ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
20 December 2010, 01:46 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Rhode island
Posts: 118
|
do any of you feel like rolexes are too small
I have been wearing panerai for awhile, went through many rolexes, a few panerai, now have traded my panerai, and am contemplating my new watch...I feel like subs and gmts are too small...I'm not that big, but, the deep sea-which I had for a month, was just too heavy and uncomfortable...anyways am I crazy...or does anyone else feel that way? suggestions? I wish they made a 42 or 43 mm sub or gmt
|
20 December 2010, 01:50 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: toronto
Watch: 116610LN
Posts: 27
|
Get the DSSD :)
|
20 December 2010, 01:50 AM | #3 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Real Name: D'OH!
Location: Kentucky
Watch: Rolex-1 Tudor-3
Posts: 36,217
|
Wearing a Panerai would make anything else seem small. 40mm Oyster works perfect for me. But it's all relative.
dP
__________________
TRF Member# 1668 Bass Player in TRF "AFTER DARK" Bar & NightClub Band Commander-in-Chief of The Nylon Nation The Crown & Shield Club Honorary Member of P-Club |
2 July 2011, 11:58 PM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Real Name: Tony
Location: Ontario, Canada
Watch: 16610
Posts: 3,290
|
|
20 December 2010, 01:50 AM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Rhode island
Posts: 118
|
I had the dssd, but, felt too heavy and uncomfortable
|
20 December 2010, 01:51 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Real Name: Gary
Location: UK
Watch: WG Daytona
Posts: 4,398
|
I have owned 3 Breitlings prior to getting my Daytona a couple of weeks ago and i honestly feel that the Daytona size is perfect. I did used to like the big and chunky style of the Breitlings but I have been converted. I do still like the Breitlings though1
|
20 December 2010, 01:54 AM | #7 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: Chris
Location: San antonio, TX
Watch: 116610LV
Posts: 2,143
|
I think as you mature in your watch tastes, you'll find wearing a smaller (<45mm) watch is more tasteful than the bigger counterparts.
|
20 December 2010, 03:57 AM | #8 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Real Name: davinci
Location: suffolk, uk
Watch: Rolex & Breitling
Posts: 340
|
|
20 December 2010, 08:16 AM | #9 |
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: in a house
Posts: 13,510
|
|
20 December 2010, 01:55 AM | #10 |
⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
2024 SubLV41 Sponsor & Boutique Seller Join Date: Jul 2009
Real Name: Tony Geha
Location: San Diego, CA
Watch: Yacht-Master
Posts: 51,120
|
To me Rolex offers just the right size
__________________
Instagram @JustRolexes 2FA security active |
20 December 2010, 02:00 AM | #11 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Real Name: Roger
Location: California
Posts: 182
|
I used to have 7.75 inches wrist and liked big watches. Now it dropped to 7.25 inches and the 40mm GMTIIc fits perfect.
|
20 December 2010, 02:12 AM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Real Name: Gordon
Location: California
Watch: Gmtll,LV,SD,GV,etc
Posts: 627
|
Someone wrote once about guys with satellite dishes on their wrists... Personally, I max out with the Omega SMP ~42. I think the 40 Rolexes are perfect, and the 36 TOG is a nice change up.
|
20 December 2010, 03:56 AM | #13 |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2009
Real Name: Steve
Location: Newport Beach, CA
Watch: GMT Master Pepsi
Posts: 1,243
|
|
20 December 2010, 02:04 AM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Real Name: Todd
Location: Boston
Watch: Explorer I
Posts: 144
|
Depends on the size of your wrist. For me, anything between 36-40mm looks great. The Breitlings make me look like a child.
|
20 December 2010, 02:05 AM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: toronto
Watch: 116610LN
Posts: 27
|
Larger watches, say >41mm is begging for attention, saying "Look at me, look at me".
40mm watches are confident and comfortable with themselves, perfectly fine to be missed by the those who strive to be cool and trendy. I'm not saying that big watches are a fad, as it is true that watches are trending to be larger. But within each generation there will be the large, small and in-between watches. For me the 40-41mm range is perfect in the current times. |
20 December 2010, 02:12 PM | #16 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Real Name: Sanj
Location: Toronto, Canada
Watch: Depends on day
Posts: 347
|
Quote:
Cheers Sanj |
|
20 December 2010, 02:13 PM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Real Name: Roland
Location: GMT -4:00 Today
Watch: Enthusiast
Posts: 874
|
Nope.
|
20 December 2010, 02:06 AM | #18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Real Name: Tom
Location: Chi town
Watch: Daytona AP DD Sub
Posts: 3,717
|
I totally understanad where you are coming from. I remember I use to only wear 36 mm watches... now that I have 40mm watches... I started looking at the 42-44mm... But I think I am going to max out at 44mm.
|
20 December 2010, 02:09 AM | #19 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Real Name: Mark
Location: United Kingdom
Watch: 16610 & 116710LN
Posts: 559
|
One reason I switched from Omega to Rolex was because of the fact the Sub and GMT are 40mm while Omega seems happier producing 42mm+ watches. The 40mm size suits my wrist far better and I am a lot happier with it.
So no I don't feel Rolex make their watches too small. M |
20 December 2010, 02:16 AM | #20 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Real Name: Joey
Location: Dallas, TX
Watch: SS Sub 16610 M
Posts: 3,824
|
40-44 is just right for me. But it seems like 40 is just perfect when it comes to Rolex designs.
__________________
Current Rotation: Rolex Submariner Date (M) - 1/08, Rolex Milgauss GV (V) - 2/10, Rolex SS Black Daytona (V) - 6/10, Rolex GMTIIC (G) - 5/11, TAG Heuer Silverstone (286/1860) - 1/2015 Former-watches: Omega PO/2535.80/2254, TAG Carrera/F1x2/Monaco, Panerai 312K/292L Wish List: Panerai 270/505, Rolex SMURF, Rolex RG Daytona, Rolex DSSD |
20 December 2010, 10:07 AM | #21 | |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Real Name: John
Location: Within24,901fromU
Watch: 116713 - V
Posts: 220
|
Quote:
In truth...I love um both...and they both have their place on my wrist...but my Rolex is seeing all the "time" right now...and I am LOVING it |
|
20 December 2010, 02:24 AM | #22 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: USA & France
Posts: 11,078
|
You have to get used to whatever you are wearing if you switch between sizes. If you came from Rolex, you would have found a 44mm Panerai too big initially but after a couple of days it seems "right".
The same holds true the other way around. Unless you are a very large man, getting the new Sub Ceramic and put it on the wrist for 2-3 days and I think you will really like it. Also, agree with you that the Deepsea is not optimal for everyday wear. It is a superlative piece but personally I think they went overboard on it. |
20 December 2010, 02:30 AM | #23 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Here and there
Posts: 12,485
|
Rolex is perfect for me
__________________
Fine Quality is Long Remembered After the Pain of Spending Money is Forgotten |
20 December 2010, 02:38 AM | #24 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Iowa, USA
Posts: 490
|
Some brands have taken themselves off of my wish list with their sizes, I don't buy anything over 40 mm so Rolex is about right.
|
20 December 2010, 02:35 AM | #25 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 351
|
Try a 40mm Panerai........they wear larger than a Sub but more comfortably than a 44mm PAM
|
20 December 2010, 02:39 AM | #26 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Real Name: Jason
Location: USA
Watch: Rolex/Tudor Divers
Posts: 7,973
|
I started-out with a Flav-o-Flav Breitling super avenger at 48.4mm. My tastes have been refining over the last several years, and I now think the 40mm Rolex sports line is the perfect size for me. If I had gorilla arms, I might look at something larger, but my 7.25" wrist likes the 39.5mm 16600 the best.
__________________
Best Regards, Jason Just Say "NO" to Polishing Card-Carrying Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch Curmudgeons LIfe is too short to wear inexpensive watches PLEXI IS SEXY |
20 December 2010, 02:35 AM | #27 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Real Name: Jay
Location: TEXAS
Watch: Daytona
Posts: 7,648
|
No and I think the trend to big 45mm watches is fading.
For me the 42mm is about as big as like. I see Rolex taking the next Daytona to 41 or 42mm. |
4 July 2011, 12:09 AM | #28 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Real Name: Mike
Location: Magic Mountain
Watch: Rolex, AP & Others
Posts: 100
|
|
20 December 2010, 02:42 AM | #29 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: South Florida, US
Watch: du jour
Posts: 1,815
|
I do wish that Rolex made a 42 mm sports models. I have an average sized wrist, but love the presence of a 42mm watch, such as some of the Oris divers, PO or the new tag diver models. However, I love the Rolex designs and quality moreso than most other brands, and even when I can find another brand that offers 42 mm in a design I really like, their cases often are so thick that they make the watch look ridiculous on my wrist.
|
20 December 2010, 02:55 AM | #30 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: South Carolina
Watch: Panerai 914
Posts: 6,540
|
Unless you are really, really big, I feel that 40MM is perfect. At my size (6'2 240 lbs), I don't like the 34MM or 36MM watches as I do believe they are too small which limits what I will buy from Rolex. Realizing that most people are nowhere near as big as I am, Rolex probably makes the right size for the majority of the market. However, anything bigger than 40-42MM looks silly too me unless, as I said, you are REALLY big. Giant clock watches I think are fad.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.