ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

sappie66 · 9 January 2011, 08:01 AM

Got my first Rolex a short while ago, a nice regularly-serviced U series 16610. Had Omegas and Breitlings before (still do).

I have, however, been thinking (obsessing) about the Sub-C.

Would getting one be too much overlap? The 16610 Sub with the smaller lugs is iconic and I don't intend on getting rid of it. In fact, it gets the most wrist time now (actually, as I type, I have it on my left wrist, while my Speedy Pro is on my right wrist

-- only do this while at home

).

I know I have to do what is right for me, but just would like some of your thoughts.

Thanks.

Fiery · 9 January 2011, 08:08 AM

If you meant the black Sub-C: If I were you, I'd wait until Basel, because there's a teeny-tiny bit of chance that Rolex will roll out a Sub-C NoDate there. That would be a perfect mate for your 16610 IMHO.

If you meant the green Sub-C: Go for it!

sappie66 · 9 January 2011, 08:20 AM

I was meaning the black Sub-C, but the no-date idea is superb!

Green.... hmmm..... not ruling it out, but need more mulling over. Certainly there would be no problem as there would be little real overlap with the 16610, but the colour raises other concerns. ;-)

Al1988 · 9 January 2011, 08:26 AM

Personally I'd say no.

If you like the new case design of the SubC then i'd recommend looking at a GMTiic, it's a beautiful watch that feels great on the wrist. It gives you all the new design features of the SubC (only difference being the SubC clasp is marginally better) but looks even better in my opinion

sappie66 · 9 January 2011, 08:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Al1988

Personally I'd say no.

If you like the new case design of the SubC then i'd recommend looking at a GMTiic, it's a beautiful watch that feels great on the wrist. It gives you all the new design features of the SubC (only difference being the SubC clasp is marginally better) but looks even better in my opinion

That is a fine plan, indeed. I tend to like divers, especially the Sub, though, since I don't dive, this GMT idea could work. More thinking....

So, Sub-C black -- perhaps too much overlap; Sub-C green -- too green, though nice; Sub-C no date -- not yet here, and overlap still an issue; GMT IIC - no overlap, similar design, GMT functionality, but less (though enough) WR.

On paper (metaphorically speaking), the decision should be easy......

PeterT · 9 January 2011, 08:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sappie66

That is a fine plan, indeed. I tend to like divers, especially the Sub, though, since I don't dive, this GMT idea could work. More thinking....

So, Sub-C black -- perhaps too much overlap; Sub-C green -- too green, though nice; Sub-C no date -- not yet here, and overlap still an issue; GMT IIC - no overlap, similar design, GMT functionality, but less (though enough) WR.

On paper (metaphorically speaking), the decision should be easy......

Go and see a Sub C - LV in person.
It is not as green as you think for most of the time. The photos are deceptive. The dial is often black but when the sun just catches it you see the flash of green just like someone has turned on the light.

Peter

pk_diver · 9 January 2011, 08:50 AM

No. I'd like to spend years togheter with a fine watch as a Sub is, rather than changing it every time they update the design. If i was to change the watch everytime a new collection comes out, I'd wear a colourful Swatch...

faingator · 9 January 2011, 08:52 AM

Do it. You won't regret it. One compliments the other nicely...

z32turbo · 9 January 2011, 11:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by faingator

Do it. You won't regret it. One compliments the other nicely...

Absolutely!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Watch Professor · 18 January 2011, 12:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Al1988

Personally I'd say no.

If you like the new case design of the SubC then i'd recommend looking at a GMTiic, it's a beautiful watch that feels great on the wrist. It gives you all the new design features of the SubC (only difference being the SubC clasp is marginally better) but looks even better in my opinion

I agree. I have both the GMT IIC and the 16610.

Art 1 · 9 January 2011, 08:26 AM

I would not.

B. Doggy · 9 January 2011, 08:35 AM

Not me.

Speed · 9 January 2011, 08:51 AM

No

esm · 9 January 2011, 08:55 AM

I would.

They are almost "the same", but "different" enough.

MortgageGuy · 9 January 2011, 09:10 AM

I love the subs so I will be in the minority here and say YES... I would certainly look at the green too, as one said it is really not that green

cwwhk · 9 January 2011, 09:20 AM

Yes go for it. I did.

Watch Professor · 9 January 2011, 09:21 AM

Go for the GMT IIC.

awright102 · 9 January 2011, 09:22 AM

I would. I've got the sub-c and am looking at getting a 16610 to add to the collection. Old and new, the perfect combination.

slcbbrown · 9 January 2011, 09:23 AM

No

axecollector65 · 9 January 2011, 09:25 AM

I had the same concern as the 16610 is a classic, but once I saw the ceramic bezel in person I was hooked. I love both watches , but the ceramic get most of the wrist time. Although the subc is heavier, it's much more comfortable to wear than the 16610.

JBat · 9 January 2011, 09:27 AM

I like the 16610 so much that I would not. I would be looking at other Rolex models, maybe even variations on the 16610, like the LV or 14060. I think for now I am done with the ceramic models.

George Ab · 9 January 2011, 09:32 AM

I have had the Sub-D LV on my wrist.....nice. Do check it out in person to see if the clasp bothers you.... length. If you have big wrists it should not be a problem. Else, lay down until the urge goes away.

Eric88 · 9 January 2011, 09:33 AM

I had a 16610LV and made the bold move for a black Sub-C. I could not keep both at the time as my watch fund has a ceiling on it and so I sold my 16610 a few weeks after getting the Sub-C, to be sure I was happy with the new one. I have no regrets with the Sub-C. I do have intentions of one day getting another pre-ceramic Sub, most likely a 14060M or 5513, as I do miss certain things about the classic.

If you have the ability to get both, I say go for it!

sappie66 · 9 January 2011, 10:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PeterT

Go and see a Sub C - LV in person.
It is not as green as you think for most of the time. The photos are deceptive. The dial is often black but when the sun just catches it you see the flash of green just like someone has turned on the light.

This I will do, again. Perhaps they will let me outside the store with it so I can see it in the sunshine.

Quote:

Originally Posted by pk_diver

No. I'd like to spend years togheter with a fine watch as a Sub is, rather than changing it every time they update the design. If i was to change the watch everytime a new collection comes out, I'd wear a colourful Swatch...

Not changing, just adding.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Eric88

I had a 16610LV and made the bold move for a black Sub-C. I could not keep both at the time as my watch fund has a ceiling on it and so I sold my 16610 a few weeks after getting the Sub-C, to be sure I was happy with the new one. I have no regrets with the Sub-C. I do have intentions of one day getting another pre-ceramic Sub, most likely a 14060M or 5513, as I do miss certain things about the classic.

That's the thing. I know I would miss the 16610 so it isn't going anywhere.

Thanks for all your replies!

fishrising · 9 January 2011, 10:17 AM

I had neither sub a short while ago and decided to get a classic 16610 rather than the newer ceramic one. The new one just didn't do it for me.

Paracentesis · 9 January 2011, 10:53 AM

Nope.

LAJM · 9 January 2011, 11:06 AM

No for me.

sea-dweller · 9 January 2011, 11:15 AM

I have a 14060, 16610 and a SD, but would buy the new Sub, if I had funds to do so.

Rolex Freak · 9 January 2011, 11:23 AM

I went GMT IIC and absolutely love it.

subtona · 9 January 2011, 12:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sappie66

Got my first Rolex a short while ago, a nice regularly-serviced U series 16610. Had Omegas and Breitlings before (still do).

I have, however, been thinking (obsessing) about the Sub-C.

Would getting one be too much overlap? The 16610 Sub with the smaller lugs is iconic and I don't intend on getting rid of it. In fact, it gets the most wrist time now (actually, as I type, I have it on my left wrist, while my Speedy Pro is on my right wrist

-- only do this while at home

).

I know I have to do what is right for me, but just would like some of your thoughts.

Thanks.

they are too similar they have essentiallythe same movement.
the blue spring being the significant change but really not that big a deal .
the other big change is the band the new one is imo far superior.

the green is an awesome option and since you alreadyhave black its a perfect solution.
the ceramic bezel claims not to scratch easily but there has been a few pictures of them chipping.
but if your jonesing for the new thing. did i mention the green one? it was definately hot in person!
good luck.

9 January 2011, 08:01 AM	#1
sappie66 "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2010 Location: Vancouver Posts: 87	Would you get a Sub-C if you already have a 16610? Got my first Rolex a short while ago, a nice regularly-serviced U series 16610. Had Omegas and Breitlings before (still do). I have, however, been thinking (obsessing) about the Sub-C. Would getting one be too much overlap? The 16610 Sub with the smaller lugs is iconic and I don't intend on getting rid of it. In fact, it gets the most wrist time now (actually, as I type, I have it on my left wrist, while my Speedy Pro is on my right wrist -- only do this while at home ). I know I have to do what is right for me, but just would like some of your thoughts. Thanks.

9 January 2011, 08:52 AM	#8
faingator "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2009 Location: Fort Myers, FL Watch: Rolex Deepsea Posts: 8,726	Do it. You won't regret it. One compliments the other nicely... __________________ Rolex SS Blk Sub-C V-Series Rolex TT Blk Sub-C V-Series Rolex Sub 14060M V-Series Rolex Explorer II White V-Series Rolex Yachtmaster SS M-Series

9 January 2011, 08:35 AM	#12
B. Doggy "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2008 Real Name: Bryan Location: Oregon Posts: 7,399	Not me. __________________ Rolex / Panerai / Omega

9 January 2011, 09:10 AM	#15
MortgageGuy "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2009 Real Name: Adam Location: Orlando, Florida Watch: Me Posts: 9,935	I love the subs so I will be in the minority here and say YES... I would certainly look at the green too, as one said it is really not that green __________________ The richest people in the world look for and build NETWORKS, Everyone else looks for work... Robert Kiyosaki

9 January 2011, 09:20 AM	#16
cwwhk "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2009 Location: Hong Kong Watch: Black Daytona Posts: 827	Yes go for it. I did. __________________ Everyday is a Rolex day.

9 January 2011, 08:08 AM	#2
Fiery "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: Europe Watch: Sub-C 116610LN Posts: 2,649	If you meant the black Sub-C: If I were you, I'd wait until Basel, because there's a teeny-tiny bit of chance that Rolex will roll out a Sub-C NoDate there. That would be a perfect mate for your 16610 IMHO. If you meant the green Sub-C: Go for it!

9 January 2011, 08:20 AM	#3
sappie66 "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2010 Location: Vancouver Posts: 87	I was meaning the black Sub-C, but the no-date idea is superb! Green.... hmmm..... not ruling it out, but need more mulling over. Certainly there would be no problem as there would be little real overlap with the 16610, but the colour raises other concerns. ;-)

9 January 2011, 08:26 AM	#4
Al1988 "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2010 Location: New York City Watch: Watch Posts: 1,000	Personally I'd say no. If you like the new case design of the SubC then i'd recommend looking at a GMTiic, it's a beautiful watch that feels great on the wrist. It gives you all the new design features of the SubC (only difference being the SubC clasp is marginally better) but looks even better in my opinion

9 January 2011, 08:50 AM	#7
pk_diver "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2010 Location: Italy Watch: the stars Posts: 91	No. I'd like to spend years togheter with a fine watch as a Sub is, rather than changing it every time they update the design. If i was to change the watch everytime a new collection comes out, I'd wear a colourful Swatch...

9 January 2011, 08:26 AM	#11
Art 1 Banned Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: Florida, Canada Watch: Rol/Seik/Tud/Omega Posts: 30,244	I would not.

9 January 2011, 08:51 AM	#13
Speed "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2009 Location: USA Posts: 19,706	No

9 January 2011, 08:55 AM	#14
esm "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2008 Real Name: Eric Location: Location,Location Watch: this, bro... Posts: 15,340	I would. They are almost "the same", but "different" enough.

9 January 2011, 09:21 AM	#17
Watch Professor "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2009 Real Name: Myron Location: New York Watch: GMT IIC; Sub Date Posts: 3,166	Go for the GMT IIC.

9 January 2011, 09:22 AM	#18
awright102 "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2010 Real Name: Andy Wright Location: UK Watch: Sea Dweller 16600 Posts: 78	I would. I've got the sub-c and am looking at getting a 16610 to add to the collection. Old and new, the perfect combination.

9 January 2011, 09:23 AM	#19
slcbbrown "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2009 Real Name: steve Location: dallas area Watch: 50's TT t-bird Posts: 3,689	No

9 January 2011, 09:25 AM	#20
axecollector65 Member Join Date: Nov 2010 Location: New England Watch: Casio G-Shock Posts: 199	I had the same concern as the 16610 is a classic, but once I saw the ceramic bezel in person I was hooked. I love both watches , but the ceramic get most of the wrist time. Although the subc is heavier, it's much more comfortable to wear than the 16610.

9 January 2011, 09:27 AM	#21
JBat "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2007 Real Name: John Location: Washington Watch: 16710, 16610, DJ Posts: 7,329	I like the 16610 so much that I would not. I would be looking at other Rolex models, maybe even variations on the 16610, like the LV or 14060. I think for now I am done with the ceramic models.

9 January 2011, 09:32 AM	#22
George Ab "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2009 Real Name: George Location: Seattle Watch: One of Them Posts: 6,924	I have had the Sub-D LV on my wrist.....nice. Do check it out in person to see if the clasp bothers you.... length. If you have big wrists it should not be a problem. Else, lay down until the urge goes away. __________________

9 January 2011, 09:33 AM	#23
Eric88 "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2010 Location: 88 keys Posts: 2,241	I had a 16610LV and made the bold move for a black Sub-C. I could not keep both at the time as my watch fund has a ceiling on it and so I sold my 16610 a few weeks after getting the Sub-C, to be sure I was happy with the new one. I have no regrets with the Sub-C. I do have intentions of one day getting another pre-ceramic Sub, most likely a 14060M or 5513, as I do miss certain things about the classic. If you have the ability to get both, I say go for it!

9 January 2011, 10:17 AM	#25
fishrising "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2007 Real Name: Ben Location: New England, USA Watch: Sub, Pam164, PO-XL Posts: 383	I had neither sub a short while ago and decided to get a classic 16610 rather than the newer ceramic one. The new one just didn't do it for me. __________________ ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ

9 January 2011, 10:53 AM	#26
Paracentesis Banned Join Date: May 2010 Real Name: James Location: UK Watch: Tissot Posts: 1,454	Nope.

9 January 2011, 11:06 AM	#27
LAJM "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2010 Real Name: Larry Location: Canada Watch: Explorer II Posts: 270	No for me.

9 January 2011, 11:15 AM	#28
sea-dweller "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2007 Real Name: Dennis Location: Bay Area - 925 Posts: 40,018	I have a 14060, 16610 and a SD, but would buy the new Sub, if I had funds to do so. __________________ TRF Member #6699 (since September 2007)

9 January 2011, 11:23 AM	#29
Rolex Freak "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2008 Real Name: Sandro Location: Canada Watch: Rolex/GS Posts: 4,412	I went GMT IIC and absolutely love it.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)