ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

cajunron · 29 January 2012, 11:45 AM

http://www.ebay.com/itm/Rare-Rolex-S...item3f12cd4990

What is the general consensus of this watch? It doesn't look like an oyster case to me. Seller states it is a "rare snap caseback" model, which I've never seen before. I want to be sure before I condemn it.

highcaliber7 · 30 January 2012, 08:23 AM

well, the description is misleading when it says solid 14k gold. Then it states that the band is 14kgf(goldfilled) The back casing is extremely wrong. Then it says its 2000+year model, it has the style look of a vintage, 70's back, and even if it was, the hallmarks on wrong on dial . Then it says it has caliber 1530, in which in fact this movement was introduced to the submariner model in the 1950-s, then look at the detail of the link on at the end..ladies and gentlemen, we have a bogus watch! go ahead and condemn ronnie!

GradyPhilpott · 30 January 2012, 10:30 AM

Reported

29 January 2012, 11:45 AM	#1
cajunron 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Nov 2009 Real Name: Ronnie Location: Southeastern USA Watch: Omega Seamaster PO Posts: 3,872	"rare snap caseback" Rolex on the bay http://www.ebay.com/itm/Rare-Rolex-S...item3f12cd4990 What is the general consensus of this watch? It doesn't look like an oyster case to me. Seller states it is a "rare snap caseback" model, which I've never seen before. I want to be sure before I condemn it. __________________

30 January 2012, 10:30 AM	#3
GradyPhilpott 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: New Mexico Watch: Seiko #SRK050 Posts: 34,460	Reported __________________ JJ Inaugural TRF $50 Watch Challenge Winner

30 January 2012, 08:23 AM	#2
highcaliber7 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2012 Real Name: Jhonatan Location: union, nj Watch: Tudor Prince Posts: 36	well, the description is misleading when it says solid 14k gold. Then it states that the band is 14kgf(goldfilled) The back casing is extremely wrong. Then it says its 2000+year model, it has the style look of a vintage, 70's back, and even if it was, the hallmarks on wrong on dial . Then it says it has caliber 1530, in which in fact this movement was introduced to the submariner model in the 1950-s, then look at the detail of the link on at the end..ladies and gentlemen, we have a bogus watch! go ahead and condemn ronnie!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)