The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 4 October 2011, 07:13 PM   #1
Engi
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Everywhere
Posts: 1,434
Big dilemma here: I need your feedback about my DJII ...

Hi all,
I need your feedback in order to help me in taking a diffiult decision ...

Here is the question: in the past I owned a DJ 16234, that I sold because I felt it too small, not so "solid" and with tiny lugs, so I took the decision to buy the DJII, that I like very much.

In the last months I lost a lot of weight, so now also my wrist become thin ... ...

Therefore now when I see my DJII on the wrist it seems a bit too larger for me ... Yesterday I went to a watch shop and I tried on the DJ ref. 116200 (they had not the 116234 ...) but it looks a bit too small for me ...

Here below several wrist pics of my DJII and the last one with my GMTIIC for size comparison.

I forgot to add that my wrist size is 16.5 cm, about 6.5 inches.

So the question is: is the DJII too large for me ? Have I to keep the DJII or to sell it and buy the DJ ref. 116234, assuming that the 36 mm is a better size for my wrist ? Anyway the final combo of the 116234 should be the same, I mean black dial with stick markers and oyster bracelet ...

Thanks in advance for your input, comments are more than welcome !

Ciao

Engi



















Engi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 October 2011, 07:42 PM   #2
Cru Jones
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Cru Jones's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Paris, France
Posts: 35,300
it does look a little big, but, not outrageous. if it's a style you like, i say, stick with it.

plus, if you switch to the DJ, what happens when you pick up weight again??
Cru Jones is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 October 2011, 07:51 PM   #3
Engi
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Everywhere
Posts: 1,434
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cru Jones View Post
it does look a little big, but, not outrageous. if it's a style you like, i say, stick with it.

plus, if you switch to the DJ, what happens when you pick up weight again??

My weight now is (and has to be) stable ...

Ciao

Engi
Engi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 October 2011, 07:44 PM   #4
GMT Mafia
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Real Name: Barry
Location: Fresno, CA
Watch: GMT II 116710LN
Posts: 31
I say wear the watch you gravitate more towards no matter what.
GMT Mafia is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 October 2011, 07:55 PM   #5
α-ψ!
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Real Name: tolis
Location: athens
Watch: daytona tt
Posts: 194
My opinion is that it's ok !36mm watches are for short guys because I am tall with long hands but small wrists and 36mm looks very small on my hands!
α-ψ! is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 October 2011, 08:27 PM   #6
Oyster1982
"TRF" Member
 
Oyster1982's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Real Name: Ed
Location: Jersey Shore
Watch: Rolex DJ
Posts: 1,905
I think the watch looks fine, you have the wrists for a DJII.
__________________
It 10pm do you know where your Datejust is?
http://i1187.photobucket.com/albums/...DA0MC5qcGc.jpg
Oyster1982 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 October 2011, 08:32 PM   #7
dddrees
"TRF" Member
 
dddrees's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Real Name: Dan
Location: USA
Watch: This N That
Posts: 34,253
There's not much difference between the GMTIIC and the DJII.

It's just depends on what you are comfortable with.
__________________
When it captures your imagination, that's when you know you have found your passion.

Loyal Foot Soldier of The Nylon Nation.

Card Carrying Member of the Global Association of
Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons
dddrees is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 October 2011, 08:33 PM   #8
Fearsome Puppy
"TRF" Member
 
Fearsome Puppy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Real Name: Kevin
Location: Kuala Lumpur
Watch: SD4K
Posts: 880
From the pics if you're going to wear the DJII a lot with shirts and suits I do think that it looks a bit on the big side...
__________________
Lange 1815 Chrono, AP ROO 26470ST, RO 26230ST, Rolex 216570 (w), 116600, 116520 (w), IWC XV, PAM 366, 420, Omega 311.30.42.30.01.005, Seiko SKX007J, Apple Watch, a bunch of G-Shocks
-------------------------------------------------------------
Fearsome Puppy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 October 2011, 08:42 PM   #9
Engi
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Everywhere
Posts: 1,434
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fearsome Puppy View Post
From the pics if you're going to wear the DJII a lot with shirts and suits I do think that it looks a bit on the big side...
Yes, I'll use it most with shirts and suites.

Thanks for your opinion !

Ciao

Engi
Engi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 October 2011, 10:23 AM   #10
DCgator
"TRF" Member
 
DCgator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: PNW
Watch: DS,BLNR,SubLV,DJ2
Posts: 8,123
Icon6

Keep the DJII Engi. It's a great watch, as is the GMTc. Both look just fine on your wrist.
DCgator is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 October 2011, 09:32 PM   #11
cedargrove
"TRF" Member
 
cedargrove's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Real Name: Rich
Location: Canada
Watch: Milgauss, GMT IIc
Posts: 3,013
Looks fine to me.
cedargrove is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 October 2011, 06:46 AM   #12
princeton3
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Spotsylvania, VA
Posts: 187
I like it...
princeton3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 October 2011, 06:57 AM   #13
petesjag
"TRF" Member
 
petesjag's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: netherlands
Posts: 2,177
looks fine to me
petesjag is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 October 2011, 07:00 AM   #14
OYSTERMANN
"TRF" Member
 
OYSTERMANN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Real Name: Neil
Location: West Midlands UK
Watch: DJ,DD,GMTIIc,Sub
Posts: 7,063
Yep, I think it looks fine on you - a nice looking DJII ;-)
__________________
Neil

116231 SS/RG DATEJUST 2007
118238 YG DAY-DATE 2007
116713 LN SS/YG GMT IIc 2008
116613 LB SS/YG SUBMARINER 2009
216570 SS EXPLORER II 2013
116520 SS DAYTONA 2014
OYSTERMANN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 October 2011, 07:00 AM   #15
thewatchguy93
"TRF" Member
 
thewatchguy93's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Real Name: thewatchguy
Location: UK
Watch: me buy gold..
Posts: 7,441
Engi.. My wrists are much thinner than yours and I think the DJII looked ok on me. So you have got no problem there. I think it suits you well


Ciao

-Dino
__________________
Instagram.. @thewatchguy

www.thewatchguyofficial.co.uk

Got a GREEN Submariner 116610LV.. Visit the official thread here! http://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=179580

Don't forget to visit the Rolex & Attire thread too! http://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=215077
thewatchguy93 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 October 2011, 07:25 AM   #16
mjclark32
"TRF" Member
 
mjclark32's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Real Name: MJC
Location: PHL USA
Watch: IWC, Rolex, AP
Posts: 29,232
Looks fine to me
__________________
mjclark32 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 October 2011, 07:29 AM   #17
Lisa
"TRF" Member
 
Lisa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: oklahoma city
Posts: 15,741
Engi, this might be a weird observation, but might the watch "wear smaller" if it were slightly higher on your forearm, and away from your hand? Then again, would you have trouble fitting it under your shirt cuff?

Either way, it's a beautiful watch and it looks nice on you.
Lisa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 October 2011, 07:34 AM   #18
ktmd
Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Canada
Posts: 110
Honestly, it looks too big to me. A 36mm DJ would look better IMO.
ktmd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 October 2011, 09:34 AM   #19
horseco
"TRF" Member
 
horseco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: Anthony
Location: North Jersey
Watch: Daytona 116528
Posts: 3,426
Quote:
Originally Posted by ktmd View Post
Honestly, it looks too big to me. A 36mm DJ would look better IMO.
I second that...
horseco is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 October 2011, 09:42 AM   #20
Shelby-villian
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: S** ****, C*
Watch: 18**
Posts: 255
Go to the store and take a picture of you with the 36mm of your choice. I will give you my advice when you do that. :)
Shelby-villian is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 October 2011, 09:22 PM   #21
The Joker
"TRF" Member
 
The Joker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Gotham
Posts: 9,641
Quote:
Originally Posted by ktmd View Post
Honestly, it looks too big to me. A 36mm DJ would look better IMO.
x6 or x7 not sure what we are upto.

I don't really get the DJII, a dressy watch should be elegent, i.e on the smaller side. Think you really need a huge wrist to pull it off.

Even if you gain weight again, the DJ 36m will still look fine.

Guess it depends what's your style and what you are used to.

Good luck.
The Joker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 October 2011, 07:35 AM   #22
Watch Professor
"TRF" Member
 
Watch Professor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Real Name: Myron
Location: New York
Watch: GMT IIC; Sub Date
Posts: 3,166
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lisa View Post
Engi, this might be a weird observation, but might the watch "wear smaller" if it were slightly higher on your forearm, and away from your hand? Then again, would you have trouble fitting it under your shirt cuff?

Either way, it's a beautiful watch and it looks nice on you.
+1. I agree.
__________________
Watch Professor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 October 2011, 07:59 AM   #23
mrbill2mrbill2
"TRF" Member
 
mrbill2mrbill2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Real Name: Mr. Bill
Location: South Florida
Watch: 16610
Posts: 6,148
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lisa View Post
Engi, this might be a weird observation, but might the watch "wear smaller" if it were slightly higher on your forearm, and away from your hand? Then again, would you have trouble fitting it under your shirt cuff?

Either way, it's a beautiful watch and it looks nice on you.
x2!

__________________
Card Carrying Member of the Global Association of the Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons - ID # 13
mrbill2mrbill2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 October 2011, 08:21 AM   #24
Engi
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Everywhere
Posts: 1,434
Great suggestion here !

Please keep your feedback going
Engi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 October 2011, 07:58 AM   #25
jamesbondOO7
"TRF" Member
 
jamesbondOO7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Real Name: BondJamesBond
Location: The Algarve
Watch: Rolex or nothing
Posts: 4,081
Keep the watch, wear it higher on your wrist, get a new tailor.


And more importantly, keep the weight down.
__________________
♛ 5-digit Rolex or nothing ♛
jamesbondOO7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 October 2011, 08:31 AM   #26
Spartan
"TRF" Member
 
Spartan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Canada
Watch: ALL of them
Posts: 450
Thats one fantastic looking watch ! Much better than the older DJ...
__________________
ROLEX1675:126660:226570BL:116613LN:114060
Pam00279 : Pam00270 : OMEGA3861 : Navitimer A23322 :
Spartan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 October 2011, 08:53 AM   #27
docmarioce
"TRF" Member
 
docmarioce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Florida
Watch: 16610
Posts: 476
It does wear big on you at least thats what the pics show but the current trend is to wear bigger watches so I would just forget about it and enjoy the watch which is a beauty BTW

Best,
__________________
______________________________________________
Rolex Sub 16610. The Classic!
Omega Seamaster Chrono
docmarioce is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 October 2011, 08:57 AM   #28
OYSTERMANN
"TRF" Member
 
OYSTERMANN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Real Name: Neil
Location: West Midlands UK
Watch: DJ,DD,GMTIIc,Sub
Posts: 7,063
Quote:
Originally Posted by docmarioce View Post
It does wear big on you at least thats what the pics show but the current trend is to wear bigger watches so I would just forget about it and enjoy the watch which is a beauty BTW

Best,
Yep - good advice!

Agreed ;-)
__________________
Neil

116231 SS/RG DATEJUST 2007
118238 YG DAY-DATE 2007
116713 LN SS/YG GMT IIc 2008
116613 LB SS/YG SUBMARINER 2009
216570 SS EXPLORER II 2013
116520 SS DAYTONA 2014
OYSTERMANN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 October 2011, 09:20 AM   #29
Bobble
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Real Name: Paul
Location: Midlands UK
Watch: GMT IIc, Daytona
Posts: 423
I was told by my cousin who runs a very established jewellers, that you should be able to see a bit of your arm each side of the watch, if you can't it's too big. I know that fashion has gone for large watches but I honestly think that your DJII looks too big on your wrist. I have a 7.5 wrist and think my GMTIIc is just about right, I came from a Breitling that I felt was too large. Of course it's your choice but you did ask for opinions, sorry if it's not what you wanted to hear.
Bobble is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 October 2011, 09:28 AM   #30
Engi
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Everywhere
Posts: 1,434
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bobble View Post
I was told by my cousin who runs a very established jewellers, that you should be able to see a bit of your arm each side of the watch, if you can't it's too big. I know that fashion has gone for large watches but I honestly think that your DJII looks too big on your wrist. I have a 7.5 wrist and think my GMTIIc is just about right, I came from a Breitling that I felt was too large. Of course it's your choice but you did ask for opinions, sorry if it's not what you wanted to hear.
Thanks a lot, it is the exact kind of opinion I need; I really appreciate also your cousin's suggestion; in fact the main concern I have is that on the DJII I'm not able to see any portion of wrist on each watch side.

Thanks again

Ciao

Engi
Engi is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.