The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Other (non-Rolex) Watch Topics > Panerai Discussion Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 22 April 2011, 06:55 AM   #1
AJMarcus
"TRF" Member
 
AJMarcus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Real Name: AJ
Location: USA
Watch: Swiss
Posts: 5,238
Opinions please PAM 287

As I've mentioned before I've been drawn to the Pam 88. I finally got to try one on in person at my AD and it was a stunner. Then I decided to try on the Pam 287 radiomir and it just felt great. It certainly has less presence than the 88 despite it's 45 mm size. Im thinking i like the 287 but alas cant get both Thoughts on the 88 vs 287 from the PAM experts would be appreciated. It seems lately that the 88 sales are a little sluggish. Am I wrong on that? Thanks much.
AJMarcus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 April 2011, 07:12 AM   #2
SaddleSC
"TRF" Member
 
SaddleSC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Real Name: Charles B
Location: GMT -7
Watch: Hulk 116610LV
Posts: 6,131
I am very interested in a similar question...I am currently trying to decide between a 111 and a 183. I always thought I wanted a Luminor, but recently have started to really be drawn to the Radiomir.
__________________
Hulk 116610LV + GMT II 126710 BLNR + Explorer 124270 + Air King 126900 + Submariner 16613LB
SaddleSC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 April 2011, 08:47 AM   #3
dddrees
"TRF" Member
 
dddrees's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Real Name: Dan
Location: USA
Watch: This N That
Posts: 34,253
The Pam 88 is the first one I fell for, actually decide to go with the Pam000 instead. Really though it shouldn't matter what others think.

Go with Your Heart!!!!
__________________
When it captures your imagination, that's when you know you have found your passion.

Loyal Foot Soldier of The Nylon Nation.

Card Carrying Member of the Global Association of
Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons
dddrees is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 April 2011, 09:14 AM   #4
B. Doggy
"TRF" Member
 
B. Doggy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Real Name: Bryan
Location: Oregon
Posts: 7,399
With the caveat of recommending buying what sings to you, here's my $.02- If you're going to have just one, a Luminor just SCREAMS Panerai. Can't go go wrong. The 88 is great and I personally wouldn't mind having one some day, but the dial is busy for a PAM. The 287 isn't for me, but some really like it and have even said it's underrated.

Take a look and enjoy the search! Many great ones out there...may I seed a terrible notion and say check out the 190! One of the greatest movements stuffed into a Panerai...

B
__________________
Rolex / Panerai / Omega
B. Doggy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 April 2011, 11:43 AM   #5
nauticajoe
"TRF" Member
 
nauticajoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Joe
Location: PA
Posts: 14,774
Quote:
Originally Posted by B. Doggy View Post
If you're going to have just one, a Luminor just SCREAMS Panerai.
X2. I entered the PAM world with the 292, but ultimately ended up with a Luminor.
nauticajoe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 April 2011, 11:34 AM   #6
bigmikebee
"TRF" Member
 
bigmikebee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: USA
Posts: 359
I had a 287 and regreted selling it : (
bigmikebee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 April 2011, 11:37 AM   #7
mfer
"TRF" Member
 
mfer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Real Name: Mik
Location: USA
Posts: 13,724
I'm enjoying my rad more than my lum at the moment. Strap versatility is higher IMHO. Dressy to vintage dirty in the blink of an eye. Fits so well and comfy too!
mfer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 April 2011, 11:38 AM   #8
mfer
"TRF" Member
 
mfer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Real Name: Mik
Location: USA
Posts: 13,724
Oh, and I have notice 88 sales slow lately.
mfer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 April 2011, 01:18 PM   #9
bigterpsfan
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Maryland
Posts: 176
bump for 111
bigterpsfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 April 2011, 02:27 PM   #10
gtsayson
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Singapore
Posts: 18
sharing...

..to help you decide

actually, this is also my 1st PAM



then still got the urge to get a Luminor :-) ! Decided on a 112 and had a 359 recently...
gtsayson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 April 2011, 03:05 PM   #11
Duffs4me
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: Marty Foxman
Location: Orange County, Ca
Watch: Wg panda, wg sub
Posts: 100
Pam 88

I own 5 Roles and one Panerai, that being the 88. I fell in love with the 237, but since they only made 400 pieces, this was the closest to it, and a stunner! I get more compliments on this watch than any of my Rolex.
Duffs4me is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 April 2011, 03:01 AM   #12
AJMarcus
"TRF" Member
 
AJMarcus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Real Name: AJ
Location: USA
Watch: Swiss
Posts: 5,238
Thanks everyone. As usual everybody's spot on with their comments/suggestions. The 88 does seem like the most bang for your buck and it is a beauty. What
about the 1950s case on the Luminor? Does this lower it's wrist profile at all?
AJMarcus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 April 2011, 01:28 PM   #13
alljunks
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: CA
Watch: All Nice watch !
Posts: 387
I asked the same question when I was deciding between 104 and 287...if you are buying 1 and only 1 (we always think this way).. Luminor is way to go..so.. 104 !!
alljunks is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches

Asset Appeal

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.