ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
27 April 2012, 07:48 AM | #1 |
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Japan
Watch: Daytona and others
Posts: 3,023
|
Yet another DD I vs DD II thread? Yes!
I take exception to all the criticism of the bezel on the DD II. To me, it seems appropriate to the size of the watch. Here are a I and II side-by-side. They don't look so dramatically different in overall style; only in size. Look at each one in isolation and it's clear to me, at least, that both are just fine as a DD. Look at them together in a shop; and the II is clearly much bigger overall and it becomes easy to focus on that and enter an almost OCD state of mind in comparing the two versions with the familiar traditional size being the baseline for comparison. I know; been there; done that; moved on.
I see 36 mm DDs "in the wild" that look absolutely fantastic on the wearer; and I've seen my DD II (not many "in the wild" yet) on others and it looked great on them. I think in the end how they look on one's arm is the determinative factor on the 36 vs 41 decision; and that Rolex made a smart move in offering the larger alternative. So...when it first came out, I focused on the bezel size when I looked at photos; and I was critical; but real world experience "in the wild" with both DD versions has convinced me that it's just like shoe size; get the one that fits best and if a wider width helps; go for it. To me, the larger bezel is a good idea for the larger dial. I chose the II for better or worse because it just felt better. I gave up my I to get the II. |
27 April 2012, 08:24 AM | #2 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Real Name: PaulG
Location: Georgia
Posts: 42,017
|
The DJII bezel does look fat when side by side with the DJ. But I believe it is well proportioned to the case when it is on your wrist.
Either way - great addition, er, replacement!
__________________
Does anyone really know what time it is? |
27 April 2012, 08:28 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Real Name: John
Location: Palm Beach, FL
Watch: Sub-C + Exp 42
Posts: 1,654
|
I love the DDII
As for the bezel, its a flashy bezel on a flashy watch!
__________________
John Submariner C LN Explorer 42 Polar |
27 April 2012, 08:32 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Real Name: AJ
Location: Oregon
Watch: SUBC, DJII
Posts: 1,827
|
__________________
|
27 April 2012, 08:37 AM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Real Name: Gunter
Location: AL/NJ
Watch: DSSD; 116610LN
Posts: 5,509
|
Looks great Otto!!!!
|
27 April 2012, 08:45 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2010
Real Name: Dan
Location: USA
Watch: This N That
Posts: 34,253
|
Great comparisions Otto.
Thanks for the words of encouragement. I know when I try Day Dates, I always try the DD first. But at 6'3" and my old eye's I just can't see myself getting anything but the DDII if I ever actually get one.
__________________
When it captures your imagination, that's when you know you have found your passion. Loyal Foot Soldier of The Nylon Nation. Card Carrying Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons |
27 April 2012, 09:25 AM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: PA
Watch: Sub-c date
Posts: 192
|
Love it, very pretty.
|
27 April 2012, 10:08 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Real Name: Erik
Location: Bay Area, CA
Watch: 116234, 116710LN
Posts: 936
|
Great side-by-side Otto. Nice that you could get the same watch (gold choice and dial) to compare. I've decided on the DDII, the bezel only looks really big when you have it right next to a 36mm. Now comes challenge number II: dial choice. I think the champagne dial looks too monochromatic, and I'd like something simple, black or white. Then the next question in stick dial or romans. So many choices...
__________________
Submariner 116610LN - Black Dial & Stainless Steel DateJust 116234 - White Stick Dial & Roulette Wheel GMT-Master II 116710LN - Black Dial & Green "Fouth Hand" |
27 April 2012, 10:40 AM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Real Name: R.J.
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,546
|
The champagne dial only looks monochromatic in photos...
The crystal adds a bit of glow to the dial and it really dances on the wrist... The I vs II debate is a tough one. I have the DD I and a couple DJ I's and a DJ II. .. Everytime I have either on my wrist it seems like the perfect watch... I do think that the bigger size adds a bit of sportiness... And the wider bezel reflects light in a way that you have to see in the wild to truly appreciate... I think that there is no right answer... |
27 April 2012, 10:54 AM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Real Name: Will
Location: land of oz
Watch: sundial
Posts: 2,219
|
does anyone havea dj1 vs dj2 side by side?
|
27 April 2012, 11:13 AM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Larry
Location: Canada
Watch: Explorer II
Posts: 270
|
What a gorgeous watch! Wear it in good health Otto
|
27 April 2012, 11:17 AM | #12 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: USA & France
Posts: 11,078
|
Some day...
Thanks Otto! |
27 April 2012, 11:17 AM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: The Ozone
Watch: DD, DJ, SubC Date
Posts: 1,666
|
I disagree, respectfully. IMHO, the bezel on the DDII looks flat and out of proportion. while the bezel on the DDI is sharp, crisp and perfect.
|
27 April 2012, 01:44 PM | #14 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Real Name: Wolfgang
Location: New Jersey.
Watch: Rolex Tudor Omega
Posts: 5,592
|
I agree 100% but its up to each person to decide what ever they like better, thats what makes the world go round.
__________________
TRF member #917 |
27 April 2012, 02:24 PM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Real Name: Chris
Location: .
Watch: Daytonas/Subs/GMTs
Posts: 12,609
|
One day .....
YG DD II with Roman Champagne Plat DD II with ice-blue diamond dial I will be in watch heaven |
27 April 2012, 05:57 PM | #16 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: Eddie
Location: Australia
Watch: A few.
Posts: 37,533
|
Better be nice to antie.
__________________
E |
27 April 2012, 12:23 PM | #17 |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Japan
Watch: ing your back.
Posts: 16,179
|
Seeing Ottos`s DD II in person was mesmorizing... Awesome Rolex!
|
27 April 2012, 12:31 PM | #18 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Real Name: Kevin
Location: Maine
Watch: All of them
Posts: 1,376
|
Stunning timepiece ..
|
27 April 2012, 12:35 PM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 19,706
|
Gold works well on you Otto. I will have a WG watch some day!
|
27 April 2012, 12:35 PM | #20 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Real Name: D'OH!
Location: Kentucky
Watch: Rolex-1 Tudor-3
Posts: 36,217
|
Otto,
No question a live wrist test is the best way to determine what size works best. Proportions can be hard to quantify in pics. dP
__________________
TRF Member# 1668 Bass Player in TRF "AFTER DARK" Bar & NightClub Band Commander-in-Chief of The Nylon Nation The Crown & Shield Club Honorary Member of P-Club |
27 April 2012, 12:36 PM | #21 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: CA
Watch: 116710
Posts: 237
|
Looks great!
|
27 April 2012, 01:35 PM | #22 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Earth
Posts: 1,695
|
the daydateII has to be tried on to compare it with the daydate, imho the daydateII trumps the original.
Otto made the right decision, I have always thought that the daydate would be perfect if they upsized it and when rolex did they made perfection!
__________________
PP Geneva |
27 April 2012, 02:46 PM | #23 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: TSW
Location: Le Brassus
Watch: Rolex & AP's
Posts: 27,449
|
Love the classic 36mm a Rolex i'd like to add to the list!
__________________
AP Owners Club IG @swiss.watch.connection |
27 April 2012, 05:24 PM | #24 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Asia & US
Posts: 1,551
|
The trend is to go bigger, even PP is going big. I like DDII at 41, any bigger however, would ruin the oyster case look.
|
27 April 2012, 05:26 PM | #25 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: PA
Watch: DJ 116234
Posts: 510
|
I have a Small wrist, but I was making the same comparison myself. I am thinking of the same watches, but preowned. I guess a 36 mm 118238 goes for about $15k used?
|
27 April 2012, 08:03 PM | #26 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Real Name: Travis
Location: FL / NYC
Watch: Yes..
Posts: 33,493
|
Nice Otto!
I didn't care much for the DDII or DJII at all.
That is, until I actually tried them on . I love the proportions and the bezel. These look much different on the wrist than sitting in a showcase. I can surely see one in my future. |
27 April 2012, 11:15 PM | #27 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Sea Level
Watch: Varies
Posts: 6,877
|
Love the DDII. Thanks for the comparison shots Otto.
__________________
Instagram @z32turbo |
27 April 2012, 11:44 PM | #28 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Real Name: Chris
Location: Wisconsin
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 2,984
|
Thanks Otto. I love seeing pics of your DDII and only wish you'd post them more often! I also love the bezel on the DDII, the sparkle is beautiful, tasteful, and elegant.
__________________
Lead by example through production. |
28 April 2012, 07:19 AM | #29 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Real Name: Gym Rat
Location: USA
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 1,327
|
I like em both. I hope to sell my 36 and get. 41mm. But RG is my favorite!
|
28 April 2012, 12:23 PM | #30 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Point Blank, TX
Posts: 2,894
|
They are both fabulouse watches. Come on guys it's solid gold what's not to like about them. If you could turn a turd into gold people would still stare it.
__________________
I once dated a girl in high school and her dad told me I would never amount to anything. He was right |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.