ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
View Poll Results: which Panerai | |||
372 - aka the 127 killer ;-) | 15 | 53.57% | |
372 - 47 mm 'bronzo' | 13 | 46.43% | |
Voters: 28. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
27 June 2011, 07:01 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Europe
Posts: 825
|
372 or 382
which would you buy
372 very nice and at least 3000 pce ... so it can wait 382 also very coll, only 1000 pce so probably now or never |
27 June 2011, 07:24 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Real Name: Bryan
Location: Oregon
Posts: 7,399
|
372 without hesitation.
__________________
Rolex / Panerai / Omega |
27 June 2011, 07:40 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: Eric
Location: Location,Location
Watch: this, bro...
Posts: 15,340
|
I think the question is - which one can you get.
The way the whole availability is going, both are going to be very difficult to come by, especially the 382..... Unless you are a big time collector with a good relationship with your supplier(s) |
27 June 2011, 07:43 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: near my PAM
Watch: P-A-M.
Posts: 146
|
372 for me...hope i can get one at that time.
|
27 June 2011, 07:46 AM | #5 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Paris, France
Posts: 35,296
|
382! Such a cool, interesting and striking piece.
372 is nice, no doubt, but, for that kind of money, I think I want more. Both are great, though, and get my juices flowing more than this year's new models from a certain other brand. |
27 June 2011, 11:11 AM | #6 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: UK
Posts: 908
|
Quote:
P.s L-16610 I guess we know the result you want as both voting options are for the 372 |
|
27 June 2011, 12:10 PM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Real Name: Clive
Location: Exoplanet
Watch: spring-driven
Posts: 38,856
|
I don't really understand the buzz about the 372. Imho it is a $10k+ base model, not even (apparently) a LE. The 'vintage' touches are nice, but not worth a huge premium. The 'Bronzo' does nothing for me at all...
__________________
|
28 June 2011, 09:05 AM | #8 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: DC Area, USA
Watch: IIc,1680 Red,16660
Posts: 4,492
|
Quote:
Even though you can point to all these things, deconstructing it actually leads you away from the real reason for the buzz. That reason? The 372 is a -perfectly- conceptualized and executed piece. There isn't one thing you'd add or change. It's a masterpiece. |
|
28 June 2011, 10:43 AM | #9 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Real Name: Clive
Location: Exoplanet
Watch: spring-driven
Posts: 38,856
|
Quote:
I take your points ...I just think it's overpriced (aren't they all!) I'm thinking in comparison to, say, the 233 which also has an inhouse movement and some unique features. At 6k I would be interested. At 10k+ there is a lot of interesting competition - not that Panerai will have any trouble selling them all of course.
__________________
|
|
28 June 2011, 11:33 AM | #10 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Real Name: Bryan
Location: Oregon
Posts: 7,399
|
Quote:
I don't disagree with your comments. But there are-a-plenty willing and able to pay these "ridiculous" prices. 233 isn't a bad comparison; however, I think the draw to the 372 is the lack of features. Go figure!
__________________
Rolex / Panerai / Omega |
|
28 June 2011, 08:58 PM | #11 | |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Paris, France
Posts: 35,296
|
Quote:
yes, OP definitely accomplished what it set about to do. but, i would change one thing (setting aside the size (for me) and price ). i just don't like the engravings on the 12 o'clock and 6 o'clock sides of the case. at least in pictures, it clutters the look and almost makes the case seem chipped/scratched. see eric's picture above, for example. i'm guessing that in real life, it looks better. |
|
27 June 2011, 07:59 AM | #12 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: Eric
Location: Location,Location
Watch: this, bro...
Posts: 15,340
|
Quote:
Name on the list, but will see how I feel about it when mine arrives I would def want a 382, due to the bronze material and the green dial. |
|
27 June 2011, 10:48 AM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: Norman
Location: Jakarta
Watch: All of 'em..
Posts: 2,926
|
The 372 wins hands down for me. The bronzo is a great piece, but I always have not been able to wear the sub pam comfortably on my wrist. The titanium ones are the least fussy, but still doesnt feel that good.
__________________
My collections.. Plus PAM 233, 232, 249 & PAM 417. |
27 June 2011, 12:02 PM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Joe
Location: PA
Posts: 14,774
|
Another vote for the 372.
|
28 June 2011, 03:28 PM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Real Name: Bryan
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 1,577
|
Hmmmm.... 233 with gold hands? Interesting thought. You might needs to also the hands on the seconds too to complete the look
__________________
Omega Panerai Chopard Grand Seiko |
28 June 2011, 03:33 PM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: Norman
Location: Jakarta
Watch: All of 'em..
Posts: 2,926
|
Then again, 233 is not a bad option instead of the 372.
And Bryan, usually the ones on eBay sells them in 3. One for the hour hand, one for the minute hand, and one for the seconds hand. So I don't think there's any trouble looking for one. Just thinking of changing it, and DOING the change. Since it's an in-house 8 days movement, it's kinda pretty scary to disassemble the unit alone. And no - I don't think those service centres would want to do it.
__________________
My collections.. Plus PAM 233, 232, 249 & PAM 417. |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.