ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

AJMarcus · 2 July 2011, 09:14 AM

Just curious if anyone has both a SS Sub C and a SS GMT II C? If you do, do you find you have much variety? In the old days, it was not unusual to have an SS SUb and a GMT Coke or Pepsi too.

esm · 2 July 2011, 09:16 AM

i like them both.

to some they can look quite similar... but too WIS/keen eyes, they are "miles apart"

nyfida · 2 July 2011, 09:23 AM

Great pic! Love the way it shows the lume.

drockadam · 2 July 2011, 09:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by esm

i like them both.

to some they can look quite similar... but too WIS/keen eyes, they are "miles apart"

Wow. What a beautiful pair! 116710 and 116610LN!

dddrees · 3 July 2011, 06:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by drockadam

Wow. What a beautiful pair! 116710 and 116610LN!

Great Lume PIC Eric.

HDHNTER · 3 July 2011, 06:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dddrees

Great Lume PIC Eric.

+1

A.J.R. · 2 July 2011, 09:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by esm

i like them both.

to some they can look quite similar... but too WIS/keen eyes, they are "miles apart"

GMT and SUB.JPEG

Great pair of watches!

HPY · 2 July 2011, 10:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by esm

i like them both.

to some they can look quite similar... but too WIS/keen eyes, they are "miles apart"

nice pair!

chicagofan · 2 July 2011, 12:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by esm

i like them both.

to some they can look quite similar... but too WIS/keen eyes, they are "miles apart"

Nice pic of a great pair of watches.

Hooper · 3 July 2011, 12:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by esm

i like them both.

to some they can look quite similar... but too WIS/keen eyes, they are "miles apart"

I'M in love !!

mborkow · 2 July 2011, 09:27 AM

I think the GMT IIc and the DSSD would be a great ceramic duo

cedargrove · 2 July 2011, 09:30 AM

Quick question. Are the lugs the same on both? The Sub's lugs look slightly wider and possibly shorter. I have always wondered this and even side by side I still wonder.

HPY · 2 July 2011, 09:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cedargrove

Quick question. Are the lugs the same on both? The Sub's lugs look slightly wider and possibly shorter. I have always wondered this and even side by side I still wonder.

If i am not wrong, they are the same

NutNut · 2 July 2011, 05:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cedargrove

Quick question. Are the lugs the same on both? The Sub's lugs look slightly wider and possibly shorter. I have always wondered this and even side by side I still wonder.

I’m not sure but judging from the pic, the Sub’s lugs look longer than the GMT’s. Also, the Sub’s crown guards seem to be wider than that of the GMT’s. Regardless, both of those SS watches are a-OK.

I have the TT GMTIIc and I hope to add a TT Blue SubC to my collection some time in the near future.

AJMarcus · 2 July 2011, 09:43 AM

Great pic! Thanks for sharing. I can definitely see your point Eric. I just wonder if anyone got the other in TT to differentiate. But not everyone likes TT or YG.

gqllc · 2 July 2011, 10:19 AM

Here is how I do the two...

FusionSel · 2 July 2011, 10:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gqllc

woah! Awesome!

AJMarcus · 3 July 2011, 04:35 AM

Well....I'm actually going the Ceramic x 2 club! Waiting for the arrival of my SS GMT II C from David SW. I considered a TT GMT but, though gorgeous, I prefer my watches less blingy. I had a Sub TT before and I felt it just drew too much attention. And quite a lot of them around. So i went with the SS. But with the polished center links it will be a tad dressier I think than my SS Sub C. And the PCLs got me thinking. It totally fits with the GMT. The classic GMTs once had the option of the jubilee bracelet which, as we know, has PCLs! As usual Rolex knows what they're doing when they slowly redesign, I.e., update, their pieces Thanks again for sharing your pics! Hope everyones enjoying the weekend.

757doc001 · 3 July 2011, 06:09 AM

amazing pics, I hope to have both of those parked in my garage some day...They have come and gone but together they are amazing!

z32turbo · 3 July 2011, 08:31 AM

I went Sub C LV & GMT II-C for some variety.

esm · 3 July 2011, 08:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by z32turbo

I went Sub C LV & GMT II-C for some variety.

Oh yeah, that is a good idea too

Green and green - will see if I can snap a pix of them two together too

2 July 2011, 09:14 AM	#1
AJMarcus "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2010 Real Name: AJ Location: USA Watch: Swiss Posts: 5,238	Ceramics x 2 Just curious if anyone has both a SS Sub C and a SS GMT II C? If you do, do you find you have much variety? In the old days, it was not unusual to have an SS SUb and a GMT Coke or Pepsi too.

2 July 2011, 10:19 AM	#16
gqllc "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2010 Real Name: Steve Location: Albany NY Watch: Blue Bezel SubC Posts: 1,511	Here is how I do the two... __________________ K-TT Datejust, Random Blue Bezel SubC

3 July 2011, 06:09 AM	#19
757doc001 "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2011 Real Name: Jason Location: Virginia Watch: 116610LN C Posts: 478	amazing pics, I hope to have both of those parked in my garage some day...They have come and gone but together they are amazing! __________________ Don't just make a living, make a difference!

3 July 2011, 08:31 AM	#20
z32turbo "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2009 Location: Sea Level Watch: Varies Posts: 6,877	I went Sub C LV & GMT II-C for some variety. __________________ Instagram @z32turbo

2 July 2011, 09:16 AM	#2
esm "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2008 Real Name: Eric Location: Location,Location Watch: this, bro... Posts: 15,340	i like them both. to some they can look quite similar... but too WIS/keen eyes, they are "miles apart"

2 July 2011, 09:23 AM	#3
nyfida "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2010 Location: new york Posts: 539	Great pic! Love the way it shows the lume.

2 July 2011, 09:27 AM	#11
mborkow "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: san francisco Watch: gmt2c pam372 Posts: 842	I think the GMT IIc and the DSSD would be a great ceramic duo

2 July 2011, 09:30 AM	#12
cedargrove "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2010 Real Name: Rich Location: Canada Watch: Milgauss, GMT IIc Posts: 3,013	Quick question. Are the lugs the same on both? The Sub's lugs look slightly wider and possibly shorter. I have always wondered this and even side by side I still wonder.

2 July 2011, 09:43 AM	#15
AJMarcus "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2010 Real Name: AJ Location: USA Watch: Swiss Posts: 5,238	Great pic! Thanks for sharing. I can definitely see your point Eric. I just wonder if anyone got the other in TT to differentiate. But not everyone likes TT or YG.

3 July 2011, 04:35 AM	#18
AJMarcus "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2010 Real Name: AJ Location: USA Watch: Swiss Posts: 5,238	Well....I'm actually going the Ceramic x 2 club! Waiting for the arrival of my SS GMT II C from David SW. I considered a TT GMT but, though gorgeous, I prefer my watches less blingy. I had a Sub TT before and I felt it just drew too much attention. And quite a lot of them around. So i went with the SS. But with the polished center links it will be a tad dressier I think than my SS Sub C. And the PCLs got me thinking. It totally fits with the GMT. The classic GMTs once had the option of the jubilee bracelet which, as we know, has PCLs! As usual Rolex knows what they're doing when they slowly redesign, I.e., update, their pieces Thanks again for sharing your pics! Hope everyones enjoying the weekend.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)