The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Other (non-Rolex) Watch Topics > Panerai Discussion Forum

View Poll Results: 232 or 190?
232 17 36.96%
190 29 63.04%
Voters: 46. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 26 June 2011, 08:34 AM   #1
B. Doggy
"TRF" Member
 
B. Doggy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Real Name: Bryan
Location: Oregon
Posts: 7,399
232 vs. 190

It has been done with the 312 and 233, but what about these....

Both uber delicious in their own right and chalked full of history & PAM DNA. But which one do you choose??


__________________
Rolex / Panerai / Omega
B. Doggy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 June 2011, 08:48 AM   #2
mfer
"TRF" Member
 
mfer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Real Name: Mik
Location: USA
Posts: 13,724
Oh man..........

for me 190, but is a tough choice for sure.



__________________
member#3242
mfer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 June 2011, 09:37 AM   #3
mfer
"TRF" Member
 
mfer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Real Name: Mik
Location: USA
Posts: 13,724
12 views and only 2 votes!
__________________
member#3242
mfer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 June 2011, 10:21 AM   #4
esm
"TRF" Member
 
esm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: Eric
Location: Location,Location
Watch: this, bro...
Posts: 15,340
On Tapatalk, so can't vote

I'd have to go with the 232 since I'm not a big fan of sub dial on Panerai watches....
esm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 June 2011, 10:23 AM   #5
B. Doggy
"TRF" Member
 
B. Doggy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Real Name: Bryan
Location: Oregon
Posts: 7,399
You know the one I've been hankering for, Mik. However, getting the 190 back in the mix has been something I've considered if I can get the 372. It would be a good way to change things up in the PAM rotation. The second hand and sweeeet 8-day movement.....
__________________
Rolex / Panerai / Omega
B. Doggy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 June 2011, 12:07 PM   #6
Shade
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: Norman
Location: Jakarta
Watch: All of 'em..
Posts: 2,926
232 only because of the dial and cream letters lol.
__________________
My collections..

http://rolexforums.com/image.php?type=sigpic&userid=33241&dateline=128831  6747

Plus PAM 233, 232, 249 & PAM 417.
Shade is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 June 2011, 01:05 PM   #7
mfer
"TRF" Member
 
mfer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Real Name: Mik
Location: USA
Posts: 13,724
Tied up! 4/4
__________________
member#3242
mfer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 June 2011, 01:58 PM   #8
TswaneNguni
"TRF" Member
 
TswaneNguni's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Real Name: Chris
Location: .
Watch: Daytonas/Subs/GMTs
Posts: 12,609
Order of preference :

249
232
190

However,the margins are VERY small.All great choices
TswaneNguni is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 June 2011, 02:45 PM   #9
Shade
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: Norman
Location: Jakarta
Watch: All of 'em..
Posts: 2,926
Quote:
Originally Posted by mfer View Post
Tied up! 4/4
I wouldnt be surprised Mik, I havent been presented both at once before. But if I had, I wouldnt know what to do either lol.
__________________
My collections..

http://rolexforums.com/image.php?type=sigpic&userid=33241&dateline=128831  6747

Plus PAM 233, 232, 249 & PAM 417.
Shade is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 June 2011, 02:58 PM   #10
ocwatching
"TRF" Member
 
ocwatching's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Phil
Location: CA
Posts: 5,374
made this choice when I picked up the 190 late last year...

just a more versatile piece for daily wear..

gold hands+JLC movement = ultimate daily PAM

unless you throw the in the 249 into the poll
__________________
too much into watches...
ocwatching is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 June 2011, 06:12 PM   #11
Shade
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: Norman
Location: Jakarta
Watch: All of 'em..
Posts: 2,926
Well, I feel ya Phil, despite liking my 232 very much, I will not turn down a 190 haha.
__________________
My collections..

http://rolexforums.com/image.php?type=sigpic&userid=33241&dateline=128831  6747

Plus PAM 233, 232, 249 & PAM 417.
Shade is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 June 2011, 07:13 PM   #12
swatty
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
swatty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Peter
Location: Sydney
Watch: The Game
Posts: 17,415
The 190 could be my first Panerai
swatty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 June 2011, 07:14 PM   #13
TSW
"TRF" Member
 
TSW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: TSW
Location: Le Brassus
Watch: Rolex & AP's
Posts: 27,449
190 for sure!
__________________

AP Owners Club
IG @swiss.watch.connection
TSW is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 June 2011, 09:55 PM   #14
jvo300
"TRF" Member
 
jvo300's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: TX
Posts: 1,897
I think the 190 would be more wearable for me given its 45mm dimension.
jvo300 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 June 2011, 10:25 PM   #15
dukerules
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: NC, USA
Posts: 681
My two favorite Rads by a mile. You can't go wrong with either...if I had to choose one, it's the 232, but I'd love to own either.
__________________

Instagram: dukerules
dukerules is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 June 2011, 12:52 AM   #16
B. Doggy
"TRF" Member
 
B. Doggy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Real Name: Bryan
Location: Oregon
Posts: 7,399
Wow! To my surprise the 190 is in the lead over the SE...
__________________
Rolex / Panerai / Omega
B. Doggy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 June 2011, 01:13 AM   #17
Shade
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: Norman
Location: Jakarta
Watch: All of 'em..
Posts: 2,926
Yes, amazingly the 47mm is an issue to many..
__________________
My collections..

http://rolexforums.com/image.php?type=sigpic&userid=33241&dateline=128831  6747

Plus PAM 233, 232, 249 & PAM 417.
Shade is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 June 2011, 01:30 AM   #18
mfer
"TRF" Member
 
mfer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Real Name: Mik
Location: USA
Posts: 13,724
Well, 190 is close to SE numbers. Only 2056 made (including the 6 OORs)
mfer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 June 2011, 01:35 AM   #19
MikeJaye
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: London
Posts: 675
I must be the only here that doesn't rate the 232. Yes it's got history but it's basically a 210 with gold hands. I chose the 190 due to lovely JLC 8 day movement, 45mm size and seconds sub dial.
MikeJaye is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 June 2011, 02:10 AM   #20
dalip
"TRF" Member
 
dalip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Real Name: Dalip
Location: Mumbai and Perth
Watch: Rolex PAM Omega
Posts: 18,656
190 for me also.
__________________



------------------------------------------------------------
"The liar's punishment is not in the least that he is not believed, but that he cannot believe anyone else." George Bernard Shaw
dalip is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 June 2011, 03:22 AM   #21
ocwatching
"TRF" Member
 
ocwatching's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Phil
Location: CA
Posts: 5,374
I think it really depends on what your own watch wearing habits and how the 47mm will fit into your collection.

I personally will probably keep the 44mm and the 45mm for dailies and the 47mm will be for special GTG or WIS events.
To a non-WIS, the 47mm on my wrist is huge.

its a win win all around though...
__________________
too much into watches...
ocwatching is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 June 2011, 06:36 AM   #22
B. Doggy
"TRF" Member
 
B. Doggy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Real Name: Bryan
Location: Oregon
Posts: 7,399
Quote:
Originally Posted by ocwatching View Post
I think it really depends on what your own watch wearing habits and how the 47mm will fit into your collection.

I personally will probably keep the 44mm and the 45mm for dailies and the 47mm will be for special GTG or WIS events.
To a non-WIS, the 47mm on my wrist is huge.

its a win win all around though...

I like the way you think, Phil!
__________________
Rolex / Panerai / Omega
B. Doggy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 June 2011, 07:47 AM   #23
heart82
"TRF" Member
 
heart82's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: near my PAM
Watch: P-A-M.
Posts: 146
After I just got my first rad, the 210, a week ago. Now, If I want another rad, it would have to be something like 190. I just like the sub sec, and power ind in the back.
heart82 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 June 2011, 09:29 AM   #24
mfer
"TRF" Member
 
mfer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Real Name: Mik
Location: USA
Posts: 13,724
Quote:
Originally Posted by heart82 View Post
After I just got my first rad, the 210, a week ago. Now, If I want another rad, it would have to be something like 190. I just like the sub sec, and power ind in the back.
Both a 210 and a 190. Now that is just crazy!
__________________
member#3242
mfer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 June 2011, 10:58 AM   #25
Shade
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: Norman
Location: Jakarta
Watch: All of 'em..
Posts: 2,926
Quote:
Originally Posted by mfer View Post
Both a 210 and a 190. Now that is just crazy!
Im sure you are Mik! Good crazy though hahaha..

Well the voting is close, 190 has an edge though!
__________________
My collections..

http://rolexforums.com/image.php?type=sigpic&userid=33241&dateline=128831  6747

Plus PAM 233, 232, 249 & PAM 417.
Shade is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 June 2011, 10:20 PM   #26
heart82
"TRF" Member
 
heart82's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: near my PAM
Watch: P-A-M.
Posts: 146
Quote:
Originally Posted by mfer View Post
Both a 210 and a 190. Now that is just crazy!
haha...insanely awesome, isn't it, Mik. I forgot you got both of them...I didn't mean to follow your footsteps, ok! I always thought that you have a 232 n a 190...
heart82 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 June 2011, 11:34 PM   #27
bcacncnc
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Real Name: Bryan
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 1,577
I prefer the look of the 232, the size of the 190.
__________________
Omega
Panerai
Chopard
Grand Seiko
bcacncnc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 June 2011, 12:26 AM   #28
Shade
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: Norman
Location: Jakarta
Watch: All of 'em..
Posts: 2,926
Thats right Bryan!
__________________
My collections..

http://rolexforums.com/image.php?type=sigpic&userid=33241&dateline=128831  6747

Plus PAM 233, 232, 249 & PAM 417.
Shade is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 June 2011, 09:56 AM   #29
B. Doggy
"TRF" Member
 
B. Doggy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Real Name: Bryan
Location: Oregon
Posts: 7,399
190 by a hair!!
__________________
Rolex / Panerai / Omega
B. Doggy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 June 2011, 10:04 AM   #30
mfer
"TRF" Member
 
mfer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Real Name: Mik
Location: USA
Posts: 13,724
Quote:
Originally Posted by B. Doggy View Post
190 by a hair!!
uhhhhhhohhhhhhhh! bwahahahahahahahahahahaha
__________________
member#3242
mfer is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches

Asset Appeal

Wrist Aficionado


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.