ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

lindstd · 11 August 2011, 04:24 AM

I am in the process of buying one of these two watches and I would greatly appreciate any advice. I am looking for the "perfect" all around watch to wear to work with my suits or weekend in my jeans. I know these are two very different watches but both considered timeless watches. Thanks!

agsstructures · 11 August 2011, 04:42 AM

Funny that this thread popped up, I had a Sub-C that I purchased in March and sold it for the 5001-07. The Sub-C is the ultimate daily wearer and can be worn in ANY situation. The IWC is a little thick and can be worn dressed up or casual but if its going to be your only watch I suggest trying it on first. I do not have to get that dressed up for work so it works as a daily wearer for me. Also the Sub I had was dead on accurate while the IWC runs a little fast. The clear case back of the IWC is a marvel to look at and the IWC is a bit less common in the wild than the Sub. Even though I own the IWC, you mentioned you wanted the perfect "all around" watch which in this case would go to the Sub-C. Either way you cannot go wrong and good luck with the purchase.

drdenn · 11 August 2011, 05:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by knobberboy

Even though I own the IWC, you mentioned you wanted the perfect "all around" watch which in this case would go to the Sub-C. Either way you cannot go wrong and good luck with the purchase.

Been here, done that. Buy the Sub C. Later, add to your collection. You will find out what many others have, that your Sub is your best friend, and your others are merely an acquaintance!

nauticajoe · 11 August 2011, 04:47 AM

My vote goes to the SubC.

The watch looks great for any occasion.

mjclark32 · 11 August 2011, 05:04 AM

That's a tough little situation you've got there.
Knobber gives pretty good advice IMO.

agsstructures · 11 August 2011, 05:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mjclark32

That's a tough little situation you've got there.
Knobber gives pretty good advice IMO.

Thanks for the compliment! It took me a while to make my decision and I contemplated it for a very long time. It was a tough one but the IWC was the winner for me!

besview · 11 August 2011, 05:10 AM

Best all rounder would be the Sub-C. i keep staring at the shiny ceramic bezel ,dont know why:)

dddrees · 11 August 2011, 05:16 AM

For me the Sub C is a much better all around watch. Durability, Dependability, Flexibility, and Looks.

esm · 11 August 2011, 05:18 AM

Sub C for me also - considered a Portuguese Auto a couple of years ago, but the non-in house movement eventually turned me away...

if'd be a different story if it were the Portuguese 7 Days...

agsstructures · 11 August 2011, 05:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by esm

Sub C for me also - considered a Portuguese Auto a couple of years ago, but the non-in house movement eventually turned me away...

if'd be a different story if it were the Portuguese 7 Days...

I think the OP is referring to the 7 day when he says Auto but I could be wrong. I think the other Port is the Port Chrono, the one with no date and ETA movement which I am not to crazy about. I went with the 7 day Auto and am assuming that is what he is talking about. Not 100% sure though.

Wcdhtwn · 18 February 2016, 05:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by knobberboy

I think the OP is referring to the 7 day when he says Auto but I could be wrong. I think the other Port is the Port Chrono, the one with no date and ETA movement which I am not to crazy about. I went with the 7 day Auto and am assuming that is what he is talking about. Not 100% sure though.

Does the Portugieser Chrono still have the modified ETA? The one I have does but I got it 12 years ago. I thought they replaced it with an in house movement. Calibre 79350 on their Website, I suppose that could be an ETA...

OP: I'd say Sub and the lume is probably the biggest reason. But if you are set on an IWC I'd suggest the Yacht Club Chronograph. That's closer to the Sub in the Portugieser family. Though the Aquatimer line is their version of dive watches so from a diving tool perspective you should be shopping there.

WhatTheDeuce · 18 February 2016, 09:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wcdhtwn

Does the Portugieser Chrono still have the modified ETA? The one I have does but I got it 12 years ago. I thought they replaced it with an in house movement. Calibre 79350 on their Website, I suppose that could be an ETA...

OP: I'd say Sub and the lume is probably the biggest reason. But if you are set on an IWC I'd suggest the Yacht Club Chronograph. That's closer to the Sub in the Portugieser family. Though the Aquatimer line is their version of dive watches so from a diving tool perspective you should be shopping there.

Still ETA but the Chronograph Classic has an in-house movement.

Sent from half way through the Kessel Run using Tapatalk

travisb · 11 August 2011, 05:18 AM

For everyday and every situation I would take the SubC without a doubt. Perfect for absolutely anything.

The Portuguese would be a great addition if you ever add a second piece.

lindstd · 11 August 2011, 05:24 AM

Knobberboy is correct. 7 day in black or white.

agsstructures · 11 August 2011, 05:31 AM

wrist shot (not so great iphone pic)

mjclark32 · 11 August 2011, 06:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by knobberboy

wrist shot (not so great iphone pic)

Looks awesome

conrail · 11 August 2011, 07:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by knobberboy

wrist shot (not so great iphone pic)

That is on my short list - what a beauty.

Between those two, I vote Portuguese all the way - IMO the Sub-C ruined the proportions of a beautiful and timeless Submariner.

lindstd · 11 August 2011, 05:34 AM

Nice photo I must say!

A.J.R. · 11 August 2011, 05:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lindstd

Nice photo I must say!

X2

SubC, but I am starting to fancy the offerings from IWC more and more.

DFM1 · 11 August 2011, 06:08 AM

I own a Sub, not a Sub C (yet) and a 5001. Love them both for various reasons so it would be hard to choose. So my advise is get them both!

agsstructures · 11 August 2011, 06:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DFM1

I own a Sub, not a Sub C (yet) and a 5001. Love them both for various reasons so it would be hard to choose. So my advise is get them both!

Best of both worlds!

Stephen.S · 11 August 2011, 05:37 AM

Sub C black

warrior · 11 August 2011, 05:38 AM

Unless your primary criteria is having something less common on your wrist, I'd opt for the Sub-C. It's simply a better all rounder.

The IWC leans more toward dress than casual/sport. Has to do with the water-resisitance, polished bezel, and overall look/design IMO.

psv · 11 August 2011, 05:43 AM

I agree that the SubC is a "better" all around watch but at the same time they are hardly unique. It all depends on your lifestyle, vibe, needs etc. Personally I love/need good lume so that would kill the 5001...

Art 1 · 11 August 2011, 06:18 AM

The IWC out of those two. The Sub C is my least favorite Rolex sports watch and that is the only IWC that I like.

RRGHOST1 · 11 August 2011, 07:06 AM

Not a great lover of IWC watches so it would be the SubC for me.

Ck8 · 11 August 2011, 07:24 AM

Go for the IWC great watch I rated better quality than a Rolex.

slcbbrown · 11 August 2011, 07:28 AM

If this is to be your only good watch, pick the Sub. Sub should be much tougher, easier to maintain, and clearly sportier. That IWC is dressier, more complicated and certainly pretty. I think this comparison is really apples to oranges. Once you have decided what kind watch you really want, the decision should be obvious.

ManUtd · 11 August 2011, 07:29 AM

I like both but for the perfect all-around watch it has gotta be the SubC.

Cabaiguan · 11 August 2011, 08:14 AM

Both are fantastic pieces. I think that they are different enough to co-exist beautifully in any collection. That being said, I think the Sub is the "jack of all trades." Looks good dressed up or down and the bracelet is generally better in the humid summer months. I say Sub first, then IWC.

11 August 2011, 04:24 AM	#1
lindstd "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2011 Location: Minneapolis Posts: 233	Rolex Sub C or IWC Portuguese Auto I am in the process of buying one of these two watches and I would greatly appreciate any advice. I am looking for the "perfect" all around watch to wear to work with my suits or weekend in my jeans. I know these are two very different watches but both considered timeless watches. Thanks!

11 August 2011, 05:04 AM	#5
mjclark32 "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2010 Real Name: MJC Location: PHL USA Watch: IWC, Rolex, AP Posts: 29,232	That's a tough little situation you've got there. Knobber gives pretty good advice IMO. __________________

11 August 2011, 05:16 AM	#8
dddrees "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2010 Real Name: Dan Location: USA Watch: This N That Posts: 34,253	For me the Sub C is a much better all around watch. Durability, Dependability, Flexibility, and Looks. __________________ When it captures your imagination, that's when you know you have found your passion. Loyal Foot Soldier of The Nylon Nation. Card Carrying Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons

11 August 2011, 05:18 AM	#13
travisb 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Aug 2009 Real Name: Travis Location: FL / NYC Watch: Yes.. Posts: 33,493	The Portuguese is an amazing watch but... For everyday and every situation I would take the SubC without a doubt. Perfect for absolutely anything. The Portuguese would be a great addition if you ever add a second piece.

11 August 2011, 05:31 AM	#15
agsstructures 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: Brooklyn, NY Posts: 2,401	wrist shot (not so great iphone pic) Attached Images

11 August 2011, 04:42 AM	#2
agsstructures 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: Brooklyn, NY Posts: 2,401	Funny that this thread popped up, I had a Sub-C that I purchased in March and sold it for the 5001-07. The Sub-C is the ultimate daily wearer and can be worn in ANY situation. The IWC is a little thick and can be worn dressed up or casual but if its going to be your only watch I suggest trying it on first. I do not have to get that dressed up for work so it works as a daily wearer for me. Also the Sub I had was dead on accurate while the IWC runs a little fast. The clear case back of the IWC is a marvel to look at and the IWC is a bit less common in the wild than the Sub. Even though I own the IWC, you mentioned you wanted the perfect "all around" watch which in this case would go to the Sub-C. Either way you cannot go wrong and good luck with the purchase.

11 August 2011, 04:47 AM	#4
nauticajoe "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2010 Real Name: Joe Location: PA Posts: 14,774	My vote goes to the SubC. The watch looks great for any occasion.

11 August 2011, 05:10 AM	#7
besview "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2010 Location: malaysia Posts: 293	Best all rounder would be the Sub-C. i keep staring at the shiny ceramic bezel ,dont know why:)

11 August 2011, 05:18 AM	#9
esm "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2008 Real Name: Eric Location: Location,Location Watch: this, bro... Posts: 15,340	Sub C for me also - considered a Portuguese Auto a couple of years ago, but the non-in house movement eventually turned me away... if'd be a different story if it were the Portuguese 7 Days...

11 August 2011, 05:24 AM	#14
lindstd "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2011 Location: Minneapolis Posts: 233	Knobberboy is correct. 7 day in black or white.

11 August 2011, 05:34 AM	#18
lindstd "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2011 Location: Minneapolis Posts: 233	Nice photo I must say!

11 August 2011, 06:08 AM	#20
DFM1 "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2009 Real Name: Drew Location: The Jersey Shore Watch: Me keep buying! Posts: 1,246	I own a Sub, not a Sub C (yet) and a 5001. Love them both for various reasons so it would be hard to choose. So my advise is get them both!

11 August 2011, 05:37 AM	#22
Stephen.S Member Join Date: Aug 2011 Location: UK Posts: 54	Sub C black

11 August 2011, 05:38 AM	#23
warrior "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2009 Location: massachusetts Watch: Explorer Posts: 1,692	Unless your primary criteria is having something less common on your wrist, I'd opt for the Sub-C. It's simply a better all rounder. The IWC leans more toward dress than casual/sport. Has to do with the water-resisitance, polished bezel, and overall look/design IMO.

11 August 2011, 05:43 AM	#24
psv 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: USA & France Posts: 11,078	I agree that the SubC is a "better" all around watch but at the same time they are hardly unique. It all depends on your lifestyle, vibe, needs etc. Personally I love/need good lume so that would kill the 5001...

11 August 2011, 06:18 AM	#25
Art 1 Banned Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: Florida, Canada Watch: Rol/Seik/Tud/Omega Posts: 30,244	The IWC out of those two. The Sub C is my least favorite Rolex sports watch and that is the only IWC that I like.

11 August 2011, 07:06 AM	#26
RRGHOST1 "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2009 Real Name: luke standing Location: england Watch: Rolex TT SubC Blue Posts: 3,997	Not a great lover of IWC watches so it would be the SubC for me.

11 August 2011, 07:24 AM	#27
Ck8 "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2007 Real Name: Mark 哥 Location: UK Posts: 860	Go for the IWC great watch I rated better quality than a Rolex. __________________ I like wonton noodles soup - Mark 哥

11 August 2011, 07:28 AM	#28
slcbbrown "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2009 Real Name: steve Location: dallas area Watch: 50's TT t-bird Posts: 3,689	If this is to be your only good watch, pick the Sub. Sub should be much tougher, easier to maintain, and clearly sportier. That IWC is dressier, more complicated and certainly pretty. I think this comparison is really apples to oranges. Once you have decided what kind watch you really want, the decision should be obvious.

11 August 2011, 07:29 AM	#29
ManUtd "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2011 Real Name: Eric Location: SF Bay Area Posts: 1,613	I like both but for the perfect all-around watch it has gotta be the SubC. __________________ 116520 116610LN 126334 126600 PAM986

11 August 2011, 08:14 AM	#30
Cabaiguan "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2010 Real Name: Raf Location: NJ Watch: GMTII Posts: 2,155	Both are fantastic pieces. I think that they are different enough to co-exist beautifully in any collection. That being said, I think the Sub is the "jack of all trades." Looks good dressed up or down and the bracelet is generally better in the humid summer months. I say Sub first, then IWC.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)