The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Other (non-Rolex) Watch Topics > Panerai Discussion Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 27 May 2011, 08:27 AM   #1
papasmurf
"TRF" Member
 
papasmurf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Brad
Location: San Fran
Watch: rolex
Posts: 47
GMT IIc for PAM 320?

hi all-

I have a possibility to trade my V-serial GMT IIc for a 320 in a great condition ($400 cash additionally from my side). I love the look of GMT IIc but havent worn it since last spring, so I am thinking might as well get something different. I also prefer leather straps - much more comfortable on my wrist.

My main concern is whether 320 would be stupidly huge on my scrawny wrist (6.75'). And whether panerai is a fad that would fade (not likely IMO).

Wanted to get some thots? I bot a victorinox divemaster PVD version some months back and that's my go-to "sporty." I also own a cartier santos 100 with black gator strap. The 320 comes with dark brown gator strap.
papasmurf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 May 2011, 08:30 AM   #2
Speed
"TRF" Member
 
Speed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 19,706
Gosh... I would not do this trade myself. I love the GMTIIC...it will be around alot longer than the 320 - as a desirable watch IMHO.
Speed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 May 2011, 09:12 AM   #3
VetteBandit
"TRF" Member
 
VetteBandit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: JP
Location: USA
Watch: All of them!
Posts: 917
Quote:
Originally Posted by papasmurf View Post
hi all-

My main concern is whether 320 would be stupidly huge on my scrawny wrist (6.75'). And whether panerai is a fad that would fade (not likely IMO).
I dont think it will look bad at all on your wrist, but you should go try a 1950's case on before moving forward.

No comment on is the trade worth it - totally your call.
__________________
*********************************
"Eveyone has a plan until they get punched in the face."


Instagram: @30threejosh
VetteBandit is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 May 2011, 10:00 AM   #4
dalip
"TRF" Member
 
dalip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Real Name: Dalip
Location: Mumbai and Perth
Watch: Rolex PAM Omega
Posts: 18,656
Have you tried the 320 on? I would recommend seeing if the case is for you. The trade is only worth it if you are sure the 320 suits your wrist.
__________________



------------------------------------------------------------
"The liar's punishment is not in the least that he is not believed, but that he cannot believe anyone else." George Bernard Shaw
dalip is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 May 2011, 11:16 AM   #5
bcacncnc
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Real Name: Bryan
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 1,577
Agree with the other comments about really trying it on to see how it fits and sits on the wrist. I am fairly sure its much thicker than the GMT and sits higher. The 320 is a beauty though - one of my favs in the PAM line up. Good luck in your hunt.
__________________
Omega
Panerai
Chopard
Grand Seiko
bcacncnc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 May 2011, 11:56 AM   #6
Wisconsin Proud
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 351
Keep the Rollie.
Wisconsin Proud is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 May 2011, 12:09 PM   #7
jvo300
"TRF" Member
 
jvo300's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: TX
Posts: 1,897
I would not trade the GMTIIc. It is a modern classic as far as I'm concerned.
jvo300 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 May 2011, 12:27 PM   #8
kilyung
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
kilyung's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Cave
Watch: Sundial
Posts: 33,940
Like everyone said - check out the 1950 case for fit first. If you still like it, at best it's an even trade in my book. On the secondary market, IMHO, the Rolex will beat the PAM320 over time.
kilyung is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 May 2011, 01:15 PM   #9
CoachRolexRyan
"TRF" Member
 
CoachRolexRyan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: Coach
Location: Boston
Watch: Rolex Deep Sea
Posts: 1,297
I say go for it. Panerai's are already classics in they're own right. Changing and buying different straps is half the fun of owning one. You'll have a great summer with a new bitch on your wrist!
CoachRolexRyan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 May 2011, 01:18 PM   #10
zlin08033
"TRF" Member
 
zlin08033's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: PA
Posts: 1,034
Go for it!

IMO, it is a fair trade.
zlin08033 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 May 2011, 01:23 PM   #11
leeye
"TRF" Member
 
leeye's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Real Name: Lee
Location: Singapore
Watch: Too many......
Posts: 689
i would stick with the GMTIIC
__________________
Lee, Singapore - Shanghai
Submersibles - PAM 64, 87, 187, 243, 382
Luminor - PAM 366, 367, 372, 390, 420
Radiomir - PAM 410
leeye is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 May 2011, 01:36 PM   #12
Shade
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: Norman
Location: Jakarta
Watch: All of 'em..
Posts: 2,926
I personally never really liked the GMTIIc, so I'd trade it for sure.
__________________
My collections..

http://rolexforums.com/image.php?type=sigpic&userid=33241&dateline=128831  6747

Plus PAM 233, 232, 249 & PAM 417.
Shade is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 May 2011, 06:27 PM   #13
Cru Jones
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Cru Jones's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Paris, France
Posts: 35,300
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shade View Post
I personally never really liked the GMTIIc, so I'd trade it for sure.


this.

but, have you tried on the piece? assume so. but, just in case, the 1950 case is pretty thick and on my 6.75 wrists it just doesn't sit right. the luminors sit perfectly, however.
Cru Jones is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 May 2011, 10:05 PM   #14
zeroshiki
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Real Name: paul
Location: surabaya
Posts: 321
keep the gmt
zeroshiki is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 May 2011, 10:12 PM   #15
nauticajoe
"TRF" Member
 
nauticajoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Joe
Location: PA
Posts: 14,774
Try the 320 out first to see if it sits well on your wrist. If you like it....got for it!

Good luck!
nauticajoe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 May 2011, 10:49 PM   #16
Shade
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: Norman
Location: Jakarta
Watch: All of 'em..
Posts: 2,926
Cru, I have small wrist as well and either cases fits me just fine, but then again people's wrists do vary despite same sizes. Best advice is to try it on first, the only thing keeping me from getting a fiddy is the size, I can never pull it off unless I can grow my wrist size.
__________________
My collections..

http://rolexforums.com/image.php?type=sigpic&userid=33241&dateline=128831  6747

Plus PAM 233, 232, 249 & PAM 417.
Shade is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 May 2011, 02:45 AM   #17
+SwissWatch
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Manila
Posts: 32
keep the GMT2C and save up for the new watch.
+SwissWatch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 May 2011, 03:24 AM   #18
B. Doggy
"TRF" Member
 
B. Doggy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Real Name: Bryan
Location: Oregon
Posts: 7,399
Two very different watches. Tough call.
__________________
Rolex / Panerai / Omega
B. Doggy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 May 2011, 06:05 AM   #19
mike
"TRF" Member
 
mike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 22,683
The IIc is a must for me.
mike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 May 2011, 07:02 PM   #20
Shade
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: Norman
Location: Jakarta
Watch: All of 'em..
Posts: 2,926
Thats not fair mike, I think any GMTs is a must for you haha..
__________________
My collections..

http://rolexforums.com/image.php?type=sigpic&userid=33241&dateline=128831  6747

Plus PAM 233, 232, 249 & PAM 417.
Shade is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 May 2011, 09:35 PM   #21
Psmith
"TRF" Member
 
Psmith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Real Name: Clive
Location: Exoplanet
Watch: spring-driven
Posts: 38,856
Much as I like the 320, would not swap a IIc for one. This may not be a factor for you, but the 320 is less functional in being a 12 hour GMT, and of course has no rotating bezel to provide a third timezone.

But if the 1950 case suits you, and you want something a little more interesting than a 312 (while retaining a clean look) then why not...?
__________________
Psmith is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 May 2011, 09:35 AM   #22
kingblackbolt
"TRF" Member
 
kingblackbolt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Real Name: Ren
Location: Toronto On Canada
Posts: 1,886
Funnily enough I did that exact trade just a few months ago and was happy with the 320 being my first Pam. I have no regrets as the GMT IIc was quite a watch of course but the 320 had more presence for me. I've now settled on a 351 Ti with the exact same 1950s case which I'm a HUGE fan of... As long as you're happy with the way it fits your wrist I think that's a great deal and would do it in a second :)
__________________

“Hail to the king, baby" Ash (Army of Darkness 1992)
kingblackbolt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 May 2011, 05:22 PM   #23
htc8p
"TRF" Member
 
htc8p's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: Bert
Location: philippines
Watch: 116710 ln
Posts: 3,472
between the 2 i'd stick with the boring rolex.

you may like the look of panerai or find it more appealing but Rolex will be there till the end of time. dont let it go.
htc8p is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 May 2011, 01:32 PM   #24
guyrolex
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Real Name: John
Location: Canada
Watch: DSSD, SubC LV
Posts: 258
I'd do it- I sold my GMT II C last year to buy a Daytona because I stopped wearing it, and I don't miss it at all- and you can always find a GMT II C but 320's are hard to come by. My wrist is 6.75 and I wear a 104 with suits all the time- it is definitely not too big -the 320 is a bit thicker, but not by much
guyrolex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 May 2011, 11:56 PM   #25
psv
2024 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: USA & France
Posts: 11,078
Watch out with the height of the 320, I think it is about 18mm, or 10 stacked quarters. Way too much IMO. If I'd go for a Panerai, I'd go with a manual wind one that sits lower, especially on a small wrist.
psv is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 June 2011, 12:14 AM   #26
dalip
"TRF" Member
 
dalip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Real Name: Dalip
Location: Mumbai and Perth
Watch: Rolex PAM Omega
Posts: 18,656
I agree with Patrick above. I've put the 320 on and found it much higher than I expected.
__________________



------------------------------------------------------------
"The liar's punishment is not in the least that he is not believed, but that he cannot believe anyone else." George Bernard Shaw
dalip is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 June 2011, 12:36 AM   #27
Shade
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: Norman
Location: Jakarta
Watch: All of 'em..
Posts: 2,926
What Patrick said is true, manual wind ia friendlier on smaller wrists.
__________________
My collections..

http://rolexforums.com/image.php?type=sigpic&userid=33241&dateline=128831  6747

Plus PAM 233, 232, 249 & PAM 417.
Shade is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches

Asset Appeal

Wrist Aficionado


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.