ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
17 November 2011, 03:24 PM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: USA
Watch: Sea-Dweller 16600
Posts: 2,157
|
Which speedometer is more accurate . . .
. . . the one built in the car or the one in a GPS unit?
I notice the GPS units show a slightly lower speed than the car speedometers . . . I've seen this in several cars and GPS units. Any thoughts on which is more accurate? |
17 November 2011, 03:35 PM | #2 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: New Mexico
Watch: Seiko #SRK047
Posts: 34,460
|
I get the same effect, but Honda admitted to errors in my car's odometer, so I'm not sure if that affects the speedometer or not, but my observation is that on flat surfaces the GPS is more consistent with what those radar signs report and also what the police have told me when I've been stopped.
Unless the GPS modules have been coded with some algorithm to compensate for hills, there will be an error introduced when a vehicle is going uphill or downhill, because the rate of movement relative to that on a flat surface will be longer, thus indicating a slower speed. How significant that difference would be would be dependent on the rate of incline. I'm sure we have a mathematician here who can explain it better, but until one comes along maybe this will help.
__________________
JJ Inaugural TRF $50 Watch Challenge Winner |
17 November 2011, 03:37 PM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: USA
Watch: Sea-Dweller 16600
Posts: 2,157
|
Interesting point about hills. I'm going to have to observe more closely and see what speed is on the GPS vs. the speedometer on hills.
|
17 November 2011, 04:25 PM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: Eric
Location: Location,Location
Watch: this, bro...
Posts: 15,340
|
I'm pretty sure I have read some where before that that speedometer on the car actually displays a higher reading than the actual speed... This may have to do with some sort of "safety issue"....
Probably a good idea to keep your eyes on the road as well.... |
17 November 2011, 07:11 PM | #5 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Real Name: Andreas
Location: Margaritaville
Watch: Smurf
Posts: 19,879
|
Quote:
The GPS is likely more accurate, if it has a good signal.
__________________
Yeah, well, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man. |
|
17 November 2011, 07:04 PM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Real Name: Mark
Location: Bonny Scotland
Watch: 14060M Sub (cosc)
Posts: 5,280
|
I think car manufacturers err on the side of caution so that their instruments can't be blamed for your speeding ticket!!!
That could get VERY expensive if a precedent was set.
__________________
Don't mind me. I'm full of scotch, bitterness and impure thoughts! "You have enemies? Good! That means you stood up for something, sometime in your life." Sir Winston Leonard Spencer-Churchill KG, OM, CH, TD, PC, DL, FRS. |
17 November 2011, 07:26 PM | #7 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Paris, France
Posts: 35,303
|
my GPS always shows a faster speed.....
|
17 November 2011, 07:33 PM | #8 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Peter
Location: Sydney
Watch: The Game
Posts: 17,415
|
GPS is the most accurate traveling along a straight flat piece of road
|
17 November 2011, 07:34 PM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: Vincent
Location: LON HKG SYD
Posts: 1,236
|
Your speedo will also be affected by non-standard tyres you have (if any). So GPS is likely more accurate.
|
17 November 2011, 11:08 PM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: Greg
Location: PA
Watch: me burn
Posts: 1,435
|
X2. very common issue.
__________________
Motocross is life! |
17 November 2011, 11:29 PM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: midwest
Watch: SS Datejust
Posts: 1,288
|
If you figure in the time it take the GPS signal to reach the satellite then return it's pretty much dead on.
|
17 November 2011, 11:57 PM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: USA
Watch: Sea-Dweller 16600
Posts: 2,157
|
That's a good point about car manufacturers intentionally setting the readings a little low, also about the speedometer readings being affected by any non-standard tires. I guess the speedometer readings could also be affected by air pressure in the tires and probably other factors.
|
18 November 2011, 12:02 AM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Real Name: Dennis
Location: L.I./N.Y.
Watch: SUBMARINER 14060M
Posts: 2,769
|
Many car speedos are optomistic. My BMW registers about 4mph faster than actual while my Corvettes is about dead on. My other cars/bikes Ive owned in the past also registered high on the speedo. This is based on several radar speed indicators you sometimes see on streets, usually around schools.
|
18 November 2011, 08:13 AM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Real Name: Blank
Location: Romo
Posts: 1,465
|
Car speedo ALWAYS overstates speed.
1 - To give you the impression of speed. "Wow, this thing is zippy!" 2 - To give misleadingly high MPG. "Hmm, not the 29 on the sticker but 27 isn't too bad (it's 24.2!)" 3 - To consume warranty more quickly. 60,000 mile liability ends after 55,000 miles. 4 - To give you the "time to trade" feeling sooner. "Eh, 100,000 miles, time to trade..." 5 - To lower resale value at trade in time. "Would love to give you more but with this many miles...". EU mandates that the speedo can never be "slow" ("ticket getter") and can be up to 10% fast. Manufacturers can now deliver a speedo with +/- 1mph, but prefer to be at the 10% maximum for the five reasons stated. |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.