The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 29 October 2011, 07:16 AM   #1
bigwatchman
"TRF" Member
 
bigwatchman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Real Name: Scott
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 1,307
14060 or 14060m?

Hello all. Well my dream of owning a Submariner is off and running now. Once I sell my two other watches, I should hve more than enough for a 14060, one of my grails. Now the question is, which model 14060? I like the look of the two line version but several have eluded to the good upgrades with the new movement, but of course that changes it to a four line sub. If it is truly better, I could learn to like the four line version of this watch, but need to know more about it. If anyone could help me out on the differences between the two, I will thank you in advnce.
bigwatchman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 October 2011, 07:19 AM   #2
z32turbo
"TRF" Member
 
z32turbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Sea Level
Watch: Varies
Posts: 6,877
The only difference I know is the look of the dial but I much prefer the 4 line COSC dial.

Just my $.02
__________________


Instagram @z32turbo
z32turbo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 October 2011, 12:31 AM   #3
Rags
2024 Pledge Member
 
Rags's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Chuck
Location: SW Florida
Watch: 16233,16610,214270
Posts: 11,196
Quote:
Originally Posted by z32turbo View Post
The only difference I know is the look of the dial but I much prefer the 4 line COSC dial.

Just my $.02
I agree the 4 line no date sub looks better that the 2 line IMO.
__________________
16233 Y Serial Datejust
16610 Z Serial Submariner
214270 Explorer

114300 Oyster Perpetual
76200 Tudor Date+Day
Rags is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 October 2011, 07:43 AM   #4
ddnyc77
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: nyc
Posts: 425
I think you are confused. The only difference between a recent two liner and the four liner is the two extra lines of text on the dial and the engraved rehault, both model 14060M. I think you have to go back to pre ~2000 or prior (someone will clarify this) to get a 14060, which from what I understand still basically the exact same movement as the 14060M. I believe the M significes a slight modification to the movement. If you like the two liner as many do buy something from the mid 2000s to 2007.
ddnyc77 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 October 2011, 07:56 AM   #5
cornerstore
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Canada
Posts: 4,010
I've had both,two liner for me.I found the four liner and engraved rehaut a bit busy.One thing seldom mentioned is there is a small difference in 93150 bracelets, there are more than one style of that small link that connects the bracelet end of a 93150 to the end piece.It fits a little different, newer style a little closer to a sel feel ..
cornerstore is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 October 2011, 08:01 AM   #6
ddnyc77
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: nyc
Posts: 425
Quote:
Originally Posted by patrick09 View Post
I've had both,two liner for me.I found the four liner and engraved rehaut a bit busy. One thing seldom mentioned is there is a small difference in 93150 bracelets, there are more than one style of that small link that connects the bracelet end of a 93150 to the end piece.It fits a little different, newer style a little closer to a sel feel ..
Partick, I have had both as well and also prefer the two liner, I had a Z four liner and currently have a Z two liner. Are you saying there is a small difference in these braceletets? Do you have any pics, I've never heard of this.
ddnyc77 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 October 2011, 08:16 AM   #7
Nica64
"TRF" Member
 
Nica64's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 2,596
Two liner!!
__________________
______________________________
You can't turn back the clock. But you can wind it up again.
Nica64 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 October 2011, 08:37 AM   #8
cornerstore
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Canada
Posts: 4,010
Quote:
Originally Posted by ddnyc77 View Post
Partick, I have had both as well and also prefer the two liner, I had a Z four liner and currently have a Z two liner. Are you saying there is a small difference in these braceletets? Do you have any pics, I've never heard of this.
The end attachment links are slightly different I'll take a pic of the one I have on my A serial 1999/2000 and one I sold from 97 .I did some digging and confirmed it .
cornerstore is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 October 2011, 08:47 AM   #9
ddnyc77
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: nyc
Posts: 425
Quote:
Originally Posted by patrick09 View Post
The end attachment links are slightly different I'll take a pic of the one I have on my A serial 1999/2000 and one I sold from 97 .I did some digging and confirmed it .
yes, please post. That is interesting.
ddnyc77 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 October 2011, 09:00 AM   #10
cornerstore
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Canada
Posts: 4,010
Quote:
Originally Posted by ddnyc77 View Post
yes, please post. That is interesting.
The black background is the A 99/00 serial the other earlier 97ish I think .
Attached Images
       
cornerstore is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 October 2011, 09:02 AM   #11
impalass
"TRF" Member
 
impalass's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Real Name: Mark
Location: Toronto, Canada.
Watch: SD / LV / Daytona
Posts: 2,089
My go to is a 14060 (97) with the 3000 movement. Love it to this day, but the tritium lume is just about done.

If it's a two liner your after my only advice would be to find a pre-loved with luminova lume which I believe started with the 14060M in 1999 (3130 movement)

In 2007 (?) the four line COSC and RolexRolex on the rehaut became available.
Imo you can't go wrong with either the 14060 or the 14060M.

The modifications include a better balance bridge, increased shock protection,
and improved winding system.

Good luck and congrats in advance.
impalass is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 October 2011, 08:55 AM   #12
Rollie2011
"TRF" Member
 
Rollie2011's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Real Name: John
Location: Palm Beach, FL
Watch: Sub-C + Exp 42
Posts: 1,654
M for me
Rollie2011 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 October 2011, 09:10 AM   #13
George Ab
"TRF" Member
 
George Ab's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Real Name: George
Location: Seattle
Watch: One of Them
Posts: 6,924
I personally like the ROLEXROLEXROLEX. However, they are the same watch. Same movement. Just buy quality for a price you can live with.
__________________

George Ab is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 October 2011, 09:20 AM   #14
kilyung
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
kilyung's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Cave
Watch: Sundial
Posts: 33,940
Non-COSC 14060M... It's even lighter than the COSC 14060M (mechanically identical). Why? Absence of two lines of paint!

kilyung is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 October 2011, 04:09 PM   #15
316lad
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: UK
Posts: 1,642
Quote:
Originally Posted by kilyung View Post
Non-COSC 14060M... It's even lighter than the COSC 14060M (mechanically identical). Why? Absence of two lines of paint!

It's .5mm smaller case and .5mm smaller crystal.
I think its 1mm thinner as well.
I have no idea why.
316lad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 October 2011, 11:33 PM   #16
Mickey®
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Real Name: Mickey®
Location: Atlanta, GA
Watch: Swiss Made
Posts: 5,801
Quote:
Originally Posted by 316lad View Post
It's .5mm smaller case and .5mm smaller crystal.
I think its 1mm thinner as well.
I have no idea why.
Ok. This is my "learn something new everyday"...
I thought these were the same size just the differences the 4 lines and maybe the rehuat....
Mickey® is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 October 2011, 11:48 PM   #17
Deyn Man
"TRF" Member
 
Deyn Man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Real Name: Dean
Location: Philippines
Posts: 1,037
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mickey® View Post
Ok. This is my "learn something new everyday"...
I thought these were the same size just the differences the 4 lines and maybe the rehuat....
x2

this is interesting... so same case as the sea dwellers which are slightly smaller?
Deyn Man is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 October 2011, 12:16 AM   #18
Eric88
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: 88 keys
Posts: 2,241
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mickey® View Post
Ok. This is my "learn something new everyday"...
I thought these were the same size just the differences the 4 lines and maybe the rehuat....
I think maybe folks are getting mixed up. The Sub ND is .5mm smaller than the Sub Date, but the 14060 and 14060m are the same dimension.
Eric88 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 October 2011, 12:23 AM   #19
Mickey®
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Real Name: Mickey®
Location: Atlanta, GA
Watch: Swiss Made
Posts: 5,801
Quote:
Originally Posted by Eric88 View Post
I think maybe folks are getting mixed up. The Sub ND is .5mm smaller than the Sub Date, but the 14060 and 14060m are the same dimension.
Yeah I got confused. Thanks for clarification....
Still I would have thought the ND and the SubDate would be the same size...
Mickey® is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 October 2011, 12:34 AM   #20
316lad
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: UK
Posts: 1,642
Quote:
Originally Posted by Eric88 View Post
I think maybe folks are getting mixed up. The Sub ND is .5mm smaller than the Sub Date, but the 14060 and 14060m are the same dimension.
I stand corrected Sir.
I thought the cases were changed on intro of the 14060M - smaller and the original case size for the introduction of the cosc in 2006.
316lad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 October 2011, 09:33 AM   #21
azguy
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Real Name: -------
Location: -------
Watch: ---------
Posts: 12,609
Two liner for sure, I own one. The simpleness of this watch is its beauty...the extra two lines of text just isn't necessary. It my favorite watch of all time. Not once have I regretted not having the date. No cyclopes is clean !!!!
azguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 October 2011, 10:50 AM   #22
ibramr
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: usa
Posts: 173
I think that you can also find a two liner 14060 with 3000 movement in A series as well. Enjoy in good health.
ibramr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 October 2011, 11:12 AM   #23
cornerstore
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Canada
Posts: 4,010
Quote:
Originally Posted by ibramr View Post
I think that you can also find a two liner 14060 with 3000 movement in A series as well. Enjoy in good health.
I have that one an A 9400xx serial two liner 14060 Luminova Dial /swiss made- non M 14060 dated to Dec. 1999.Love it .

Last edited by cornerstore; 29 October 2011 at 12:38 PM.. Reason: added serial number
cornerstore is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 October 2011, 11:06 AM   #24
Widowmaker
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: NY
Watch: Sub
Posts: 41
I say 14060M
Widowmaker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 October 2011, 11:10 AM   #25
mew
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Singapore
Posts: 187
14060 with tritium dial
mew is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 October 2011, 11:11 AM   #26
Mickey®
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Real Name: Mickey®
Location: Atlanta, GA
Watch: Swiss Made
Posts: 5,801
Never liked the 2 line...Love the new 4 line and will get one sooner or later.
Mickey® is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 October 2011, 11:16 AM   #27
ayres
"TRF" Member
 
ayres's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: honolulu
Watch: whatever runs
Posts: 551
Quote:
Originally Posted by bigwatchman View Post
Hello all. Well my dream of owning a Submariner is off and running now. Once I sell my two other watches, I should hve more than enough for a 14060, one of my grails. Now the question is, which model 14060? I like the look of the two line version but several have eluded to the good upgrades with the new movement, but of course that changes it to a four line sub. If it is truly better, I could learn to like the four line version of this watch, but need to know more about it. If anyone could help me out on the differences between the two, I will thank you in advnce.
yep, sorry, you're confused. 14060 was a reference produced in the 1990s. i believe the movement was a 3030. around 1999, the 3030 movement was modified slightly (balanced bridge, etc) and became the 3130 movement. hence, the 'm' was added to the end of 14060.

it has nothing to do with the cosc text being added to the dial. that happened during the z-serial case production.

but the 14060m production dates back to around the a serial. so...

14060 = all two-line dials.

14060m = a-serial dials to z-serial dials are two lines. z-serial to present are four lines.

all of these versions (cosmetic and mechanical) are great watches. though, technically speaking, the 14060m is better than the 14060 due to the changes to the movement. but all can keep excellent time.
ayres is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 October 2011, 01:33 AM   #28
sea-dweller
"TRF" Member
 
sea-dweller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Real Name: Dennis
Location: Bay Area - 925
Posts: 40,018
Love my 14060

sea-dweller is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 October 2011, 03:41 AM   #29
skyedog
"TRF" Member
 
skyedog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Real Name: Joey
Location: around the Bay
Watch: ing TRF
Posts: 1,942
Love the 2 liners! It's clean & simple! Just my 2 cents
skyedog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 October 2011, 05:09 AM   #30
The Godzilla
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Malaysia
Posts: 200
4 lines
The Godzilla is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.