ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
26 July 2011, 09:51 PM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Cheshire
Posts: 35
|
Newbie that can't decide (Sub or GMT)
Hi all,
As above I am new to the site and would like to hear people’s opinions on my dilemma!!! I’m currently looking at purchasing my 1st Rolex and can not make my mind up on which one to get. What would you guys recommend? I’m torn between the new Sub and the GMT II master!! Thanks in advance Ash |
26 July 2011, 09:57 PM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: .
Posts: 17,898
|
As always, go try on, as you will get 100 different opinions here...make it 99, as my vote is for the Sub
Seriously, do yourself the favor and go to an AD and spend time with them, as they really are both must haves for any Rolex owner. One will make you go 'wow' and out will come the credit card...or better yet both! |
26 July 2011, 10:00 PM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Joe
Location: PA
Posts: 14,774
|
Both great watches to own as a 1st. Can't go wrong with either.
I'd lean towards the SubC. Good luck! |
27 July 2011, 08:34 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Real Name: Dave
Location: Canada
Watch: Submariner
Posts: 2,080
|
|
26 July 2011, 10:04 PM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Real Name: Howard
Location: Chicago
Posts: 3,588
|
Either would be great for a 1st Rolex. My preference is for the Sub; however, it's a personal choice. Take your time in choosing and good luck.
|
26 July 2011, 10:11 PM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,458
|
Don't worry, what you are facing now is a very common dilemma. I went for a Black Stainless steel Sub ceramic for my first, GMT didn't even come into the picture until I was deciding between a two tone blue sub ceramic or a two tone GMT for my fourth. Get the one that you like best.
The black sub ceramic is an absolutely beautiful watch. Each time after wearing my two tone or full gold watch for a while I would start to think the stainless steel sub ceramic is kind of plain but when I have it on my wrist again it just shines! |
26 July 2011, 10:14 PM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Cheshire
Posts: 35
|
Thanks Guys. All comments really apreciated.
I currently own a Breitling Bentley 6.75 which i wear on weekends, so I want something abit more suttel with a classy look! I need to have both in front of me to decide i think!! |
26 July 2011, 10:17 PM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,458
|
Got to an AD and try both on if you can. I don't have the luxury of doing that for all the watch I own as AD are too far away from me. I based my decisions on pics after pics, posting up threads reading, up the features and history on TRF and the internet and have not regretted my purchase.
|
26 July 2011, 10:48 PM | #9 | |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Paris, France
Posts: 35,301
|
Quote:
well, if you are wondering which one is more subtle, i'd have to say the GMTIIc's PCLs, green hand and text and large numbers on the bezel make it less subtle than the SubC. BUT, the SubC is so instantly recognizable, i don't know if one would ever consider it to be "subtle". in the end, try 'em on and go with what feels best. |
|
26 July 2011, 10:19 PM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Real Name: emad
Location: Kuwait
Watch: LV-PAM312-214270
Posts: 252
|
For me the sub . i don't like the green hand in the GMT
|
26 July 2011, 10:24 PM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Cheshire
Posts: 35
|
Based on Pictures/Info over the internet the Subc seems to appeal the most, however i love the green hand on the GMT as I think it gives that little bit extra??
|
26 July 2011, 10:28 PM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: *
Posts: 2,323
|
Can't go wrong with any of the two.
__________________
Member# 52,675 Est. 3/2011 |
26 July 2011, 10:32 PM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Real Name: Charles B
Location: GMT -7
Watch: Hulk 116610LV
Posts: 6,131
|
Go for the Sub C...and if you really want something special, try on the LV.
__________________
Hulk 116610LV + GMT II 126710 BLNR + Explorer 124270 + Air King 126900 + Submariner 16613LB |
26 July 2011, 10:37 PM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Real Name: Myron
Location: New York
Watch: GMT IIC; Sub Date
Posts: 3,166
|
GMT IIC.
__________________
|
26 July 2011, 10:42 PM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Cheshire
Posts: 35
|
HAHA thanks for all the comments guys.
I really thought coming on this site would help me decide but now im more confussed than ever!!! I Want BOTH :-/ |
26 July 2011, 10:43 PM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Real Name: Charles B
Location: GMT -7
Watch: Hulk 116610LV
Posts: 6,131
|
__________________
Hulk 116610LV + GMT II 126710 BLNR + Explorer 124270 + Air King 126900 + Submariner 16613LB |
26 July 2011, 11:05 PM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Real Name: MJC
Location: PHL USA
Watch: IWC, Rolex, AP
Posts: 29,232
|
Exactly, don't fight yourself
__________________
|
26 July 2011, 11:09 PM | #18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: Mark
Location: Seattle-ish
Posts: 6,078
|
Sub for me, but I have no use for a gmt. I like to keep it simple and clean.
|
26 July 2011, 11:17 PM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: USA
Watch: GMT IIc, Daytona
Posts: 69
|
My first Rolex was a Sub. Today I'm trading my second Sub for a GMT IIc.
I think a Sub is a good starting watch for a first time Rolex owner. Good luck with your decision. |
26 July 2011, 11:07 PM | #20 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Cheshire
Posts: 35
|
As much as i want 2, I think my wife would leave me if i bought both !!!
|
27 July 2011, 12:17 AM | #21 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Real Name: Steve
Location: Albany NY
Watch: Blue Bezel SubC
Posts: 1,511
|
So is that a bad thing?? At least you could have two Rolex! The SubC is more subtle than the GMTIIc...I have both and NO wife...LMAO!
__________________
K-TT Datejust, Random Blue Bezel SubC |
27 July 2011, 12:19 AM | #22 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Real Name: Ari
Location: Florida
Watch: ...me go broke
Posts: 2,428
|
|
27 July 2011, 01:28 AM | #23 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Real Name: Adam
Location: Orlando, Florida
Watch: Me
Posts: 9,935
|
As said they are both amazing watches, I own both of them but my vote goes for the GMT, I love the bezel for whatever that is worth. Good luck with your decision
__________________
The richest people in the world look for and build NETWORKS, Everyone else looks for work... Robert Kiyosaki |
26 July 2011, 11:15 PM | #24 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 19,706
|
What are your pros and cons for each?
Maybe listing them out can help you decide. |
26 July 2011, 11:22 PM | #25 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Cheshire
Posts: 35
|
Thanks all, I will try both on over the Wkend and evaluate which is best!
Although... I think im leaning towards the Subc :-) What do you think would be a good price for the Subc?? |
26 July 2011, 11:33 PM | #26 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: North Carolina
Watch: me save for it.
Posts: 444
|
What would be more useful to you, additional timezones or a timing bezel?
|
26 July 2011, 11:36 PM | #27 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Cheshire
Posts: 35
|
Either or really i just want the best looking watch !!
|
26 July 2011, 11:37 PM | #28 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Singapore
Watch: Rolex GMT II
Posts: 53
|
Both are iconic Rolex watches. But since I don't dive, and I travel quite a bit, I chose the GMT.
|
26 July 2011, 11:52 PM | #29 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Real Name: Ari
Location: Florida
Watch: ...me go broke
Posts: 2,428
|
They're both beautiful watches. If you don't travel much and have little use for the GMT function, I'd think the Sub would be the better choice.
Most AD's won't discount a Sub C much if at all, in the forums, trusted sellers tend to ask about $7300 give or take for BNIB examples, LNIB around $6800-$7100. I've seen LNIB GMT's go for $6600. Personally, I'd buy a BNIB here from a trusted seller, and also, maybe it's just me, but I feel safer if the warranty card is stamped, named and dated at the time of purchase from the AD. Even better if the date is recent, perhaps 1-3 months ago. |
26 July 2011, 11:43 PM | #30 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Cheshire
Posts: 35
|
ok lets look at it in a different point of view..!
which will retain the most vaule and possibly increase of time? |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.