ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
25 January 2011, 01:25 AM | #1 |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Kingstown
Posts: 58,279
|
What makes this an Explorer?
|
25 January 2011, 01:28 AM | #2 |
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: Daniel
Location: North Carolina
Watch: Sea Dweller
Posts: 5,524
|
What do you mean???
|
25 January 2011, 01:29 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Jon
Location: London
Watch: 214270
Posts: 147
|
Very strange - as it has the mercedes hour hand. Oyster P's do not have this.
__________________
XROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXR LOREREXPLOREREXPLORERE |
25 January 2011, 01:33 AM | #4 |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: US
Watch: 3570.50
Posts: 2,156
|
I think he's referring to the fact that the dial doesn't say Explorer on it. Was a dial variant like that ever released or is this a aftermarket or re-dial?
|
25 January 2011, 01:39 AM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Jon
Location: London
Watch: 214270
Posts: 147
|
I have no idea. Maybe it was damaged in the past, had a new crystal and aftermarket Oyster Perp. dial put in? - Just a guess
I too would be interested to know if anyone out there has any ideas?
__________________
XROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXR LOREREXPLOREREXPLORERE |
25 January 2011, 02:27 AM | #6 |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Kingstown
Posts: 58,279
|
I've never seen an Explorer that doesn't say Explorer on the dial.
|
25 January 2011, 02:34 AM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Jon
Location: London
Watch: 214270
Posts: 147
|
...other than the smith's that Hillary wore up the mountian LOL!
__________________
XROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXR LOREREXPLOREREXPLORERE |
25 January 2011, 02:35 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Real Name: Steve
Location: Burbank, CA
Watch: 214270 Mark II
Posts: 4,121
|
Good question.
Maybe you should ask the seller and see what he says. |
25 January 2011, 02:58 AM | #9 |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Kingstown
Posts: 58,279
|
|
25 January 2011, 03:15 AM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Jon
Location: London
Watch: 214270
Posts: 147
|
I've Pm'd him so we should have an answer soon!
__________________
XROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXR LOREREXPLOREREXPLORERE |
25 January 2011, 03:25 AM | #11 |
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2009
Real Name: Daniel
Location: UK
Posts: 520
|
Could be an aftermarket dial? or perhaps he just doesnt have the model number right? very strange indeed...
|
25 January 2011, 03:32 AM | #12 |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Kingstown
Posts: 58,279
|
|
25 January 2011, 03:46 AM | #13 |
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2009
Real Name: Daniel
Location: UK
Posts: 520
|
|
25 January 2011, 03:50 AM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: GMT+1
Posts: 2,711
|
Well, the reference number on the case says that the watch should be an Explorer, and the serial number indicates that it should be a so called "blacked out" Explorer, but that dial, and the hands - if you ask me - are nothing that ever came from Rolex in Geneva. I might be wrong, but I am confident that I am not.
Perhaps someone needed the original dial more in a different 14270 case that were in better shape. Looking forward to see some replies in the sales thread from the seller. I am curious on the history of this watch. Best, A |
25 January 2011, 03:53 AM | #15 | |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Kingstown
Posts: 58,279
|
Quote:
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.