The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 4 August 2007, 07:06 AM   #1
RONeb
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Israel
Posts: 65
What do you think about the Rolex Explorer 1 ?

Ok, it seem like a nice watch, I think for guys that want a watch that is both "dress" watch, but yet "durable" this is a very nice one
So
What do you think of this watch? I hardly see people talking about it here, also please post some nice photos
RONeb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 August 2007, 07:09 AM   #2
Welshwatchman
"TRF" Member
 
Welshwatchman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Real Name: Paul
Location: Wales, UK
Posts: 14,578
There are five members who own an Explorer I so I reckon you will get a few very nice pics.
__________________
..33
Welshwatchman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 August 2007, 07:13 AM   #3
Sam
Member
 
Sam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Texas
Watch: Yes...too many!!!
Posts: 426
I love mine.....classic, dressy, sporty....all in one. And best yet....it doesn't SCREAM Rolex.

Sam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 August 2007, 07:11 AM   #4
leopardprey
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: Chad
Location: Around the world
Watch: Panerai 233
Posts: 4,204
The Original "Professional Tool Watch" that started it all.

Simple and rugged. Can go anywhere!
leopardprey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 August 2007, 05:42 PM   #5
BiG JeEzY
"TRF" Member
 
BiG JeEzY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Real Name: Jerome
Location: N. California
Watch: GMT I/EXP II/DJ
Posts: 3,351
Quote:
Originally Posted by leopardprey View Post
The Original "Professional Tool Watch" that started it all.

Simple and rugged. Can go anywhere!
Cannot agree with this more. It definitely is the pioneer model of the professional line. It may not have been the actual watch to go up Mt. Everest back in 1953 but this model was selected as the model that celebrates the accomplishment of that feat.

It is also dressy, sporty, durable, and most of all, timeless. It is the manliest 36 mm watch ever made!

__________________
-Rolex Explorer II Black dial 16570 (circa 2001)
-Rolex GMT Master I Pepsi 1675 (circa 1978)
-Rolex Datejust TT Champagne 16233 (circa 1991)
-Vintage Longines Automatic La Grande Classique
-Vintage Seiko 6138 Automatic Chronograph with "Kakume" Dial
BiG JeEzY is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 August 2007, 05:59 PM   #6
mc1010
"TRF" Member
 
mc1010's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Real Name: Mark
Location: *
Posts: 240
Quote:
Originally Posted by BiG JeEzY View Post
Cannot agree with this more. It definitely is the pioneer model of the professional line. It may not have been the actual watch to go up Mt. Everest back in 1953 but this model was selected as the model that celebrates the accomplishment of that feat.

It is also dressy, sporty, durable, and most of all, timeless. It is the manliest 36 mm watch ever made!

I think the Explorer the watch worn by the two climbers in the 1953 Everest summit. Tenzing Norgay was actually wearing an Explorer when he summited and this watch is now on display in the Rolex Geneva Museum. It is said that Edmund Hillary wore another watch brand (Smith) when he actually summited, but he wore an Explorer as well during the climb. Rolex was the official sponsor of the expedition.

Last edited by mc1010; 4 August 2007 at 07:33 PM..
mc1010 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 August 2007, 07:23 AM   #7
SPACE-DWELLER
"TRF" Member
 
SPACE-DWELLER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Real Name: Bo
Location: Denmark
Watch: Rolex, of course!
Posts: 22,436
I DO like the classic look of the Explorer (which is NOT called the "Explorer I" btw, but just the "Explorer").

But IMHO, it is too small. At least for MY wrist.

Also, I have never understood why Rolex, since Rolex launched the SuperLuminova on the dial and hands in 2001, chose NOT to coat the 3, 6 and 9 numbers with SuperLuminova.

The numbers LOOK as if they would glow in the dark but in fact they don't

The earlier Explorers with Tritium did have luminous numbers, so I just think it is strange that Rolex chose to omit luminosity on the 3,6 and 9 on the new Explorers.
__________________
With kind regards, Bo

LocTite 221: The Taming Of The Screw...
SPACE-DWELLER is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 August 2007, 08:02 AM   #8
Carolina
"TRF" Member
 
Carolina's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: North Carolina
Watch: it, Bubba!
Posts: 6,271
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spacedweller View Post
I DO like the classic look of the Explorer (which is NOT called the "Explorer I" btw, but just the "Explorer").

But IMHO, it is too small. At least for MY wrist.

Also, I have never understood why Rolex, since Rolex launched the SuperLuminova on the dial and hands in 2001, chose NOT to coat the 3, 6 and 9 numbers with SuperLuminova.

The numbers LOOK as if they would glow in the dark but in fact they don't

The earlier Explorers with Tritium did have luminous numbers, so I just think it is strange that Rolex chose to omit luminosity on the 3,6 and 9 on the new Explorers.

Looking at the photo of the luminous dial, it is truly strange that 3 of the numbers do not glow. I would have never suspected! Why on earth would they leave the 3,6, and 9 out - it just looks a bit silly ( as if someone forgot).
Carolina is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 August 2007, 08:28 AM   #9
C.J.
"TRF" Member
 
C.J.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: *
Posts: 10,196
I think it's a timeless classic that just screams simple elegance while being durable as can be I've owned one before and if it had a date, it's be on my wrist right now
__________________
Me? I'm still looking for Kokomo. I just hope that damn golfer isn't there
C.J. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 August 2007, 05:27 PM   #10
SPACE-DWELLER
"TRF" Member
 
SPACE-DWELLER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Real Name: Bo
Location: Denmark
Watch: Rolex, of course!
Posts: 22,436
Quote:
Originally Posted by Carolina View Post
Looking at the photo of the luminous dial, it is truly strange that 3 of the numbers do not glow. I would have never suspected! Why on earth would they leave the 3,6, and 9 out - it just looks a bit silly ( as if someone forgot).
Agree! Beats me why Rolex did not fill out the numbers with SL. But as you can see on Jocke's photo of the nightglowing Explorer, the numbers don't glow.

But as I stated earlier, on the Tritium Explorers, the numbers DID glow! Very strange that Rolex made this change, especially considering that SuperLuminova is NOT radioactive!
__________________
With kind regards, Bo

LocTite 221: The Taming Of The Screw...
SPACE-DWELLER is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 August 2007, 05:35 PM   #11
Henry T
"TRF" Member
 
Henry T's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Malaysia
Posts: 352
Understated, simple and minimalist in design, all these features contributing to a classy watch.

The price is right too.
__________________
Fat cats need to be fed too.
A cat has nine lives. Fat cats may have more.
Henry T is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 August 2007, 07:27 AM   #12
Carolina
"TRF" Member
 
Carolina's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: North Carolina
Watch: it, Bubba!
Posts: 6,271
Quote:
Originally Posted by RONeb View Post
Ok, it seem like a nice watch, I think for guys that want a watch that is both "dress" watch, but yet "durable" this is a very nice one
So
What do you think of this watch? I hardly see people talking about it here, also please post some nice photos
The Exp I is probably the watch I will buy my husband. It's definitely masculine and sporty, yet understated (kinda like my hubby )! I,for one, think it carries a lot of class.
Carolina is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 August 2007, 07:34 AM   #13
Tools
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
 
Tools's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,515
Quote:
Originally Posted by Carolina View Post
The Exp I .... It's definitely masculine and sporty, yet understated (kinda like my hubby )! I,for one, think it carries a lot of class.

I sometimes don't agree with anybody....

But I will agree with that.


Tools is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 August 2007, 07:44 AM   #14
Jocke
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Jocke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Real Name: Jocke
Location: Sweden
Watch: A dozen of Rolex's
Posts: 22,541
Here is my views, I wrote this for a while ago.

This is my first try to do a review so be nice to me.

After I have got this Explorer about a year so I believe
it´s time to write about it.



I was one of the first guy who got one here in Sweden
with the new (current) ref 114270 and I have order it
a couple of months before I got it. I have look forward
to recieve the new one with SEL and the new movement cal
3130. It have the same size (36 mm) as the classic DateJust
but it feels a little smaller, I suppose it´s the black
dial who fool the eye.



I don´t know if Rolex have done something new with the
bracelet except the SEL´s but it feels more solid than
my Exp II bracelet (I bought that new too). The clasp is
much more tight and it feels not like the other I have.
But as I say I don´t believe they have made something
new with it but it just feels so.

He looks even great with a croc strap too.



The dial have a great detail work and the finish is very
high. This one is very easy to read in every angles and
only the sapphire crystal can do the reading hard in some
angles.



He looks even good in the dark.



There is Super Luminova at the markers except the 3,6,9
and at the hands.

The new movement cal 3130 with 31 jewels, hack second and
28800 bph have got some upgrade like a balance bridge.





And it runs very smooth and in my opinion the no date feels
more acurate and durable than the date movement. But that is
just my opinions and I don´t believe it is so, but it feels so.

Here you can count the seconds.



The Explorer is one of the most simple watch Rolex made and it´s
a little overpriced if you comapre it to a Air King. But it´s a
classic Rolex and you can wear it as a sport watch or a dress watch.
So I believe there is a place for it in every Rolex collectors
collection.

If you want some more pics of the watch, just visit my website at:

http://www.watchwallpapers.com/exp.htm

Thanks for reading.

Jocke
Jocke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 August 2007, 07:51 AM   #15
timebroker
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Real Name: Filip
Location: Belgium
Posts: 1,619
Nice and classic watch, good pictures.
Learning on here every day.
Website can be used as a reference for comparing types, good work.
timebroker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 August 2007, 07:57 AM   #16
Robb
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
 
Robb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Real Name: Robb
Location: USA
Watch: BLNR
Posts: 4,939
Great pics of a great watch!!!
__________________
126610LN l 166610LV l 126619LB l 116710BLNR l 126710BLRO l 126720VTNR l 126718GRNR l 116500 white l 116500 black l 116508 john mayer l 116519LN l 116503 white l 126655 l 226627 Ti Master l 116518LN
Robb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 August 2007, 09:58 AM   #17
Mrdi
Banned
 
Mrdi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: PA
Posts: 3,478


Understated Elegance.
AND...... if Jocke likes it,
it is very kOOl.
Mrdi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 August 2007, 10:08 AM   #18
Mrdi
Banned
 
Mrdi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: PA
Posts: 3,478
BTW
The dial on the EXP is just as big as the dials on the other sport models.
It just looks a little more subdued because it doesn't wear a bezel as a Halo.
It doesn't need a halo.
It has panache.

As always thanks for the pics Jocke.

Last edited by Mrdi; 5 August 2007 at 12:12 AM..
Mrdi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 August 2007, 12:54 PM   #19
jac67
"TRF" Member
 
jac67's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: John
Location: Australia
Watch: Me
Posts: 1,950
I really like mine. It's just so slick!

But will sell very soon, as I don't seem to wear it (D series).




John.
jac67 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 August 2007, 01:07 PM   #20
redsrover
"TRF" Member
 
redsrover's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Georgia
Watch: Rolex GMTMaster II
Posts: 432
Bought my second EXP earlier this year. Original one I had got sold to fund a no-date Sub in 1989. Glad to have it back and I love it.
__________________
Rolex Explorer 14270, OMEGA Seamaster, OMEGA Speedmaster Professional, OMEGA Speedmaster Professional X-33, Sinn EZM3, IWC Mark XII, Tudor Heritage BB36
redsrover is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 August 2007, 03:26 PM   #21
JJ Irani
Fondly Remembered
 
JJ Irani's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: JJ
Location: Auckland, NZ
Watch: ALL SOLD!!
Posts: 74,319
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mrdi View Post
BTW
The dial on the EXP is just as big that as on the other sport models.
It just looks a little more subdued because it doesn't wear a bezel as a Halo.
It doesn't need a halo.
It has panache.

As always thanks for the pics Jocke.
Nicely put!!
__________________
Words fail me in expressing my utmost thanks to ALL of you for this wonderful support during my hour of need!!

I firmly believe that my time on planet earth is NOT yet up!! I shall fight this to the very end.......and WIN!!
JJ Irani is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 August 2007, 04:27 PM   #22
RONeb
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Israel
Posts: 65
Thanks guys
great review, great watch and nice photos :)
RONeb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 August 2007, 06:35 PM   #23
KKrlx
"TRF" Member
 
KKrlx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 12
With my 6,5" wrist, this probably is the only option from the Rolex-catalogue for me. Although a DJ or perhaps Air-King could also be acceptable.
KKrlx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 August 2007, 01:10 AM   #24
Mr. K
"TRF" Member
 
Mr. K's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: Mark
Location: Seattle-ish
Posts: 6,078
Quote:
Originally Posted by KKrlx View Post
With my 6,5" wrist, this probably is the only option from the Rolex-catalogue for me. Although a DJ or perhaps Air-King could also be acceptable.
I think a date not a DJ might suit you well.

But the best value right now I think is the new AK, all upgraded features, clasp, bracelet, end links. And still very affordable.
Mr. K is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 August 2007, 01:15 AM   #25
Mr. K
"TRF" Member
 
Mr. K's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: Mark
Location: Seattle-ish
Posts: 6,078
I like my Exp I, Very stealth. Good to have a watch like that.

I am sure they will change the exp in the future. Not sure if they will make it bigger but I think they will give it the newer clasp band and case.

All in due time.

Unless I need the money, I plan on keeping my exp for a very long time.
Mr. K is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 August 2007, 09:12 PM   #26
leopardprey
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: Chad
Location: Around the world
Watch: Panerai 233
Posts: 4,204
KKrlx, I think you would be really happy with the Explorer II. One thing that I like about the Explorer compared to the date just and the Air King, is the luminous dot on the second hand. Very easy to see. But, the Black dial Date just on the oyster bracelet is also very nice, especially the newer models with the more squared looking case, better lum on the hands, and the alternating red/black date feature.
leopardprey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 August 2007, 03:54 AM   #27
ohlins
"TRF" Member
 
ohlins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Singapore
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 1,213
it's one of my personal favs............understated, unassuming and yet a real classic in its own right....



__________________

the hype is true. a crown for every achievement.
visit my audio and watch blog & how to use the rolex comfort link?
ohlins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 August 2007, 05:32 AM   #28
JJ Irani
Fondly Remembered
 
JJ Irani's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: JJ
Location: Auckland, NZ
Watch: ALL SOLD!!
Posts: 74,319
Ohlins...your camera work is sheer magic!
__________________
Words fail me in expressing my utmost thanks to ALL of you for this wonderful support during my hour of need!!

I firmly believe that my time on planet earth is NOT yet up!! I shall fight this to the very end.......and WIN!!
JJ Irani is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 August 2007, 06:48 AM   #29
JayD
"TRF" Member
 
JayD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: New York City
Posts: 1
Wow, no better thread for my first post than this one. Hello and thank you all, I've been combing TRF since I found you, and that includes last Saturday when I jumped out of the AD's store and (logging in via the iPhone) searched through some old posts to confirm that this AD was treating me well. So I bought the Explorer one week ago today, and have caught myself staring at it at several times each day.

When I first showed my wife the watch, she said "Oh! Very retro!" which she quickly amended to "I should say, classic." Which is exactly why I like it, echoing everyone's comments here so far -- stealth, dressy, sporty, timeless. And even at just 36mm, the size works for me (no snide comments, please).

All I can add is this surprising feeling I got after trying it on -- there aren't alot of watches, jewelry, or anything else in my family that have been handed down the generations. The thought came to me as I was buying: someone in the family will be putting this watch on in 50, 60 years. Honestly I think that clinched the deal for me.

Of course, there's also the pleasure in buying the thing: nice treatment from a Rolex AD makes nearly every other retail experience seem like an interrogation scene from a bad spy movie.

And now when I flip through a watch magazine, my wife's much more interested. And what caught her eye as I flip past it the other day? Only a white Daytona.

"Oh my god that's beautiful! What's the story with that one?"
JayD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 August 2007, 06:12 AM   #30
ohlins
"TRF" Member
 
ohlins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Singapore
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 1,213
thanks............nice to know u like the pics..........
__________________

the hype is true. a crown for every achievement.
visit my audio and watch blog & how to use the rolex comfort link?
ohlins is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.