ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
18 February 2011, 05:47 AM | #1 |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: NY
Posts: 88
|
Rolex "Old Man's Watch"
I am 35 years old and not much of a WIS but I am learning a lot from all of you here. I was and am a Tag owner but I wanted to treat myself to a new watch. I saw Robert Downey Jr. wearing a Bell & Ross in Iron Man and thought that it was cool and I did some research but I could not get over the rubber bands.
Bigger watches are in with my age group and I was not thinking about Rolex I always remembered the fake gold ones I would see on vacation in the Islands and thought that they were a old persons watch. I decided to buy a Grand Carrera and it cost $9000 and I thought I could probably look at a Rolex for that kind of money. I went on the Rolex website and was so surprised at the sport watches that I saw they did not look old at all. While I was looking I came across the Deepsea Dweller I thought it was the coolest watch I have ever seen and knew I had to try it on. When I told my friends about it they all told me I should be looking at Breitling since they all wore those but I was set. I went to the local AD and fell in love. Why does Rolex not advertise in younger publications like Maxim or other 30 something magazines and get their new designs out there? I think they could sell much more if they lose their stigma as an old watch. |
18 February 2011, 05:50 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Annapolis, MD
Watch: Sea-Dweller 16600
Posts: 5,081
|
The reason they are perceived as old man watches is that we buy them as young men, and then wear them until we are old men. Jury is still out on being able to do this with a Breitling.
|
18 February 2011, 05:56 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Real Name: john
Location: Scotland
Watch: sub 16610Lv
Posts: 13,523
|
welcome. from the old Scottish guy
__________________
"AFTER DARK" BAR AND NIGHT CLUB GM. |
18 February 2011, 08:26 AM | #4 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: Bob
Location: U.S.A.
Watch: 1655
Posts: 64,277
|
right on!
__________________
Founder & Card Carrying Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons |
18 February 2011, 08:38 AM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: London/Tokyo
Watch: FPJ CO BL
Posts: 1,709
|
No way they are for old people. I mean I dun mean to say old people cant wear them, but what I am saying is that a good watch is "ageless". Would you tell a young kid that Steak or that painting, that statue is for "old tastes"? No.
What is good is good. For the price, you will not get a better watch. Forget Breitling, their inhouse chrono costs over 6000GBP, u can get a submariner for 4900 which is also inhouse and a solid movement at that. Tags dun even use their in house movements. A rolex is a damn fine watch whoever wears it. |
18 February 2011, 08:56 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Real Name: Brian
Location: Kansas
Watch: 16610, Omega PO
Posts: 1,898
|
Perfect answer. I'm 36 and have been aware of Rolex since I was probably 7 or 8 years old. I still remember all of those cool ads in National Geographic and couldn't wait for the day I could afford one.
__________________
Things got out of control and I had to stab a clown... |
23 February 2011, 09:27 PM | #7 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Real Name: Brett
Location: Bahrain, Dubai
Watch: Rolex and AP
Posts: 5,538
|
Quote:
Too right mate - how cool were those Nat Geo Sub ads when you were a kid dreaming of adventure!! |
|
18 February 2011, 10:56 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: NJ
Posts: 81
|
So true of a Quote
Couldnt agree more! I think it also depends on the Rolex you buy the stainless ones are easy to pass off as being young I think it is when you get the all gold models is where it gets difficult
|
18 February 2011, 11:10 AM | #9 |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: NY
Posts: 88
|
I never looked at Breitling watches before and I just spent a half hour looking at them and I do not understand what people see in them. They seem really big and busy also they seem to have a bit to much bling to them. Maybe this is the reason that they are popular with my 30 something generation. I would rather buy a nice Tag Heuer watch then any of the Breitling watches I looked at. I think that with the Rolex watches they just seem to be built with one block of steel and tank like. I see a lot of people complain about the DSSD but it seems like all of the Breitlings are bigger then the DSSD.
|
18 February 2011, 03:05 PM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Real Name: Bob
Location: Dallas, Texas
Watch: Daytona Meteorite
Posts: 3,417
|
I'm with you!
__________________
meteor flying to Earth onto my wrist... 116509 Daytona Meteorite, 116520 Daytona Black, 116710 GMTIIC, 16013 DATEJUST, CARTIER SANTOS 100 W20090X8, IWC Big Pilot, IWC Top Gun "Everything works out in the end. If it hasn't worked out, it's not the end." |
18 February 2011, 06:31 PM | #11 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: Oliver
Location: Qatar
Watch: GMT-Master II
Posts: 260
|
My Dad wears a TT DJ with a pyramid dial, which he bought to celebrate his 50th birthday.
To be honest I think that it is a jolly nice watch but I would not consider wearing one myself here at age 29. However I am sure that when I am older wearing a DJ like this will appeal more to me than it does at present. For now I will stick with the sports models. Just as the clothes we wear change as we grow up so might the watch. |
18 February 2011, 06:48 PM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: singapore
Posts: 6,424
|
Old? I thought 50 is the new 40?
|
18 February 2011, 07:32 PM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: Andrew
Location: Glasgow, Scotland
Watch: Tudor Submariner
Posts: 130
|
I don't think Rolex is aimed at the older person, merely the more discerning person
I got my first Rolex brand Tudor Sub for my 21st from my parents which I will never part with and wear on a daily basis. Before that I bought myself a TAG F1 with wages from my first proper job, which my dad now wears pretty much on a daily basis. I remember seeing Roger Moore as James Bond as a youngster, turning the bezel on his Sub and it activating a magnet to unzip his ladies dress and thought "I need one of those in my life". Unfortunately I was mighty disappointed when I realised at an older age that this was indeed camera trickery However, I remember looking in AD's windows with my dad from probably around the age of 10 and always wanting one. I also think that with my dad in the bespoke tailoring business all of his life, fine hand made suits and fine watches kinda go hand in hand which probably influenced my love of Rolex and other fine watch brands. Now at the fine old age of 33 I recently bought a DSSD myself and am planning on treating my dad to a Yacht-Master while adding a white Milgauss and hopefully a Daytona to my collection in the very near future. Mind you at the same time I'm lusting over a few Panerai too. With regard to Rolex advertising in younger publications like Maxim, I don't think this is the type of magazine Rolex would associate themself with. I remember subscribing to both Maxim and FHM in my 20's and as I got older, engaged then subsequently married, I found these magazines turning into soft porn and they lost their appeal to me and I have now changed over to reading GQ. I have also found myself moving away from the "boy racer" type cars that had me hooked growing up and now like more "grown up" cars like Range Rover and Bentley. The same with radio stations, I now listen to the same stations as my dad from time to time. Man, I'm turning into my dad Or maybe I am just getting old
__________________
DSSD arrived
|
18 February 2011, 05:57 AM | #14 | |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 365
|
Quote:
|
|
18 February 2011, 05:59 AM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Real Name: Tom
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 1,506
|
Really nice watch. I am sure it will age well with you.
__________________
Datejust II 116333 Submariner 116610LN |
18 February 2011, 06:05 AM | #16 |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: NY
Posts: 88
|
My friends are really into Breitling but they seem a little to BLING to me. I like the look of Tags but I wanted something a little more upscale. I like the look of a larger watch without it being to much I think the DSSD fits the bill very well. Their really seems to be a love hate relationship with the watch though I read a lot about people having one for 3 months and selling it. It seems easier to buy one used then to find one at a AD. Mine was in my AD only two days and he said he had a hard time getting them but their are a lot for sale here.
Do you think Rolex is sending out less on purpose to spike interest in the watch because it is not as popular and their is a big used market. Or do you think maybe they will stop production and go with a new design? |
18 February 2011, 06:38 AM | #17 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Real Name: Rob
Location: Brisbane AUS
Watch: SeaDweller
Posts: 850
|
Quote:
IMHO the trend for the younger generation is to wear a slightly larger cased watch, nothing wrong with this of course. As a ROLEX fan, I can understand that other enthusiasts want to try the DSSD. But I also appreciate that its not a watch for everyone in all situations, and they may flip it for something that meets their requirements a little better. Hence, the influx in used models. Just a blip in the big scheme. And no, I for one would be surprised if ROLEX would hold onto stock to boost the DSSD image. There are easier ways to achieve this through advertising, surely Stopping production or model change so quick after release is almost unheard of in ROLEX land Ok, so maybe there was the orange hand GMT, but it is now an instant classic. The day of the Zenith Daytona strategy is over. Rob
__________________
Travelling Through Time at The Speed of Life. |
|
18 February 2011, 06:03 AM | #18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: The Sea
Posts: 1,894
|
I've never read Maxim, but just had a look at their website, and I can see why Rolex wouldn't advertise in it. There are Rolex ads in lots of other magazines aimed squarely at the 30s crowd.
|
18 February 2011, 06:13 AM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Real Name: MJC
Location: PHL USA
Watch: IWC, Rolex, AP
Posts: 29,232
|
Great watch, you'll see a lot of 20-30 year olds (and of course up) wearing a Rolex. I'm 25 and a few of my friends have them. Rolex being an old man's watch is a misconception, imo.
__________________
|
18 February 2011, 06:27 AM | #20 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Real Name: Gary
Location: Bozeman, MT
Watch: 126508 Paul Newman
Posts: 7,835
|
Welcome. I actually have never really thought of Rolex as being an Old Man's Watch and I think Rolex does market to a lot of demographics including the younger generation. They are huge sponsors of many sporting events and a lot of young athletes are spokesmen and women for Rolex like Lindsey Vonn and Roger Federer to name a few.
|
18 February 2011, 07:19 AM | #21 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2008
Real Name: Andy
Location: EU
Watch: them come and go..
Posts: 2,052
|
The Watch Snob says it's an old man watch..:chuc kle:
|
18 February 2011, 07:27 AM | #22 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2010
Real Name: Dan
Location: USA
Watch: This N That
Posts: 34,253
|
Everybody has an opinion. You'll find this in regards to watches, cars, houses and other things as well.
However you will find a number of people your age and younger on this forum. I am sure your demographic and even younger people than you are very important to Rolex. The baby boomers wont live for ever. Maybe for a long long time, but not forever.
__________________
When it captures your imagination, that's when you know you have found your passion. Loyal Foot Soldier of The Nylon Nation. Card Carrying Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons |
18 February 2011, 07:31 AM | #23 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Real Name: Joel
Location: Renton, WA
Watch: 16610LV
Posts: 2,990
|
welcome to trf...
how about SI swimsuit. is that young enough!
__________________
___/ /_/ /_____ 16610LV; Ball Diver EMT II \:::::::::::::::/ ~~~~~~~~~~ |
18 February 2011, 07:33 AM | #24 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Real Name: Jim Snyder
Location: Ohio
Watch: Ask me later.....
Posts: 7,726
|
I'm half way to 100
__________________
"You ain't lived, 'til you've had your tires rotated by a red-headed women." |
18 February 2011, 01:47 PM | #25 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Real Name: Michael
Location: Midwest-USA
Watch: 5513
Posts: 1,942
|
|
18 February 2011, 08:48 AM | #26 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Canada
Watch: Explorer
Posts: 1,748
|
Classic is classic, age means nothing with rolex.
|
18 February 2011, 08:49 AM | #27 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Lancashire, UK
Watch: ????????
Posts: 2,187
|
My son asked me for one for his 18th Birthday........ which I had to grant (obviously!)
He got a 14060 Sub - he loves it to bits !! |
18 February 2011, 08:57 AM | #28 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Real Name: DOUBLE RY
Location: NYC
Watch: and learn.
Posts: 289
|
When a girlfriend of mine first saw my Expy she played with it admiringly and then said "there's something very senior citizen about the magnifying glass."
|
18 February 2011, 09:35 AM | #29 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: PNW
Watch: DS,BLNR,SubLV,DJ2
Posts: 8,123
|
My dad had a Rolex when I was a kid and have always thought that someday I would own one. And so I bought my first Rolex when I was in my early 30s. I own a couple three today.
I will give my 20 and 30 y/o sons their first Rolex watch this year or early next year. |
18 February 2011, 09:36 AM | #30 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 22,683
|
Nice score on the DS.
It's interesting that may feel Rolex is for the "more mature" set. Perhaps Rolex themselves lends to this with their "crown for every achievement" saying. The implication being a Rolex comes later after your "mark" has been made. I don't think that holds a lot of water. I got my first when I was 19 and remember a lot of younger guys wearing them because they were considered the best thing out there. Sure Rolex has several bling references that perhaps are better suited to the higher income of those more well established, but again I not sure that is really the case. The professional models are successfull because they are just that--professional models. Whether one actually uses the watch for it's intended purpose or likes the design, young or old there is an appeal to the watch that few can match. |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.