ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

dairyman · 29 May 2007, 09:16 AM

i was wonderin if the sub has a bigger face than the GMT?

JJ?

mike · 29 May 2007, 09:44 AM

Both are listed as 40MM watches,

The Sub has a slightly thicker case, triplock crown as opposed to twinlock, and a little different bezel.

davor · 29 May 2007, 09:49 AM

http://www.clockmaker.com.au/rolex_case_size.html
nicks info is ok too

...btw he is a member here also...
hope it is usefull

JJ Irani · 29 May 2007, 12:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dairyman

i was wonderin if the sub has a bigger face than the GMT?

JJ?

If by "face" you mean dial, then they are both the same - 30 mm!

leopardprey · 29 May 2007, 01:17 PM

The Sub No Date 14060M is smaller in diameter by 1mm, than the GMT II.

mansion · 29 May 2007, 05:44 PM

The Submariner is thicker and heavier than the GMT II. It stands taller on the wrist.

Mind you, the SeaDweller is the heaviest and the thickest of them all!

Obsession · 29 May 2007, 05:47 PM

Same! but Submariner looks like bigger cause of the bigger numbers ar its bezel and also its crown lock is bigger than GMT and all other things are same size ,bracelet,case,bezel,dial,etc...

vdave · 29 May 2007, 06:06 PM

The new GMT II has bigger case like the sub and a triple lock crown. So, if you like the thicker heavier case of sub, triple lock crown and the practical usability of a GMT II then you may want to check out the new GMT II.

JJ Irani · 30 May 2007, 04:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vdave

The new GMT II has bigger case like the sub and a triple lock crown. So, if you like the thicker heavier case of sub, triple lock crown and the practical usability of a GMT II then you may want to check out the new GMT II.

The new GMT-II still has the same case diameter of 40 mm as the existing line-up. It's just a slightly thicker case and, more importantly, thicker lugs that makes it appear larger. Of course, the bold new ceramic bezel is imposing and gives the watch a bigger look.

JJ

29 May 2007, 09:16 AM	#1
dairyman Member Join Date: May 2007 Location: new jersey Posts: 28	is the submariner bigger in size than the GMT II? i was wonderin if the sub has a bigger face than the GMT? JJ?

29 May 2007, 09:49 AM	#3
davor "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2006 Real Name: davor Location: croatia Posts: 669	http://www.clockmaker.com.au/rolex_case_size.html nicks info is ok too ...btw he is a member here also... hope it is usefull __________________ You learn to love, not by finding a perfect person, but by learning to see an imperfect person perfectly.

29 May 2007, 09:44 AM	#2
mike "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2005 Posts: 22,683	Both are listed as 40MM watches, The Sub has a slightly thicker case, triplock crown as opposed to twinlock, and a little different bezel.

29 May 2007, 01:17 PM	#5
leopardprey Banned Join Date: Nov 2006 Real Name: Chad Location: Around the world Watch: Panerai 233 Posts: 4,204	The Sub No Date 14060M is smaller in diameter by 1mm, than the GMT II.

29 May 2007, 05:44 PM	#6
mansion Member Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: switzerland Posts: 196	The Submariner is thicker and heavier than the GMT II. It stands taller on the wrist. Mind you, the SeaDweller is the heaviest and the thickest of them all!

29 May 2007, 05:47 PM	#7
Obsession Banned Join Date: Mar 2007 Real Name: Aykun Location: Istanbul/Turkey Watch: Tissot Seastar Posts: 804	Same! but Submariner looks like bigger cause of the bigger numbers ar its bezel and also its crown lock is bigger than GMT and all other things are same size ,bracelet,case,bezel,dial,etc...

29 May 2007, 06:06 PM	#8
vdave Member Join Date: Feb 2007 Real Name: Dave Location: Texas Watch: Oyster DT & GMT II Posts: 75	The new GMT II has bigger case like the sub and a triple lock crown. So, if you like the thicker heavier case of sub, triple lock crown and the practical usability of a GMT II then you may want to check out the new GMT II.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)