The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Other (non-Rolex) Watch Topics > Panerai Discussion Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 30 September 2011, 06:02 AM   #1
barstoolman
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 801
47MM Panerais..........Really????

Let me start off by saying that Panerai is my favorite brand by far and I love virtually all the different designs and styles they make however, when I often see pics of the 47MM watches on other members wrists, I have to be honest...........on many of these people, the watch just looks plain silly, sometimes as ridiculous looking as the clock Flavor Flav wears around his neck. By the same token, these 47MM watches look great on bigger guys but for the average guy, I just don't see it. I wish that Panerai would make some of these fantastic looking 47MM styles in 44MM so the average guy could wear them and not be so out of proportion.............thoughts?????
barstoolman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 September 2011, 06:13 AM   #2
eric23
"TRF" Member
 
eric23's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: Eric
Location: Calgary
Posts: 9,595
My watches seem to be getting bigger every year, But 47mm is big.

I did try some U-Boat watches on the weekend that where at 47mm or more.
eric23 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 September 2011, 07:49 AM   #3
B. Doggy
"TRF" Member
 
B. Doggy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Real Name: Bryan
Location: Oregon
Posts: 7,399
You haven't heard, Man? 47mm is the new 44mm. What sized wrists do you have? Mine are 7.25" and I've easily worn a BP without any issue. Personally can't wait to strap on my new 47mm PAM....hopefully sooner than later.
__________________
Rolex / Panerai / Omega
B. Doggy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 October 2011, 05:18 AM   #4
Mike1066
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: San Diego, CA
Watch: 16600
Posts: 728
Quote:
Originally Posted by B. Doggy View Post
You haven't heard, Man? 47mm is the new 44mm.
Too true.
__________________
V/R
Mike
Mike1066 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 September 2011, 08:10 AM   #5
dddrees
"TRF" Member
 
dddrees's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Real Name: Dan
Location: USA
Watch: This N That
Posts: 34,253
Different strokes for different folks.

Thats why there are so many styles and sizes out there to begin with.

To each his own. Your mileage may vary.
__________________
When it captures your imagination, that's when you know you have found your passion.

Loyal Foot Soldier of The Nylon Nation.

Card Carrying Member of the Global Association of
Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons
dddrees is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 September 2011, 08:22 AM   #6
Launch Mini
"TRF" Member
 
Launch Mini's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Real Name: John
Location: Canada, eh
Watch: can I?
Posts: 6,240
I've had 2 47mm ( the 232 & 249).
Both are gone now as I just never wore them enough. Partially was they were just too big. My wrist is about 7.25".
Gone back to a 42mm Rad as my daily beater now.
__________________
Something witty to go here.

Member # 293
Launch Mini is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 September 2011, 11:41 AM   #7
B. Doggy
"TRF" Member
 
B. Doggy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Real Name: Bryan
Location: Oregon
Posts: 7,399
Quote:
Originally Posted by Launch Mini View Post
I've had 2 47mm ( the 232 & 249).
Both are gone now as I just never wore them enough. Partially was they were just too big. My wrist is about 7.25".
Gone back to a 42mm Rad as my daily beater now.
Wow, big change up John. We gotta love what we own though! Good to see you posting.
__________________
Rolex / Panerai / Omega
B. Doggy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 September 2011, 08:28 AM   #8
MP5
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
MP5's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: ATX
Posts: 2,886
Yes some guys with below averag wrists have to have the 47 mm SEs because of it's true historic size and look silly. But 47 is the true Panerai size and most people can pull it off very well depending on wrist shape, helps to have a flat top wrist
MP5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 September 2011, 08:32 AM   #9
nauticajoe
"TRF" Member
 
nauticajoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Joe
Location: PA
Posts: 14,774
To each their own.
nauticajoe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 September 2011, 08:33 AM   #10
632627
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: los angeles
Posts: 37
i have a 7 inch wrist, and a big pilot(46mm) fits me fine. i tried on a 305 and it seemed a bit too big. if they made a 47mm in a standard luminor case(not 1950) my guess is it wouldnt be too bad.
632627 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 September 2011, 09:43 AM   #11
f458
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: canada
Watch: DSSD 114060 sub bl
Posts: 130
Chunky watches are great.
f458 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 September 2011, 10:47 AM   #12
Demo-man
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
Posts: 5
All my pieces are 47mm, simply fits me. But, I am a big guy. 47"s actually look normal on me.
Demo-man is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 September 2011, 11:58 AM   #13
HL65
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
 
HL65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Ken
Location: SW Florida
Watch: One on my wrist.
Posts: 64,006
It is nice to see Panerai making watches like they used to in the 50's - with the vintage size 47mm!! Back to their roots and tradition- pure Panerai DNA!! I am happy that I too have a big wrist!!
__________________

SPEM SUCCESSUS ALIT
HL65 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 September 2011, 01:39 PM   #14
H2F
"TRF" Member
 
H2F's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: Horace
Location: RPV, CA & JAKARTA
Watch: Pam & Lings
Posts: 89
Icon10

I like big watches and my wrist size is only 6-3/4". At 40 I only buy & wear what I like (as opposed to what looks good or reasonable) -- and the only other person whose opinion matters anymore is my wife's...

Imho, as a luxury good, a high-end watch is much more a fashion statement than a device to tell time. And as far as fashion goes... have you seen Lady Gaga recently?

Anyways... Did I mention I like big (as in 60mm BIG) watches...? (feel free to laugh... I really don't mind/care )



H2F is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 September 2011, 02:29 PM   #15
DCgator
"TRF" Member
 
DCgator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: PNW
Watch: DS,BLNR,SubLV,DJ2
Posts: 8,123
Icon6

Quote:
Originally Posted by H2F View Post
I like big watches and my wrist size is only 6-3/4". At 40 I only buy & wear what I like (as opposed to what looks good or reasonable) -- and the only other person whose opinion matters anymore is my wife's...

Imho, as a luxury good, a high-end watch is much more a fashion statement than a device to tell time. And as far as fashion goes... have you seen Lady Gaga recently?

Anyways... Did I mention I like big (as in 60mm BIG) watches...? (feel free to laugh... I really don't mind/care )



Agree. It's how you pull it off that matters.


Off topic - just saw Chaz Bono wearing what looks like a SubC or GMTc on Jay Leno.
DCgator is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 October 2011, 11:09 AM   #16
andrew79
"TRF" Member
 
andrew79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Real Name: Andrew
Location: Indonesia
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 2,277
Quote:
Originally Posted by H2F View Post
I like big watches and my wrist size is only 6-3/4". At 40 I only buy & wear what I like (as opposed to what looks good or reasonable) -- and the only other person whose opinion matters anymore is my wife's...

Imho, as a luxury good, a high-end watch is much more a fashion statement than a device to tell time. And as far as fashion goes... have you seen Lady Gaga recently?

Anyways... Did I mention I like big (as in 60mm BIG) watches...? (feel free to laugh... I really don't mind/care )



__________________
Baume & Mercier Riviera
Rolex GMT II c, DJ 116234, Sub 16610, EXP 2 16570
Panerai 111 , 232
andrew79 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 October 2011, 01:19 PM   #17
Nahligah
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Real Name: Alex
Location: Pattaya Thailand
Watch: not enough...
Posts: 244
Quote:
Originally Posted by H2F View Post
I like big watches and my wrist size is only 6-3/4". At 40 I only buy & wear what I like (as opposed to what looks good or reasonable) -- and the only other person whose opinion matters anymore is my wife's...

Imho, as a luxury good, a high-end watch is much more a fashion statement than a device to tell time. And as far as fashion goes... have you seen Lady Gaga recently?

Anyways... Did I mention I like big (as in 60mm BIG) watches...? (feel free to laugh... I really don't mind/care )



Lady GaGa....
Attached Images
 
Nahligah is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 September 2011, 02:13 PM   #18
TopNotchChach
"TRF" Member
 
TopNotchChach's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Near the Ocean!
Watch: 116610
Posts: 1,306
40mm looks good on me.
TopNotchChach is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 September 2011, 10:37 PM   #19
f458
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: canada
Watch: DSSD 114060 sub bl
Posts: 130
But i thought they were mens watches lol
f458 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 September 2011, 10:52 PM   #20
Vetteman
"TRF" Member
 
Vetteman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: NC
Watch: 16610
Posts: 420
My new HD watch... I think it's just the right size... People don't even need to ask me for the time as they can see for themselves

__________________
His 16610 E serial
Her's 178240 Z Serial Salmon Dial Roman Markers
178344 Random Serial MOP Dial Diamond 6/Bezel
114210 M Serial Blue 3-6-9 Sticks
115200/210 M Serial Black / White Dial Stick Markers
Vetteman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 September 2011, 11:35 PM   #21
CEG
"TRF" Member
 
CEG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Real Name: Dan
Location: ENGLAND
Watch: 116505
Posts: 1,587
I've only average size wrists but loved the look of my 50mm U-Boat Flightdeck.. Each to their own I guess..
__________________
16710-116505-116660-116680-116610LV-216570-126331-116710-114060-126621-TudorGMT-Tudor BB58-Sapphire Speedy Pro-Speedy Rising Sun

CEG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 October 2011, 03:45 AM   #22
barstoolman
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 801
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vetteman View Post
My new HD watch... I think it's just the right size... People don't even need to ask me for the time as they can see for themselves

That's great:..........quite frankly, from some of the pics I've seen in the past of 47MM watches on some average size guys, this proportion isn't far off. I understand the history, the DNA, the fantastic look of some of these watches.........that's not really what I'm getting at. Anyway, as some others have said, to each his own and at the end of the day, the only person it should matter to is you.
barstoolman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 October 2011, 04:49 AM   #23
dav2321
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: WA
Posts: 2
Hi, new guy here. I just got a Pan 48 (40mm) and I'm glad I didn't go bigger. Aesthetically the proportions seem good for my 6 3/4 wrist. In fact I was thinking about a 36mm datejust (that may be my next). Wonder if it's the younger guys who like the XL watches? (I'm 42).
dav2321 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 October 2011, 01:20 AM   #24
B. Doggy
"TRF" Member
 
B. Doggy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Real Name: Bryan
Location: Oregon
Posts: 7,399
Quote:
Originally Posted by dav2321 View Post
Hi, new guy here. I just got a Pan 48 (40mm) and I'm glad I didn't go bigger. Aesthetically the proportions seem good for my 6 3/4 wrist. In fact I was thinking about a 36mm datejust (that may be my next). Wonder if it's the younger guys who like the XL watches? (I'm 42).

plenty of older guys like the PAM sized PAM's.
__________________
Rolex / Panerai / Omega
B. Doggy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 October 2011, 09:20 PM   #25
yannis
"TRF" Member
 
yannis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Real Name: Yannis
Location: Europe
Watch: maniac
Posts: 9,070
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vetteman View Post
My new HD watch... I think it's just the right size... People don't even need to ask me for the time as they can see for themselves


omg you have got tiny wrists mate
__________________
Rolex Submariner 116610LV | Tudor 79220N



yannis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 October 2011, 03:00 AM   #26
Fiddy
"TRF" Member
 
Fiddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Asia
Watch: PP AP PAM ROLEX
Posts: 495
I had 232 and I just let it go.
My wrist(6.2) can't handle 47mm watch but i'm still in the line for 372.
Pure DNA is in PAM 47mm and I can't live without these.
Fiddy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 October 2011, 05:45 AM   #27
Launch Mini
"TRF" Member
 
Launch Mini's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Real Name: John
Location: Canada, eh
Watch: can I?
Posts: 6,240
For me, it was mostly how the watch rested on my hand. The crown would rub the back of my hand & I would get a calous there. I haven't tried a 47mm Luminor though.
I am happy with my reduced collection.
It's been a horribly busy spring, summer & fall ( so far) at work, so no time to post much.
__________________
Something witty to go here.

Member # 293
Launch Mini is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 October 2011, 06:08 AM   #28
Welshwatchman
"TRF" Member
 
Welshwatchman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Real Name: Paul
Location: Wales, UK
Posts: 14,578
I owned a 232 for a short while as I was lucky enough to get one at MRSP.

Even though it was a 47mm watch, the Radiomir case allowed it to look balanced enough on my 7.75" wrist.
__________________
..33
Welshwatchman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 October 2011, 02:36 PM   #29
bcacncnc
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Real Name: Bryan
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 1,577
I tried on the 232 47mm Rad yesterday, and frankly, even with my puny 6.25 inch wrists I don't think it looked ridiculous. Surprisingly, it seemed to fit better than my 44mm 233.
__________________
Omega
Panerai
Chopard
Grand Seiko
bcacncnc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 October 2011, 02:33 AM   #30
hennabav
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Real Name: Jon
Location: New England
Watch: --Rolex--
Posts: 2,391
Quote:
Originally Posted by bcacncnc View Post
I tried on the 232 47mm Rad yesterday, and frankly, even with my puny 6.25 inch wrists I don't think it looked ridiculous. Surprisingly, it seemed to fit better than my 44mm 233.
The 47mm Rads actually fit very well surprisingly for its size. At first you would think it would be way too ridiculous but b/c of its sleeker profile, it's not bad!! I had one before and I have small wrists as well but it wore very well. Would highly recommend it.
hennabav is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches

Asset Appeal

Wrist Aficionado


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.