

30 July 2010, 02:09 PM	#2
Rolesor "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2009 Real Name: Brandon Location: Toronto, ON Watch: 116234 Posts: 4,150	The 39mm looks like it will be a great size - it's very sleek and has a nice low profile. I'm also a big fan of the white dial Expy-II. It's a tough call - I'd say wait until you can try both on. You'll know right away :) __________________ 116234 - Blue Concentric Dial - Fluted Bezel - Oyster Bracelet Tudor Black Bay 54 - Rubber Strap

30 July 2010, 02:12 PM	#3
sakuraba "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2009 Real Name: Jib Location: SJ, California Watch: sun dial Posts: 8,189	I prefer the Explorer II because of the ability to track a second time zone (I use it for work). But for design alone, the Explorer's simplicity is hard to dismiss. Good luck, you can't go wrong with either IMO. __________________ F 14000 AirKing black F 16710 GMT Pepsi F 16570 Explorer II white T 16600 SD D 16610 LV "fine quality is remembered long after the pain of spending money" -Steve Mulholland

30 July 2010, 02:13 PM	#4
sakuraba "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2009 Real Name: Jib Location: SJ, California Watch: sun dial Posts: 8,189	Oh, and welcome to the forum! __________________ F 14000 AirKing black F 16710 GMT Pepsi F 16570 Explorer II white T 16600 SD D 16610 LV "fine quality is remembered long after the pain of spending money" -Steve Mulholland

30 July 2010, 02:19 PM	#8
sleddog TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron Join Date: Jul 2007 Real Name: Rob Location: Nearby. Posts: 24,931	Welcome to TRF J....! Personaly,the EXP II is my choice,but we all have our own views......Try them both and see what signs the most!!! Good luck, Rob. __________________ He who wears a Rolex is always on time, even when late!! TRF's "After Dark" Bar & Nightclub Patron-Founding Member..

30 July 2010, 02:18 PM	#7
ibramr "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2010 Location: usa Posts: 173	Exp II is more functional and posses very elegant design. Exp I is nice, no question, but if simplicity is the point, then it can not compete with the 14060 Submariner no date. Use either of them in good health.

30 July 2010, 02:47 PM	#13
pradeep "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2010 Real Name: Pradeep Location: In a crazy world! Watch: Rolex Day Dates Posts: 265	Get the explorer II. It looks more current, i think.

30 July 2010, 03:12 PM	#14
Zed Homme "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2008 Real Name: Chris Location: usa Watch: Rolex Posts: 6,962	brutal! In all seriousness though, Rob is right. Try to get both on your wrist and see which one you prefer. Welcome to TRF! I got to catch some sleep, going to work early tomorrow so I can leave early...

30 July 2010, 06:47 PM	#15
Jayo "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2010 Location: Out there Posts: 22	I think the new Explorer II should be out next year! Wait for this beauty: Attached Images

30 July 2010, 06:51 PM	#16
TimeOnHand "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2007 Real Name: Kevin Location: Hong Kong Watch: Rolex Air-King Posts: 4,468	Both great watches.... However this one gets my vote! __________________ Instagram: timeonhand1010

30 July 2010, 06:56 PM	#17
RRGHOST1 "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2009 Real Name: luke standing Location: england Watch: Rolex TT SubC Blue Posts: 3,997	I agree with Jayo here, if you are desparate to buy now, go for the Explorer 1 but if you can wait for the new Explorer 2, i think it will be worth it. Anyway they both look good, so try them both on, and see which looks the best on your wrist, and then buy both of them.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)