ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

RolexYM · 22 August 2011, 02:03 AM

Link: http://www.rolex-chat.com/review-on-...n-o-graph.html

If repost, then sorry. I am new here...and a proud owner of TOG. For the experts, are the facts in the article above correct??

RolexYM · 22 August 2011, 10:04 AM

Can anyone confirm the facts in the link above? Thx.

FlyingMoose · 22 August 2011, 10:16 AM

I want one of those also. Which one do you have? And do you like it?

What facts do you want to confirm?

RolexYM · 22 August 2011, 11:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FlyingMoose

I want one of those also. Which one do you have? And do you like it?

What facts do you want to confirm?

See: http://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=190583

I love it so far! I am sure that it will provide many years of pleasure....

The site talks about TOG being what started it all for Rolex sports watch...in 1953...so, i was just wondering if this is true?

GradyPhilpott · 22 August 2011, 10:40 AM

I'm pretty sure that site deals in subjects that aren't allowed here.

aleiberman · 22 August 2011, 11:33 AM

Great looking TOG. One of my all time favorite combinations. "What started it all" could be sort of subjective. It's not a vintage TOG from the early 50's. It's a great piece on its own, regardless of any history. My Sub 14060M, sure i guess you can say its classic, but it is still a 2001 Sub, and IMHO very far from many of the desired vintage subs we all drool over here on this forum.

RolexYM · 22 August 2011, 11:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by aleiberman

Great looking TOG. One of my all time favorite combinations. "What started it all" could be sort of subjective. It's not a vintage TOG from the early 50's. It's a great piece on its own, regardless of any history. My Sub 14060M, sure i guess you can say its classic, but it is still a 2001 Sub, and IMHO very far from many of the desired vintage subs we all drool over here on this forum.

No doubt. However, for some reason, i thought that TOG is a recent introduction for Rolex...but, clearly, i don't know much!!

Andelain · 23 August 2011, 01:57 AM

Nope, not recent. Here's a 1991 vintage that I just bought and hope to have next week.

22 August 2011, 02:03 AM	#1
RolexYM Banned Join Date: Jul 2011 Location: TX Watch: TOG + Yachmaster Posts: 202	Rolex Turn-O-Graph Synopsis Link: http://www.rolex-chat.com/review-on-...n-o-graph.html If repost, then sorry. I am new here...and a proud owner of TOG. For the experts, are the facts in the article above correct??

22 August 2011, 10:40 AM	#5
GradyPhilpott 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: New Mexico Watch: Seiko #SRK047 Posts: 34,460	I'm pretty sure that site deals in subjects that aren't allowed here. __________________ JJ Inaugural TRF $50 Watch Challenge Winner

23 August 2011, 01:57 AM	#8
Andelain "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2011 Location: The Sandbox Watch: ing your 6...... Posts: 1,379	Nope, not recent. Here's a 1991 vintage that I just bought and hope to have next week. __________________ .

22 August 2011, 10:04 AM	#2
RolexYM Banned Join Date: Jul 2011 Location: TX Watch: TOG + Yachmaster Posts: 202	Can anyone confirm the facts in the link above? Thx.

22 August 2011, 10:16 AM	#3
FlyingMoose "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: New York, USA Posts: 502	I want one of those also. Which one do you have? And do you like it? What facts do you want to confirm?

22 August 2011, 11:33 AM	#6
aleiberman "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2009 Real Name: Aaron Location: MA Watch: Rolex Posts: 501	Great looking TOG. One of my all time favorite combinations. "What started it all" could be sort of subjective. It's not a vintage TOG from the early 50's. It's a great piece on its own, regardless of any history. My Sub 14060M, sure i guess you can say its classic, but it is still a 2001 Sub, and IMHO very far from many of the desired vintage subs we all drool over here on this forum.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)