ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
5 May 2012, 12:47 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Real Name: Simon
Location: England (Manc)
Watch: Explorer 11, BF
Posts: 268
|
had the back off...still waterproofish ?
Hey all
I recently had the case of my EXP 11 (2007) opened by an old watch repairer buddy to tak a curiosity look (beautiful).....now, I don't immerse my rollie in water too often, but wondered how much this may, or may not have affected the water resistance ?.... Swimproof, showerproof, don't take it in the rain ? |
5 May 2012, 12:50 AM | #2 |
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2011
Real Name: -------
Location: -------
Watch: ---------
Posts: 12,609
|
simple, have it pressure tested. Your pal should have done that after his exploration mission..........
|
5 May 2012, 01:04 AM | #3 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2010
Real Name: Dan
Location: USA
Watch: This N That
Posts: 34,253
|
Quote:
Yep this ensures no issues.
__________________
When it captures your imagination, that's when you know you have found your passion. Loyal Foot Soldier of The Nylon Nation. Card Carrying Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons |
|
5 May 2012, 01:10 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Watch: GMT-II Pepsi
Posts: 1,051
|
pressure test it.
__________________
Lug hole loyalist! |
5 May 2012, 02:36 AM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Chad
Location: Des Moines, Iowa
Watch: Rolex, PAM, Omega
Posts: 1,607
|
Nobody will have a clue until it's tested.
__________________
Rolex P-Series SS GMT II Black, Rolex Y-Series Sea-Dweller, Rolex F-Series TT Blue Sub, Rolex F-Series Sub LV, Rolex D-Series Ladies SS/WG DJ for wife, Panerai K-Series PAM 112, Omega Speedmaster Pro 3570.50, Omega Seamaster 300M Chrono 2594.52 |
5 May 2012, 02:44 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: NC, USA
Posts: 555
|
Yup, it would have been easy for a small kink or rollup in the back gasket to occur when the back was replaced. Only way to know is to test.
|
5 May 2012, 03:31 AM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Real Name: Ian
Location: Spain
Watch: Ω & ♛
Posts: 1,321
|
As others have said, unless you test it, no way to know for sure
BUT, if it is the first time it has been opened, the seal should be in good condition and should go back together OK. A lot of "shoulds" in that sentence When I was a wee nipper I wanted to know what was inside a golf ball, so I put the golf ball on a shiny table, tightly clenched between my thumb and forefinger, and proceeded to cut the ball in half with a Stanley knife, as pressure was applied, the golf ball span round and the blade stuck in my finger.... 6 stitches and 30 years later, I still have not lost the scar nor the curiosity!! well done on opening it up just to see what was there!
__________________
Rolex GMT, Zenith Chronomaster Sport, Zenith Pilot type 20 40mm, IWC mkXVI, Tudor BB58, Glashütte Original SeaQ 39. 5 |
5 May 2012, 05:07 AM | #8 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: GMT+1
Posts: 2,711
|
Quote:
I am having my watches pressure tested every second year (at least). Best, A |
|
5 May 2012, 07:22 AM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Real Name: Mr. Bill
Location: South Florida
Watch: 16610
Posts: 6,148
|
As stated without a pressure test - who knows?
__________________
Card Carrying Member of the Global Association of the Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons - ID # 13 |
5 May 2012, 08:54 AM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: TSW
Location: Le Brassus
Watch: Rolex & AP's
Posts: 27,449
|
__________________
AP Owners Club IG @swiss.watch.connection |
5 May 2012, 09:31 AM | #11 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: jP
Location: Texas
Watch: GMT-MASTER
Posts: 17,319
|
A pressure test is done with the movement removed, therefore you would need to open the back again to install the movement after the test. If the o-ring was good, and tightened properly, it should be OK.
__________________
Member of NAWCC since 1990. INSTAGRAM USER NAME: SPRINGERJFP Visit my Instagram page to view some of the finest vintage GMTs anywhere - as well as other vintage classics. |
5 May 2012, 09:43 AM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: US
Watch: Sub
Posts: 3,175
|
The movement is removed?
__________________
侘 寂 -- wabi-sabi -- acceptance of transience and imperfection by finding beauty in that which is imperfect, impermanent, and incomplete Commissioner of WEIRD POLICE , Badge # ecsub44 |
5 May 2012, 04:11 PM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Real Name: Ian
Location: Spain
Watch: Ω & ♛
Posts: 1,321
|
The newer tests are done without liquid and is actually a vacuum test, but it is loosely referred to as a pressure test.
__________________
Rolex GMT, Zenith Chronomaster Sport, Zenith Pilot type 20 40mm, IWC mkXVI, Tudor BB58, Glashütte Original SeaQ 39. 5 |
5 May 2012, 04:40 PM | #14 | |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: Eddie
Location: Australia
Watch: A few.
Posts: 37,533
|
Quote:
A dry vacuum test at about -0.8 bar should be done only to check the seals prior to a pressure test to full depth. Some watchmakers claim that if a watch holds this tiny vacuum then it is good to go to its full depth - but they will not guarantee this and if it leaks then it was someone else's fault...
__________________
E |
|
5 May 2012, 04:31 PM | #15 | |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: Eddie
Location: Australia
Watch: A few.
Posts: 37,533
|
Quote:
Good one John. If there is no movement what do you stick in the hole where the crown goes? If what you say is true what do they do when they put the movement back in.........test it again?
__________________
E |
|
6 May 2012, 12:57 AM | #16 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: jP
Location: Texas
Watch: GMT-MASTER
Posts: 17,319
|
In the old days, the water torture trick was used. The crown screws in and seals the watch!!!!!!!!!! The vacuum test replaced the water test many eons ago.
__________________
Member of NAWCC since 1990. INSTAGRAM USER NAME: SPRINGERJFP Visit my Instagram page to view some of the finest vintage GMTs anywhere - as well as other vintage classics. |
5 July 2012, 11:40 PM | #17 |
"TRF" Life Patron
Join Date: Jun 2005
Real Name: Peter
Location: Llanfairpwllgwyng
Watch: ing you.
Posts: 53,063
|
Who told you that who ever did its totally wrong they dry test first if it passes they wet test both with movement in case but water cannot get into the case on both tests..
__________________
ICom Pro3 All posts are my own opinion and my opinion only. "The clock of life is wound but once, and no man has the power to tell just when the hands will stop. Now is the only time you actually own the time, Place no faith in time, for the clock may soon be still for ever." Good Judgement comes from experience,experience comes from Bad Judgement,.Buy quality, cry once; buy cheap, cry again and again. www.mc0yad.club Second in command CEO and left handed watch winder |
5 May 2012, 09:45 AM | #18 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 5,529
|
I've seen it done both way.
|
5 May 2012, 09:47 AM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: US
Watch: Sub
Posts: 3,175
|
Seems weird to test it disassembled and then have to reassemble. Whatevs.
__________________
侘 寂 -- wabi-sabi -- acceptance of transience and imperfection by finding beauty in that which is imperfect, impermanent, and incomplete Commissioner of WEIRD POLICE , Badge # ecsub44 |
5 May 2012, 09:47 AM | #20 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Real Name: Gunter
Location: AL/NJ
Watch: DSSD; 116610LN
Posts: 5,509
|
Yes a pressure test will tell you for sure but these watches are machined very precisely so if the case back is sitting perfectly on the case I'd say it's probably good to go. Still I would only be sure with a pressure test. I've had my watches pressure tested a few times. Never removed the movement before the test. If it was a peice that was old and very unsure of the case I could see why it would be removed.
|
5 July 2012, 11:06 PM | #21 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Real Name: Simon
Location: England (Manc)
Watch: Explorer 11, BF
Posts: 268
|
Just to follow up on this. I finally got round to having Rollie pressure tested this morning (though my local AD wasn't overkeen on doing it....it's changed hands recently and a long way from friendly service), and it came out as passed for 100metres resistant....phew I can finally take a shower again.
|
5 July 2012, 11:14 PM | #22 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Real Name: Ari
Location: Florida
Watch: ...me go broke
Posts: 2,428
|
Quote:
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.