The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > General Topics > Open Discussion Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 1 August 2007, 11:45 PM   #1
Fortunato
"TRF" Member
 
Fortunato's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Brazil
Watch: SS Sub (Date)
Posts: 43
What's that? A birth mark?

I may be too perfectionist, but when I was tooking some macro photos of my SS SUB DATE, I found a white lilttle dot between the 26 & 27 minutes marks.

My question: Is that normal or should a return it to my AD?

Thanks, folks.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Whats-that.jpg (56.7 KB, 173 views)
Fortunato is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 August 2007, 11:47 PM   #2
timebroker
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Real Name: Filip
Location: Belgium
Posts: 1,619
Sure it is on the dial and not on the crystal?
mmmhh didn't see the enlargement on bottom right.
If it is on the dial I would definitely go back to the AD

Last edited by timebroker; 1 August 2007 at 11:49 PM.. Reason: extra
timebroker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 August 2007, 11:57 PM   #3
Fortunato
"TRF" Member
 
Fortunato's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Brazil
Watch: SS Sub (Date)
Posts: 43
Yes. It is on the dial. I will post a better picture today.

Thank you, timebroker.
Fortunato is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 August 2007, 12:20 AM   #4
timebroker
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Real Name: Filip
Location: Belgium
Posts: 1,619
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fortunato View Post
Yes. It is on the dial. I will post a better picture today.

Thank you, timebroker.
I have no experience with Rolex AD's and having flaws corrected.
On new pieces it should have been picked up by them when checking. Não é nada
timebroker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 August 2007, 12:47 AM   #5
roadcarver
"TRF" Member
 
roadcarver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Real Name: Vernon
Location: C-a-n-a-d-a
Watch: 16600
Posts: 5,641
Not normal.

Looks like a defect on the dial or perhaps dust. I would take it back... now that's the kind of defect / imperfection that should even make it to the shelves.
__________________
I'm just a cook...
roadcarver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 August 2007, 01:29 AM   #6
Tools
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
 
Tools's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,516
If it's a fleck on the dial, any good watchmaker can open it up and dust it off in a few minutes.

If it's a scratch or chip on the dial paint, it's going to be a bit harder to fix.

If it is under warranty, take it back.....

If not, find a watchmaker you trust....I know, it would bug the hell out of me..
Tools is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 August 2007, 01:55 AM   #7
Fortunato
"TRF" Member
 
Fortunato's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Brazil
Watch: SS Sub (Date)
Posts: 43
Here it is!

I don not know if I took it back, or leave it with this personal "tatoo"...
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Point.jpg (35.9 KB, 162 views)
Fortunato is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 August 2007, 02:46 AM   #8
Tools
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
 
Tools's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,516
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fortunato View Post
I don not know if I took it back, or leave it with this personal "tatoo"...
Looking at that again...at these huge magnifications it's pretty easy to see.

During normal wearing, I don't know if you could even spot that if you were trying to.

It's something I might find upon inspection with a 10X loupe, catalog in the back of my mind, and then promptly forget...It may not be worth the bother of trying to correct.


Tools is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 August 2007, 04:07 AM   #9
roadcarver
"TRF" Member
 
roadcarver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Real Name: Vernon
Location: C-a-n-a-d-a
Watch: 16600
Posts: 5,641
I believe it is still easy to see without magnification. Granted that you quickly look at the time you won't see it, but once you start to admire your watch, it would be really noticeable.

I would still encourage Fortunato to bring it back to his AD to get it rectified.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tools View Post
Looking at that again...at these huge magnifications it's pretty easy to see.

During normal wearing, I don't know if you could even spot that if you were trying to.

It's something I might find upon inspection with a 10X loupe, catalog in the back of my mind, and then promptly forget...It may not be worth the bother of trying to correct.


__________________
I'm just a cook...
roadcarver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 August 2007, 02:51 AM   #10
leopardprey
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: Chad
Location: Around the world
Watch: Panerai 233
Posts: 4,204
I would take back to the RSC and/or the AD and have them fix. I had the same issue myself recently with a Rolex I bought. Several others have posted on this forum as well. Rolex QC seems to very lacking in dial examination recently. Take it back and fix! Rolex needs to start getting their act together. There is no reason a $5000 or higher costing watch should have any imperfections on the dial itself, wheter lint (which shows sloppy assembly) or a scratch.
leopardprey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 August 2007, 07:23 AM   #11
Welshwatchman
"TRF" Member
 
Welshwatchman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Real Name: Paul
Location: Wales, UK
Posts: 14,578
Wow, that is one obvious blemish.

If it is a recent purchase take it back and give them hell.
__________________
..33
Welshwatchman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 August 2007, 07:25 AM   #12
Rubenonfire
"TRF" Member
 
Rubenonfire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Real Name: Ruben
Location: Orange County
Watch: 16610LV
Posts: 1,317
Lesson learned...I'm definitely taking my loupe along for the next Rolex purchase!
__________________
Throw your Rollies in the sky, wave 'em side to side, now keep your hands high.
Rubenonfire is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 August 2007, 06:24 PM   #13
JJ Irani
Fondly Remembered
 
JJ Irani's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: JJ
Location: Auckland, NZ
Watch: ALL SOLD!!
Posts: 74,319
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rubenonfire View Post
Lesson learned...I'm definitely taking my loupe along for the next Rolex purchase!
Not really a laughing matter at all, Ruben. Believe me, I inspect every Rolex I buy with a fine tooth comb under a powerful loupe right there and then in front of the AD before plonking down a single cent.

Had one awful experience with a white dial Exp-II three years ago when I brought it home (after having made full payment) and discovered a huge gash running right through the black coronet on the dial.

JJ
__________________
Words fail me in expressing my utmost thanks to ALL of you for this wonderful support during my hour of need!!

I firmly believe that my time on planet earth is NOT yet up!! I shall fight this to the very end.......and WIN!!
JJ Irani is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 August 2007, 03:21 PM   #14
ezmoney46
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: steve
Location: florida
Watch: several
Posts: 711
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rubenonfire View Post
Lesson learned...I'm definitely taking my loupe along for the next Rolex purchase!

Yup take it back and get them to correct.
ezmoney46 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 August 2007, 04:21 AM   #15
Fortunato
"TRF" Member
 
Fortunato's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Brazil
Watch: SS Sub (Date)
Posts: 43
I will take it back. Sad thing. Money here don't grow at the backyard.

Thank you all my friends.

And what do you think about send an e-mail with photo to the Rolex Head Quarter?
Fortunato is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 August 2007, 04:22 AM   #16
JJ Irani
Fondly Remembered
 
JJ Irani's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: JJ
Location: Auckland, NZ
Watch: ALL SOLD!!
Posts: 74,319
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fortunato View Post
I will take it back. Sad thing. Money here don't grow at the backyard.

Thank you all my friends.

And what do you think about send an e-mail with photo to the Rolex Head Quarter?
Yes, I think you should. At least some "slacker" in Quality Control might have his ass whipped!!
__________________
Words fail me in expressing my utmost thanks to ALL of you for this wonderful support during my hour of need!!

I firmly believe that my time on planet earth is NOT yet up!! I shall fight this to the very end.......and WIN!!
JJ Irani is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 August 2007, 04:41 AM   #17
colemanitis
"TRF" Member
 
colemanitis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Real Name: Jeff
Location: Florida
Watch: PAM 1090
Posts: 3,723
You should definitely take it back to your AD.
__________________
Member #471
colemanitis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 August 2007, 04:54 AM   #18
mven74
"TRF" Member
 
mven74's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: houston
Posts: 22
i have to say, that is a great macro shot. what were you using? and yes, take it back
mven74 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 August 2007, 02:56 PM   #19
TARDIS
"TRF" Member
 
TARDIS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Real Name: Steve
Location: Queensland, AUST
Posts: 2,003
That is a great macro shot.
Does that 'blemish' shine in the dark?
TARDIS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 August 2007, 07:41 PM   #20
Fortunato
"TRF" Member
 
Fortunato's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Brazil
Watch: SS Sub (Date)
Posts: 43
Answers

Quote:
Originally Posted by mven74 View Post
i have to say, that is a great macro shot. what were you using? and yes, take it back
A Canon 30D with a 60mm Macro Lens, thanks.

Quote:
Originally Posted by TARDIS View Post
That is a great macro shot.
Does that 'blemish' shine in the dark?
No it does not. Thank God...
Attached Images
File Type: jpg My-Problem.jpg (39.0 KB, 103 views)
Fortunato is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 July 2008, 06:17 AM   #21
Fortunato
"TRF" Member
 
Fortunato's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Brazil
Watch: SS Sub (Date)
Posts: 43
Hello again, My Friends!

I have to say: The Little White Dot desapeared...I'm did not have time to took it back to my AD! I know it is an year later, but I wondering if this thing can demage the movement, shoud I?
Fortunato is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 July 2008, 06:51 AM   #22
TonyD
2024 Pledge Member
 
TonyD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Real Name: Tony
Location: Boston North
Watch: Meteorite Daytona
Posts: 1,471
Yup

I would get it checked. You are most likely out of warranty now though. I have been told that it is possible for a speck of dust to enter the movement via the date window. That small piece is pretty big compared to the inner parts of the watch. Good luck!
TonyD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 July 2008, 10:52 AM   #23
Fortunato
"TRF" Member
 
Fortunato's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Brazil
Watch: SS Sub (Date)
Posts: 43
Sorry by the wrong spelling, folks.
Fortunato is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

OCWatches

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.