ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
View Poll Results: 232 or 190? | |||
232 | 17 | 36.96% | |
190 | 29 | 63.04% | |
Voters: 46. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
26 June 2011, 08:34 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Real Name: Bryan
Location: Oregon
Posts: 7,399
|
232 vs. 190
It has been done with the 312 and 233, but what about these....
Both uber delicious in their own right and chalked full of history & PAM DNA. But which one do you choose??
__________________
Rolex / Panerai / Omega |
26 June 2011, 08:48 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Real Name: Mik
Location: USA
Posts: 13,724
|
Oh man..........
for me 190, but is a tough choice for sure.
__________________
member#3242 |
26 June 2011, 09:37 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Real Name: Mik
Location: USA
Posts: 13,724
|
12 views and only 2 votes!
__________________
member#3242 |
26 June 2011, 10:21 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: Eric
Location: Location,Location
Watch: this, bro...
Posts: 15,340
|
On Tapatalk, so can't vote
I'd have to go with the 232 since I'm not a big fan of sub dial on Panerai watches.... |
26 June 2011, 10:23 AM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Real Name: Bryan
Location: Oregon
Posts: 7,399
|
You know the one I've been hankering for, Mik. However, getting the 190 back in the mix has been something I've considered if I can get the 372. It would be a good way to change things up in the PAM rotation. The second hand and sweeeet 8-day movement.....
__________________
Rolex / Panerai / Omega |
26 June 2011, 12:07 PM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: Norman
Location: Jakarta
Watch: All of 'em..
Posts: 2,926
|
232 only because of the dial and cream letters lol.
__________________
My collections.. Plus PAM 233, 232, 249 & PAM 417. |
26 June 2011, 01:05 PM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Real Name: Mik
Location: USA
Posts: 13,724
|
Tied up! 4/4
__________________
member#3242 |
26 June 2011, 01:58 PM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Real Name: Chris
Location: .
Watch: Daytonas/Subs/GMTs
Posts: 12,609
|
Order of preference :
249 232 190 However,the margins are VERY small.All great choices |
26 June 2011, 02:45 PM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: Norman
Location: Jakarta
Watch: All of 'em..
Posts: 2,926
|
I wouldnt be surprised Mik, I havent been presented both at once before. But if I had, I wouldnt know what to do either lol.
__________________
My collections.. Plus PAM 233, 232, 249 & PAM 417. |
26 June 2011, 02:58 PM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Phil
Location: CA
Posts: 5,374
|
made this choice when I picked up the 190 late last year...
just a more versatile piece for daily wear.. gold hands+JLC movement = ultimate daily PAM unless you throw the in the 249 into the poll
__________________
too much into watches... |
26 June 2011, 06:12 PM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: Norman
Location: Jakarta
Watch: All of 'em..
Posts: 2,926
|
Well, I feel ya Phil, despite liking my 232 very much, I will not turn down a 190 haha.
__________________
My collections.. Plus PAM 233, 232, 249 & PAM 417. |
26 June 2011, 07:13 PM | #12 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Peter
Location: Sydney
Watch: The Game
Posts: 17,415
|
The 190 could be my first Panerai
|
26 June 2011, 07:14 PM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: TSW
Location: Le Brassus
Watch: Rolex & AP's
Posts: 27,449
|
190 for sure!
__________________
AP Owners Club IG @swiss.watch.connection |
26 June 2011, 09:55 PM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: TX
Posts: 1,897
|
I think the 190 would be more wearable for me given its 45mm dimension.
|
26 June 2011, 10:25 PM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: NC, USA
Posts: 681
|
My two favorite Rads by a mile. You can't go wrong with either...if I had to choose one, it's the 232, but I'd love to own either.
__________________
Instagram: dukerules |
27 June 2011, 12:52 AM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Real Name: Bryan
Location: Oregon
Posts: 7,399
|
Wow! To my surprise the 190 is in the lead over the SE...
__________________
Rolex / Panerai / Omega |
27 June 2011, 01:13 AM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: Norman
Location: Jakarta
Watch: All of 'em..
Posts: 2,926
|
Yes, amazingly the 47mm is an issue to many..
__________________
My collections.. Plus PAM 233, 232, 249 & PAM 417. |
27 June 2011, 01:30 AM | #18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Real Name: Mik
Location: USA
Posts: 13,724
|
Well, 190 is close to SE numbers. Only 2056 made (including the 6 OORs)
|
27 June 2011, 01:35 AM | #19 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: London
Posts: 675
|
I must be the only here that doesn't rate the 232. Yes it's got history but it's basically a 210 with gold hands. I chose the 190 due to lovely JLC 8 day movement, 45mm size and seconds sub dial.
|
27 June 2011, 02:10 AM | #20 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Real Name: Dalip
Location: Mumbai and Perth
Watch: Rolex PAM Omega
Posts: 18,656
|
190 for me also.
__________________
------------------------------------------------------------ "The liar's punishment is not in the least that he is not believed, but that he cannot believe anyone else." George Bernard Shaw |
27 June 2011, 03:22 AM | #21 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Phil
Location: CA
Posts: 5,374
|
I think it really depends on what your own watch wearing habits and how the 47mm will fit into your collection.
I personally will probably keep the 44mm and the 45mm for dailies and the 47mm will be for special GTG or WIS events. To a non-WIS, the 47mm on my wrist is huge. its a win win all around though...
__________________
too much into watches... |
27 June 2011, 06:36 AM | #22 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Real Name: Bryan
Location: Oregon
Posts: 7,399
|
Quote:
I like the way you think, Phil!
__________________
Rolex / Panerai / Omega |
|
27 June 2011, 07:47 AM | #23 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: near my PAM
Watch: P-A-M.
Posts: 146
|
After I just got my first rad, the 210, a week ago. Now, If I want another rad, it would have to be something like 190. I just like the sub sec, and power ind in the back.
|
27 June 2011, 09:29 AM | #24 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Real Name: Mik
Location: USA
Posts: 13,724
|
Both a 210 and a 190. Now that is just crazy!
__________________
member#3242 |
27 June 2011, 10:58 AM | #25 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: Norman
Location: Jakarta
Watch: All of 'em..
Posts: 2,926
|
Im sure you are Mik! Good crazy though hahaha..
Well the voting is close, 190 has an edge though!
__________________
My collections.. Plus PAM 233, 232, 249 & PAM 417. |
27 June 2011, 10:20 PM | #26 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: near my PAM
Watch: P-A-M.
Posts: 146
|
|
27 June 2011, 11:34 PM | #27 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Real Name: Bryan
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 1,577
|
I prefer the look of the 232, the size of the 190.
__________________
Omega Panerai Chopard Grand Seiko |
28 June 2011, 12:26 AM | #28 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: Norman
Location: Jakarta
Watch: All of 'em..
Posts: 2,926
|
Thats right Bryan!
__________________
My collections.. Plus PAM 233, 232, 249 & PAM 417. |
29 June 2011, 09:56 AM | #29 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Real Name: Bryan
Location: Oregon
Posts: 7,399
|
190 by a hair!!
__________________
Rolex / Panerai / Omega |
29 June 2011, 10:04 AM | #30 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Real Name: Mik
Location: USA
Posts: 13,724
|
__________________
member#3242 |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.