ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

AJMarcus · 26 March 2011, 09:51 PM

Just curious how many began their interest in Panerai after having caught the Rolex bug? I'm wondering if there's a patter because I know a few, like myself, who really did not appreciate Panerai until after I got into the Rolex sports models. Thanks

jamesbondOO7 · 26 March 2011, 10:05 PM

I cannot for the life of me understand the attraction.

Brunotheboxer · 26 March 2011, 10:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jamesbondOO7

I cannot for the life of me understand the attraction.

I know what you mean. Rolex does seem to be going in the wrong direction. Have you thought about flipping your watches?

Mosco · 27 March 2011, 01:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brunotheboxer

I know what you mean. Rolex does seem to be going in the wrong direction. Have you thought about flipping your watches?

marcinthemiddle · 26 March 2011, 10:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jamesbondOO7

I cannot for the life of me understand the attraction.

Bruno's right... flip 'em!

esm · 27 March 2011, 01:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AJMarcus

Just curious how many began their interest in Panerai after having caught the Rolex bug? I'm wondering if there's a patter because I know a few, like myself, who really did not appreciate Panerai until after I got into the Rolex sports models. Thanks

when i started getting into watches about 2 and half years ago, i got a Sub first... then you read and interact with fellow owners for more WIS knowledge.

some people gets it, some dont - that's the fact of like.

i for one like the appearance of Paneri watches, but not all of them (same for Rolex).

several Rolex later (still have them all) and i'm now on my second Panerai - im loving it.

IMO - Rolex and Panerai are somewhat "connected", as Rolex supplied Panerai movements back in the days.

which one has caught your eyes atm?

Quote:

Originally Posted by jamesbondOO7

I cannot for the life of me understand the attraction.

so, mr. 007 - if that is the case, can i ask what are you doing in a Panerai sub-forum?

Benwah · 27 March 2011, 01:33 AM

Had the 16610, bought the 111, then the 024. Sold the 16610 and the 111 and bought the 328...

Brunotheboxer · 27 March 2011, 01:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by esm

so, mr. 007 - if that is the case, can i ask what are you doing in a Panerai sub-forum?

He's hating.

Dont hate the Playa, hate the game I say.

swish77 · 27 March 2011, 02:19 AM

Love both for different reasons and different occasions. Both brands have models that are way too blingy, though. Too much polished steel on many Panerais, and they're so big that they scratch easily. Some Rolex models have similar issues, and some are downright ugly. However, depending on your tastes both offer sports models that are stunning. For simple beauty I think Panerai wins. Rolex has long left the world of simple classic tool watches. I own both, but only basic models, PAM177 and Sub 14060M, for example, for the reasons above.

HL65 · 27 March 2011, 03:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jamesbondOO7

I cannot for the life of me understand the attraction.

How to win friends and influence people. Nice.......
Ps Mr.Bond, why are you then lurking in the Panerai section?

AJMarcus · 27 March 2011, 03:29 AM

You all made good points. I guess I can understand mr. Bond's preference for Rolex. Maybe he just made a wrong turn or clicked the wrong button on the forums.

Anyway, I too think there's a connection between the two brands that's why I posed the question. And I absolutely enjoy my Sub C LN and my GMT Pepsi. But alas not much wrist time for the 16613. I may flip the TT Sub down the road for a PAM 88. We'll see.......

0037ksm · 27 March 2011, 03:55 AM

I'm attracted to some of the Panerai models although not enough (yet) to make getting one a priority over some other watches. That doesn't stop me from browsing this forum or any other.

jamesbondOO7 · 27 March 2011, 04:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SteelerFan1965

How to win friends and influence people. Nice.......
Ps Mr.Bond, why are you then lurking in the Panerai section?

No idea, I just press the new posts button.

mike · 27 March 2011, 05:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jamesbondOO7

No idea, I just press the new posts button.

Here's a thought...read the post. I really have a hard time understanding why some (not just you) feel it necessary to make a negative comment on a brand, ANY brand, just to make a comment.

In answer to the OPs question, I've worn Rolex before many of you were alive. They were, and are, amazingly strong watches that carry a storied history and will always have a special place for me.

That said, Panerai brings to the table many of the very things that Rolex is also noted for. Strength, a particular unique look, practicality from a user standpoint, and it's own strong following.

No watch is the be all end all for everyone, but Rolex and Panerai seem to have answered all I need in a timepiece.

Brunotheboxer · 27 March 2011, 05:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mike

Here's a thought...read the post. I really have a hard time understanding why some (not just you) feel it necessary to make a negative comment on a brand, ANY brand, just to make a comment.

In answer to the OPs question, I've worn Rolex before many of you were alive. They were, and are, amazingly strong watches that carry a storied history and will always have a special place for me.

That said, Panerai brings to the table many of the very things that Rolex is also noted for. Strength, a particular unique look, practicality from a user standpoint, and it's own strong following.

No watch is the be all end all for everyone, but Rolex and Panerai seem to have answered all I need in a timepiece.

Great post. For me its also rolex and Pam. Plus G-shock for me. My new found watch love.

HL65 · 27 March 2011, 08:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mike

Here's a thought...read the post. I really have a hard time understanding why some (not just you) feel it necessary to make a negative comment on a brand, ANY brand, just to make a comment.

In answer to the OPs question, I've worn Rolex before many of you were alive. They were, and are, amazingly strong watches that carry a storied history and will always have a special place for me.

That said, Panerai brings to the table many of the very things that Rolex is also noted for. Strength, a particular unique look, practicality from a user standpoint, and it's own strong following.

No watch is the be all end all for everyone, but Rolex and Panerai seem to have answered all I need in a timepiece.

Well said Mike and I could not agree more with you!

Brunotheboxer · 27 March 2011, 05:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jamesbondOO7

No idea, I just press the new posts button.

So let me clear my throat.

After you "press the new post button" what happens next?

You go into a coma and your fingers uncontrollably type out "I cannot for the life of me understand the attraction"?

Tony-GB · 1 April 2011, 12:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jamesbondOO7

I cannot for the life of me understand the attraction.

Most Panerai's have a certain "magic" about them. Plus, the dial is perfectly legible.

marcinthemiddle · 26 March 2011, 10:57 PM

Had Rolex- and some great ones: the Platty YM, white Daytona, sea-Dweller(original) and most recently a GMT2C- NONE of them 'smiled' at me the way a nice, robust, 44mm Panerai does. I'm staying in the Darkside!

Athas · 26 March 2011, 11:22 PM

I started with rolex having an sd and a daytona. Then moved to panerai (pam233). Having seen the new ceramic daytona I now can't stop thinking of rolex

karmatp · 26 March 2011, 11:49 PM

I have gone back and forth for years, and when the new Sub C was introduced I sold a couple of pams to fund it, and some money in the back.

They are both great brands but I honestly feel like I get more bang for my buck with Rolex. I was going to buy a 351 or a Sub C, I went with the Sub because of all the worries or Panerai's new in house movements. I did not want to have any chance of having to send my watch back to Panerai. It basically came down to that, I knew the Rolex would take a beating and I had concerns with Panerai.

When it comes to base models, no worries, and watchmaker can fix a ETA base movement, but the new in house movement could leave me watch less for months.

I do think about picking up another base Pam, probably one that I have already owned like a 000, 005 or a 176.

mfer · 26 March 2011, 11:52 PM

Bought 16610
Bought 116710
Bought 111
Bought 210
Sold 116710

B. Doggy · 27 March 2011, 12:47 AM

I started with Rolex, but knew of Panerai when I took the plunge. I love both brands and intend to stick to those two I think.

tkc324 · 27 March 2011, 02:27 AM

Only have Rolex right now... but as some of the experts above already know, I am looking at an opportunity to get my first PAM...

garGARgar · 27 March 2011, 02:42 AM

I started with rolex. Have 2. My third watch will probably be a PAM 111. Unless I win the lotto, then I'm getting an A. Lange.

Speed · 27 March 2011, 04:06 AM

I fall into that camp!

Kapture1 · 27 March 2011, 04:07 AM

I have had my eye on them for some time, think they look sweet.

I'm worried about getting one... I hear that the dark side consumes you.

Launch Mini · 27 March 2011, 05:40 AM

I think Rolex is a gateway drug/watch.
Many people start the luxury watch purchases based on the reputation, then with research find other brands, Panerai or other.
For me
was
Rolex
Rolex
about 14 Panerai
Sold the 2 Rolexes
Sold about 10 Panerai
Bought a Rolex.

Now can you say BREGUET?

Cru Jones · 27 March 2011, 08:24 AM

If Rolex had designs like PAM and a strap culture, maybe I wouldn't look outside of Rolex. Then again, then Rolex wouldn't be Rolex.

It all comes down to personal taste. I'm very happy with my Rolex and have my eye on other models, but, why would I limit myself to just Rolex? Is there anything in Rolex's catalogue resembling a 111 on a JV? Should there even be?

esm · 27 March 2011, 08:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cru Jones

If Rolex had designs like PAM and a strap culture, maybe I wouldn't look outside of Rolex. Then again, then Rolex wouldn't be Rolex.

It all comes down to personal taste. I'm very happy with my Rolex and have my eye on other models, but, why would I limit myself to just Rolex? Is there anything in Rolex's catalogue resembling a 111 on a JV? Should there even be?

Agreed. It's like is there any Panerai in the catalogue resembling a SS Sub on a Bond NATO?

Let's open yourself open to more exciting experiences in the WIS world.

26 March 2011, 09:51 PM	#1
AJMarcus "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2010 Real Name: AJ Location: USA Watch: Swiss Posts: 5,238	From Rolex to Panerai anyone? Just curious how many began their interest in Panerai after having caught the Rolex bug? I'm wondering if there's a patter because I know a few, like myself, who really did not appreciate Panerai until after I got into the Rolex sports models. Thanks

26 March 2011, 10:05 PM	#2
jamesbondOO7 "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2010 Real Name: BondJamesBond Location: The Algarve Watch: Rolex or nothing Posts: 4,081	I cannot for the life of me understand the attraction. __________________ ♛ 5-digit Rolex or nothing ♛

27 March 2011, 01:33 AM	#7
Benwah "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2010 Location: Ottawa ON Canada Posts: 89	Yes Had the 16610, bought the 111, then the 024. Sold the 16610 and the 111 and bought the 328...

27 March 2011, 03:55 AM	#12
0037ksm "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2007 Location: Pacific NW Posts: 98	I'm attracted to some of the Panerai models although not enough (yet) to make getting one a priority over some other watches. That doesn't stop me from browsing this forum or any other. __________________ Chris

26 March 2011, 10:57 PM	#19
marcinthemiddle Vacated Join Date: Nov 2009 Real Name: Marc Location: Connecticut Watch: PAM 111 'N' Posts: 2,558	Had Rolex- and some great ones: the Platty YM, white Daytona, sea-Dweller(original) and most recently a GMT2C- NONE of them 'smiled' at me the way a nice, robust, 44mm Panerai does. I'm staying in the Darkside! __________________ NAWCC Member Card Carrying Member of the Global Assoc. of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons Executive Dorklehead

27 March 2011, 02:19 AM	#9
swish77 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Jan 2009 Real Name: Aaron Location: CT/NYC Watch: ing the time! Posts: 6,999	Love both for different reasons and different occasions. Both brands have models that are way too blingy, though. Too much polished steel on many Panerais, and they're so big that they scratch easily. Some Rolex models have similar issues, and some are downright ugly. However, depending on your tastes both offer sports models that are stunning. For simple beauty I think Panerai wins. Rolex has long left the world of simple classic tool watches. I own both, but only basic models, PAM177 and Sub 14060M, for example, for the reasons above.

27 March 2011, 03:29 AM	#11
AJMarcus "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2010 Real Name: AJ Location: USA Watch: Swiss Posts: 5,238	You all made good points. I guess I can understand mr. Bond's preference for Rolex. Maybe he just made a wrong turn or clicked the wrong button on the forums. Anyway, I too think there's a connection between the two brands that's why I posed the question. And I absolutely enjoy my Sub C LN and my GMT Pepsi. But alas not much wrist time for the 16613. I may flip the TT Sub down the road for a PAM 88. We'll see.......

26 March 2011, 11:22 PM	#20
Athas "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2009 Location: Australia Watch: SD,Daytona,P233,PO Posts: 163	I started with rolex having an sd and a daytona. Then moved to panerai (pam233). Having seen the new ceramic daytona I now can't stop thinking of rolex

26 March 2011, 11:49 PM	#21
karmatp "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2007 Real Name: Trevor Location: Arizona Posts: 5,740	I have gone back and forth for years, and when the new Sub C was introduced I sold a couple of pams to fund it, and some money in the back. They are both great brands but I honestly feel like I get more bang for my buck with Rolex. I was going to buy a 351 or a Sub C, I went with the Sub because of all the worries or Panerai's new in house movements. I did not want to have any chance of having to send my watch back to Panerai. It basically came down to that, I knew the Rolex would take a beating and I had concerns with Panerai. When it comes to base models, no worries, and watchmaker can fix a ETA base movement, but the new in house movement could leave me watch less for months. I do think about picking up another base Pam, probably one that I have already owned like a 000, 005 or a 176. __________________ My grails:

26 March 2011, 11:52 PM	#22
mfer "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2007 Real Name: Mik Location: USA Posts: 13,724	Bought 16610 Bought 116710 Bought 111 Bought 210 Sold 116710

27 March 2011, 12:47 AM	#23
B. Doggy "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2008 Real Name: Bryan Location: Oregon Posts: 7,399	I started with Rolex, but knew of Panerai when I took the plunge. I love both brands and intend to stick to those two I think. __________________ Rolex / Panerai / Omega

27 March 2011, 02:27 AM	#24
tkc324 "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2009 Real Name: Tom Location: Chi town Watch: Daytona AP DD Sub Posts: 3,717	Only have Rolex right now... but as some of the experts above already know, I am looking at an opportunity to get my first PAM...

27 March 2011, 02:42 AM	#25
garGARgar "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2010 Real Name: Gary Location: New York, NY Watch: 16610LV Posts: 711	I started with rolex. Have 2. My third watch will probably be a PAM 111. Unless I win the lotto, then I'm getting an A. Lange. __________________ 16610LV 126334 116710LN

27 March 2011, 04:06 AM	#26
Speed "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2009 Location: USA Posts: 19,706	I fall into that camp!

27 March 2011, 04:07 AM	#27
Kapture1 "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2009 Real Name: Matt Location: Flint, MI Watch: Ω 3570.50.00 Posts: 2,058	I have had my eye on them for some time, think they look sweet. I'm worried about getting one... I hear that the dark side consumes you. __________________ Miss you JJ Wash out this tired notion that the best is yet to come

27 March 2011, 05:40 AM	#28
Launch Mini "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2006 Real Name: John Location: Canada, eh Watch: can I? Posts: 6,240	I think Rolex is a gateway drug/watch. Many people start the luxury watch purchases based on the reputation, then with research find other brands, Panerai or other. For me was Rolex Rolex about 14 Panerai Sold the 2 Rolexes Sold about 10 Panerai Bought a Rolex. Now can you say BREGUET? __________________ Something witty to go here. Member # 293

27 March 2011, 08:24 AM	#29
Cru Jones 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Mar 2010 Location: Paris, France Posts: 35,297	If Rolex had designs like PAM and a strap culture, maybe I wouldn't look outside of Rolex. Then again, then Rolex wouldn't be Rolex. It all comes down to personal taste. I'm very happy with my Rolex and have my eye on other models, but, why would I limit myself to just Rolex? Is there anything in Rolex's catalogue resembling a 111 on a JV? Should there even be?

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)