ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
22 August 2011, 02:15 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Real Name: B.
Location: Beverly Hills, CA
Posts: 3,621
|
Panerai on a small wrist?
So, I have been debating on buying a panerai lately, I am deciding between a 312, 351, 359 and 111. The problem is I have the wrist size of a 12 year old girl (I am 23 FYI). Does anyone have any experience with how a 44mm Panerai will fit on a small wrist in terms of size and also long term comfortability? Below is a picture of a 42mm Navi 1461 jours on my wrist for comparison sake.
|
22 August 2011, 02:29 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: .
Posts: 17,898
|
Those are large models your are contemplating. I would try them on, but should not be issue. You may want to try some of the base models (000, 111, 112) as they tend to wear a little smaller than 312 or 351. 351 is a very light watch, and I would highly recommend it for a smaller wrist over the heavier 312. Also look at 40mm 241. Just some thoughts.
|
22 August 2011, 02:54 AM | #3 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Real Name: Adam
Location: Philly ‘burbs
Posts: 5,660
|
What Paul said I dumped my third 48 and stepped it back up to 44mm. I really wanted an in-house 1950 model. I wouldn't of bought one if it didn't come in Ti. The 312 is nice, but too to heavy in my opinion. I really love my 351. The brushed Ti case, gold hands and tabacco dial are very unique. I can pull it off with my relatively thin 6 3/4" wrists. My wrists are more rounded than flat.
Quote:
__________________
Adam |
|
22 August 2011, 03:23 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: UK
Posts: 908
|
111 as it's manual (and a great first Pam) tends to fit better and is smaller on the wrist then some auto models but will still be big on your wrist,it really comes down to if you want to wear a watch and forget it's there,for me walking through a doorway would be done sideways and I have 7.5'' wrists,I would go to your AD and try them on first.
|
22 August 2011, 04:43 AM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Denmark
Watch: Panerai 305
Posts: 200
|
|
22 August 2011, 05:44 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Real Name: Adam
Location: Philly ‘burbs
Posts: 5,660
|
Not sure how much the 312 weighs. I meant it is too top heavy.
__________________
Adam |
22 August 2011, 05:50 AM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: USA
Posts: 3,495
|
Ive got a 6.75" wrist and wear a 320. Its big, but in a good way.
|
22 August 2011, 03:27 AM | #8 |
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2010
Real Name: Lorenzo
Location: Netherlands
Watch: 116710LN & 116201
Posts: 849
|
THE PROBLEM WITH A LARGE CASE ON A SMALL WRIST IS THAT THE CASE WILL GET BANGED UP MORE EASILY! I think the diameter of the case should fall within the width of the wrist. Just my
|
28 August 2011, 08:48 AM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Real Name: Tom
Location: San Diego
Watch: 1968 GMT 1675
Posts: 1,059
|
I agree. My wrist is only 6-7/8" and I find that I tend to bang big-case watches into things, plus they don't feel that comfortable with all that weight on one side.
|
22 August 2011, 03:50 AM | #10 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Gotham
Posts: 1,274
|
Best advice is to try them on yourself...so you can see how they fit on your wrist. IMO you would be better off with something like a 000, 005, 111, 112, 176, or 177 to start. While I love the look of the Luminors with the 1950 case, they are a little too thick for me.
|
22 August 2011, 04:13 AM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Real Name: Mik
Location: USA
Posts: 13,724
|
It all depends on the size and shape of your wrists. I'm slightly lucky in that I have a pretty flat wrist given that I'm only 6.5" around.
Just try them on and only you can decide. This is 42mm and wears big on me. This is 45mm and wears perfect on me. Here is a good 44mm for me. Here is a BAD 45.5mm for me. I wish I had a pic, but the 46mm IWC Mission Earth fits me like a glove. So, your wrist on a watch will fit........only one way to find out.
__________________
member#3242 |
23 August 2011, 04:24 AM | #12 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: UK
Watch: BLNR, JLC Deep Sea
Posts: 164
|
Quote:
Now you're just showing off!!!! Nice wardrobe |
|
23 August 2011, 05:02 AM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Real Name: Mik
Location: USA
Posts: 13,724
|
Not all are mine. I try on other people's watches and take a pic.
I have a 127 too (picture that is). Too big on me.
__________________
member#3242 |
22 August 2011, 04:29 AM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2010
Real Name: Dan
Location: USA
Watch: This N That
Posts: 34,253
|
Just test them out and give it a shot as Mik said. They do come in different sizes by the way.
__________________
When it captures your imagination, that's when you know you have found your passion. Loyal Foot Soldier of The Nylon Nation. Card Carrying Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons |
22 August 2011, 05:07 AM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Real Name: Joey
Location: around the Bay
Watch: ing TRF
Posts: 1,942
|
I have a 6" wrist and I have a 050 40mmand a 336 42mm it looks fine...
but the other day when I am at the Ad I try on a 210 45mm and I really like it, I guess the thickness make a big difference! The only thing is I can never pull it off with a cal dial w/ 47mm it like I am wearing a clock on my wrist! |
22 August 2011, 04:56 PM | #16 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: Bert
Location: philippines
Watch: 116710 ln
Posts: 3,472
|
Quote:
the only problem is...that other people will notice it most of the time |
|
22 August 2011, 05:09 PM | #17 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: Eddie
Location: Australia
Watch: A few.
Posts: 37,521
|
I agree. The Navi looks ok.
Wear wharever makes YOU feel good.
__________________
E |
22 August 2011, 05:29 PM | #18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Barrowford
Watch: Tudor Black Bay 54
Posts: 1,699
|
My wife has tiny wrists but pulls the 44mm Luminors off with ease. Don't bother with the 40mm!!! You'll just end up flipping it for a 44!!
__________________
Rolex Explorer 214270, Omega Speedmaster '1957 Relaunch' 3594.50.00, Panerai Luminor 1950 PAM00127-E, Panerai Radiomir 1936 PAM00249-I, Panerai Mare Nostrum PAM00716-T, Panerai PAM00785-Q Set, Panerai Luminor Black Seal PAM00594-Q, Panerai Luminor Daylight PAM00604-Q, Tudor Black Bay 54 79000N, Heuer Carrera Re-Edition CS3113, Hamilton Military W10 & TAG Heuer F1
|
23 August 2011, 12:57 AM | #19 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Real Name: Matt
Location: Dallas
Posts: 1,683
|
Quote:
Take the plunge and wear it a day, I promise it'll be weird at first and you'll be so used to it by day two that you won't want to go back to anything smaller. |
|
23 August 2011, 01:07 AM | #20 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: .
Posts: 17,898
|
|
23 August 2011, 01:19 AM | #21 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: Norman
Location: Jakarta
Watch: All of 'em..
Posts: 2,926
|
I think buying a panerai is not a small purchase.. So I highly recommend you to try it on before making any decisions.
__________________
My collections.. Plus PAM 233, 232, 249 & PAM 417. |
22 August 2011, 06:28 PM | #22 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Real Name: Andrew
Location: Indonesia
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 2,277
|
I dont think you have problem with 44 mm pam... it will look just fine.... trust me, been there, done that.... work just fine for me in the end.
__________________
Baume & Mercier Riviera Rolex GMT II c, DJ 116234, Sub 16610, EXP 2 16570 Panerai 111 , 232 |
22 August 2011, 06:34 PM | #23 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: ATX
Posts: 2,886
|
40mm PAMS are a bad idea. They are hard to move. Always go with the 44
|
23 August 2011, 02:37 AM | #24 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2011
Real Name: Jim
Location: SE MI, USA
Watch: Sub C
Posts: 2,068
|
I'll chime in as a former 40mm wearer who traded up to the 44's and 45's. I've found that the observations of the different models feeling and wearing differently to be true, e.g., I'm not crazy about the 3 day autos in the 1950 case, but the winding models are all fine.
|
23 August 2011, 09:29 AM | #25 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Real Name: B.
Location: Beverly Hills, CA
Posts: 3,621
|
Thank you everyone, this has been a huge help. I plan on going to the local AD here in Manhattan and trying on a few. My biggest issue is being young no one will give me the time of day, regardless if I am in an expensive suit or wearing my Navi. It looks like the radiomir wears a little smaller, I might just have to get one too.
Watches - an expensive hobby. |
23 August 2011, 10:40 AM | #26 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Real Name: Mik
Location: USA
Posts: 13,724
|
Quote:
__________________
member#3242 |
|
23 August 2011, 12:46 PM | #27 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: UK
Posts: 908
|
you don't need them to give you the time of day, just pass you the watches to try on ,unless you walk in with notes falling out your pockets these guys can be $£%"$ to most people,if they are too up themselves, just start with the Pams, then move on to the Rolex, try the whole shop on,and if they really pee you off, ask them do they stock G shock!
|
23 August 2011, 02:42 PM | #28 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Canada
Posts: 909
|
PAM 24 on small 6.1 "wrist
PAM233 |
23 August 2011, 10:04 PM | #29 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: NC, USA
Posts: 125
|
|
23 August 2011, 09:04 PM | #30 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Australia
Watch: RG DD40
Posts: 1,149
|
111 fits great on my wrist, I have small wrist trust me, looks big but I love it
__________________
"Did you get that at retail?" |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 2 (0 members and 2 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.