ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
13 October 2010, 01:34 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Singapore
Posts: 6
|
1601 dial
Hi all, would like to ask if anyone has any idea if the following dial is genuine? Most of the dials I have seen are glossy, while this is matte. And should the word "Datejust" be bigger/longer than "Rolex". Thanks in advance.
|
13 October 2010, 02:03 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: Brian
Location: Republic of Texas
Posts: 2,776
|
Looks like a linen pie pan.
Original, I don't know. |
13 October 2010, 02:25 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Real Name: kent
Location: midland
Watch: 5512 18k s 1601
Posts: 39
|
I have a 69 model 1601 that has the same dial and mine is original
|
13 October 2010, 02:31 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Singapore
Posts: 6
|
|
13 October 2010, 02:32 AM | #5 |
"TRF" Life Patron
Join Date: Jun 2005
Real Name: Peter
Location: Llanfairpwllgwyng
Watch: ing you.
Posts: 53,063
|
Yes dial is fine.
__________________
ICom Pro3 All posts are my own opinion and my opinion only. "The clock of life is wound but once, and no man has the power to tell just when the hands will stop. Now is the only time you actually own the time, Place no faith in time, for the clock may soon be still for ever." Good Judgement comes from experience,experience comes from Bad Judgement,.Buy quality, cry once; buy cheap, cry again and again. www.mc0yad.club Second in command CEO and left handed watch winder |
13 October 2010, 07:46 AM | #6 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Real Name: Wolfgang
Location: New Jersey.
Watch: Rolex Tudor Omega
Posts: 5,592
|
Dial is 100% original.... now enjoy that DJ.
__________________
TRF member #917 |
13 October 2010, 11:14 AM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Singapore
Posts: 6
|
Tks for all the replies!
Here is another one with a similar dial. The condition is better but the word "Datejust" is now longer then "Rolex". And the cyclops/magnification, does it look suspect? Now if this is original too, I would go for this due to the superior condition. Once again, tks all for help!! |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.