The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 20 December 2010, 01:46 AM   #1
Gregcar
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Rhode island
Posts: 118
do any of you feel like rolexes are too small

I have been wearing panerai for awhile, went through many rolexes, a few panerai, now have traded my panerai, and am contemplating my new watch...I feel like subs and gmts are too small...I'm not that big, but, the deep sea-which I had for a month, was just too heavy and uncomfortable...anyways am I crazy...or does anyone else feel that way? suggestions? I wish they made a 42 or 43 mm sub or gmt
Gregcar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 December 2010, 01:50 AM   #2
dtwo
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: toronto
Watch: 116610LN
Posts: 27
Get the DSSD :)
dtwo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 December 2010, 01:50 AM   #3
Dan Pierce
2024 Pledge Member
 
Dan Pierce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Real Name: D'OH!
Location: Kentucky
Watch: Rolex-1 Tudor-3
Posts: 36,217
Wearing a Panerai would make anything else seem small. 40mm Oyster works perfect for me. But it's all relative.
dP
__________________
TRF Member# 1668
Bass Player in TRF "AFTER DARK" Bar & NightClub Band
Commander-in-Chief of The Nylon Nation
The Crown & Shield Club
Honorary Member of P-Club
Dan Pierce is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 July 2011, 11:58 PM   #4
Hooper
"TRF" Member
 
Hooper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Real Name: Tony
Location: Ontario, Canada
Watch: 16610
Posts: 3,290
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan Pierce View Post
Wearing a Panerai would make anything else seem small. 40mm Oyster works perfect for me. But it's all relative.
dP
I agree, but it all depends on wrist size ! Anything else will be just a Fad !
Hooper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 December 2010, 01:50 AM   #5
Gregcar
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Rhode island
Posts: 118
I had the dssd, but, felt too heavy and uncomfortable
Gregcar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 December 2010, 01:51 AM   #6
GolfPunk
"TRF" Member
 
GolfPunk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Real Name: Gary
Location: UK
Watch: WG Daytona
Posts: 4,398
I have owned 3 Breitlings prior to getting my Daytona a couple of weeks ago and i honestly feel that the Daytona size is perfect. I did used to like the big and chunky style of the Breitlings but I have been converted. I do still like the Breitlings though1
GolfPunk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 December 2010, 01:54 AM   #7
cht
2024 Pledge Member
 
cht's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: Chris
Location: San antonio, TX
Watch: 116610LV
Posts: 2,143
I think as you mature in your watch tastes, you'll find wearing a smaller (<45mm) watch is more tasteful than the bigger counterparts.
cht is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 December 2010, 03:57 AM   #8
baxta69
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Real Name: davinci
Location: suffolk, uk
Watch: Rolex & Breitling
Posts: 340
Quote:
Originally Posted by cht View Post
I think as you mature in your watch tastes, you'll find wearing a smaller (<45mm) watch is more tasteful than the bigger counterparts.
x2
baxta69 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 December 2010, 08:16 AM   #9
clock
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: in a house
Posts: 13,510
Quote:
Originally Posted by cht View Post
i think as you mature in your watch tastes, you'll find wearing a smaller (<45mm) watch is more tasteful than the bigger counterparts.
+1
clock is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 December 2010, 01:55 AM   #10
JUSTROLEXES
⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
2024 SubLV41 Sponsor & Boutique Seller
 
JUSTROLEXES's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Real Name: Tony Geha
Location: San Diego, CA
Watch: Yacht-Master
Posts: 51,120
To me Rolex offers just the right size
__________________
Instagram @JustRolexes
2FA security active
JUSTROLEXES is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 December 2010, 02:00 AM   #11
av8ors
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Real Name: Roger
Location: California
Posts: 182
I used to have 7.75 inches wrist and liked big watches. Now it dropped to 7.25 inches and the 40mm GMTIIc fits perfect.
av8ors is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 December 2010, 02:12 AM   #12
cyglee
"TRF" Member
 
cyglee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Real Name: Gordon
Location: California
Watch: Gmtll,LV,SD,GV,etc
Posts: 627
Someone wrote once about guys with satellite dishes on their wrists... Personally, I max out with the Omega SMP ~42. I think the 40 Rolexes are perfect, and the 36 TOG is a nice change up.
cyglee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 December 2010, 03:56 AM   #13
Newportkrieger
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Real Name: Steve
Location: Newport Beach, CA
Watch: GMT Master Pepsi
Posts: 1,243
Quote:
Originally Posted by cyglee View Post
someone wrote once about guys with satellite dishes on their wrists... Personally, i max out with the omega smp ~42. I think the 40 rolexes are perfect, and the 36 tog is a nice change up.
+1
Newportkrieger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 December 2010, 02:04 AM   #14
tfarchio
"TRF" Member
 
tfarchio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Real Name: Todd
Location: Boston
Watch: Explorer I
Posts: 144
Depends on the size of your wrist. For me, anything between 36-40mm looks great. The Breitlings make me look like a child.
tfarchio is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 December 2010, 02:05 AM   #15
dtwo
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: toronto
Watch: 116610LN
Posts: 27
Larger watches, say >41mm is begging for attention, saying "Look at me, look at me".

40mm watches are confident and comfortable with themselves, perfectly fine to be missed by the those who strive to be cool and trendy.

I'm not saying that big watches are a fad, as it is true that watches are trending to be larger. But within each generation there will be the large, small and in-between watches. For me the 40-41mm range is perfect in the current times.
dtwo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 December 2010, 02:12 PM   #16
pb2au
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Real Name: Sanj
Location: Toronto, Canada
Watch: Depends on day
Posts: 347
Quote:
Originally Posted by dtwo View Post
Larger watches, say >41mm is begging for attention, saying "Look at me, look at me".

40mm watches are confident and comfortable with themselves, perfectly fine to be missed by the those who strive to be cool and trendy.

I'm not saying that big watches are a fad, as it is true that watches are trending to be larger. But within each generation there will be the large, small and in-between watches. For me the 40-41mm range is perfect in the current times.
Really depends on the size of one's wrist. I wear a 40 mm Panerai and numerous Rolexes.

Cheers

Sanj
pb2au is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 December 2010, 02:13 PM   #17
Roley
"TRF" Member
 
Roley's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Real Name: Roland
Location: GMT -4:00 Today
Watch: Enthusiast
Posts: 874
Nope.
Roley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 December 2010, 02:06 AM   #18
tkc324
"TRF" Member
 
tkc324's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Real Name: Tom
Location: Chi town
Watch: Daytona AP DD Sub
Posts: 3,717
I totally understanad where you are coming from. I remember I use to only wear 36 mm watches... now that I have 40mm watches... I started looking at the 42-44mm... But I think I am going to max out at 44mm.
tkc324 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 December 2010, 02:09 AM   #19
NMS75
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Real Name: Mark
Location: United Kingdom
Watch: 16610 & 116710LN
Posts: 559
One reason I switched from Omega to Rolex was because of the fact the Sub and GMT are 40mm while Omega seems happier producing 42mm+ watches. The 40mm size suits my wrist far better and I am a lot happier with it.

So no I don't feel Rolex make their watches too small.

M
NMS75 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 December 2010, 02:16 AM   #20
Joey_V
"TRF" Member
 
Joey_V's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Real Name: Joey
Location: Dallas, TX
Watch: SS Sub 16610 M
Posts: 3,824
40-44 is just right for me. But it seems like 40 is just perfect when it comes to Rolex designs.
__________________

Current Rotation: Rolex Submariner Date (M) - 1/08, Rolex Milgauss GV (V) - 2/10, Rolex SS Black Daytona (V) - 6/10, Rolex GMTIIC (G) - 5/11, TAG Heuer Silverstone (286/1860) - 1/2015
Former-watches: Omega PO/2535.80/2254, TAG Carrera/F1x2/Monaco, Panerai 312K/292L
Wish List: Panerai 270/505, Rolex SMURF, Rolex RG Daytona, Rolex DSSD
Joey_V is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 December 2010, 10:07 AM   #21
Z06
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Real Name: John
Location: Within24,901fromU
Watch: 116713 - V
Posts: 220
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joey_V View Post
40-44 is just right for me. But it seems like 40 is just perfect when it comes to Rolex designs.
I too agree...My Omega SM GMT is 44...and when I put my on my 116713 in 40...it seems SMALL! but after wearing it now, it seems PERFECT! (and my Omega too BIG)

In truth...I love um both...and they both have their place on my wrist...but my Rolex is seeing all the "time" right now...and I am LOVING it
Z06 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 December 2010, 02:24 AM   #22
psv
2024 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: USA & France
Posts: 11,078
You have to get used to whatever you are wearing if you switch between sizes. If you came from Rolex, you would have found a 44mm Panerai too big initially but after a couple of days it seems "right".

The same holds true the other way around. Unless you are a very large man, getting the new Sub Ceramic and put it on the wrist for 2-3 days and I think you will really like it.

Also, agree with you that the Deepsea is not optimal for everyday wear. It is a superlative piece but personally I think they went overboard on it.
psv is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 December 2010, 02:30 AM   #23
Puffy
"TRF" Member
 
Puffy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Here and there
Posts: 12,485
Rolex is perfect for me
__________________
Fine Quality is Long Remembered After the Pain of Spending Money is Forgotten
Puffy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 December 2010, 02:38 AM   #24
skypilot
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Iowa, USA
Posts: 490
Some brands have taken themselves off of my wish list with their sizes, I don't buy anything over 40 mm so Rolex is about right.
skypilot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 December 2010, 02:35 AM   #25
Wisconsin Proud
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 351
Try a 40mm Panerai........they wear larger than a Sub but more comfortably than a 44mm PAM
Wisconsin Proud is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 December 2010, 02:39 AM   #26
Jason71
"TRF" Member
 
Jason71's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Real Name: Jason
Location: USA
Watch: Rolex/Tudor Divers
Posts: 7,973
I started-out with a Flav-o-Flav Breitling super avenger at 48.4mm. My tastes have been refining over the last several years, and I now think the 40mm Rolex sports line is the perfect size for me. If I had gorilla arms, I might look at something larger, but my 7.25" wrist likes the 39.5mm 16600 the best.
__________________
Best Regards,
Jason


Just Say "NO" to Polishing
Card-Carrying Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch Curmudgeons
LIfe is too short to wear inexpensive watches
PLEXI IS SEXY
Jason71 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 December 2010, 02:35 AM   #27
landroverking
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Real Name: Jay
Location: TEXAS
Watch: Daytona
Posts: 7,648
No and I think the trend to big 45mm watches is fading.
For me the 42mm is about as big as like. I see Rolex taking the next Daytona to 41 or
42mm.
landroverking is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 July 2011, 12:09 AM   #28
gmt3
"TRF" Member
 
gmt3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Real Name: Mike
Location: Magic Mountain
Watch: Rolex, AP & Others
Posts: 100
Quote:
Originally Posted by landroverking View Post
No and I think the trend to big 45mm watches is fading.
For me the 42mm is about as big as like. I see Rolex taking the next Daytona to 41 or
42mm.
This should be perfect!
gmt3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 December 2010, 02:42 AM   #29
jnkay
"TRF" Member
 
jnkay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: South Florida, US
Watch: du jour
Posts: 1,815
I do wish that Rolex made a 42 mm sports models. I have an average sized wrist, but love the presence of a 42mm watch, such as some of the Oris divers, PO or the new tag diver models. However, I love the Rolex designs and quality moreso than most other brands, and even when I can find another brand that offers 42 mm in a design I really like, their cases often are so thick that they make the watch look ridiculous on my wrist.
jnkay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 December 2010, 02:55 AM   #30
Dan2010
"TRF" Member
 
Dan2010's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: South Carolina
Watch: Panerai 914
Posts: 6,540
Unless you are really, really big, I feel that 40MM is perfect. At my size (6'2 240 lbs), I don't like the 34MM or 36MM watches as I do believe they are too small which limits what I will buy from Rolex. Realizing that most people are nowhere near as big as I am, Rolex probably makes the right size for the majority of the market. However, anything bigger than 40-42MM looks silly too me unless, as I said, you are REALLY big. Giant clock watches I think are fad.
Dan2010 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.