ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
7 August 2011, 10:32 PM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Australia
Posts: 28
|
Quick question about wear on ref. and case numbers between the lugs
Hello all,
I am noticing as I do research that many vintage examples I see for sale have considerable wear between the lugs partially obscuring the case and/or reference numbers. Do members here have a theory on how the wear occurs? Does it result particularly from use with leather straps as opposed to OEM bracelets? Is it a result of sweat, sea water or other corosive? Some examples I see have pronounced wear and others have next to none. Is there an explanation for this (other than varying levels of use by their owners)? An 16750 (c.1986) I am interested in has pristine markings between the lugs beautifully preserved. Will wearing the watch on a NATO strap cause more wear on the area than wearing it on the jubilee bracelet? I'm a fan of leather NATOs do you think it is going to speed up the wear if I put it on one? Regards, Zac |
8 August 2011, 12:17 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: US
Watch: Sub
Posts: 3,175
|
It's caused by the non-SEL of the Role bracelet moving slightly while the watch is being worn. More wear means the watch was worn more often...less wear probably means a safe queen.
And your NATO probably won't cause any wear like you are describing. Although it can mark up the caseback in some cases.
__________________
侘 寂 -- wabi-sabi -- acceptance of transience and imperfection by finding beauty in that which is imperfect, impermanent, and incomplete Commissioner of WEIRD POLICE , Badge # ecsub44 |
8 August 2011, 12:20 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: *
Posts: 2,323
|
It's caused by non solid endlinks.
__________________
Member# 52,675 Est. 3/2011 |
8 August 2011, 12:42 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2010
Real Name: Dan
Location: USA
Watch: This N That
Posts: 34,253
|
A Nato strap won't even to touch that area, so it shouldn't be a concern.
__________________
When it captures your imagination, that's when you know you have found your passion. Loyal Foot Soldier of The Nylon Nation. Card Carrying Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons |
8 August 2011, 06:28 PM | #5 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Australia
Posts: 28
|
Thanks that is what logic led me too as well
Quote:
I had a think about it today and the Nato only just touches the crisp edge of the case right down near the case back no where near the engraved numbers. I can't wait to take some pics of these imaculate between the lug areas. Zac |
|
9 August 2011, 12:26 AM | #6 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Aaron
Location: CT/NYC
Watch: ing the time!
Posts: 6,999
|
Loose end pieces on the bracelet are the culprits. Over the years, even slightly loose end pieces can rub and rub and rub that area, taking off parts of the numbers. The rub marks are usually a very distinctive shape, almost like a half moon, because the end pieces are curved, of course. However, properly adjusted end pieces on a non-SEL bracelet shouldn't do this. On older watches those end pieces just have a tendency to loosen up over time and often they become slightly bent. At an RSC service, the tech will either adjust the end pieces or just replace them. So, worn areas between the lugs can also be an indication that a vintage watch wasn't serviced much, or that someone wore it a lot.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.