ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
17 August 2011, 08:52 PM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: UK
Watch: GMT IIC
Posts: 230
|
Help choosing my first Panerai
Hi All,
I looking for some advice and guidance regarding my first purchase from the Panerai brand. I currently have 3 Rolex's, (S/S Datejust) (S/S GMTIIC) & (S/S Daytona) and am looking at add a new watch to the collection that has a different look to it hence Panerai. The cult following that Panerai also seems to have is also attractive. My requirements are as follows, Stainless Steel, on a strap & with a date complication. With regards the date function I'm not a fan of the cyclops that Panerai use so would want a date function without the addition of the cyclops. Finally i'd like an inhouse movement but not essential. So far I've selected the 312 and 359 model from the luminor range but can't see any in the Radiomir range. Do you guys have any views on the 312 and 359 and can you shed any light as to whether there are Radiomirs that fit the bill also. Finally what are biggest wrist differences going from wearing 36mm and 40mm Rolex's up to the larger Panerai's?? Thanks for you help guys. Nick |
17 August 2011, 09:05 PM | #2 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: May 2008
Real Name: Panos
Location: Athens, Greece
Watch: 16710
Posts: 8,704
|
312 is the perfect watch to enter Panerai world.
6 advantages (1950, inhouse, sandwich, date,automatic, easy change strap) non disadvantage, only is a bit top heavy. It's huge, when you compare it with 36 and even 40mm Rolex but soon you get used to it. The final judgment will be the wrist test. Here are some comparison pics between 312 and 000 http://50.30.33.71/~trfcom/showthread.php?t=189117 Good luck choosing one |
17 August 2011, 09:33 PM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: .
Posts: 17,898
|
I know stainless is one of your criteria, but look at the 351. It's very similar in design to 312, exact it's titanium, and EXTREMELY light. Has the gold hands and tabacco face--it's a beauty.
You cannot go wrong with the 312, as PanosI said. I would suggest trying the 312 and 351 on. Here's my 351... |
18 August 2011, 02:25 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Australia
Watch: RG DD40
Posts: 1,149
|
312 is a great option, recently acquired a 111 and now the rolex gmtc rarely gets worn! love my pam
__________________
"Did you get that at retail?" |
18 August 2011, 04:31 AM | #5 |
Vacated
Join Date: Nov 2009
Real Name: Marc
Location: Connecticut
Watch: PAM 111 'N'
Posts: 2,558
|
I like the 312- I'm not a fan of the lighter, titanium cases.
Congrats in advance on your future 312!
__________________
NAWCC Member Card Carrying Member of the Global Assoc. of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons Executive Dorklehead |
18 August 2011, 06:01 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Real Name: Mik
Location: USA
Posts: 13,724
|
Sounds like you are on a good start to learning. I REALLY suggest trying on as many case styles as you can. You'll find the right one.
Enjoy the ride.
__________________
member#3242 |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.