ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

baller24 · 20 April 2012, 05:28 AM

I bought my first Rolex a few months ago, a new Daytona SS. I'm looking for more of an everyday watch that I'm not so worried about damaging:)

A local guy is selling a 14060M Sub. He wants $2k, here are a few pics.

Buy it or not?

gwalker · 20 April 2012, 05:30 AM

I can't see that we'll from the pics. If its real that's a good price if it's in good shape. It will most likely need a service but at that price you can't lose. That makes me very nervous because that's WAY TOO CHEAP..... That's not even a 14060....., that's a 16610.

Ichaice · 20 April 2012, 05:32 AM

That is not a 14060M

baller24 · 20 April 2012, 05:31 AM

if its not in awful shape, how much am I looking at for a service?

gwalker · 20 April 2012, 05:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by baller24

if its not in awful shape, how much am I looking at for a service?

$500-700 for basic service. If parts needed $700-1k+ if it needed something major

gimpex · 20 April 2012, 05:38 AM

Unless the pics are distorting things that's a $20 dollar watch. Should be in a watch out section.

SaddleSC · 20 April 2012, 05:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gimpex

Unless the pics are distorting things that's a $20 dollar watch. Should be in a watch out section.

I agree. Rehaut appears too angled, dial fonts are wrong, magnification looks off. I don't believe this to be an authentic watch.

dysondiver · 20 April 2012, 05:39 AM

Bad pics bad start.

up2nogood · 20 April 2012, 05:41 AM

Not from those pics.

baller24 · 20 April 2012, 05:43 AM

thanks guys, I will pass on it

HORNBLOWER · 20 April 2012, 05:45 AM

I wouldnt give 20 bucks for it, just look at the state of the bracelet, square finger nail depression under the fold over clasp section, clasp font wrong, FOLEX crown on clasp is a joke, end pieces are CHUNKY, dial font looks way out to me, I dont like the overall look of this one. This watch has never even seen Switzerland, thats just my opinion! REAL SUBS DONT SELL FOR 2K. Run Forest, Run...

Wacko · 20 April 2012, 05:53 AM

Just get it checked at an AD

acce1999 · 20 April 2012, 06:21 AM

That is not a Rolex, eventhough it says so on the dial and clasp. Others in this thread have already indicated it. No need to spend more time on this.

MoBe · 20 April 2012, 07:44 AM

This does not pass the "too good to be true" test,nobody sells a $4,000 watch for $2,000,not to mention the fact that it`s counterfeit.

mrbill2mrbill2 · 20 April 2012, 08:04 AM

It's a Fake! Look a lugs, crown guards, the thumb recess to undo safety clasp, the cyclops mag, etc.

Run Forrest Run!

crowncollection · 20 April 2012, 08:11 AM

Clearly fake

brownbear · 20 April 2012, 08:14 AM

just say NO....

moviefreak · 20 April 2012, 08:47 AM

Nothing good on that watch..

RRY · 20 April 2012, 08:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by moviefreak

Nothing good on that watch..

$20 says it will blend.

bigwatchman · 20 April 2012, 09:50 AM

Garbage...

Tridor · 20 April 2012, 10:13 AM

Total fake. Biggest give aways for me are: (a) a 14060M is NOT supposed to have a date function ... it's a non-date sub for chrissake; (b) the date font is wrong as Rolex hasn't used open 9s for years ... if you're gonna try an pull a fast one, at least TRY to make it look right; and (c) the bracelet is totally wrong. All in all, a total piece of crap. Run away!

Welshwatchman · 20 April 2012, 10:17 AM

My first thought was "not a 14060".

My second thought was "it's been moved to watchout, saves me a job".

$2,000? Jeebus.

rolex_london · 20 April 2012, 12:04 PM

You would think people would learn with these posts but nope still tryin their luck

Chris628 · 20 April 2012, 01:13 PM

Check first.

joesephcho · 20 April 2012, 01:53 PM

saw this particular watch on the dallas craigslist. not a pro at determining fakes but mismatched name was a bad start.

GradyPhilpott · 20 April 2012, 04:26 PM

Junk.

bayerische · 20 April 2012, 06:21 PM

As fake as they come.

Andad · 20 April 2012, 06:58 PM

It has all been said.

20 April 2012, 05:28 AM	#1
baller24 Banned Join Date: Feb 2012 Location: dallas Watch: SS Daytona Posts: 111	Rolex Submariner 14060M Value? local guys has one for sale at $2k I bought my first Rolex a few months ago, a new Daytona SS. I'm looking for more of an everyday watch that I'm not so worried about damaging:) A local guy is selling a 14060M Sub. He wants $2k, here are a few pics. Buy it or not? Attached Images

20 April 2012, 08:04 AM	#15
mrbill2mrbill2 "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2010 Real Name: Mr. Bill Location: South Florida Watch: 16610 Posts: 6,148	It's a Fake! Look a lugs, crown guards, the thumb recess to undo safety clasp, the cyclops mag, etc. Run Forrest Run! __________________ Card Carrying Member of the Global Association of the Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons - ID # 13

20 April 2012, 08:11 AM	#16
crowncollection "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2011 Real Name: David Location: australia Posts: 20,216	Clearly fake __________________ watches many

20 April 2012, 08:47 AM	#18
moviefreak "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: in my house... Posts: 5,524	Nothing good on that watch.. __________________ Cheers, Eduardo Be a WIS not a WUSS... and remove all the stickers..

20 April 2012, 04:26 PM	#26
GradyPhilpott 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: New Mexico Watch: Seiko #SRK047 Posts: 34,460	Junk. __________________ JJ Inaugural TRF $50 Watch Challenge Winner

20 April 2012, 05:30 AM	#2
gwalker "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2011 Real Name: Gunter Location: AL/NJ Watch: DSSD; 116610LN Posts: 5,509	I can't see that we'll from the pics. If its real that's a good price if it's in good shape. It will most likely need a service but at that price you can't lose. That makes me very nervous because that's WAY TOO CHEAP..... That's not even a 14060....., that's a 16610.

20 April 2012, 05:32 AM	#3
Ichaice "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2011 Location: Earth Posts: 133	That is not a 14060M

20 April 2012, 05:31 AM	#4
baller24 Banned Join Date: Feb 2012 Location: dallas Watch: SS Daytona Posts: 111	if its not in awful shape, how much am I looking at for a service?

20 April 2012, 05:38 AM	#6
gimpex "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2010 Real Name: Greg Location: Austria Watch: Sub C LV / Exp II Posts: 609	Unless the pics are distorting things that's a $20 dollar watch. Should be in a watch out section.

20 April 2012, 05:39 AM	#8
dysondiver "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2010 Real Name: tom Location: northern ireland Watch: my fins Posts: 10,063	Bad pics bad start.

20 April 2012, 05:41 AM	#9
up2nogood "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2011 Real Name: Alex Location: Sydney, Australia Watch: Idiot Savant Posts: 1,944	Not from those pics.

20 April 2012, 05:43 AM	#10
baller24 Banned Join Date: Feb 2012 Location: dallas Watch: SS Daytona Posts: 111	thanks guys, I will pass on it

20 April 2012, 05:45 AM	#11
HORNBLOWER "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2010 Real Name: Ben Location: Ireland Watch: 1 OR 2 Posts: 2,640	I wouldnt give 20 bucks for it, just look at the state of the bracelet, square finger nail depression under the fold over clasp section, clasp font wrong, FOLEX crown on clasp is a joke, end pieces are CHUNKY, dial font looks way out to me, I dont like the overall look of this one. This watch has never even seen Switzerland, thats just my opinion! REAL SUBS DONT SELL FOR 2K. Run Forest, Run...

20 April 2012, 05:53 AM	#12
Wacko "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2011 Real Name: Ray Location: Canada Watch: DJ2,SubLVc,SubND Posts: 159	Just get it checked at an AD

20 April 2012, 06:21 AM	#13
acce1999 "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: GMT+1 Posts: 2,711	That is not a Rolex, eventhough it says so on the dial and clasp. Others in this thread have already indicated it. No need to spend more time on this.

20 April 2012, 07:44 AM	#14
MoBe "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2011 Location: Canada Posts: 6,773	This does not pass the "too good to be true" test,nobody sells a $4,000 watch for $2,000,not to mention the fact that it`s counterfeit.

20 April 2012, 08:14 AM	#17
brownbear "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2010 Real Name: Danny Location: georgia Watch: it Bub Posts: 1,334	just say NO....

20 April 2012, 09:50 AM	#20
bigwatchman "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2010 Real Name: Scott Location: North Carolina Posts: 1,307	Garbage...

20 April 2012, 10:13 AM	#21
Tridor "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: The Ozone Watch: DD, DJ, SubC Date Posts: 1,666	Total fake. Biggest give aways for me are: (a) a 14060M is NOT supposed to have a date function ... it's a non-date sub for chrissake; (b) the date font is wrong as Rolex hasn't used open 9s for years ... if you're gonna try an pull a fast one, at least TRY to make it look right; and (c) the bracelet is totally wrong. All in all, a total piece of crap. Run away!

20 April 2012, 10:17 AM	#22
Welshwatchman "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2006 Real Name: Paul Location: Wales, UK Posts: 14,578	My first thought was "not a 14060". My second thought was "it's been moved to watchout, saves me a job". $2,000? Jeebus.

20 April 2012, 12:04 PM	#23
rolex_london "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2009 Location: london Watch: Sub n DJ Posts: 78	You would think people would learn with these posts but nope still tryin their luck

20 April 2012, 01:13 PM	#24
Chris628 "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2012 Location: Maryland Posts: 3	Check first.

20 April 2012, 01:53 PM	#25
joesephcho "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2011 Location: Dallas, TX Watch: Submariner ND Posts: 188	saw this particular watch on the dallas craigslist. not a pro at determining fakes but mismatched name was a bad start.

20 April 2012, 06:21 PM	#27
bayerische "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2009 Real Name: Andreas Location: Margaritaville Watch: Smurf Posts: 19,879	As fake as they come. __________________ Yeah, well, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man.

20 April 2012, 06:58 PM	#28
Andad 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Nov 2006 Real Name: Eddie Location: Australia Watch: A few. Posts: 37,533	It has all been said. __________________ E

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)