The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 6 March 2012, 12:50 PM   #1
WWC
"TRF" Member
 
WWC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Home
Posts: 1,438
Tudor Antique Question

I currently have with me a Tudor Prince Oysterdate Serial 96x,xxx supposedly manufactured around 1981.

This watch is from my grandfather and I noticed that even though it's a Tudor watch, it does have a Rolex Crown, Bracelet, and clasp...

I don't see that in the newer models of nowadays... was it different back then in the days?

Thanks
WWC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 March 2012, 01:08 PM   #2
MoBe
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Canada
Posts: 6,773
Back then Tudor was a Chevy type Rolex so it had the word Rolex on it,today Tudor is a separate brand.
MoBe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 March 2012, 02:45 PM   #3
GradyPhilpott
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
GradyPhilpott's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: New Mexico
Watch: Seiko #SRK050
Posts: 34,460
It definitely shouldn't say Rolex on the dial, though.
__________________
JJ

Inaugural TRF $50 Watch Challenge Winner
GradyPhilpott is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 March 2012, 02:50 PM   #4
Dan Pierce
2024 Pledge Member
 
Dan Pierce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Real Name: D'OH!
Location: Kentucky
Watch: Rolex-1 Tudor-3
Posts: 36,215
Quote:
Originally Posted by WWC View Post
I currently have with me a Tudor Prince Oysterdate Serial 96x,xxx supposedly manufactured around 1981.

This watch is from my grandfather and I noticed that even though it's a Tudor watch, it does have a Rolex Crown, Bracelet, and clasp...

I don't see that in the newer models of nowadays... was it different back then in the days?

Thanks
Completely normal for that era. Tudor Shields started to replace the Rolex Coronet on the crown and case back, as well as Prince Date from Oysterdate dials, during the 792XX series dating to the mid to late 90's.
dP
__________________
TRF Member# 1668
Bass Player in TRF "AFTER DARK" Bar & NightClub Band
Commander-in-Chief of The Nylon Nation
The Crown & Shield Club
Honorary Member of P-Club
Dan Pierce is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 6 March 2012, 04:35 PM   #5
WWC
"TRF" Member
 
WWC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Home
Posts: 1,438
Thanks so much for the answers everybody :)

Great help from you guys. and yes, the dial does say Tudor and on the 12 o'clock position it has the Tudor shield logo there... aside from that, everything else seems to have the Rolex Logo... So just wondering if the parts nowadays are different since they have all been replaced with the Tudor Shield for the nowadays watches
WWC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 March 2012, 11:28 PM   #6
Dan Pierce
2024 Pledge Member
 
Dan Pierce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Real Name: D'OH!
Location: Kentucky
Watch: Rolex-1 Tudor-3
Posts: 36,215
WWC,

Hope you don't mind me answering your PM here so others might learn as well.


Hi Dan,

Sorry to bother. I'd like to thank you for taking the time to answer to my question earlier today regarding the Tudor watch with Rolex parts.

I was reading through the forum and saw that you contribute quite a lot of Tudor knowledge to others and would like to know if you are able to answer some of my questions revolving this brand.

I know now that Tudor used rolex parts all the way up to the 90's and since then, they went on their own in terms of accessories using their own Shield logo.

Can I deduce that Tudor watches before the 1990's had higher quality as they were produced under a "closer" watch of Rolex?

Also, the movement on my Prince Oysterdate serial 96x,xxx (Circa 1981) was it ETA?

How is the quality of that watch under the Tudor Family?

Thanks Dan!


There is absolutely NO DIFFERENCE in the quality between the earlier Tudor references sporting the Rolex coronet vs the later references w/ the Tudor shield. Tudor has, and remains to this day, produced in the exact same manufacturing facility, using the same equipment, by the very same employees as Rolex.

I'm amazed some feel the Tudor brand was exiled to the darkest corner of the basement, replaced the state of the art machinery w/ shoddy equipment, and employed the most inferior workers they could find to produce the lowly brand once the Tudor shield was introduced.

Tudor watches sporting the Rolex coronet certainly command somewhat higher value from collectors as they are seen as the last of the "vintage" collectables. That should change as new "collectables" are realized over time. Also, Tudor will always be viewed as "second fiddle" to the mother brand, as it should. That was Hans Wilsdorf's plan all along, to produce an Oyster quality timepiece at a lower price point.

Yes, the movement used is the highest chronometer grade Valjoux 7750. The same quality used in all Tudor watches.

In later years Rolex had Tudor go in a separate design direction to help establish it's own identity. However, these new designs were received with little fanfare. Since the introduction of the Tudor Heritage Chronograph in 2010 Tudor designers have reached back to the rich history of the brand to produce retro modern designs that both vintage and new watch buyers applaud. This year seems to be no different as a contemporary Snowflake Sub is predicted for the 2012 Basel Show.
dP
__________________
TRF Member# 1668
Bass Player in TRF "AFTER DARK" Bar & NightClub Band
Commander-in-Chief of The Nylon Nation
The Crown & Shield Club
Honorary Member of P-Club
Dan Pierce is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 6 March 2012, 11:36 PM   #7
nowzen
"TRF" Member
 
nowzen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 741
Wow!... a new snowflake sub? - that'd be nice!... hope it's that navy blue.
__________________
Card Carrying Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons
nowzen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 March 2012, 11:59 PM   #8
joe100
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
joe100's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Real Name: Joe
Location: New Mexico
Watch: Explorer
Posts: 12,840
Used to be Tudors were made on the last generation of tooling from the Rolex line. It's a great business plan because it makes use of outdated tooling and still generates gobs of money. Today they have their own identity. Personally I like the old way but thats my opinion. The new ones are sturdy to say the least.
__________________
It's Espresso, not Expresso. Coffee is not a train in Italy.
-TRF Member 6982-
joe100 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 March 2012, 12:03 AM   #9
Dan Pierce
2024 Pledge Member
 
Dan Pierce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Real Name: D'OH!
Location: Kentucky
Watch: Rolex-1 Tudor-3
Posts: 36,215
Quote:
Originally Posted by joe100 View Post
Used to be Tudors were made on the last generation of tooling from the Rolex line. It's a great business plan because it makes use of outdated tooling and still generates gobs of money. Today they have their own identity. Personally I like the old way but thats my opinion. The new ones are sturdy to say the least.
Outdated tooling?
dP
__________________
TRF Member# 1668
Bass Player in TRF "AFTER DARK" Bar & NightClub Band
Commander-in-Chief of The Nylon Nation
The Crown & Shield Club
Honorary Member of P-Club
Dan Pierce is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 7 March 2012, 12:19 AM   #10
joe100
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
joe100's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Real Name: Joe
Location: New Mexico
Watch: Explorer
Posts: 12,840
Well, an example would be folded link bracelets. Once Rolex stopped using them the tooling was idle. You'll notice Tudor used them up until the early 1990s. Every time Rolex updated their tooling and equipment it went to Tudor. They used to get every dollar or Franc rather, out of the tooling
__________________
It's Espresso, not Expresso. Coffee is not a train in Italy.
-TRF Member 6982-
joe100 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 March 2012, 12:36 AM   #11
Dan Pierce
2024 Pledge Member
 
Dan Pierce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Real Name: D'OH!
Location: Kentucky
Watch: Rolex-1 Tudor-3
Posts: 36,215
Quote:
Originally Posted by joe100 View Post
Well, an example would be folded link bracelets. Once Rolex stopped using them the tooling was idle. You'll notice Tudor used them up until the early 1990s. Every time Rolex updated their tooling and equipment it went to Tudor. They used to get every dollar or Franc rather, out of the tooling
The tooling wasn't idle if in continual use either by Rolex or Tudor. Again, it allowed Tudor to achieve the lower price point objective at the time.
Also, for a few short years, Tudor was producing some all solid link bracelets when Rolex was still producing the hollow center links w/ stamped clasps on a few remaining references.
No question it makes fiscal sense to get the most out of one's capital investment but Tudor was also allowed to be more adventurous over the years w/ various exotic dials, multiple sized Subs, Date + Day's, and DJ's.
dP
__________________
TRF Member# 1668
Bass Player in TRF "AFTER DARK" Bar & NightClub Band
Commander-in-Chief of The Nylon Nation
The Crown & Shield Club
Honorary Member of P-Club
Dan Pierce is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 7 March 2012, 12:45 AM   #12
azguy
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Real Name: -------
Location: -------
Watch: ---------
Posts: 12,609
Are Tudors going to be added to the AD line-up here in the states soon would love a "new" blue snowflake
azguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 March 2012, 12:46 AM   #13
joe100
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
joe100's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Real Name: Joe
Location: New Mexico
Watch: Explorer
Posts: 12,840
I think you're agreeing with me. Lol

The point is this: Rolex stopped using outdated tooling so it was then put to use by Tudor. This is the reason their price point is lower. Not questioning Tudor quality.

If they have an old machine, tool, or die and their was life left in it, Tudor used it.

What I am not saying is that it was lock-step. I think I'm being taken too specifically. I know Tudor used solid links but they also used folded links far longer than Rolex. They likely kept the old Rolex equipment and recycled it. Probably true for lots of other machines. I'm sure there was lots of overlap, probably from day one of Tudor to the restructuring of the line in the late 90s.
__________________
It's Espresso, not Expresso. Coffee is not a train in Italy.
-TRF Member 6982-
joe100 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 March 2012, 01:22 AM   #14
Dan Pierce
2024 Pledge Member
 
Dan Pierce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Real Name: D'OH!
Location: Kentucky
Watch: Rolex-1 Tudor-3
Posts: 36,215
On the folded bracelets I do agree. Just can't think of another example of Tudor using tooling for cases, bezels, crowns, or any other component, from discontinued Rolex references.
In fact there are many more examples of Tudor going beyond traditional Rolex tooling such as the rotating bezel on Tudor chronos and multiple sized Oyster cases on Subs and other references.
dP
__________________
TRF Member# 1668
Bass Player in TRF "AFTER DARK" Bar & NightClub Band
Commander-in-Chief of The Nylon Nation
The Crown & Shield Club
Honorary Member of P-Club
Dan Pierce is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 7 March 2012, 02:39 AM   #15
joe100
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
joe100's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Real Name: Joe
Location: New Mexico
Watch: Explorer
Posts: 12,840
You're taking me too specifically. By tools I mean everything. Machines are replaced on the Rolex side and given too Tudor. Stamping machines, presses... Whatever it takes. Rolex modernizes, Tudor gets the stuff that's still in good shape.

I'm not going to list ever single part and state whether the die was used interchangeably. All I am saying, and very broadly at that, is that Rolex handed down its unused equipment to Tudor.

I was always under the impression that was the point of Tudor. Recycle and make money from it.

Don't think I'm slighting Tudor. I love them.
__________________
It's Espresso, not Expresso. Coffee is not a train in Italy.
-TRF Member 6982-
joe100 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 March 2012, 04:24 AM   #16
Dan Pierce
2024 Pledge Member
 
Dan Pierce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Real Name: D'OH!
Location: Kentucky
Watch: Rolex-1 Tudor-3
Posts: 36,215
Quote:
Originally Posted by joe100 View Post
You're taking me too specifically. By tools I mean everything. Machines are replaced on the Rolex side and given too Tudor. Stamping machines, presses... Whatever it takes. Rolex modernizes, Tudor gets the stuff that's still in good shape.

I'm not going to list ever single part and state whether the die was used interchangeably. All I am saying, and very broadly at that, is that Rolex handed down its unused equipment to Tudor.

I was always under the impression that was the point of Tudor. Recycle and make money from it.

Don't think I'm slighting Tudor. I love them.
I never said you were slighting Tudor, nor would I care. It's your recycling concept I question.
dP
__________________
TRF Member# 1668
Bass Player in TRF "AFTER DARK" Bar & NightClub Band
Commander-in-Chief of The Nylon Nation
The Crown & Shield Club
Honorary Member of P-Club
Dan Pierce is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 9 March 2012, 08:25 PM   #17
padi56
"TRF" Life Patron
 
padi56's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Real Name: Peter
Location: Llanfairpwllgwyng
Watch: ing you.
Posts: 53,062
Quote:
Originally Posted by joe100 View Post
You're taking me too specifically. By tools I mean everything. Machines are replaced on the Rolex side and given too Tudor. Stamping machines, presses... Whatever it takes. Rolex modernizes, Tudor gets the stuff that's still in good shape.

I'm not going to list ever single part and state whether the die was used interchangeably. All I am saying, and very broadly at that, is that Rolex handed down its unused equipment to Tudor.

I was always under the impression that was the point of Tudor. Recycle and make money from it.

Don't think I'm slighting Tudor. I love them.
Wonder where you got that information from perhaps fantasy island.
__________________

ICom Pro3

All posts are my own opinion and my opinion only.

"The clock of life is wound but once, and no man has the power to tell just when the hands will stop. Now is the only time you actually own the time, Place no faith in time, for the clock may soon be still for ever."
Good Judgement comes from experience,experience comes from Bad Judgement,.Buy quality, cry once; buy cheap, cry again and again.

www.mc0yad.club

Second in command CEO and left handed watch winder
padi56 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 7 March 2012, 04:28 AM   #18
joe100
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
joe100's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Real Name: Joe
Location: New Mexico
Watch: Explorer
Posts: 12,840
Ok question it
__________________
It's Espresso, not Expresso. Coffee is not a train in Italy.
-TRF Member 6982-
joe100 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 March 2012, 04:35 AM   #19
xhype
"TRF" Member
 
xhype's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Real Name: Michael
Location: Brooklyn,NY
Watch: Rolex GMT II 16710
Posts: 850
wow dan you know a lot.
xhype is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 March 2012, 08:10 PM   #20
WWC
"TRF" Member
 
WWC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Home
Posts: 1,438
Thanks a lot Dan!!! :)
WWC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 March 2012, 05:38 AM   #21
joe100
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
joe100's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Real Name: Joe
Location: New Mexico
Watch: Explorer
Posts: 12,840
i'll never have another theory or idea on here again. fantasy island huh? this place is getting mighty unfriendly.
joe100 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches

Asset Appeal

Wrist Aficionado


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.